scholarly journals Preclinical Test Methods with Animal Mouse and Rats Biomedical Research: Technical Guideline

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-386
Author(s):  
Rachmat Hidayat ◽  
Patricia Wulandari

A B S T R A C TTrials in pre-clinical trials are very complex multidisciplinary studies. Extrapolatingdata from animals to humans requires information from many fields of science. Frompre-clinical trials, more detailed information and data on efficacy and safety wereobtained, especially at doses equivalent to doses in humans, and the presence orabsence of cumulative effects and whether these effects could return to normal(reversible) after the administration of the test material was stopped. This test canbe used to predict the negative impact on humans if he is exposed to the materialfor a long time.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2774-2774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Piga ◽  
Elliott Vichinsky ◽  
Gian Luca Forni ◽  
Yurdanur Kilinc ◽  
Henry Maseruka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Children with transfusion-dependent anemias will usually require lifelong iron chelation therapy. Establishing the long-term efficacy and safety profile of deferasirox is critically important in children. Presented here are cumulative long-term efficacy and safety data from a cohort of children treated with deferasirox in ongoing clinical trials. Methods: Pediatric patients (<16 years old) with β-thalassemia, sickle cell disease or other transfusion-dependent anemias were enrolled in 4 clinical trials and treated for 1 year with deferasirox (studies 106/108) or randomized to either deferasirox or deferoxamine (DFO; 107/109). Study treatment was extended for 4 years (extension phases); patients either continued deferasirox (deferasirox cohort) or crossed over from DFO to deferasirox (crossover cohort). Doses in the extensions were adjusted based on efficacy and safety parameters. Efficacy was monitored via serum ferritin (SF); safety was assessed by the incidence and type of AEs. Growth and sexual development were evaluated every 6 months. Results: 434 patients aged 2–<16 years (n=289 deferasirox cohort; n=145 crossover cohort) entered the extensions. In the deferasirox and crossover cohorts, respectively, 50 and 20 pediatric patients were ≥2–<6 years old, 123 and 69 were 6–<12 years old, and 116 and 56 were ≥12–<16 years old. Patients in the deferasirox cohort have received treatment for a median 3.5 years. Mean (SD) doses were 9.5 (1.6), 19.5 (2.6) and 29.6 (2.5) mg/kg/d in the 5/10, 20 and 30 mg/kg/d groups at month 1, respectively, and 22.9 (7.7), 24.6 (7.6) and 26.3 (9.5) mg/kg/d at month 42. Until month 12, median SF levels were maintained in the 20 mg/kg/d cohort, decreased in the 30 mg/kg/d cohort and increased in the 5/10 mg/kg/d cohort. After dose escalations at month 12, median SF levels fell below baseline at month 42 in all cohorts (Table). 390 (90%) children continue to receive deferasirox. Of 43 discontinuations, 22 were due to AEs. Two deaths, both considered unrelated to treatment, occurred in the deferasirox cohort. The most common drug-related AEs, including vomiting (n=26), nausea (n=25), abdominal pain (n=21), diarrhea (n=19) and mild/moderate skin rash (n=35), occurred mainly in the core phases. There were no significant changes in markers of liver function in the extension phases and no cases of progressive increases in serum creatinine. Physical and sexual development proceeded normally in all children. Conclusions: Over a median period of 3.5 years, treatment with deferasirox provided dose dependent overall reduction in iron burden in transfusion-dependent children, as measured by SF levels. Deferasirox had a manageable safety profile in children, which was similar to that observed in the 1-year core trials. There was no negative impact on growth and sexual development. Median SF values (ng/mL) in children (deferasirox cohort) Initial dose, mg/kg/d Month 5/10 20 30 All n=129 n=89 n=74 n=292 *Dose adjustments Baseline 2126 2504 3491 2420 1 2041 2488 2976 2451 6 2394 2724 2678 2460 12* 2653 2602 2608 2618 18 3037 2480 2271 2771 24 2929 2651 2106 2522 30 2747 2404 2007 2440 36 1967 1916 2008 1970 42 1830 1812 1889 1831


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxia Wang ◽  
Guanqi Wang ◽  
Haiyan Ma ◽  
Baoen Shan

Introduction: Crizotinib was approved to treat anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by the Food and Drug Administration in 2011.We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials and retrospective studies to compare the efficacy and safety of crizotinib with chemotherapy. </P><P> Methods: We searched electronic databases from inception to Dec. 2016. Clinical trials and retrospective studies regarding crizotinib and crizotinib versus chemotherapy in treatment of NSCLC were eligible. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: Nine studies (five clinical trials and four retrospective studies) including 729 patients met the inclusion criteria. Crizotinib treatment revealed 1-year OS of 77.1% and PFS of 9.17 months. And crizotinib had a better performance than chemotherapy in ORR (OR: 4.97, 95%CI: 3.16 to 7.83, P<0.00001, I2=35%). DCR revealed superiority with crizotinib than chemotherapy (OR: 3.42, 95% CI: 2.33 to 5.01, P<0.00001, I2=0%). PR (partial response) were significant superior to that of chemotherapy through direct systematic review. No statistically significant difference in CR (complete response) was found between crizotinib-treated group and chemotherapy-treated group. Regarding SD (stable disease), chemotherapy-treated group had a better performance than crizotinib-treated group. Common adverse events associated with crizotinib were visual disorder, gastrointestinal side effects, and elevated liver aminotransferase levels, whereas common adverse events with chemotherapy were fatigue, nausea, and hematologic toxicity. This systematic review revealed improved objective response rate and increased disease control rate in crizotinib group comparing with chemotherapy group. Crizotinib treatment would be a favorable treatment option for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. ALK inhibitors may have future potential applications in other cancers driven by ALK or c-MET gene mutations.


Author(s):  
Bartosz Karaszewski ◽  
Adam Wyszomirski ◽  
Bartosz Jabłoński ◽  
David J. Werring ◽  
Dominika Tomaka

AbstractIntravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rtPA) has been routinely used to treat ischemic stroke for 25 years, following large clinical trials. However, there are few prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of this therapy in strokes attributed to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We evaluated functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) using all available data on the effects of iv-rtPA in SVD-related ischemic stroke (defined either using neuroimaging, clinical features, or both). Using fixed-effect and random-effects models, we calculated the pooled effect estimates with regard to excellent and favorable outcomes (mRS=0–1 and 0–2 respectively, at 3 months), and the rate of sICH. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 11 of which were comparative, and there were only 3 randomized clinical trials. In adjusted analyses, there was an increased odds of excellent outcome (adjusted OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.29–1.82, I2: 0%) or favorable outcome (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.31–2.15,I2: 0%) in patients who received iv-rtPA compared with placebo. Across the six studies which reported it, the incidence of sICH was higher in the treatment group (M-H RR = 8.83, 95% CI: 2.76–28.27). The pooled rate of sICH in patients with SVD administered iv-rtPA was only 0.72% (95% CI: 0.12%–1.64%). We conclude that when ischemic stroke attributed to SVD is considered separately, available data on the effects of iv-rtPA therapy are insufficient for the highest level of recommendation, but it seems to be safe. Although further therapeutic trials in SVD-related ischemic stroke appear to be justified, our findings should not prevent its continued use for this group of patients in clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-210
Author(s):  
Gian Maria Busetto ◽  
Francesco Del Giudice ◽  
Daniele D'Agostino ◽  
Daniele Romagnoli ◽  
Andrea Minervini ◽  
...  

Background: Combination therapy with 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) and alpha-blocker can be considered as a gold standard intervention for medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). On the other hand, 5-ARI monotherapy and in particular Finasteride alone is currently getting focus of attention especially due to lack of systematic reviews investigating efficacy outcomes and/or adverse events associated. Objectives: Aim of the present critical review was to analyze current knowledge of clinical efficacy and incidence of adverse events associated with 5-ARI treatment for LUTS/BPH. Materials and methods: A systematic review of clinical trials of the literature of the past 20 years was performed using database from PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration and Embase. A total of 8821 patients were included in this study and inclusion criteria for studies selection were: data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focusing their attention on the clinical role of Finasteride monotherapy for symptomatic BPH. Parameters of research included prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume (PV), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPPS), postvoid residual urine (PVR), voiding symptoms of IPSS (voiding IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Overall 12 original articles were included and critically evaluated. Sample sizes of patient actively treated with finasteride varied from 13 to 1524 cases analyzed in a single study. Follow-up after treatments ranged from 3 to 54 months. The effect of finasteride in reducing prostate volume (PV) was moderate (standardized mean difference (SMD) effect between 0.5 to 0.8 for all trials evaluable) while the effect on IPSS score and Qmax was considered significant (SMD in the 0.2 to 0.5 variation range). No severe AEs and/or psychiatric disorders were retrieved among the studies. Sexual health dysfunctions were significantly influenced by finasteride therapy when compared with placebo treated patients. Conclusions: Although significant clinical benefits of finasteride monotherapy were demonstrated, the effective size of the available reports included in the analysis is limited. Additional head-to-head studies would be needed to re-evaluate clinical efficacy and safety of 5-ARI in combination or not with alpha blockers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document