scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Outcomes With Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation Versus Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Elderly Intertrochanteric Fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Bo Wei ◽  
Sha-Jie Dang ◽  
Ling Wei ◽  
MengXi Xin
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Hospitalization Time ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Time Operation ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Although proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) are selected by most of the orthopaedic surgeons for elderly intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) patients, there is still no consensus on the superiority of PFNA and BPH for ITFs in the elderly. The study aims to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) on ITFs in the elderly. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2016, a total of 62 patients participated in the study: BHA (Group B, n=30), PFNA (Group P, n=32). The fractures were classified according to Evans-Jensen. Hospitalization time, operation time, bleeding loss, Harris scores and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time was (125.76 ± 33.49) min and (94.38 ± 20.94) min in PFNA group and BHA group (P < 0.05); bleeding loss was (153.33 ± 59.96) mL and (335.31 ± 90.87) mL(P < 0.05); hospitalization time was (17.13 ± 2.92) days and (16.63 ± 3.64) days (P > 0.05); and the Harris scores were (73.20 ± 6.56) points and (68.91 ± 8.15) points (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both PFNA and BHA are safe and effective treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Nonetheless, BHA can be considered for those with the poor bone condition and short life expectancy.

scholarly journals Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenghu Zhou ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Ping Zhen ◽  
Weiwei Shen ◽  
Yanfeng Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture

Abstract Background The treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly has always been a controversial issue. The aim in this study was to compare the curative effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (CPH) on femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. Methods From March 2008 to December 2012, 108 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated by PFNA or CPH. There were 63 males and 45 females, aged 75.3–99.1 years [(83.7 ± 5.6) years]. The patients’ bone mineral density was routinely measured, and the fractures were classified according to Evans-Jensen. The patients were divided into CPH group and PFNA group. The differences in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, immobilization duration, hospitalization time, Harris scores and postoperative complications including deep venous thrombosis, lung and urinary infection were analyzed. Results All patients were followed for 12.5–36.2 months [(28.0 ± 6.3) months)]. The operation time was (53.7 ± 15.2) min and (77.5 ± 16.8) min in PFNA group and CPH group, respectively (P < 0.05); intraoperative bleeding was (132.5 ± 33.2) mL and (286.3 ± 43.2) mL, respectively (P < 0.05); immobilization duration was (28.2 ± 3.7) days and (3.1 ± 1.2) days, respectively (P < 0.05); hospitalization time was (7.6 ± 1.8) days and (6.9 ± 2.2) days, respectively (P > 0.05); and the Harris scores after 1 year were (87.7 ± 7.9) points and (88.3 ± 9.2) points, respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both PFNA and CPH are safe and effective treatments for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. Nonetheless, CPH allows faster mobilization and recovery. Trial registration Registration Number: ChiCTR1900022846. Reg Date:2019-04-26 00:27:33 Retrospective registration

scholarly journals Comparison of mortality rate between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation for intertrochanteric fractures in Sanglah hospital, Bali

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 3503
Author(s):  
I. Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽  
I. Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana ◽  
Cokorda Gde Oka Dharmayuda ◽  
I. Wayan Subawa ◽  
Hans Kristian Nugraha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fixation Treatment ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Multi Center Study

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures occur in about 50% of all hip fracture events, with a mortality rate within 1 year after fracture reaching 15 to 20%. The most common treatment nowadays is either the bipolar hemiarthroplasty procedure or proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), although there is still no consensus regarding which is better from the two, especially on patient mortality.Method: This study was an observational study using a retrospective cohort design. A total of 102 study subjects who met the inclusion requirements were grouped into 2 groups, one with bipolar hemiarthroplasty fixation treatment and another with PFNA fixation treatment. Mortality rate was recorded by survey 2 years after surgery.Result: Chi-square test showed that 2-year mortality rate after intertrochanteric fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (21.4%) was significantly higher than the PFNA group (10.3%) (p=0.028). Bipolar hemiarthroplasty group also had longer length of stay (LoS) (50%) than the PFNA group (32.4%), albeit statistically insignificant (p=0.13). There was no significant difference between the 2-year mortality rate and LoS (p=0.976).Conclusion: Patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty have significantly higher 2-year mortality rate than similar patients underwent fixation with PFNA, while they did not experience higher LoS than the PFNA group. Future prospective, multi-center study with larger sample size will be likely to validate similar fixation choice needed to decrease the mortality rate in intertrochanteric fractures.

scholarly journals Comparison of Mortality Rate Between Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation for Intertrochanteric Fractures in Sanglah Hospital, Bali

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
I Wayan Suryanto Dusak ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Wien Aryana ◽  
Cokorda Gde Oka Dharmayuda ◽  
I Wayan Subawa ◽  
Hans Kristian Nugraha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fixation Treatment ◽  
Multi Center Study

Introduction: Intertrochanteric fractures occur in about 50% of all hip fracture events, with a mortality rate within 1 year after fracture reaching 15 to 20%. The most common treatment nowadays is either the bipolar hemiarthroplasty procedure or proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), although there is still no consensus regarding which is better from the two, especially on patient mortality.Method: This study was an observational study using a retrospective cohort design. A total of 102 study subjects who met the inclusion requirements were grouped into 2 groups, one with bipolar hemiarthroplasty fixation treatment and another with PFNA fixation treatment. Mortality rate was recorded by survey 2 years after surgery.Results: Chi-square test showed that 2-year mortality rate after intertrochanteric fracture treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty (21.4%) was significantly higher than the PFNA group (10.3%) (p = 0.028). Bipolar hemiarthroplasty group also had longer length of stay (50%) than the PFNA group (32.4%), albeit statistically insignificant (p = 0.13). There was no significant difference between the 2-year mortality rate and length of stay (p = 0.976).Conclusion: Patients with intertrochanteric fractures who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty have significantly higher 2- year mortality rate than similar patients underwent fixation with PFNA, while they did not experience higher length of stay than the PFNA group. Future prospective, multi center study with larger sample size will be likely to validate similar fixation choice needed to decrease the mortality rate in intertrochanteric fractures.

Predictive Value of Charlson Comorbidity Index and Cofactors on 2-Year Mortality in Older Patients With Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianda Xu ◽  
Homma Yasuhiro ◽  
Yuta Jinnai ◽  
Tomonori Baba ◽  
Zhuang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Time Operation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Time

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of Charlson comorbidities index (CCI) and cofactors on 2-year mortality in older patients with intertrochanteric fractures. 60 cases with unilateral intertrochanteric fracture were retrospectively analyzed and divided into Low-CCI group (CCI: 1-4) or high-CCI groups (CCI: 5-6). All the patients’ electronic hospital records were reviewed. The preoperative situations (demographic data, comorbidities and fracture conditions), perioperative situations (wait time, operation time, implant choice, blood loss, transfusion or not) and postoperative situations (complications, first time out of bed, function about 1-/2- week and 2-year mortality) were recorded. 51.67% were in low-CCI group and 48.33% in high-CCI group. The survival rates in low- and high-CCI group were 93.5% and 86.2 % respectively. According to the functional results of 1- or 2- week after operation, no significant difference was found (P=0.955, 0.140). Log-rank analysis showed that the main prognostic factors were blood loss, first time out of bed and complication (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that complication and first time out of bed were significant factor on survival rate (P=0.029, 0.010). Charlson comorbidities index maybe not the indicator of 2-year mortality in older patients with intertrochanteric fractures. In order to improve the prognosis, more attentions should be paid to reduce the complications and encourage postoperative earlier excise out of bed.

Computed Tomographic Image Analysis of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1746-1752
Author(s):  
Yugang Teng ◽  
Yuanzhen Zhang ◽  
Zhenyu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Ct Image ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ct Image Analysis

Objective: Based on the observation of Computed Tomography (CT) image analysis technique, the efficacy of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and Dynamic hip screw (DHS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly was analyzed. Methods: Thirty-nine elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were randomly divided into two groups: 19 patients in the DHS internal fixation group and 20 patients in the PFNA group. They were treated with DHS and PFNA internal fixation, and were observed based on CT image analysis techniques. The patient performs follow-up testing of the procedure before and after surgery. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the groups (P < 0.01). The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was statistically different between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative and postoperative complications in the PFNA group was lower than that in the DHS group. The excellent and good rates of DHS group and PFNA group were 89.47% and 95.00%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in fracture healing time between the PFNA group and the DHS group (P < 0.01). Discussion: Compared with DHS, PFNA has the advantages of short operation time, low bleeding volume and short hospital stay. There were 7 cases of internal fixation failure or non-union in the DHS group and 1 case of delayed healing in the PFNA group. Conclusion: DHS and PFNA were used to treat intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. After observation by CT image analysis technique, there was no significant difference in efficacy. The average operative time of PFNA was the shortest, the intraoperative blood loss was the least, the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications was low, and the fracture healing time was short. PFNA has a lesser effect on the blood circulation and bone destruction at the fracture end, and it is more secure. It is a reasonable surgical method for the treatment of senile osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures.

scholarly journals A comparative study of the fracture union between long and short proximal femoral intramedullary nails antirotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a multicentric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
B. Hari Krishnan ◽  
S. K. Rai ◽  
Rohit Vikas ◽  
Manoj Kashid ◽  
Pramod Mahender
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Fracture Union ◽  
Femur Fractures

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to compare the fracture union of long vs. short proximal femoral intramedullary nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients who was more than 60 years old.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective analysis of 170 cases of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur (AO type A1 and A2) in the elderly was conducted. There were 64 males (37.6%) and 106 females (62.3%) with the age of 60–90 (mean age 75) years. The general demographic data of patients, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, blood transfusion rate, anterior thigh pain, postoperative complications like periprosthetic fractures, infections were recorded.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The short nail group also had a significantly shorter operation time (41.5±15.3 minutes vs. 62.5±25.3 minutes, p=0.002) and lower rate of postoperative transfusion (31.3% vs. 58.7%, p=0.041). However the length of hospital stay showed no significant differences. After surgery in short group there were 03 cases of periprosthetic fracture with a total incidence of 03%, however there were none in long nail group. At the end of the follow-up, all patients achieved bony union. The average fracture union time of the long nail group was (8.5±3.2) months, and the short nail group was (7.8±4.7) months, revealing no significant differences (p=0.09).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Both the proximal femoral intramedullary long and short nail fixation has a good result in the form of fracture union in treating intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. They showed no significant difference in terms of fracture union, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures and anterior thigh pain was slightly high in short nail group. In short intramedullary nailing group there was obvious decrease in the intraoperative blood loss, operation time and postoperative blood transfusion.</p>

scholarly journals Arthroplasty Is Not Superior Than Internal Fixation for Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly: a Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kexiao Yu ◽  
Weizhong Lu ◽  
Qiuke Xiao ◽  
Ruijie Wan ◽  
Lujue Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Surgical treatment is the first choice for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly as it allows early rehabilitation and functional recovery. Recently, more and more surgeons prefer arthroplasty instead of internal fixation in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures. However, there is conflicting evidence as to which is the best surgical treatment for them. In this article, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical effectiveness of internal fixation (IF) and arthroplasty (AR) for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Methods: The online databases of PubMed, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science were searched to include studies conducted from 01/01/2000 to 11/30/2018 in English using keywords to identify articles relevant to this study. All studies had to have evaluated the treatment of patients with intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly(≥60 years of age). The quality of the trials was assessed and meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.3 version. Results: A total of 14 studies involving a total of 1588 patients were suitable for inclusion in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the IF and AR groups for postoperative complications-related general condition (OR=1.24; 95% CI= 0.90, 1.70; P=0.19), hospital stay (SMD=0.16; 95% CI= -0.5, 0.82; P =0.64), and Harris hip score (SMD= -0.12; 95% CI= -0.79, 0.54; P =0.71). AR group had a significantly lower rate of complications-related operation (OR= 2.21; 95% CI= 1.41, 3.45; P=0.0005) and reoperation (OR=2.74; 95% CI= 1.57, 4.76; P=0.0004). However, compared with AR group, IF group could reduce the blood loss (OR=-4.08; 95% CI=-4.58, -3.59; P<0.00001), transfusion requirement (SMD= -0.67; 95% CI= -1.08, -0.26; P=0.001), operation time (SMD= -0.80; 95% CI= -1.47, -0.12; P < 0.00001), and have a lower rate of mortality within 1-year (OR= 0.67; 95% CI= 0.52, 0.86; P=0.002).Conclusion: AR is associated with less rates of complications-related operation and reoperation but has an increased risk of blood loss, transfusion, operation time and mortality within 1-year. Our findings demonstrated that AR does not have significant advantages over IF for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

scholarly journals Risk factors for implant failure of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA –II) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31 A1 and A2)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaobo Nie ◽  
Hui Ji ◽  
ming li ◽  
di yang ◽  
Yeqing Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Coxa Vara ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Intertrochanteric fracture is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. The results of postoperative implant failure are catastrophic. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA–II) through the assessment of early therapeutic effects. Methods A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a continuous series of 123 intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with PFNA-II between Dec 2018 and Oct 2019. Perioperative medical and imaging data were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether implant failure of not. The differences in reduction quality, nail length and tip apex distance (TAD) were analyzed to determine the risk factors of implant failure. Results A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 80.2 years old. There were 6 patients with implant failure. There was no significant difference in demographic index between the two groups. The reduction quality of failure group was good, accept and poor with each 2 patients, and that of the non-failure group was 35, 35 and 4 patients respectively. The difference of reduction quality between the two groups was statistically significant. The risk of postoperative implant failure in patients with poor reduction quality was 8.75 times that of patients with good and acceptable reduction from the Logistic regression analysis(OR = 8.75,95%CI 1.215–62.99). The differences in nail length, ASA and bone quality were not statistically significant. Conclusion Reduction quality is a risk factor of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA-II. Even if the medial femoral cortex is anatomically reduced, there will be a triangular void area between the nail and the medial femur, which are prone to coxa vara and implant failure. Therefore, good reduction is the key to treat intertrochanteric fracture.

scholarly journals Risk factors for mechanical failure of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA–II) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1, A2)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaobo Nie ◽  
Hui Ji ◽  
ming li ◽  
di yang ◽  
Yeqing Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Coxa Vara ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Intertrochanteric fracture is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. The results of postoperative implant failure are catastrophic. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA–II) through the assessment of early therapeutic effects.Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a continuous series of 123 intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with PFNA-II between Dec 2018 and Oct 2019. Perioperative medical and imaging data were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether implant failure of not. The differences in reduction quality, nail length and tip apex distance (TAD) were analyzed to determine the risk factors of implant failure.Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 80.2 years old. There were 6 patients with implant failure. There was no significant difference in demographic index between the two groups. The reduction quality of failure group was good, accept and poor with each 2 patients, and that of the non-failure group was 35, 35 and 4 patients respectively. The difference of reduction quality between the two groups was statistically significant. The risk of postoperative implant failure in patients with poor reduction quality was 8.75 times that of patients with good and acceptable reduction from the Logistic regression analysis（OR=8.75，95%CI 1.215-62.99）. The differences in nail length, ASA and bone quality were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Reduction quality is a risk factor of implant failure in intertrochanteric fractures treated with PFNA-II. Even if the medial femoral cortex is anatomically reduced, there will be a triangular void area between the nail and the medial femur, which are prone to coxa vara and implant failure. Therefore, good reduction is the key to treat intertrochanteric fracture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document