scholarly journals Megathrust Earthquake Potential of the Manila Subduction Systems Revealed by the Radial Component of Seismic Moment Tensors Mrr

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-Yi Lin ◽  
Wen-Nan Wu ◽  
Chung-Liang Lo
Author(s):  
Félix Rodríguez-Cardozo ◽  
Vala Hjörleifsdóttir ◽  
Kristín Jónsdóttir ◽  
Arturo Iglesias ◽  
Sara Ivonne Franco ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-179
Author(s):  
S Donner ◽  
M Mustać ◽  
B Hejrani ◽  
H Tkalčić ◽  
H Igel

SUMMARY Seismic moment tensors are an important tool and input variable for many studies in the geosciences. The theory behind the determination of moment tensors is well established. They are routinely and (semi-) automatically calculated on a global scale. However, on regional and local scales, there are still several difficulties hampering the reliable retrieval of the full seismic moment tensor. In an earlier study, we showed that the waveform inversion for seismic moment tensors can benefit significantly when incorporating rotational ground motion in addition to the commonly used translational ground motion. In this study, we test, what is the best processing strategy with respect to the resolvability of the seismic moment tensor components: inverting three-component data with Green’s functions (GFs) based on a 3-D structural model, six-component data with GFs based on a 1-D model, or unleashing the full force of six-component data and GFs based on a 3-D model? As a reference case, we use the inversion based on three-component data and 1-D structure, which has been the most common practice in waveform inversion for moment tensors so far. Building on the same Bayesian approach as in our previous study, we invert synthetic waveforms for two test cases from the Korean Peninsula: one is the 2013 nuclear test of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the other is an Mw  5.4 tectonic event of 2016 in the Republic of Korea using waveform data recorded on stations in Korea, China and Japan. For the Korean Peninsula, a very detailed 3-D velocity model is available. We show that for the tectonic event both, the 3-D structural model and the rotational ground motion, contribute strongly to the improved resolution of the seismic moment tensor. The higher the frequencies used for inversion, the higher is the influence of rotational ground motions. This is an important effect to consider when inverting waveforms from smaller magnitude events. The explosive source benefits more from the 3-D structural model than from the rotational ground motion. Nevertheless, the rotational ground motion can help to better constraint the isotropic part of the source in the higher frequency range.


1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui-Feng Liu ◽  
Jing-Ping Dang ◽  
Shao-Dong Fang ◽  
Pei-Shan Chen

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Elizabeth de Joux Robertson

<p>The aim of this project is to enable accurate earthquake magnitudes (moment magnitude, MW) to be calculated routinely and in near real-time for New Zealand earthquakes. This would be done by inversion of waveform data to obtain seismic moment tensors. Seismic moment tensors also provide information on fault-type. I use a well-established seismic moment tensor inversion method, the Time-Domain [seismic] Moment Tensor Inversion algorithm (TDMT_INVC) and apply it to GeoNet broadband waveform data to generate moment tensor solutions for New Zealand earthquakes. Some modifications to this software were made. A velocity model can now be automatically used to calculate Green's functions without having a pseudolayer boundary at the source depth. Green's functions can be calculated for multiple depths in a single step, and data are detrended and a suitable data window is selected. The seismic moment tensor solution that has either the maximum variance reduction or the maximum double-couple component is automatically selected for each depth. Seismic moment tensors were calculated for 24 New Zealand earthquakes from 2000 to 2005. The Global CMT project has calculated CMT solutions for 22 of these, and the Global CMT project solutions are compared to the solutions obtained in this project to test the accuracy of the solutions obtained using the TDMT_INVC code. The moment magnitude values are close to the Global CMT values for all earthquakes. The focal mechanisms could only be determined for a few of the earthquakes studied. The value of the moment magnitude appears to be less sensitive to the velocity model and earthquake location (epicentre and depth) than the focal mechanism. Distinguishing legitimate seismic signal from background seismic noise is likely to be the biggest problem in routine inversions.</p>


Author(s):  
Andreas Steinberg ◽  
Hannes Vasyura‐Bathke ◽  
Peter Gaebler ◽  
Matthias Ohrnberger ◽  
Lars Ceranna

2019 ◽  
Vol 220 (1) ◽  
pp. 248-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Kong ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Weimin Chen ◽  
Boqi Kang

SUMMARY The far-field assumption is widely used and suitable for the moment-tensor inversion in which the source–receiver distance is quite long. However, the description of far field is uncertain and an explicit far-field range is missing. In this study, the explicit far-field range is determined and the errors of moment-tensor solutions produced by the far-field approximation are analysed. The distance, for which the far-field assumption is satisfied and the effect of the near-field term can be ignored, is directionally dependent. For the shear dislocation, in the directions near the nodal lines of the far-field P waves, the far-field distance is heavily dependent on the displacement component used to invert moment tensors. The radial component of displacement, which is parallel to the wave propagation direction, is recommended for the inversion and the corresponding far-field distance is quite short. In the directions far from the nodal lines, the selection of displacement components has little influence on the far-field distance. The maximum far-field distance appears in the directions of the pressure and tensile axes of the source and the value is about 30 wavelengths of radiated waves. Using more receivers (>6) in the moment-tensor inversion can shorten the far-field distance. The effect of the near-field term on the moment-tensor inversion for tensile dislocations and isotropic sources (explosion or implosion) can be ignored. The conclusions obtained in this study are helpful for determining the positions of receivers and evaluating the accuracy of moment-tensor solutions, with far-field assumption being applied in the inversion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 221 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-88
Author(s):  
Sean R Ford ◽  
Gordon D Kraft ◽  
Gene A Ichinose

SUMMARY Event screening is an explosion monitoring practice that aims to identify an event as an explosion (‘screened in’) or not (‘screened out’). Confidence in event screening can be increased if multiple independent approaches are used. We describe a new approach to event screening using the seismic moment tensor and its representation on the hypersphere, specifically the 5-sphere of 6-degree unit vectors representing the normalized symmetric moment tensor. The sample of moment tensors from an explosion data set is unimodal on the 5-sphere and can be parametrized by the Langevin distribution, which is sometimes referred to as the Normal distribution on the hypersphere. Screening is then accomplished by finding the angle from the explosion population mean to any newly measured moment tensor and testing if that angle is in the tail of the Langevin distribution (conservatively quantified as greater than 99.9 per cent of the cumulative density). We apply the screen to a sample of earthquakes from the Western USA and the September 2017 explosion and subsequent collapse at the Pungyye-Ri Test Site in North Korea. All the earthquakes and the collapse screen out, but the explosion does not.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document