scholarly journals Analgesia in the intensive care unit

2020 ◽  
pp. 180-182
Author(s):  
O.A. Loskutov

Background. Sedation is a technique of using drugs to put a patient in a condition in which he can tolerate unpleasant procedures, while maintaining cardiorespiratory function. The main problems associated with analgesia and sedation (AS) are associated with the development of hypoxia, vomiting and aspiration, hypotension and hemodynamic instability, apnea. Objective. To describe the features of the modern AS. Materials and methods. Analysis of literature data on this issue. Results and discussion. AS can be performed with the help of different drugs. Benzodiazepines (preferably midazolam) and/or propofol in combination with low doses of opioids should be used in patients with concomitant cardiac abnormalities. The use of propofol in this category of patients is carried out by fractional administration (on average, 50 mg) with an interval of 30-40 seconds until an adequate sedative effect is achieved. Dexmedetomidine has been suggested as an adjuvant. It should be kept in mind that benzodiazepines are not suitable for creating a long-lasting sedative effect, and can cause paradoxical agitation in the elderly. Features of sedation in patients at risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome are represented with the use of a minimum dose of hypnotics without the use of opioids. Dexmedetomidine is considered as an alternative. It is advisable to use continuous positive airways pressure by inhalation of oxygen through the nasal cannula. Patients with morbid obesity should avoid lying on their back. For the effective control of airway patency, it is advisable to use endotracheal intubation. It is recommended to avoid long-acting drugs and drugs that cause respiratory depression. The use of propofol in this group is often associated with respiratory complications, so the use of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine is recommended as an alternative. For patients with chronic renal failure, midazolam and/or fentanyl should be preferred, however, the cardiovascular and pulmonary side effects of any of these drugs are exacerbated when they are used concomitantly. In patients with hepatic dysfunction, midazolam may exacerbate symptoms, so propofol should be preferred. If the latter is used, the doctor should be near the patient throughout the procedure and monitor him exclusively. As for dexmedetomidine, this drug selectively binds and activates presynaptic α2-adrenoreceptors, inhibiting the release of norepinephrine. As a result, postsynaptic activation of adrenoceptors is inhibited, sympathetic activity is suppressed, leading to analgesia, sedation and decrease of anxiety. Under conditions of mild or moderate sedation caused by dexmedetomidine, patients respond to verbal stimulation and are able to communicate and cooperate with medical staff, and after awakening show high results in tests of central nervous system activity. Dexmedetomidine is less likely to cause postoperative delirium than midazolam (54 % vs. 76.6 %) and does not adversely affect sleep quality, unlike propofol. Dexmedetomidine can be used together with paracetamol. Intravenous paracetamol significantly reduces postoperative pain and the need for opioids. Conclusions. 1. AS can be performed with the use of benzodiazepines, propofol, dexmedetomidine. 2. Benzodiazepines are not suitable for creating a long-lasting sedative effect, and can cause paradoxical agitation in the elderly. 3. Patients with different comorbid conditions are characterized by different features of required AS. 4. Dexmedetomidine gives the patient the opportunity to communicate and cooperate with medical staff, rarely causes postoperative delirium and does not adversely affect the sleep quality. 5. Intravenous paracetamol significantly reduces postoperative pain and the need for opioids.

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Maomao HUANG ◽  
Weiqiang MU ◽  
Guohua ZHENG

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aarti Yevale ◽  
Jyothi Shetty ◽  
Vidyashree G Poojari ◽  
Vasudeva Guddattu

Background: Buprenorphine is a semisynthetic derivative of thebaine which is 75–100 times more potent than morphine and causes less respiratory depression. Efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine have been well established in chronic pain, but data regarding acute postoperative pain relief are still limited. Aim: In this study we compared the efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine patch with injectable tramadol for the relief of postoperative pain (POP) following abdominal hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions. Settings and design: three-year prospective observational study. Methods and material: One hundred patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were allocated to one of two groups. Buprenorphine group: we applied 10 mcg/hr transdermal buprenorphine patch on the lateral upper arm after surgery. The onset of relief from a patch is 8 to 16 hours. So, all patients were given diclofenac suppository 100mg before induction of anesthesia as preemptive analgesic to reduce postoperative pain. Injectable tramadol group : received intramuscular tramadol injections 50mg every 8 hours in the postoperative period. Patients were followed for two days to look for postoperative pain relief and adverse effects. If patients showed a visual analog pain (VAS) score >3, intravenous paracetamol was administered as rescue analgesic. Results: POP was assessed at different time frames: 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours after hysterectomy. Mean pain score at rest, in buprenorphine group was significantly lower than that of the tramadol group. Patients experienced less pain on mobility in the buprenorphine group compared with the tramadol group, which was statistically significant. Conclusion: We concluded that transdermal buprenorphine is an effective and safe alternative to injectable tramadol for providing postoperative analgesia. It provides a higher degree of pain relief, faster postoperative mobilization, lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and higher satisfaction scores starting 12 hours after surgery. However, for the first 12 post-operative hours, there is need for additional analgesia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-644 ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Background Postoperative pain and opioid use are associated with postoperative delirium. We designed a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, double-blinded trial to determine whether perioperative administration of gabapentin reduced postoperative delirium after noncardiac surgery. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (N = 347) or gabapentin 900 mg (N = 350) administered preoperatively and for the first 3 postoperative days. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium as measured by the Confusion Assessment Method. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, opioid use, and length of hospital stay. Results Data for 697 patients were included, with a mean ± SD age of 72 ± 6 yr. The overall incidence of postoperative delirium in any of the first 3 days was 22.4% (24.0% in the gabapentin and 20.8% in the placebo groups; the difference was 3.20%; 95% CI, 3.22% to 9.72%; P = 0.30). The incidence of delirium did not differ between the two groups when stratified by surgery type, anesthesia type, or preoperative risk status. Gabapentin was shown to be opioid sparing, with lower doses for the intervention group versus the control group. For example, the morphine equivalents for the gabapentin-treated group, median 6.7 mg (25th, 75th quartiles: 1.3, 20.0 mg), versus control group, median 6.7 mg (25th, 75th quartiles: 2.7, 24.8 mg), differed on the first postoperative day (P = 0.04). Conclusions Although postoperative opioid use was reduced, perioperative administration of gabapentin did not result in a reduction of postoperative delirium or hospital length of stay.


Author(s):  
Li Xu ◽  
Dingyun You ◽  
Chengyu Li ◽  
Xiyu Zhang ◽  
Runxu Yang ◽  
...  

AbstractFacing with COVID-19 epidemic such a catastrophic health emergency, the mental health status of medical staff deserves attention. We conducted a two-stage of psychological status monitoring after the end of the assistance and 14 days of isolation, further targeted the vulnerable groups in need of intervention. The study is a cross-sectional survey on 1156 Yunnan medical staff aid to Hubei. Used Cluster sampling method to collect data at 2 time points (at the end of returning from Wuhan and the 14th day of isolation), from March 18, 2020 to April 6, 2020. Female and nurse had higher rates of depressive symptoms than male and doctors and other occupations. The proportion of female with mild and above moderate anxiety levels (22.91%, 2.61%) was higher than male (17.35%, 1.03%) (p < 0.05). Female had a better impaired sleep quality (45.06%, 17.49%) more than male (28.57%, 7.94%). Medical staff supported in Wuhan and with junior professional titles reported a higher proportion of sleep quality impairment. At the 14th isolation day stage, the proportion of nurses changed from depression to health (9.15%) and from health to depression (6.1%) better than doctors. The front-line medical staffs had suffered greater psychological pressure in the treatment process of major public health emergency. Researches on the dynamic monitor for the change of psychological status after aiding epidemic areas were still in relatively blank stage. Targeting the vulnerable characteristics of aiding medical staff is significant for effective psychological intervention and sustainable operation of health system.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-250
Author(s):  
Bigen Man Shakya ◽  
Ninadini Shrestha

The postoperative pain management in the elderly is challenging due to comorbidities and change in physiology due to age itself. This limit the use of medication which include pain medication also. The fascia iliaca compartment block has been described in the literature for fracture of femur. It has even been safely used by non anaesthesiologist also. To our knowledge, we did not find any case report of continuous fascia iliaca compartment block published in Nepal. This is our first experience of successful continous fasicia iliaca compartment block in case of 89 year old lady with multiple co morbidities in whom traditional pain medication might be difficult to use. We encourage to practice this block which is both safe and easy to perform with good results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document