scholarly journals Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and its two abbreviated versions in persons with mild to moderate spinocerebellar ataxia: A pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-486
Author(s):  
Yuki Kondo ◽  
Kyota Bando ◽  
Yosuke Ariake ◽  
Wakana Katsuta ◽  
Kyoko Todoroki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinocerebellar Ataxia ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Evaluation Systems ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Interclass Correlation ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the evaluation of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and its two abbreviated versions are confirmed for balance characteristics and reliability. However, they are not utilized in cases of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the BESTest and its abbreviated versions in persons with mild to moderate spinocerebellar ataxia. METHODS: The BESTest was performed in 20 persons with SCA at baseline and one month later. The scores of the abbreviated version of the BESTest were determined from the BESTest scores. The interclass correlation coefficient (1,1) was used as a measure of relative reliability. Furthermore, we calculated the MDC in the BESTest and its abbreviated versions. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (1,1) and MDC at 95% confidence intervals were 0.92, 8.7(8.1%), 0.91, 4.1(14.5%), and 0.81, 5.2(21.6%) for the Balance, Mini-Balance, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BESTest and its abbreviated versions had high test-retest reliability. The MDC values of the BESTest could enable clinicians and researchers to interpret changes in the balance of patients with SCA more precisely.

scholarly journals Reliability of the ForceFrame With and Without a Fixed Upper-Limb Mold in Shoulder Rotation Strength Assessments Compared With Traditional Hand-Held Dynamometry

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Jamon Couch ◽  
Marc Sayers ◽  
Tania Pizzari
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Shoulder Strength ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Context: An imbalance between shoulder internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) strength in athletes is proposed to increase the risk of sustaining a shoulder injury. Hand-held (HHD) and externally fixed dynamometry are reliable forms of assessing shoulder IR and ER strength. A new externally fixed device with an attachable fixed upper-limb mold (The ForceFrame) exists; however, its reliability in measuring shoulder strength is yet to be investigated. Objective: To determine the test–retest reliability of the ForceFrame, with and without the fixed upper-limb mold, in the assessment of shoulder IR and ER strength, as compared with HHD. Design: Test–retest reliability study. Setting: Laboratory, clinical. Participants: Twenty-two healthy and active individuals were recruited from the university community and a private physiotherapy practice. Main Outcome Measures: Maximal isometric shoulder IR and ER strength was measured using the ForceFrame and traditional HHD in neutral and at 90° shoulder abduction. Mean (SD) strength measures were calculated. Test–retest reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (3, 1). The SEM and minimal detectable change were calculated. Results: Good to excellent test–retest reliability was found for all shoulder strength tests across Hand-held dynamometry (HHD) and externally fixed dynamometry (EFD) are reliable forms (intraclass correlation coefficients [3, 1] = .854–.916). The minimal detectable changes ranged between 25.61 and 41.84 N across tests. Test–retest reliability was not affected by the dynamometer or testing position. Conclusions: The results from this study indicate that both the ForceFrame and HHD are suitable for measuring shoulder strength in clinical practice. The use of the fixed upper-limb mold with the ForceFrame does not improve reliability.

scholarly journals Test-Retest Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test to Assess Balance in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn D. Mitchell ◽  
Han Chen ◽  
Sheri P. Silfies
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Fear Of Falling ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Berg Balance Scale ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Balance Performance ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Evaluation Systems ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) have balance deficits that result in falls. Balance tests developed for older adults do not discriminate between fallers and nonfallers with MS. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) identifies body systems contributing to imbalance/fall risk. This study evaluated the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the BESTest to assess balance in individuals with MS, compared the diagnostic accuracy of the BESTest and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and investigated the minimal detectable change of the BESTest in this population. Methods: Twenty individuals with MS were recruited. Age, onset of disease, and fall history were obtained. The following measures were used: Expanded Disability Status Scale, University of Illinois at Chicago Fear of Falling Measure, BESTest, and BBS. Twelve participants were retested to determine test-retest reliability of the BESTest. Results: The BESTest demonstrated strong test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [3,1] = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91–0.99], P = .01) and was highly correlated with the BBS (r = 0.94, P = .01). The BBS had poor accuracy to identify fallers. Using a score of 81%, the BESTest had moderate sensitivity (0.89) to identify fallers. The standard error of the measurement for the BESTest was 4.16 points, which translates into a minimal detectable change of 9.7% [90% CI] to 11.5% [95% CI]. Conclusions: The BESTest demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability and diagnostic utility as a measure of functional balance in persons with moderate MS. A change in BESTest score of at least 10% may indicate a true change in balance performance in this population.

Test–Retest Reliability of the Mini-BESTest in People With Mild to Moderate Multiple Sclerosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Wallin ◽  
M Kierkegaard ◽  
E Franzén ◽  
S Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Balance Control ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Limits Of Agreement ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Objective The mini-BESTest is a balance measure for assessment of the underlying physiological systems for balance control in adults. Evaluations of test–retest reliability of the mini-BESTest in larger samples of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate test–retest reliability of the mini-BESTest total and section sum scores and individual items in people with mild to moderate overall MS disability. Methods This study used a test–retest design in a movement laboratory setting. Fifty-four people with mild to moderate overall MS disability according to the Expanded Disability Status scale (EDSS) were included, with 28 in the mild subgroup (EDSS 2.0–3.5) and 26 in the moderate subgroup (EDSS 4.0–5.5). Test–retest reliability of the mini-BESTest was evaluated by repeated measurements taken 1 week apart. Reliability and measurement error were analyzed. Results Test–retest reliability for the total scores were considered good to excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients of .88 for the whole sample, .83 for the mild MS subgroup, and .80 for the moderate MS subgroup. Measurement errors were small, with standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of 1.3 and 3.5, respectively, in mild MS, and 1.7 and 4.7, respectively, in moderate MS. The limits of agreement were − 3.4 and 4.6. Test–retest reliability for the section scores were fair to good or excellent; weighted kappa values ranged from .62 to .83. All items but 1 showed fair to good or excellent test–retest reliability, and percentage agreement ranged from 61% to 100%. Conclusions The mini-BESTest demonstrated good to excellent test–retest reliability and small measurement errors and is recommended for use in people with mild to moderate MS. Impact Knowledge of limits of agreement and minimal detectable change contribute to interpretability of the mini-BESTest total score. The findings of this study enhance the clinical usefulness of the test for evaluation of balance control and for designing individually customized balance training with high precision and accuracy in people with MS.

Psychometric Comparisons of 2 Versions of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and 2 Versions of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
I-Ping Hsueh ◽  
Miao-Ju Hsu ◽  
Ching-Fan Sheu ◽  
Su Lee ◽  
Ching-Lin Hsieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Rehabilitation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Mild Stroke ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Rehabilitation Assessment

Objective. To provide empirical justification for selecting motor scales for stroke patients, the authors compared the psychometric properties (validity, responsiveness, test-retest reliability, and smallest real difference [SRD]) of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FM), the simplified FM (S-FM), the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement instrument (STREAM), and the simplified STREAM (S-STREAM). Methods. For the validity and responsiveness study, 50 inpatients were assessed with the FM and the STREAM at admission and discharge to a rehabilitation department. The scores of the S-FM and the S-STREAM were retrieved from their corresponding scales. For the test-retest reliability study, a therapist administered both scales on a different sample of 60 chronic patients on 2 occasions. Results. Only the S-STREAM had no notable floor or ceiling effects at admission and discharge. The 4 motor scales had good concurrent validity (rho ≥ .91) and satisfactory predictive validity (rho = .72-.77). The scales showed responsiveness (effect size d ≥ 0.34; standardized response mean ≥ 0.95; P < .0001), with the S-STREAM most responsive. The test-retest agreements of the scales were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ .96). The SRD of the 4 scales was 10% of their corresponding highest score, indicating acceptable level of measurement error. The upper extremity and the lower extremity subscales of the 4 showed similar results. Conclusions. The 4 motor scales showed acceptable levels of reliability, validity, and responsiveness in stroke patients. The S-STREAM is recommended because it is short, responsive to change, and able to discriminate patients with severe or mild stroke.

scholarly journals 72 Test-Retest Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for Postural Sway by using Sway Meter in Elderly Subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv18-iv27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kitima Rongsawad ◽  
Laddawon Worawan ◽  
Karnsiree Jirarojprapa ◽  
Sararat Kaewkham ◽  
Sarawut Khattiwong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Postural Stability ◽  
Postural Sway ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Introduction Static postural stability is the ability to maintain the posture with minimum sway. Increasing postural sway during standing in different sensory conditions is associated with aging due to decline in sensory and motor functions. Sway area measured by using sway meter is usually simple method for assessing postural stability in elderly subjects. Like many biological measurements, sway area has an intrinsic variability that affects their test-retest reliability and responsiveness of postural stability assessment. The minimal detectable change (MDC) is ability to detect smallest change beyond measurement error that reflects a reliable change. Therefore, the MDC value could provide information of clinical relevance on postural stability. The aims of this study were to determine test-retest reliability and MDC of sway area obtained from sway meter in elderly subjects. Methods Twelve healthy elderly subjects aged 60 years and above were participated in this study. The test and retest repeatability of postural sway measurements were performed twice with a 1-hour interval. For each subject was assess postural sway using Lord’s sway meter during standing on 4 sensory conditions for 30 seconds of each condition. The test-retest reliability of sway area was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient. The MDC for each sway area was calculated to quantify clinical relevance. Results The test-retest reliability of sway area revealed good to excellent reliability ranged from 0.85 to 0.94. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and MDC ranged from 75 to 205 mm2 and 209 to 568 mm2, respectively. Discussion and Conclusion Our findings reveal that sway area in different sensory conditions could be used in assessment of postural stability in elderly subjects. SEM and MDC of sway area increased when subjects were asked to close their eyes and on foam surface. The sway meter is a reliable tool for assessing postural stability in clinical setting.

scholarly journals The Reliability of Pharyngeal High Resolution Manometry with Impedance for Derivation of Measures of Swallowing Function in Healthy Volunteers

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taher I. Omari ◽  
Johanna Savilampi ◽  
Karmen Kokkinn ◽  
Mistyka Schar ◽  
Kristin Lamvik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Interrater Agreement ◽  
Swallowing Function ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
High Resolution Manometry ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Swallow Function

Purpose. We evaluated the intra- and interrater agreement and test-retest reliability of analyst derivation of swallow function variables based on repeated high resolution manometry with impedance measurements.Methods. Five subjects swallowed10×10 mL saline on two occasions one week apart producing a database of 100 swallows. Swallows were repeat-analysed by six observers using software. Swallow variables were indicative of contractility, intrabolus pressure, and flow timing.Results. The average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and interrater comparisons of all variable means showedsubstantialtoexcellentagreement (intrarater ICC 0.85–1.00; mean interrater ICC 0.77–1.00). Test-retest results were less reliable. ICC for test-retest comparisons ranged fromslighttoexcellentdepending on the class of variable. Contractility variables differed most in terms of test-retest reliability. Amongst contractility variables, UES basal pressure showedexcellenttest-retest agreement (mean ICC 0.94), measures of UES postrelaxation contractile pressure showedmoderatetosubstantialtest-retest agreement (mean Interrater ICC 0.47–0.67), and test-retest agreement of pharyngeal contractile pressure ranged fromslighttosubstantial(mean Interrater ICC 0.15–0.61).Conclusions. Test-retest reliability of HRIM measures depends on the class of variable. Measures of bolus distension pressure and flow timing appear to be more test-retest reliable than measures of contractility.

scholarly journals Test–Retest Reliability of a New Device Versus a Long-Arm Goniometer to Evaluate Knee Proprioception

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Fei Tian ◽  
Yaqi Zhao ◽  
Jixin Li ◽  
Wenjin Wang ◽  
Danni Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Error ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
New Device ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Context: Many methods used to evaluate knee proprioception have shortcomings that limit their use in clinical settings. Based on an inexpensive 3D camera, a new portable device was recently used to evaluate the joint position sense (JPS) of the knee joint. However, the test–retest reliability of the new method remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the new device and a long-arm goniometer for assessing knee JPS, and to compare the variability of the 2 methods. Design: Prospective observational study of the test–retest reliability of knee JPS measurements. Methods: Twenty-one healthy adults were tested in 2 sessions with a 1-week interval. Three target knee flexion angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) were reproduced in each session. Target and reproduced angles were measured with both methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of the measurement, and Bland–Altman plots were used to quantify test–retest reliability. Paired t tests were used to compare knee JPS (absolute error of the target-reproduced angle) between the methods. Results: The new device (good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients .74–.80; standard error of the measurement 0.52°–0.61°) demonstrated better test–retest reliability than the goniometer (poor to fair intraclass correlation coefficients .23–.43; standard error of the measurement 0.89°–2.07°) and better test–retest agreement (respective mean differences for the 30°, 45°, and 60° knee angles: 0.11°, 0.13°, and 0.41° for the new system; 0.84°, 1.52°, and 1.18° for the goniometer). The measurements (absolute errors of the target-reproduced angles) with the goniometer were significantly greater than those with the new device (P < .05); the SDs of repeated measurements with the goniometer (1.50°–2.41°) were greater than with the new device (1.08°–1.38°). Conclusions: Given that the new device has good reliability and sufficient precision, it is the better alternative for evaluating knee JPS. Goniometers should be used with caution to assess knee JPS.

scholarly journals Test-Retest Reliability of the King-Devick Test in an Adolescent Population

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler J. Oberlander ◽  
Bernadette L. Olson ◽  
Lee Weidauer
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Testing Time ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Healthy Adolescent ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Adolescent Population ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Context:  The King-Devick (KD) test is a screening tool designed to assess cognitive visual impairments, namely saccadic rhythm, postconcussion. Test-retest reliability of the KD in a healthy adolescent population has not yet been established. Objective:  To investigate the overall test-retest reliability of the KD among a sample of healthy adolescents. Additionally, we sought to determine if sex and age influenced reliability. Design:  Cross-sectional study. Setting:  Secondary school. Patients or Other Participants:  Sixty-eight healthy adolescents, 41 boys (age = 15.4 ± 1.9 years) and 27 girls (age = 15.4 ± 1.9 years). Main Outcome Measure(s):  Participants completed the KD (version 1) at 3 testing sessions (days 1, 30, and 45) following standard instructions. We recorded total time to complete the reading of 3 cards for each participant during each testing session. Two-way random-effects intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) using single measurements repeated over time and repeatability coefficients were calculated. Linear mixed models were used to determine whether differences existed at each testing time and to examine whether changes that took place among visits were different by sex or age. Results:  Adolescents who completed the KD demonstrated acceptable reliability (ICC = 0.81; 95% confidence interval = 0.73, 0.87); however, the repeatability coefficient was large (±8.76 seconds). The sample demonstrated improvements between visits 1 and 2 (mean ± standard error = 4.3 ± 0.5 seconds, P &lt; .001) and between visits 2 and 3 (2.4 ± 0.5 seconds, P &lt; .001) for a total improvement of 6.9 seconds over 3 tests. No significant visit-by-sex or visit-by-age interactions were observed. Conclusions:  Despite the ICC being clinically acceptable, providers using the KD test for serial assessment of concussion in adolescents should be cautious in interpreting the results due to a large learning effect. Incorporating multiple measures can ensure accurate detection of sport concussion.

Reliability of Autism-Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbidities (A–TAC) Inventory in a Test-Retest Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Larson ◽  
Eva Norén Selinus ◽  
Clara Hellner Gumpert ◽  
Thomas Nilsson ◽  
Nóra Kerekes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Intraclass Correlations ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

The Autism-Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbidities (A–TAC) inventory is used in epidemiological research to assess neurodevelopmental problems and coexisting conditions. Although the A–TAC has been applied in various populations, data on retest reliability are limited. The objective of the present study was to present additional reliability data. The A–TAC was administered by lay assessors and was completed on two occasions by parents of 400 individual twins, with an average interval of 70 days between test sessions. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were analysed with intraclass correlations and Cohen's κ. A–TAC showed excellent test-retest intraclass correlations for both autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (each at .84). Most modules in the A–TAC had intra- and inter-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients of ≥ .60. Cohen's κ indicated acceptable reliability. The current study provides statistical evidence that the A–TAC yields good test-retest reliability in a population-based cohort of children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document