scholarly journals Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors improve the survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in whom imatinib therapy has failed

Haematologica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (12) ◽  
pp. 1779-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Ibrahim ◽  
R. E. Clark ◽  
T. L. Holyoake ◽  
J. Byrne ◽  
P. Shepherd ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2251
Author(s):  
Valentín García-Gutiérrez ◽  
Juan Carlos Hernández-Boluda

Despite the excellent overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a significant proportion will not achieve optimal response to imatinib or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2GTKI). For patients with inadequate response to 2GTKIs, alternative 2GTKIs or ponatinib are widely available treatment options in daily clinical practice. Treatment decisions should be guided by correct identification of the cause of treatment failure and accurate distinction between resistant from intolerant or nonadherence patients. This review aims to provide practical advice on how to select the best treatment option in each clinical scenario.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 113 (21) ◽  
pp. 5058-5063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Fava ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
...  

Abstract Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors are effective in Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Occasionally, patients with Ph+ ALL, or accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) CML achieve a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) but not a complete hematologic response (CHR). We analyzed 126 patients with CML in AP or BP, or with Ph+ ALL treated with dasatinib or nilotinib after imatinib failure. Twenty patients received sequential treatment with both dasatinib and nilotinib for a total of 146 instances. CHR and MCyR rates were 54% and 37%, respectively in AP, 17% and 39% in BP, and 33% and 50% in Ph+ ALL. Failure to achieve a CHR at the time of achievement of a MCyR was associated with an inferior outcome, similar to that of patients without a MCyR (2-year survival rate, 37% and 35%, respectively). In contrast, patients with MCyR and concomitant CHR had a 77% 2-year survival rate. Twelve of 29 patients with MCyR without concomitant CHR later achieved a CHR; the 2-year survival rate for these patients was 55% compared with 22% for those who never achieved a CHR. These results suggest that achievement of a MCyR without concomitant CHR is associated with poor outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document