scholarly journals The Effect of Oral Clonidine at Different Doses on Post-Operative Analgesic and Hemodynamic Status in Upper Abdominal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Mohammmad Shaddam Hoshain Mondol ◽  
Rajat Shuvra Das ◽  
Md Arman Ali ◽  
Ishrat Jhahan Shathi ◽  
Mohammad Abdul Karim Miah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Oral Clonidine ◽  
Upper Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Severe Postoperative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Oral Premedication ◽  
Upper Abdominal

Background: Upper abdominal surgery (like- hepatobiliary surgery, gastrectomy, esophagectomy, hepatictomy, and whipples operations that involve large surgical incisions) lead to severe postoperative pain that lead to higher doses of opoids use in post-operative period as a result incidence of unwanted side effect and respiratory complication increase hospital stay and morbidity. To reduce the use of opioids clonidine can be used as a multimodal analgesic approach. It is reported that clonidine 150mcg intravenous (I/V) produce a similar analgesic effect to morphine 5mg in patient after orthopedic surgery. Because of its dose, route, and surgical variation it is very much important to specify the dose for upper abdominal surgery. Material and methods: After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria the patients were randomized to receive Group: A (2mcg/kg oral clonidine) and Group: B (4mcg/kg oral clonidine), one hour (60minutes) before surgery as an oral premedication. All groups were compared for preoperative analgesic, sedation and anxiety level along with changes of heart rate and mean arterial pressure prior to premedication and post-operative periods as follows VAS (visual analogue score) pain scores. Result: The post-operative pain measured on VAS showed Group A expressed highest VAS at 6thpost-operative hour Group –B showed highest VAS at 14th post-operative hour. So it is very clear to us that pethedine requirement of Group B (4mcg/kg oral clonidine) is less than Group A (2mcg/kg oral clonidine). The oral premedication with clonidine at 2 microgram per kg or 4 microgram per kg for postoperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability of elective upper abdominal surgery patients. Conclusion: As a part of multimodal analgesic approach, 4mcg/kg oral clonidine premedication is effective to perioperative pain control and keep stable the haemodynamic in upper abdominal surgery J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 28, No.2, October, 2019, Page 131-135

scholarly journals Balanced Anesthesia VS General Anesthesia for Upper Abdominal Surgery-A Comparative Study of Outcome

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
M Abu Zahid ◽  
Intekhab Alam ◽  
AKM Tanvirul Haque ◽  
Sharmin Sultana ◽  
SMA Taher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Upper Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Balanced Anesthesia ◽  
Group B ◽  
Upper Abdominal

This is a prospective randomized clinical study was done in the dept. of Rajshahi Medical College Hospital & in different Clinics in Rajshahi city from August 2013 to December 2014 to evaluate the outcome of patient undergoing upper abdominal surgery such as cholecystectomy, cholidocholithotomy, Nephrolithotomy, Gastrojejunestomy, Splenectomy, Hysterectomy, LUCS, Appendisectomy etc. by balanced anesthesia. This is also a comparative study of patient undergoing upper abdominal surgery either by balanced anesthesia or by general anesthesia. For this study 80 patients of upper abdominal surgery were randomly selected in two groups (Each group contain 40 patients) Group 'A' Patient received balanced anesthesia & group 'B' Patient received general anesthesia. Then these patient were monitored during per-operative & post operative period to evaluate its outcome. After completion of operation we have seen that those patent received balanced anesthesia had better outcome than general anesthesia undergoing upper abdominal surgery.TAJ 2012; 25: 47-54

Comparative Study Between Clean Intermittent Self-Catheterization (Cisc) and Continuous Indwelling Catheterization (Cidc) in Relieving Acute Refractory Retention of Urine Due to Benign Enlargement of Prostate (Bep)

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Md Shawkat Alam ◽  
Sudip Das Gupta ◽  
Hadi Zia Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Md Saruar Alam ◽  
Sharif Muhammod Wasimuddin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acute Urinary Retention ◽  
Bladder Capacity ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Better Than

Objective: To compare the clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) with continuous indwelling catheterization (CIDC) in relieving acute urinary retention (AUR) due to benign enlargement of prostate (BEP). Materials and Methods :A total 60 patients attending in urology department of Dhaka Medical college hospital were included according to inclusion criteria ,Patients were randomized by lottery into two groups namely group –A and group –B for CISC and IDC drainage respectively . Thus total 60 patients 30 in each group completed study. Results : Most men can safely be managed as out-patients after AUR due to BPH. The degree of mucosal congestion and inflammation within the bladder was found to be lower in those using CISC and the bladder capacity in these patients was also found higher.Patients with an IDC had a high incidence of UTIs then that of patients with CISC. During the period of catheterization the incidence of UTI was 43.3% in group B in comparison to 40% in group A; before TURP 36% in group B in comparison to 10% incidence in group A.According to patient’s opinion CISC is better than IDC in the management of AUR. Experiencing bladder spasm, reporting blood in urine, management difficulties, incidence and severity of pain were less in CISC group, and the method of CISC was well accepted by patients as well as their family members. Conclusion: From the current study it may be suggested that CISC is better technique for management of AUR patient due to BPH than IDC. It can also be very helpful when surgery must be delayed or avoided due to any reasons in this group of patients. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 21, No. 2, July 2018 p.105-110

Age related volume of cadaver-prostates in Bangladesh

1970 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Rukshana Ahmed ◽  
Shamim Ara
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Group A ◽  
Key Words Prostate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Pathological changes in the prostate gland occur commonly with advancing age including inflammation, atrophy, hyperplasia and carcinoma and a change in volume is also evident. Estimation of volume of prostate may be useful in a variety of clinical settings. A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to see the changes in volume of the prostate with advancing age and done in the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka from August 2006 to June 2007. The study was performed on 70 post-mortem human prostates collected from the unclaimed dead bodies that were under examination in the Department of Forensic Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. The samples were divided into three age groups; group A (10-20 years), group B (21-40 years) and group C (41-70 years). Volume of the sample was measured by using the ellipsoid formula. The mean ± SD volume of prostate was 7.68 ± 3.64 cm3 in group A, 10.61 ± 3.99 cm3 in group B and 15.40 ± 6.31 cm3 in group C. Mean difference in volume between group A and group C, group B and group C were statistically significant (p<0.001). Statistically significant positive correlation was found between age and volume of prostate (r = + 0.579, p < 0.001). Key Words: Prostate; volume; Bangladeshi. DOI: 10.3329/imcj.v4i2.6501Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(2): 74-77

Learning curve for gynecological oncologists in performing upper abdominal surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariaclelia La Russa ◽  
Chrysoula G. Liakou ◽  
Nikolaos Akrivos ◽  
Hilary L. Turnbull ◽  
Timothy J. Duncan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Upper Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Upper Abdominal

Use of Incentive Spirometry in Adults following Cardiac, Thoracic, and Upper Abdominal Surgery to Prevent Post-Operative Pulmonary Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Respiration ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Kerrie A. Sullivan ◽  
Isabella F. Churchill ◽  
Danielle A. Hylton ◽  
Waël C. Hanna
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Upper Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Upper Abdominal ◽  
Incentive Spirometry ◽  
Rehabilitation Strategies

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Currently, consensus on the effectiveness of incentive spirometry (IS) following cardiac, thoracic, and upper abdominal surgery has been based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of lower methodological quality. To improve the quality of the research and to account for the effects of IS following thoracic surgery, in addition to cardiac and upper abdominal surgery, we performed a meta-analysis with thorough application of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation scoring system and extensive reference to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The objective of this study was to determine, with rigorous methodology, whether IS for adult patients (18 years of age or older) undergoing cardiac, thoracic, or upper abdominal surgery significantly reduces30-day post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs), 30-day mortality, and length of hospital stay (LHS) when compared to other rehabilitation strategies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The literature was searched using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science for RCTs between the databases’ inception and March 2019. A random-effect model was selected to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-one RCTs involving 3,776 adults undergoing cardiac, thoracic, or upper abdominal surgery were included. By comparing the use of IS to other chest rehabilitation strategies, we found that IS alone did not significantly reduce 30-day PPCs (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88–1.13) or 30-day mortality (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.42–1.25). Likewise, there was no difference in LHS (mean difference = −0.17,95% CI: −0.65 to 0.30) between IS and the other rehabilitation strategies. None of the included trials significantly impacted the sensitivity analysis and publication bias was not detected. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This meta-analysis showed that IS alone likely results in little to no reduction in the number of adult patients with PPCs, in mortality, or in the LHS, following cardiac, thoracic, and upper abdominal surgery.

scholarly journals Comparative study between two empirical antibiotic regime in the management of childhood malignancy with fever

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Helaly ◽  
Md Zakir Hossain Sarker ◽  
MA Mannan ◽  
Md Tafazzal Hossain ◽  
Shafi Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Successful Outcome ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Pediatric Hematology ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Group B ◽  
Oncology Unit

Objective : The present prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out to assess whether combined cefepime and amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy was more effective than combined ceftriaxone and gentamicin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic children with malignant diseases.Material & Methods : The study was conducted in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology unit of BSMMU over a period of 2 years. (From January 2006 to December 2007) Hospitalised pediatric cancer patients who developed febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy or radiotherapy were the study population. A total 64 cases were consecutively included in the study and were randomly assigned to either cefepime & amikacin group (Group- A) or ceftriaxone & gentamicin group (Group-B). The Group-A received cefepime 1500 mg/m2/dose infused over 15 minutes in two divided doses intravenously(IV) while amikacin was administered as thrice daily dose of 200 mg/m2/dose. Patients of Group-B received ceftriaxone 1500 mg/m2/dose in two divided doses and gentamicin 60 mg/m2/dose thrice daily IV. The therapy was continued until absolute neutrophil counts reached >1000 neutrophils/mm3. The treatment outcome was considered successful if fever resolves within 4 days and does not recur within 7 days of completion of therapy. Of the 64 patients, 13 cases were excluded from the final analysis.Results : Bacteria were isolated from culture in only 16.7% of cases Group-A and 9.5% of group-B. Patients E. coli was the most common isolate found in blood specimen (37%). Following intervention, 90% of cefepime & amikacin group and 85.6% of ceftriaxone & gentamicin group improved absolute neutrophil count to >1000/mm3 of blood. Persistence of fever after start of study drug and duration of antibiotic therapy were significantly less in the former group than those in later group (p = 0.049 and p = 0.004 respectively). Only 1 patient of group B had recurrence of infection within 7 days of treatment completion. The mean duration of hospital stay was less in the former group (7.97 ± 2.61 days) than that in the latter group (11.00 ± 3.42 days) (p = 0.06). Evaluation of final outcome shows that majority (86.6%) of cefepime & amikacin group had successful outcome, while majority of ceftriaxone & gentamicin group (81%) failed to resolve infection with continuation of fever for > 4 days.Conclusion : The study concluded that combined cefepime and amikacin is a better option for empirical treatment of fever and neutropenia in children with malignancies than combined ceftriaxone and gentamicin (p<0.001).Northern International Medical College Journal Vol.5(2) 2014: 329-331

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document