scholarly journals Effectiveness of Long-Term Physiotherapy in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Yohei Okada ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohtsuka ◽  
Noriyuki Kamata ◽  
Satoshi Yamamoto ◽  
Makoto Sawada ◽  
...  

Background: Long-term physiotherapy is acknowledged to be crucial to manage motor symptoms for Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, but its effectiveness is not well understood. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the evidence regarding the effectiveness of long-term physiotherapy to improve motor symptoms and reduce antiparkinsonian medication dose in PD patients. Methods: Pubmed, Cochrane, PEDro, and CINAHL were searched for randomized controlled trials before August 31, 2020 that investigated the effectiveness of physiotherapy for 6 months or longer on motor symptoms and levodopa-equivalent dose (LED) in PD patients with Hoehn and Yahr stage 1– 3. We performed random effects meta-analyses for long-term physiotherapy versus no/control intervention and estimated standard mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Levels of evidence were rated by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Results: From 2,940 studies, 10 studies involving 663 PD patients were assessed. Long-term physiotherapy had favorable effects on motor symptoms in off medication state [– 0.65, 95% CI – 1.04 to – 0.26, p = 0.001] and LED [– 0.49, 95% CI – 0.89 to – 0.09, p = 0.02]. Subgroup analyses demonstrated favorable effects on motor symptoms in off medication state by aerobic exercise [– 0.42, 95% CI – 0.64 to – 0.20, p <  0.001] and LED by multidisciplinary rehabilitation of primarily physiotherapy [– 1.00, 95% CI – 1.44 to – 0.56, p <  0.001]. Quality of evidence for aerobic exercise and multidisciplinary rehabilitation were low and very low. Conclusion: This review provided evidence that long-term physiotherapy has beneficial impact on motor symptoms and antiparkinsonian medication dose in PD patients and could motivate implementation of long-term physiotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1355-1367
Author(s):  
Zhenlan Li ◽  
Tian Wang ◽  
Haoyang Liu ◽  
Yan Jiang ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate and quantify the effectiveness of dual-task training on gait parameters, motor symptoms and balance in individuals diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. Data resources: A systematic review of published literature was conducted until May 2020, using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EBSCO and CNKI databases. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs to evaluate the effects of dual-task training compared with those of non-intervention or other forms of training. The measurements included gait parameters, motor symptoms and balance parameters. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Outcomes were pooled by calculating between-group mean differences using fixed- or random-effects models based on study heterogeneity. Results: A total of 11 RCTs comprising 322 subjects were included in the present meta-analysis. Results showed that dual-task training significantly improved gait speed (standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.38 to −0.08; P = 0.002), cadence (SMD, −0.25; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.02; P = 0.03), motor symptoms (SMD, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.94; P = 0.004) and balance (SMD, −0.44; 95% CI, −0.84 to −0.05; P = 0.03). However, no significant changes were detected in step length or stride length. Conclusion: Dual-task training was effective in improving gait performance, motor symptoms and balance in patients with Parkinson’s disease relative to other forms of training or non-intervention.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paloma Cristina Alves de Oliveira ◽  
Thiago Anderson Brito de Araújo ◽  
Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado ◽  
Abner Cardoso Rodrigues ◽  
Marom Bikson ◽  
...  

Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD.Objective: Investigate isolated tDCS effect in different brain areas and number of stimulated targets on PD motor symptoms.Methods: A systematic review was carried out up to February 2021, in databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of science. Full text articles evaluating effect of active tDCS (anodic or cathodic) vs. sham or control on motor symptoms of PD were included.Results: Ten studies (n = 236) were included in meta-analysis and 25 studies (n = 405) in qualitative synthesis. The most frequently stimulated targets were dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex. No significant effect was found among single targets on motor outcomes: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III – motor aspects (MD = −0.98%, 95% CI = −10.03 to 8.07, p = 0.83, I2 = 0%), UPDRS IV – dyskinesias (MD = −0.89%, CI 95% = −3.82 to 2.03, p = 0.55, I2 = 0%) and motor fluctuations (MD = −0.67%, CI 95% = −2.45 to 1.11, p = 0.46, I2 = 0%), timed up and go – gait (MD = 0.14%, CI 95% = −0.72 to 0.99, p = 0.75, I2 = 0%), Berg Balance Scale – balance (MD = 0.73%, CI 95% = −1.01 to 2.47, p = 0.41, I2 = 0%). There was no significant effect of single vs. multiple targets in: UPDRS III – motor aspects (MD = 2.05%, CI 95% = −1.96 to 6.06, p = 0.32, I2 = 0%) and gait (SMD = −0.05%, 95% CI = −0.28 to 0.17, p = 0.64, I2 = 0%). Simple univariate meta-regression analysis between treatment dosage and effect size revealed that number of sessions (estimate = −1.7, SE = 1.51, z-score = −1.18, p = 0.2, IC = −4.75 to 1.17) and cumulative time (estimate = −0.07, SE = 0.07, z-score = −0.99, p = 0.31, IC = −0.21 to 0.07) had no significant association.Conclusion: There was no significant tDCS alone short-term effect on motor function, balance, gait, dyskinesias or motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease, regardless of brain area or targets stimulated.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Klara Komici ◽  
Grazia Daniela Femminella ◽  
Leonardo Bencivenga ◽  
Giuseppe Rengo ◽  
Gennaro Pagano

Background: A link between diabetes mellitus (DM) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) have been proposed but evidence are sparse and inconsistent. Objective: Perform a systematic review of all evidence that link DM and PD characterising the prevalence of DM in PD patients, the risk of developing PD in DM patients and the influence of DM on PD severity and progression. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 30, 2021 were searched. Studies reporting prevalence, incidence, severity and disease progression of DM and PD were included. Prevalence of DM in PD and incidence of PD in DM patients, and characteristics of PD. Results: A total of 21 studies (n = 11,396) included data on DM prevalence in PD patients, 12 studies (n = 17,797,221) included data on incidence of PD in DM patients, and 10 studies (n = 2,482) included data on DM impact on PD severity and disease progression. The prevalence of DM in PD patients was 10.02 %, (95%C.I. 7.88 –12.16), DM patients showed a higher risk of developing PD (OR: 1.34 95%CI 1.26–1.43 p <  0.0001) compared to non-DM, and PD patients with DM showed a greater severity of motor symptoms, with higher Hoehn and Yahr stage (SMD: 0.36 95%CI 0.12–0.60; p <  0.001) and higher UPDRS (SMD 0.60 95%CI 0.28–0.92; p <  0.001) compared with PD patients without DM. Conclusion: Although the prevalence of DM in PD patients is similar to the general population, patients with DM have a higher risk of developing PD, and the presence of DM is associated with greater PD severity and faster progression, which suggests that DM may be a facilitating factor of neurodegeneration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 727-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela dos Santos Delabary ◽  
Isabel Giovannini Komeroski ◽  
Elren Passos Monteiro ◽  
Rochelle Rocha Costa ◽  
Aline Nogueira Haas

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e100503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Feng Shu ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
Si-Xun Yu ◽  
Hai-Dong Huang ◽  
Ling-Li Jiang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Ines Chendo ◽  
Carlos Silva ◽  
Gonçalo S. Duarte ◽  
Luisa Prada ◽  
Valerie Voon ◽  
...  

Background: Psychotic symptoms are highly frequent in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients and are associated with poor prognosis. They include hallucinations, delusions, and minor psychotic phenomena, including sense of presence, passage hallucinations, and illusions. Objective: To evaluate the frequency of psychosis in PD patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies reporting the frequency of psychosis, hallucinations, and delusions in PD. Results: Electronic database search wielded 3,536 articles, an additional 91 were identified through citation chaining. Of these, 163 were fully inspected, 57 removed, and 106 included as relevant for neuropsychiatric events frequency, with 32 meeting our inclusion criteria (psychosis and/or specific psychotic phenomena). The pooled frequency of psychosis was 20.7% (95% CI 14.5 to 28.6; I2 = 94%, 15 studies; combined n = 2919). None of the pre-defined meta-regressions or subgroup analyses were statistically significant or helped explain the statistical heterogeneity. The pooled frequency of any form of hallucination was 21.6% (95% CI 14.7 to 30.6; I2 = 95%; 18 studies; combined n = 3,161). Duration of PD at baseline and mean baseline Hoehn & Yahr stage helped explain the statistical heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of hallucinations. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, around a fifth of PD patients experience psychosis or hallucinations. The risk of developing hallucinations is likely moderated by the disease duration, Hoehn & Yahr stage, and the cognitive status.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document