scholarly journals COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT DOSES OF ORAL MIDAZOLAM PREMEDICATION ON INDUCTION DOSE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF PROPOFOL: A DOUBLE BLIND STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukesh Choudhary ◽  
Neeti Mahla
Keyword(s):  
Water Soluble ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Induction Dose ◽  
Group I ◽  
Oral Midazolam ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Different Doses ◽  
Midazolam Premedication

Background:  Midazolam is a water-soluble, short acting benzodiazepine. The objective of our study was to study the effect of two different doses of oral midazolam premedication on propofol induction dose and characteristics. Methods: Randomized, prospective, double blind study conducted on 100 ASA I and II patients, falling between the age group of 18-60 yrs were randomly divided in to two groups, group I and group II, who received 7.5mg and 15mg midazolam orally 45 mins before the surgery respectively. Results: Mean time taken for induction in group-A was significantly higher in group-I as compare to group-II. No significant difference was noted with respect to degree of sedation, changes in the heart rate and means arterial pressure, oxygen saturation between the two groups. Conclusion: Our study concluded that 15mg midazolam premedication offers more benefits than 7.5mg midazolam by reducing induction dose of propofol without any undesirable effects like excess sedation, bradycardia and hypotension. Keywords: Midazolam, Induction, Premedication

scholarly journals Oral midazolam versus oral triclofos for sedation of children for computed tomography scan - a randomized clinical trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Anushu Gupta ◽  
Maitree Pandey ◽  
Lalita Choudhry ◽  
Aruna Jain ◽  
Harish Pemde
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Computed Tomography Scan ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Comparable Rate ◽  
Group I ◽  
Oral Midazolam ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
Tomography Scan

Background: Effective and safe pediatric procedural sedation is still a concern especially in areas outside operation theatres. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral triclofos and oral midazolam in children undergoing computed tomography.Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted in 100 children aged one to five years. Group-I (n=50) received oral triclofos 100 mg/kg and Group-II (n=50) oral midazolam 0.75 mg/kg. Both groups were given oral atropine 0.03 mg/kg and supplemented with intravenous midazolam upto 0.1 mg/kg in case of inadequate effect. Onset and duration of sedation, success for completion of procedure and time to recovery were noted. Student’s t test and Z test of proportions were used for statistical analysis.Results Majority of children 36(72%) in Group-I achieved Ramsay Sedation Score >4 as compared to 25(50%) in Group-II. Computed tomography scan could be successfully completed at comparable rate (52% vs 56%). Success rate improved to 96% vs 80% after supplementing intravenous midazolam in Group I & II respectively (p< 0.05). Onset (37.91minutes ± 7.96 vs 26 ± 10), duration of sedation ( 117.91minutes ± 72.41 vs 66.2minutes ± 33) were significantly shorter and recovery (98.19minutes ± 72.58 vs 47.4minutes ± 31.42) in Group I & II respectively was faster in children who received oral midazolam (p< 0.05).Conclusion We conclude that both drugs were equally effective and safe for computed tomography scan in children. However better recovery profile of midazolam makes it more suitable for day care procedures.Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal 2015; 2(2): 41-45

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of Myolaxin and EM LA cream for attenuation of venous cannulation pain: A prospective, randomised, double blind study

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 726-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Agarwal ◽  
G. Yadav ◽  
D. Gupta ◽  
M. Tandon ◽  
S. Dhiraaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eutectic Mixture ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Venous Cannulation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Group I ◽  
Cannulation Site

We evaluated the efficacy of topical Myolaxin (capsaican ointment, Geno, Mumbai) ointment over EMLA (eutectic mixture of lignocaine, prilocaine; Neon, Goa) cream for attenuating venous cannulation pain in this prospective, randomised, double blind study. Sixty adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group I (EMLA) received EMLA cream, whereas Group II (Myolaxin) received Myolaxin ointment. For both groups the cream was applied at the venous cannulation site (dorsum of the non-dominant hand) one hour prior to venous cannulation and was covered with an occlusive dressing. Following venous cannulation patients were asked if they felt pain during venous cannulation. If the answer was yes, they were asked to rate the severity of venous cannulation pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of O-10. The incidence of venous cannulation pain was similar between groups: in the EMLA group 65% (18/28) compared to 67% (20/30) in the Myolaxin group (P=0.19). The severity of pain (median VAS with inter quartile range) was also similar between the groups: in the EMLA group 1.5 (3) compared to 1.5 (2) in the Myolaxin group (P=0.46). As the topical application of Myolaxin ointment is cheaper than EMLA and has similar efficacy, it may be a suitable alternative for reducing the incidence and severity of venous cannulation pain.

scholarly journals PREVENTION OF SHIVERING DURING LOWER SEGMENT CESAREAN SECTION;

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 409-415
Author(s):  
ASHFAQ AHMED ◽  
MOHAMMAD ASLAM
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Production ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Lower Segment ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Lower Segment Cesarean Section ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of low-dose prophylactic use of ketamine with ketamine plus midazolam for theprevention of shivering caused by spinal anesthesia, during lower segment cesarean section. Main Outcome Measures: Heamodynamicmonitoring, avoidance of lactic acidosis/ increased carbon dioxide production and patient satisfaction. Design: Prospective RandomizedControlled trial. Place: Department of Anesthesia and ICU PNS Shifa Karachi. Duration of study: March 2010 to June 2010. Patients andMethods: 100 ASA-I & II consecutive patients who reported for LSCS in PNS Shifa Hospital were studied. In this double-blind study,patients were randomly allocated to receive ketamine alone (Group I, n= 50), and ketamine plus midazolam (Group II, n = 50). Afterstandardized Spinal anesthesia, a shivering was recorded at 5 min intervals for 15 minutes. Results: Shivering was observed in 9/50(18%) patients of group I (Ketamine only) as compared to only 2/50 (4%) patients in Group II (ketamine + midazolam) (p=0.025) whichis statically significant. The two groups were comparable regarding distribution of age (p=0.37), BMI (p=0.27) and duration of surgery.Results were analyzed by using chi square test. Conclusions: The efficacy of i.v. ketamine plus midazolam is better as compared to lowdosei.v. ketamine alone in preventing shivering in lower segment Cesarean Section patients, during spinal anesthesia.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of chloroquine compared to Fansidar in treating falciparum malaria

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Azlin ◽  
Ichwan HH Batubara ◽  
Wisman Dalimunte ◽  
Charles Siregar ◽  
Bidasari Lubis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Falciparum Malaria ◽  
Malaria Infection ◽  
Malaria Incidence ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group Ii

Background The most difficult problem in eradicating malaria isthe resistance of P. falciparum to drugs. Mandailing Natal has thehighest malaria incidence in North Sumatera.Objective This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of chloro-quine and Fansidar in treating falciparum malaria.Methods A randomized double-blind study was done from April toMay 2001. Eighty-three patients with acute uncomplicated P.falciparum malaria infection were randomized into two groups.Group I (35 patients) received chloroquine and group II (48 pa-tients) received Fansidar. Blood examinations were performed onthe 1 st , 2 nd , 7 th , and 28 th days.Results The resistance of P. falciparum to drugs in the chloro-quine group were found in 10 patients with R II and 1 patients withR III, while in the Fansidar group, there were 14 patients with R II.Conclusion The efficacy of chloroquine and Fansidar in treatingfalciparum malaria was not significantly different

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document