A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY COMPARING PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTI-ROTATION WITH CEMENTLESS BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY FOR UNSTABLE FEMORAL INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE

Background: Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are one of the most common types of bone fractures that are usually caused by severe direct or indirect force. It has also been estimated that nearly 50% of all the fractures are intertrochanteric fractures and the remaining are unstable fractures. Also, it has been found that the mortality related to hip fractures is as high as 15-20%. With an increase in the life expectancy of people, there has been a substantial increase in the number of patients with postmenopausal or senile osteoporosis. Aim: To compare Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation with cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture Methods: It was a retrospective study carried out at the Government Medical College, Baramati for a period of 1 year. One hundred patients were included for the scope of the study. Out of which 50 patients belonged to the PFNA group, and 50 patients belonged to the CPH group. Results: The number of patients in the PFNA group was 50 and that in the CPH group was 50. Both groups show male preponderance. The mean age among both the groups was almost the same, and there was no statistically significant difference among the two groups regarding the mean age. The mean operation time for PFNA was 54.15±16.1 mins, and that of the CPH group was 76.69±15.89 mins. The mean bleeding time for PFNA was 133.12±33.16 ml, and that of the CPH group was 289.25±44.01 ml. There was no statistically significant difference among the ASAA grade scores of the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference among the Evans-Jensen classification of the two groups. The mean length of hospital stay for PFNA group was 7.89±2.0 days, and the mean hospital stay for CPH group was 6.54±1.9 days. Conclusion: The current study depicted that CPH and PFNA are both safe and effective methods of treating elderly patients suffering from intertrochanteric fractures. However, it was found in the current study that CPH was found to have more mean operative time and increased blood loss. Still, the recovery and hospitalization time was almost similar in both the groups. Both the groups had almost similar ASA and Evans Jensen scores that made both the techniques equally safe

Download Full-text

Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-019-2793-8 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Shenghu Zhou ◽

Jun Liu ◽

Ping Zhen ◽

Weiwei Shen ◽

Yanfeng Chang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Operation Time ◽

The Elderly ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Intraoperative Bleeding ◽

Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture

Abstract Background The treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly has always been a controversial issue. The aim in this study was to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (CPH) on femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Methods From March 2008 to December 2012, 108 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated by PFNA or CPH. There were 63 males and 45 females, aged 75.3–99.1 years [(83.7 ± 5.6) years]. The patients’ bone mineral density was routinely measured, and the fractures were classified according to Evans-Jensen. The patients were divided into CPH group and PFNA group. The differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, immobilization duration, hospitalization time, Harris scores and postoperative complications including deep venous thrombosis, lung and urinary infection were analyzed. Results All patients were followed for 12.5–36.2 months [(28.0 ± 6.3) months)]. The operation time was (53.7 ± 15.2) min and (77.5 ± 16.8) min in PFNA group and CPH group, respectively (P < 0.05); intraoperative bleeding was (132.5 ± 33.2) mL and (286.3 ± 43.2) mL, respectively (P < 0.05); immobilization duration was (28.2 ± 3.7) days and (3.1 ± 1.2) days, respectively (P < 0.05); hospitalization time was (7.6 ± 1.8) days and (6.9 ± 2.2) days, respectively (P > 0.05); and the Harris scores after 1 year were (87.7 ± 7.9) points and (88.3 ± 9.2) points, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both PFNA and CPH are safe and effective treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. Nonetheless, CPH allows faster mobilization and recovery. Trial registration Registration Number: ChiCTR1900022846. Reg Date:2019-04-26 00:27:33 Retrospective registration

Download Full-text

Is Obesity a Risk Factor for Spinal Surgeries? A Retrospective Study in a Specialized Orthopedic Spine Center

Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science ◽

10.32598/jrosj.8.1.759.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 37-42

Author(s):

Hasan Ghandhari ◽

◽

Ebrahim Ameri ◽

Mohsen Motalebi ◽

Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Postoperative Complications ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Obese Group ◽

Obese Patients ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Duration Of Surgery

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.

Download Full-text

Comparison of mortality rate between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation for intertrochanteric fractures in Sanglah hospital, Bali

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences ◽

10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20204224 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (10) ◽

pp. 3503

Author(s):

I. Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽

I. Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana ◽

Cokorda Gde Oka Dharmayuda ◽

I. Wayan Subawa ◽

Hans Kristian Nugraha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mortality Rate ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Chi Square ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Fixation Treatment ◽

Chi Square Test ◽

Multi Center Study

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures occur in about 50% of all hip fracture events, with a mortality rate within 1 year after fracture reaching 15 to 20%. The most common treatment nowadays is either the bipolar hemiarthroplasty procedure or proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), although there is still no consensus regarding which is better from the two, especially on patient mortality.Method: This study was an observational study using a retrospective cohort design. A total of 102 study subjects who met the inclusion requirements were grouped into 2 groups, one with bipolar hemiarthroplasty fixation treatment and another with PFNA fixation treatment. Mortality rate was recorded by survey 2 years after surgery.Result: Chi-square test showed that 2-year mortality rate after intertrochanteric fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (21.4%) was significantly higher than the PFNA group (10.3%) (p=0.028). Bipolar hemiarthroplasty group also had longer length of stay (LoS) (50%) than the PFNA group (32.4%), albeit statistically insignificant (p=0.13). There was no significant difference between the 2-year mortality rate and LoS (p=0.976).Conclusion: Patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty have significantly higher 2-year mortality rate than similar patients underwent fixation with PFNA, while they did not experience higher LoS than the PFNA group. Future prospective, multi-center study with larger sample size will be likely to validate similar fixation choice needed to decrease the mortality rate in intertrochanteric fractures.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Mortality Rate Between Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation for Intertrochanteric Fractures in Sanglah Hospital, Bali

The Hip and Knee Journal ◽

10.46355/hipknee.v1i1.25 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 36-42

Author(s):

I Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽

I Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana ◽

Cokorda Gde Oka Dharmayuda ◽

I Wayan Subawa ◽

Hans Kristian Nugraha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mortality Rate ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Chi Square ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Fixation Treatment ◽

Multi Center Study

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures occur in about 50% of all hip fracture events, with a mortality rate within 1 year after fracture reaching 15 to 20%. The most common treatment nowadays is either the bipolar hemiarthroplasty procedure or proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), although there is still no consensus regarding which is better from the two, especially on patient mortality.Method: This study was an observational study using a retrospective cohort design. A total of 102 study subjects who met the inclusion requirements were grouped into 2 groups, one with bipolar hemiarthroplasty fixation treatment and another with PFNA fixation treatment. Mortality rate was recorded by survey 2 years after surgery.Results: Chi-square test showed that 2-year mortality rate after intertrochanteric fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (21.4%) was significantly higher than the PFNA group (10.3%) (p = 0.028). Bipolar hemiarthroplasty group also had longer length of stay (50%) than the PFNA group (32.4%), albeit statistically insignificant (p = 0.13). There was no significant difference between the 2-year mortality rate and length of stay (p = 0.976).Conclusion: Patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty have significantly higher 2- year mortality rate than similar patients underwent fixation with PFNA, while they did not experience higher length of stay than the PFNA group. Future prospective, multi center study with larger sample size will be likely to validate similar fixation choice needed to decrease the mortality rate in intertrochanteric fractures.

Download Full-text

Early enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis - how beneficial is it?

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/2349-2902.isj20214047 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Shruthikamal Venkat ◽

Rajesh Subramaniam ◽

Vijai Raveendran

Keyword(s):

Acute Pancreatitis ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Pain Score ◽

Tamil Nadu ◽

Early Enteral Nutrition ◽

Medical College ◽

Severe Pancreatitis ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Mean

Background: Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease of pancreas and is one of the leading cause of acute abdomen requiring hospital admission. Nutritional support plays a crucial role in this hypercatabolic state in not only providing calories but also in preventing complications and decreasing recovery time.Methods: This prospective study was done among 120 patients with acute moderate and severe pancreatitis who got admitted in department of general surgery at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India between 2018 and 2019.Results: 67 (55.8%) patients were in early enteral and 53 (44.2%) were in parenteral/delayed enteral group. Maximum number of patients were in 30-40 years age group. The mean of patient age was 40.33. Mean duration of hospital stay in enteral group was 7.06 and in parenteral/delayed enteral group it was 14.09 (p<0.001). Mean pain score in enteral group was 2.69 and in parenteral group it was 6.51 (p<0.001).Conclusions: There was significant (p<0.001) decrease in hospital stay duration and pain score in early enteral group compared to parenteral/delayed enteral group. Infections related to feeding route was found high in parenteral group. No significant difference found in complications of acute pancreatitis. Hence early enteral feeding is more beneficial in terms of shortened hospital stay, decreased pain score leading to reduction in usage of analgesics and reducing the recovery time and less nutrition related complications in management of acute moderate and severe pancreatitis.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes With Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Elderly Intertrochanteric Fractures

10.21203/rs.3.rs-527679/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Wen-Bo Wei ◽

Sha-Jie Dang ◽

Ling Wei ◽

MengXi Xin

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Operation Time ◽

The Elderly ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Hospitalization Time ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Time Operation ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Although proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) are selected by most of the orthopaedic surgeons for elderly intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) patients, there is still no consensus on the superiority of PFNA and BPH for ITFs in the elderly. The study aims to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) on ITFs in the elderly. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2016, a total of 62 patients participated in the study: BHA (Group B, n=30), PFNA (Group P, n=32). The fractures were classified according to Evans-Jensen. Hospitalization time, operation time, bleeding loss, Harris scores and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time was (125.76 ± 33.49) min and (94.38 ± 20.94) min in PFNA group and BHA group (P < 0.05); bleeding loss was (153.33 ± 59.96) mL and (335.31 ± 90.87) mL(P < 0.05); hospitalization time was (17.13 ± 2.92) days and (16.63 ± 3.64) days (P > 0.05); and the Harris scores were (73.20 ± 6.56) points and (68.91 ± 8.15) points (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both PFNA and BHA are safe and effective treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Nonetheless, BHA can be considered for those with the poor bone condition and short life expectancy.

Download Full-text

Risk factors for implant failure of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA –II) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31 A1 and A2)

10.21203/rs.3.rs-41298/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shaobo Nie ◽

Hui Ji ◽

ming li ◽

di yang ◽

Yeqing Qi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Implant Failure ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Coxa Vara ◽

Therapeutic Effects ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Failure Group ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Intertrochanteric fracture is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. The results of postoperative implant failure are catastrophic. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA–II) through the assessment of early therapeutic effects. Methods A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a continuous series of 123 intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with PFNA-II between Dec 2018 and Oct 2019. Perioperative medical and imaging data were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether implant failure of not. The differences in reduction quality, nail length and tip apex distance (TAD) were analyzed to determine the risk factors of implant failure. Results A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 80.2 years old. There were 6 patients with implant failure. There was no significant difference in demographic index between the two groups. The reduction quality of failure group was good, accept and poor with each 2 patients, and that of the non-failure group was 35, 35 and 4 patients respectively. The difference of reduction quality between the two groups was statistically significant. The risk of postoperative implant failure in patients with poor reduction quality was 8.75 times that of patients with good and acceptable reduction from the Logistic regression analysis(OR = 8.75,95%CI 1.215–62.99). The differences in nail length, ASA and bone quality were not statistically significant. Conclusion Reduction quality is a risk factor of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA-II. Even if the medial femoral cortex is anatomically reduced, there will be a triangular void area between the nail and the medial femur, which are prone to coxa vara and implant failure. Therefore, good reduction is the key to treat intertrochanteric fracture.

Download Full-text

Risk factors for mechanical failure of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA–II) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1, A2)

10.21203/rs.3.rs-41298/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shaobo Nie ◽

Hui Ji ◽

ming li ◽

di yang ◽

Yeqing Qi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Implant Failure ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Coxa Vara ◽

Therapeutic Effects ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

Failure Group ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Intertrochanteric fracture is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. The results of postoperative implant failure are catastrophic. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA–II) through the assessment of early therapeutic effects.Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a continuous series of 123 intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with PFNA-II between Dec 2018 and Oct 2019. Perioperative medical and imaging data were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether implant failure of not. The differences in reduction quality, nail length and tip apex distance (TAD) were analyzed to determine the risk factors of implant failure.Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 80.2 years old. There were 6 patients with implant failure. There was no significant difference in demographic index between the two groups. The reduction quality of failure group was good, accept and poor with each 2 patients, and that of the non-failure group was 35, 35 and 4 patients respectively. The difference of reduction quality between the two groups was statistically significant. The risk of postoperative implant failure in patients with poor reduction quality was 8.75 times that of patients with good and acceptable reduction from the Logistic regression analysis（OR=8.75，95%CI 1.215-62.99）. The differences in nail length, ASA and bone quality were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Reduction quality is a risk factor of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA-II. Even if the medial femoral cortex is anatomically reduced, there will be a triangular void area between the nail and the medial femur, which are prone to coxa vara and implant failure. Therefore, good reduction is the key to treat intertrochanteric fracture.

Download Full-text

Proximal femoral nail antirotation II in fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: retrospective and prospective observational study

International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics ◽

10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20201733 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 593

Author(s):

Arvind Kumar S. M. ◽

Arun Kumar B.

Keyword(s):

Blood Loss ◽

Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

Interquartile Range ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail ◽

Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽

X Rays ◽

Femoral Nail ◽

Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽

The Mean ◽

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation

Background: Intertrochanteric fractures occur mostly in elderly patients, and the outcome may be extremely poor if there is prolonged bed-rest. The best treatment for trochanteric fracture remains controversial. Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) II has excellent fit as the design is adapted to the anatomical situation of small statured patients also. It has a medial lateral angle of 5 degrees. It has several distal locking options viz static/dynamic. Objective of this study was to observe the operating time, blood loss and fracture union in intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA II from the data collected from patient’s case sheets and post-operative X-rays.Methods: 25 patients who were operated with PFNA II for unstable intertrochanteric fracture were selected using random selection and following parameters were noted from the records.Results: The mean age of the participants is 70.72±8.55 years with range from 52 years to 89 years. The mean duration was 1.98 hours ±0.66. The median duration was 2 with interquartile range from 1.5 to 2.5 hours. Mean blood loss was estimated to be 390 ml±62.78. The median blood loss was 370 ml with interquartile range from 360 to 420 ml.Conclusions: The PFNA II is an ideal implant for unstable intertrochanteric fracture since stable intramedullary fixation can be achieved with almost 100% union in the studied population.

Download Full-text

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary surgery through sternotomy

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England ◽

10.1308/003588413x13629960047119 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 95 (7) ◽

pp. 481-485 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

R Birla ◽

P Patel ◽

G Aresu ◽

G Asimakopoulos

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Blood Transfusion ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Coronary Artery Bypass ◽

Artery Bypass ◽

Off Pump ◽

Opcab Group ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Mean

Introduction Although it is not a new technique, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is employed only by a few surgeons in the UK. We compared our experience with MIDCAB with that of single vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) graft surgery through a standard median sternotomy. Methods Patients who underwent either MIDCAB or OPCAB between April 2008 and July 2011 were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included patients with an ejection fraction of <0.5 or previous cardiac surgery. Data were obtained retrospectively from our prospective database, medical records and through general practitioners. Results Overall, 74 patients were analysed in the MIDCAB group and 78 in the OPCAB group. Their demographics and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) values were comparable (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the two groups in terms of mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, postoperative stroke, wound infection, atrial fibrillation or need for reintervention. The MIDCAB group had six conversions to a sternotomy. Eight patients in each group required blood transfusion, with the average transfusion being 1.8 units in the MIDCAB group and 3.2 units in the OPCAB group. The mean duration of ventilation and intensive care unit stay was 5.0 hours and 38.4 hours in the MIDCAB group and 5.4 and 47.8 hours in the OPCAB group. The mean hospital stay was significantly reduced in the MIDCAB population (6.1 vs 8.5 days, p<0.05). Conclusions MIDCAB can be performed safely in appropriately selected patients with outcomes comparable with OPCAB. The potential benefits include shorter hospital stay, reduced need for blood transfusion and faster recovery.

Download Full-text