Assisted ventilation immediately after birth with self-inflating bag versus T-piece resuscitator in preterm infants

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
M. Khan ◽  
D. Bateman ◽  
R. Sahni ◽  
T.A. Leone
Keyword(s):  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Assisted Ventilation ◽  
The Self ◽  
Target Range ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Preterm Newborns

OBJECTIVE: To compare proportions of target range tidal volumes achieved with the self-inflating bag vs. the T-piece in resuscitation of preterm newborns at delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary Children’s Hospital. 20 preterm infants≤32 weeks’ gestational age with no congenital anomalies who needed positive pressure ventilation after birth were enrolled. Positive pressure ventilation was provided with the self-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator. The primary outcome was proportion of inflations within a target range of 4–8 ml/kg. Chi-square and logistical regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the self-inflating bag (SIB) group 29% of inflations (117/419) and in the T-Piece (TP) group 51% of inflations (300/590) delivered expiratory tidal volume (TVe) of 4–8 ml/kg (p <  65.001). In the SIB group 60% of all inflations (254/419), and in the TP group 35% of all inflations (204/590) delivered TVe <  4 ml/kg (p <  0.001). In the SIB group 11% of all inflations (48/419), and in the TP group, 15% of all inflations (86/590) delivered TVe >  8 ml/kg (p = 0.18). The OR of having expiratory tidal volume of 4–8 ml/kg using the T-piece was 1.8 (CI 1.1–3.1), p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: Manual inflations provided by the TP deliver expiratory tidal volumes in the range of 4–8 ml/kg more consistently than SIB.

Impact of delivered tidal volume on the occurrence of intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm infants during positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. F57-F62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qaasim Mian ◽  
Po-Yin Cheung ◽  
Megan O’Reilly ◽  
Samantha K Barton ◽  
Graeme R Polglase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Intraventricular Haemorrhage ◽  
Delivery Room ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Spontaneously Breathing

Background and objectivesDelivery of inadvertent high tidal volume (VT) during positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in the delivery room is common. High VT delivery during PPV has been associated with haemodynamic brain injury in animal models. We examined if VT delivery during PPV at birth is associated with brain injury in preterm infants <29 weeks’ gestation.MethodsA flow-sensor was placed between the mask and the ventilation device. VT values were compared with recently described reference ranges for VT in spontaneously breathing preterm infants at birth. Infants were divided into two groups: VT<6  mL/kg or VT>6 mL/kg (normal and high VT, respectively). Brain injury (eg, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)) was assessed using routine ultrasound imaging within the first days after birth.ResultsA total of 165 preterm infants were included, 124 (75%) had high VT and 41 (25%) normal VT. The mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight in high and normal VT group was similar, 26 (2) and 26 (1) weeks, 858 (251) g and 915 (250) g, respectively. IVH in the high VT group was diagnosed in 63 (51%) infants compared with 5 (13%) infants in the normal VT group (P=0.008).Severe IVH (grade III or IV) developed in 33/124 (27%) infants in the high VT group and 2/41 (6%) in the normal VT group (P=0.01).ConclusionsHigh VT delivery during mask PPV at birth was associated with brain injury. Strategies to limit VT delivery during mask PPV should be used to prevent high VT delivery.

Corrective steps to enhance ventilation in the delivery room

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kesi C Yang ◽  
Arjan B te Pas ◽  
Danielle D Weinberg ◽  
Elizabeth E Foglia
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Delivery Room ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Mouth Pressure ◽  
Before And After

ObjectiveThe clinical impact of ventilation corrective steps for delivery room positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is not well studied. We aimed to characterise the performance and effect of ventilation corrective steps (MRSOPA (Mask adjustment, Reposition airway, Suction mouth and nose, Open mouth, Pressure increase and Alternative airway)) during delivery room resuscitation of preterm infants.DesignProspective observational study of delivery room PPV using video and respiratory function monitor recordings.SettingTertiary academic delivery hospital.PatientsPreterm infants <32 weeks gestation.Main outcome measureMean exhaled tidal volume (Vte) of PPV inflations before and after MRSOPA interventions, categorised as inadequate (<4 mL/kg); appropriate (4–8 mL/kg), or excessive (>8 mL/kg). Secondary outcomes were leak (>30%) and obstruction (Vte <1 mL/kg), and infant heart rate.ResultsThere were 41 corrective interventions in 30 infants, with a median duration of 15 (IQR 7–29) s. The most frequent intervention was a combination of Mask/Reposition and Suction/Open. Mean Vte was inadequate before 16/41 interventions and became adequate following 6/16. Mean Vte became excessive after 6/41 interventions. Mask leak, present before 13/41 interventions, was unchanged after 4 and resolved after 9. Obstruction was present before five interventions and was subsequently resolved only once. MRSOPA interventions introduced leak in two cases and led to obstruction in one case. The heart rate was <100 beats per minute before 31 interventions and rose to >100 beats per minute after 14/31 of these.ConclusionsVentilation correction interventions improve tidal volume delivery in some cases, but lead to ineffective or excessive tidal volumes in others. Mask leak and obstruction can be induced by MRSOPA manoeuvres.

scholarly journals Mechanical ventilation. Part II: Basic principles and function of ventilators.

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
K. PAVLIDOU (Κ. ΠΑΥΛΙΔΟΥ) ◽  
I. SAVVAS (Ι. ΣΑΒΒΑΣ) ◽  
T. ANAGNOSTOU (Τ. ΑΝΑΓΝΩΣΤΟΥ)
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Anaesthetic Management ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Assisted Ventilation ◽  
Inspiratory Pressure ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Continuous Positive Pressure

Mechanical ventilation is the process of supporting respiration by manual or mechanical means. When normal breathing is inefficient or has stopped, mechanical ventilation is life-saving and should be applied at once. The ventilator increases the patient's ventilation by inflating the lungs with oxygen or a mixture of air and oxygen. Ventilators play an important role in the anaesthetic management of patients, as well as in the treatment of patients in the ICU. However, there are differences between the anaesthetic ventilators and the ventilators in ICU. The main indication for mechanical ventilation is difficulty in ventilation and/or oxygenation of the patient because of any respiratory or other disease. The aims of mechanical ventilation are to supply adequate oxygen to patients with a limited vital capacity, to treat ventilatory failure, to reduce dyspnoea and to facilitate rest of fatigued breathing muscles. Depression of the central nervous system function is a pre-requirement for mechanical ventilation. Some times, opioids or muscle relaxants can be used in order to depress patient's breathing. Mechanical ventilation can be applied using many different modes: assisted ventilation, controlled ventilation, continuous positive pressure ventilation, intermittent positive pressure ventilation and jet ventilation. Furthermore, there are different types of automatic ventilators built to provide positive pressure ventilation in anaesthetized or heavily sedated or comatose patients: manual ventilators (Ambu-bag), volumecontrolled ventilators with pressure cycling, volume-controlled ventilators with time cycling and pressure-controlled ventilators. In veterinary practice, the ventilator should be portable, compact and easy to operate. The controls on most anaesthetic ventilators include settings for tidal volume, inspiratory time, inspiratory pressure, respiratory rate and inspiration: expiration (I:E) ratio. The initial settings should be between 10-20 ml/kg for tidal volume, 12-30 cmH2 0 for the inspiratory pressure and 8-15 breaths/min for the respiratory rate. Mechanical ventilation is a very important part of treatment in the ICU, but many problems may arise during application of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients. All connections should be checked in advance and periodically for mechanical problems like leaks. Moreover, complications like lung injury, pneumonia, pneumothorax, myopathy and respiratory failure can occur during the course of mechanical ventilation causing difficulty in weaning.

scholarly journals Short-term effects of synchronized vs. non-synchronized NIPPV in preterm infants: study protocol for an unmasked randomized crossover trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Cresi ◽  
Federica Chiale ◽  
Elena Maggiora ◽  
Silvia Maria Borgione ◽  
Mattia Ferroglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Infants ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
Respiratory Rhythm ◽  
Assisted Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Short Term Effects

Abstract Background Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been recommended as the best respiratory support for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). However, the best NIV technique to be used as first intention in RDS management has not yet been established. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may be synchronized (SNIPPV) or non-synchronized to the infant’s breathing efforts. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short-term effects of SNIPPV vs. NIPPV on the cardiorespiratory events, trying to identify the best ventilation modality for preterm infants at their first approach to NIV ventilation support. Methods An unmasked randomized crossover study with three treatment phases was designed. All newborn infants < 32 weeks of gestational age with RDS needing NIV ventilation as first intention or after extubation will be consecutively enrolled in the study and randomized to the NIPPV or SNIPPV arm. After stabilization, enrolled patients will be alternatively ventilated with two different techniques for two time frames of 4 h each. NIPPV and SNIPPV will be administered with the same ventilator and the same interface, maintaining continuous assisted ventilation without patient discomfort. During the whole duration of the study, the patient’s cardiorespiratory data and data from the ventilator will be simultaneously recorded using a polygraph connected to a computer. The primary outcome is the frequency of episodes of oxygen desaturation. Secondary outcomes are the number of the cardiorespiratory events, FiO2 necessity, newborn pain score evaluation, synchronization index, and thoracoabdominal asynchrony. The calculated sample size was of 30 patients. Discussion It is known that NIPPV produces a percentage of ineffective acts due to asynchronies between the ventilator and the infant’s breaths. On the other hand, an ineffective synchronization could increase work of breathing. Our hypothesis is that an efficient synchronization could reduce the respiratory work and increase the volume per minute exchanged without interfering with the natural respiratory rhythm of the patient with RDS. The results of this study will allow us to evaluate the effectiveness of the synchronization, demonstrating whether SNIPPV is the most effective non-invasive ventilation mode in preterm infants with RDS at their first approach to NIV ventilation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03289936. Registered on September 21, 2017.

scholarly journals Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants after extubation: a randomized, controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052098491
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Qiufen Wei ◽  
Dan Zhao ◽  
Yan Mo ◽  
Liping Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Preterm Infants ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Oscillatory Ventilation ◽  
High Frequency Oscillatory

Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) in post-extubation preterm infants. Methods This was a randomized, controlled trial. A total of 149 preterm infants aged between 25 to 34 weeks’ gestational age with a birth weight of <1500 g who required invasive mechanical ventilation on admission were included. After extubation, they were randomized to the NHFOV group (n = 47), nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) group (n = 51), or nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) group (n = 51). We compared the effectiveness and safety among these three groups. Results A total of 139 preterm infants finally completed the study. The reintubation rate was significantly lower in the NHFOV group than in the other groups. The duration of non-invasive ventilation and the length of hospital stay in the NHFOV and NIPPV groups were significantly shorter than those in the NCPAP group. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the NHFOV and NIPPV groups was significantly lower than that in the NCPAP group. The NHFOV group had significantly less nasal injury than the NCPAP group. Conclusion As post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants, NHFOV has a lower reintubation rate compared with NCPAP and NIPPV, without increasing the rate of complications.

scholarly journals Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure: clinical experience of a respiratory ward

2004 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Scala ◽  
M. Naldi ◽  
I. Archinucci ◽  
G. Coniglio
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Background: Although a controlled trial demonstrated that non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) can be successfully applied to a respiratory ward (RW) for selected cases of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinical practice data about NIV use in this setting are limited. The aim of this observational study is to assess the feasibility and efficacy of NIV applied to AHRF in a RW in everyday practice. Methods: Twenty-two percent (216/984) of patients consecutively admitted for AHRF to our RW in Arezzo (years: 1996-2003) received NIV in addition to standard therapy, according to pre-defined routinely used criteria. Tolerance, effects upon arterial blood gases (ABG), success rate (avoidance a priori criteria for intubation) and predictors of failure of NIV were analysed. Results: Nine patients (4.2%) were found to be intolerant to NIV, while the remaining 207 (M: 157, F: 50; mean (SD) age: 73.2 (8.9) yrs; COPD: 71.5%) were ventilated for &gt;1 hour. ABG significantly improved after two hours of NIV (pH: 7.32 (0.06) versus median (Interquartiles) 7.28 (7.24-7.31), p&lt;0.0001; PaCO2: 71.9 (13.5) mmHg versus 80.0 (15.2) mmHg, p&lt;0.0001; PaO2/FiO2: 212 (66) versus 184 (150-221), p&lt;0.0001). NIV succeeded in avoiding intubation in 169/207 patients (81.6%) with hospital mortality of 15.5%. NIV failure was independently predicted by Activity of Daily Living score, pneumonia as cause of AHRF and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score. Conclusions: In clinical practice NIV is feasible, effective in improving ABG and useful in avoiding intubation in most AHRF episodes that do not respond to the standard therapy managed in an RW adequately trained in NIV.

Effects of nasal positive-pressure hyperventilation on the glottis in normal awake subjects

1995 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Jounieaux ◽  
G. Aubert ◽  
M. Dury ◽  
P. Delguste ◽  
D. O. Rodenstein
Keyword(s):  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Anterior Commissure ◽  
Minute Ventilation ◽  
Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Vocal Cords ◽  
Diaphragmatic Muscle ◽  
Inspiratory Resistance ◽  
Cyclic Changes

We have recently observed obstructive apneas during nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (nIPPV) and suggested that they were due to hypocapnia-induced glottic closure. To confirm this hypothesis, we studied seven healthy subjects and submitted them to nIPPV while their glottis was continuously monitored through a fiber-optic bronchoscope. During wakefulness, we measured breath by breath the widest inspiratory angle formed by the vocal cords at the anterior commissure along with several other indexes. Mechanical ventilation was progressively increased up to 30 l/min. In the absence of diaphragmatic activity, increases in delivered minute ventilation resulted in progressive narrowing of the vocal cords, with an increase in inspiratory resistance and a progressive reduction in the percentage of the delivered tidal volume effectively reaching the lungs. Adding CO2 to the inspired gas led to partial widening of the glottis in two of three subjects. Moreover, activation of the diaphragmatic muscle was always associated with a significant inspiratory abduction of the vocal cords. Sporadically, complete adduction of the vocal cords was directly responsible for obstructive laryngeal apneas and cyclic changes in the glottic aperture resulted in waxing and waning of tidal volume. We conclude that in awake humans passive ventilation with nIPPV results in vocal cord adduction that depends partly on hypocapnia, but our results suggest that other factors may also influence glottic width.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document