Ambulatory assessment of physical pain, emotional distress, and alcohol use

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ryan W. Carpenter

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The available research suggests that many individuals with chronic pain drink alcohol to manage their pain. However, few studies have examined the association of alcohol and pain and none have done so in patients’ daily lives. The goal of this project was to test a theoretical framework for why individuals with chronic pain consume alcohol. The project used ambulatory assessment to investigate three interrelated reasons for using alcohol, namely that alcohol: 1) has analgesic effects similar to prescription opioids’, 2) is negatively reinforcing, and 3) is expected to relieve pain. Secondarily, we examined the relationship of pain and negative affect, and to what degree a baseline pain response obtained during a laboratory task was associated with pain in daily life. Eight-seven outpatients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) who drank alcohol at least twice per week (ALC; n =27), took daily or every-other-day prescribed opioids (OPI; n = 27), neither (NON; n = 26), or both (BOTH; n = 7) were recruited. Analyses focused on the ALC, OPI, and NON groups (n-observations = 6,973). Participants reported on their alcohol and opioid use and expectancies, pain, and negative affect (NA) multiple times daily for two weeks. Results supported the first two hypotheses. There was moderate support that greater pain was associated with later alcohol use, and strong support that alcohol use was associated with pain reductions. Support was also found for the association of opioid use and pain. Effects, though slightly more inconsistent, were also found for NA, suggesting a negative reinforcement process was involved in pain reductions. Contrary to predictions, pain-related expectancies largely did not moderate associations of alcohol and pain, though NA-related expectancies moderated associations of alcohol and NA. Expectancies also moderated the relationship of opioid use with both pain and NA. Thus, the findings suggest that alcohol has meaningful short-term effects in CLBP patients. These effects may put patients at risk for developing alcohol use problems.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Carpenter ◽  
Sean Patrick Lane ◽  
Stephen Bruehl ◽  
Timothy J Trull

Objective: Prescribed opioids for chronic pain management contribute significantly to the opioid crisis. There is a need to understand the real-world benefits that, despite risks, lead chronic pain patients to persist in opioid use. Negative reinforcement models of addiction posit that individuals use substances to reduce aversive states but have seldom been applied to prescribed opioids. Using ecological momentary assessment, we examined reciprocal associations between opioid use and physical pain, for which opioids are prescribed, and negative affect (NA), for which they are not. Method: Chronic low back pain patients on long-term opioid therapy (n = 34) without significant past-year opioid misuse reported multiple times daily via smartphone over 2 weeks (nobservations = 2,285). We hypothesized that pain and NA would be positively associated with subsequent opioid use, and that use would be negatively associated with subsequent pain and NA. Results: Time-lagged multilevel models indicated that participants were more likely to use opioids and in larger doses following elevated pain and NA. There was also an interaction of concurrent pain and NA on opioid dose. In turn, participants reported reduced pain and NA following larger doses. Additionally, individuals at high risk for opioid misuse, compared with low risk, took larger doses following pain, but also experienced smaller subsequent pain and NA reductions. Conclusions: Opioid use was bidirectionally associated with pain and NA. Findings fit negative reinforcement models associated with risk of developing opioid use disorder. Educating patients and providers about negative reinforcement may help reduce opioid use and opioid-associated risks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (S267) ◽  
pp. 103-103
Author(s):  
A. H. Andrei ◽  
S. Bouquillon ◽  
J. L. Penna ◽  
F. Taris ◽  
S. Anton ◽  
...  

Quasars are the choicest objects to define a quasi-inertial reference frame. At the same time, they are active galactic nuclei powered by a massive black hole. As the astrometric precision of ground-based optical observations approaches the limit set by the forthcoming GAIA mission, astrometric stability can be investigated. Though the optical emission from the core region usually exceeds the other components by a factor of a hundred, the variability of those components must surely imply some measure of variability of the astrometric baricenter. Whether this is confirmed or not, it puts important constraints on the relationship of the quasar's central engine to the surrounding distribution of matter. To investigate the correlation between long-term optical variability and what is dubbed as the “random walk” of the astrometric center, a program is being pursued at the WFI/ESO 2.2m. The sample was selected from quasars known to undergo large-amplitude and long-term optical variations (Smith et al. 1993; Teerikorpi 2000). The observations are typically made every two months. The treatment is differential, comparing the quasar position and brightness against a sample of selected stars for which the average relative distances and magnitudes remain constant. The provisional results for four objects bring strong support to the hypothesis of a relationship between astrometric and photometric variability. A full account is provided by Andrei et al. (2009).


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penelope-Alexia Avagianou ◽  
Odysseas D. Mouzas ◽  
Konstantinos E. Siomos ◽  
Maria Zafiropoulou

2020 ◽  
Vol 285 ◽  
pp. 112774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Vinci ◽  
Lauren Malkhasyan ◽  
Vani N. Simmons ◽  
Virmarie Correa-Fernandez

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy T. Hua ◽  
Majid Afshar ◽  
Brendan J. Clark ◽  
Elizabeth J. Kovacs ◽  
Ellen L. Burnham

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document