scholarly journals Cesarean Hysterectomy with Cystotomy in Parturient having Placenta Percreta, Gestational Thrombocytopenia, and Portal Hypertension – A Case Report

Author(s):  
Surekha Chavan ◽  
Pravin Kutemate ◽  
Stefen Jebaraj ◽  
Madhu Chavan
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (8) ◽  
pp. 326-327 ◽  

Introduction: The umbilical vein can become recanalised due to portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis but the condition is rarely clinically significant. Although bleeding from this enlarged vein is a known complication, the finding of thrombophlebitis has not been previously described. Case report: We report the case of a 62-year-old male with a history of liver cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease presenting to hospital with epigastric pain. A CT scan of the patient’s abdomen revealed a thrombus with surrounding inflammatory changes in a recanalised umbilical vein. The patient was managed conservatively and was discharged home the following day. Conclusion: Thrombophlebitis of a recanalised umbilical vein is a rare cause of abdominal pain in patients with liver cirrhosis.


Kanzo ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 517-519
Author(s):  
Yasuo KUROYANAGI ◽  
Takayoshi FUKUTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. e142-e145
Author(s):  
Theresa Kuhn ◽  
Kristina Martimucci ◽  
Abdulla Al-Khan ◽  
Robyn Bilinski ◽  
Stacy Zamudio ◽  
...  

Objective To evaluate if prophylactic hypogastric artery ligation (HAL) decreases surgical blood loss and blood products transfused. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study comparing patients with placenta percreta undergoing prophylactic HAL at the time of cesarean hysterectomy versus those who did not. Data were presented as means ± standard deviations, proportions, or medians with interquartile ranges. Demographic and clinical data were compared in the groups using Student's t-test for normally distributed data or the Mann–Whitney U test for nonnormally distributed data. Fisher's exact test was used for proportions and categorical variables. Data are reported as significant where p was <0.05. Results There were 26 patients included in the control group with no HAL and 11 patients included in the study group. Estimated blood loss for the study group was 1,000 mL versus 800 mL in the control. Units of PRCBs transfused were 4.5 units in the study group versus 2 units for the control group. None of these measures were found to be statistically significant. Conclusion Our data suggest there was no benefit in the use of prophylactic HAL in decreasing surgical blood loss or amount of blood products transfused in patients who had a cesarean hysterectomy performed for placenta percreta. Précis Prophylactic HAL does not decrease blood loss during surgery for placenta percreta.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document