scholarly journals Comparison of Lung Ultrasound to X-ray for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Complications after Cardiac Surgery in Children

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Smriti Mahaju Bajracharya ◽  
Pragati Shrestha ◽  
Apurb Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Lung Ultrasonography ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in comparison to chest X-ray to detect pulmonary complication after cardiac surgery in children.Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in tertiary center of Nepal. 141 consecutive paediatric patients aged less than 14 years scheduled for cardiac surgery were enrolled during the 6 months period. Ultrasound was done on the first post-operative day of cardiac surgery and compared to chest X-ray done on the same day to detect pleural effusion, consolidation, atelectasis and pneumothorax.Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy were calculated using standard formulas. lung ultrasonography had overall sensitivity of 60 %, specificity of 72.4%, positive predictive value of 31.9% and negative predictive value of 89.3% and diagnostic accuracy of 70.2% for diagnosing consolidation. Similarly, lung ultrasonography had overall sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 82.6%, positive predictive value of 46.1% and negative predictive value of 98% and diagnostic accuracy of 83.6 % for diagnosing pleural effusion. For atelectasis, ultrasonography had sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 76.9%, positive predictive value of 30.7% and negative predictive value of 88.2% and diagnostic accuracy of 72.3%. No pneumothoraxes were detected during our study period. Conclusions: Lung ultrasound is an alternative non-invasive technique which is able to diagnose pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery with acceptable diagnostic accuracy with no proven complications but with decreasing exposure to ionizing radiation and possibly cost.Keywords: Cardiac surgery; children; lung ultrasound; pulmonary complications

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and Plain X-Ray KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) Compared to Non-Contrast CT (Computed Tomography) in Patients of Ureteric Calculi

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (47) ◽  
pp. 2762-2766
Author(s):  
N. Imdad Ali ◽  
Noor Elahi Pasha ◽  
Ravishankar T.H.S
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Ureteric Calculus ◽  
Ureteric Calculi ◽  
Ureteric Colic ◽  
Contrast Ct

BACKGROUND Imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis and management of patients with urolithiasis. Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) is generally accepted as the gold standard, but there are concerns over higher radiation exposure from NCCT to the patient population. Our prospective study compared the diagnostic accuracy of plain X-ray KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) and USG (Ultrasonography) with NCCT in the evaluation of patients with ureteric colic. METHODS This study conducted from December 2018 to January 2020 in the Department of Urology, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, and attached Hospital. 230 patients with ureteric colic were evaluated for ureteric calculi with x-ray KUB, USG (Ultrasonography) abdomen and pelvis and NCCT (Non-Contrast Computed Tomography) KUB region. RESULTS Out of 230 patients, 168 (73 %) were males and 62 (26.9 %) were females. Ages of the study population ranged from 18 to 55 yrs. 198 of the 230 patients were confirmed to have ureteric calculus, with lower ureteric calculus 97 (48.9 %), upper ureteric 65 (32.8 %), middle ureteric 29 (14.6 %), and multiple 7 (3.5 %). X-ray and USG (Ultrasonography) group yielded a sensitivity of 86.3 %, a specificity of 87.5 %, positive predictive value 97 %, and negative predictive value 51 %. While On NCCT (Non-Contrast Computed Tomography), a total of 192 patients (96 %) demonstrated ureterolithiasis of the 198 patients confirmed to have ureteric calculi (Table 2). X-ray and USG group yielded a sensitivity of 96.9 %, specificity of 93.6 %, positive predictive value 98.9 %, and negative predictive value 83 %. CONCLUSIONS Combination of x-ray KUB and USG, and NCCT were found to be excellent imaging modalities for the detection of ureteric calculi. X-ray KUB and USG can be used as the first investigation of choice for patients with ureteric colic and for follow up of patients after treatment. KEYWORDS Ureteric Colic, Ureterolithiasis, Ultrasonography

Pleural Ultrasonography versus Chest Radiography for the Diagnosis of Pneumothorax

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Ibrahim Salah ◽  
Heba Bahaa el-Dien El- Serwi ◽  
Amin Mohammad Al Ansary ◽  
Ahmed Badawy Ibrahim Houssien
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Central Line Insertion ◽  
Line Insertion ◽  
Chest X Ray

Abstract Background Pneumothorax (PTX) is an emergency that requires urgent management to avoid catastrophic consequences. PTX is also an important cause of respiratory failure in the emergency department, and may occur frequently as a complication of central venous catheter insertion. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of bedside lung US with those for anteroposterior (AP) chest X ray (CXR) for the detection of PTX in critically ill patients. Methods This study was conducted on fifty adult patients from both sexes, mechanically ventilated at least 48 hours and planned for central line insertion. We excluded overt pneumothorax, patients requiring immediate invasive intervention, pregnancy and lactation. Lung ultrasound was done to all patients after 30 minutes from central line insertion followed by CXR to confirm the diagnosis of pneumothorax. Pneumothorax was confirmed using CT chest. Results Results showed that ultrasound is superior to chest X Ray in detection of PTX.Ultrasound showed sensitivity of 94.87%, specificity of 81.82%, positive predictive value of 94.87%, negative predictive value of 21.82% and accuracy of 92.0% in detection of PTX, while Chest X Ray showed sensitivity of 76.92%, specificity of 63.64%, positive predictive value of 88.24%, negative predictive value of 43.75% and accuracy of 74.0% in detection of PTX. Conclusions In conclusion, US represent a good approach for the evaluation of PTX, with advantages of timeliness, high accuracy and high reliability.

Influence of lesion location on the accuracy of CT derived FFR: head-to-head comparison with invasive FFR

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Moshage ◽  
S Smolka ◽  
S Achenbach ◽  
F Ammon ◽  
P Ferstl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Jude Medical ◽  
Lesion Location ◽  
Distal Vessel

Abstract Background The accuracy of CT-derived FFR (FFRCT) has been repeatedly reported. However, the influence of lesion location on accuracy is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT to detect lesion-specific ischemia and determined the influence of lesion location (proximal vs. distal vessel segments) compared to invasively measured FFR in patients with suspected CAD. Methods A total of 136 vessels in which “Dual-Source”-CT coronary angiography had been performed due to suspected CAD and who were further referred for invasive coronary angiography with invasive FFR measurement within three months of the index CT examination were retrospectively identified and screened for inclusion in this analysis. Patients with either left main coronary artery stenoses, bifurcation or ostial stenoses were excluded. Invasive FFR was measured using a pressure wire (CERTUS®, St. Jude Medical, Minnesota, USA or Verrata®, Volcano, San Diego, USA). FFRCT was calculated using an on-site prototype (cFFR Version 3.0, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). All vessels were analyzed by an experienced observer blinded to the results of invasive FFR. Stenoses with invasively measured FFR ≤0.80 were classified as hemodynamically significant. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT in proximal vs. non-proximal vessel segments. Proximal lesions included stenoses located in segment one, six, eleven and twelve. All other stenoses were categorized as distal lesions. Results Out of 136 coronary stenoses, 47 (35%) were located in proximal segments and 89 (65%) lesions were located in distal segments. Compared to invasive FFR, the sensitivity of FFRCT to correctly identify/exclude hemodynamically significant stenoses in proximal vessel segments was 93% (95% CI: 68–99.8%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 89–100%), compared to a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 46.5–90%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 77–94%) for FFRCT in distal lesions. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 82.8–99.5%) compared to a positive predictive value of 59% (95% CI: 42–93.9%) and a negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI: 85.4–96.3%) for proximal vs. distal vessel segment, respectively. This corresponds to an accuracy of 98% vs. 84%, respectively (p=0.02). ROC-Curve analysis showed a slightly higher – albeit non-significant – area under the curve for FFRCT to detect hemodynamic relevance in proximal lesions compared to distal lesions (AUC 0.95, p<0.001 vs. AUC: 0.86, p<0.001, respectively, p=0.2). Conclusion FFRCT obtained using an on-site prototype shows overall a high diagnostic accuracy for detecting lesions causing ischemia as compared to invasive FFR with a trend towards better diagnostic performance in proximal vessel segments. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic neuropathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Sujan Shrestha ◽  
Mamen Prasad Gorhaly ◽  
Manil Ratna Bajracharya
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Perception Threshold ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Vibration Perception ◽  
Monofilament Test

Background Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a significant independent risk factor for diabetic foot, and an effective screening instrument is required to diagnose DPN early to prevent future ulceration and amputation. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir hospital, Mahabouddha, Kathmandu from February 2016 to January 2017. A total of 96 diabetic patients attending inpatient and outpatient Department were selected. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy was assessed by measurement of loss of protective sensation (LOPS) by monofilament test and compared with vibration perception threshold by standard biothesiometer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were calculated. Results The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 26%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of monofilament test were found to be 92.0%, 95.8%, 88.5% and 97.1% respectively. There was strong association between LOPS by monofilament and vibration perception threshold by biothesiometer. Conclusion This study showed a strong diagnostic accuracy of monofilament test to detect DPN when compared with biothesiometer. As monofilament test is a cheap, easily available, and portable, it can be used in the periphery where biothesiometer is not available.  

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF GRAY SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY VERSUS COLOR DOPPLER IN SUSPECTED CASES OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad Usman Shahid ◽  
Ishfaq Ahmad Shad ◽  
Shahzad Karim Bhatti ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Gray Scale ◽  
Versus Color ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A common surgical emergency is acute appendicitis. Various diagnostic tools are available to diagnosis acute appendicitis. Radiological investigations play an important role in making accurate and early diagnosis and thus preventing morbidity associated with the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of gray scale ultrasonography versus color Doppler in suspected cases of acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried in the department of Radiology of Mayo Hospital, Lahore. A total of 75 patients were enrolled of age 18-40 years, both genders who were suspected cases of acute appendicitis. All patients underwent baseline investigations along with gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler. All patients were subjected to surgery to confirm the diagnosis and findings were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 23.25 ±10.55 and mean transverse diameter of appendix was 8.37 ±3.39. There were 62.7% males and 37.3%females. Findings of gray scale ultrasonography and color Doppler were then correlated with surgical findings to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of these modalities. The results revealed that gray scale ultrasonography sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy was 92.7%, 94.32%, 95%, 91.4% and 93.3% respectively, whereas color Doppler had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 97.7%, 93.9%, 95.3%, 97% and 96% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of both modalities together was 98.6%. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler has better diagnostic accuracy than gray scale ultrasonography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and the combination of both modalities yields diagnostic accuracy that is similar to gold standard.

Ultrasound Detection of Pneumothorax Compared with Chest X-Ray and Computed Tomography Scan

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khanjan Nagarsheth ◽  
Stanley Kurek
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Thoracic Ultrasound ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Pneumothorax after trauma can be a life threatening injury and its care requires expeditious and accurate diagnosis and possible intervention. We performed a prospective, single blinded study with convenience sampling at a Level I trauma center comparing thoracic ultrasound with chest X-ray and CT scan in the detection of traumatic pneumothorax. Trauma patients that received a thoracic ultrasound, chest X-ray, and chest CT scan were included in the study. The chest X-rays were read by a radiologist who was blinded to the thoracic ultrasound results. Then both were compared with CT scan results. One hundred and twenty-five patients had a thoracic ultrasound performed in the 24-month period. Forty-six patients were excluded from the study due to lack of either a chest X-ray or chest CT scan. Of the remaining 79 patients there were 22 positive pneumothorax found by CT and of those 18 (82%) were found on ultrasound and 7 (32%) were found on chest X-ray. The sensitivity of thoracic ultrasound was found to be 81.8 per cent and the specificity was found to be 100 per cent. The sensitivity of chest X-ray was found to be 31.8 per cent and again the specificity was found to be 100 per cent. The negative predictive value of thoracic ultrasound for pneumothorax was 0.934 and the negative predictive value for chest X-ray for pneumothorax was found to be 0.792. We advocate the use of chest ultrasound for detection of pneumothorax in trauma patients.

How well do ACPA discriminate and predict RA in the general population: a study based on 12 590 population-representative Swedish twins

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aase Haj Hensvold ◽  
Thomas Frisell ◽  
Patrik K E Magnusson ◽  
Rikard Holmdahl ◽  
Johan Askling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Protein Levels

ObjectiveAnti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) are highly specific for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA in the general population has not been thoroughly assessed. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ACPA for RA in the general population and to further characterise the citrullinated peptide recognition pattern.MethodsSerum samples from a large population-representative twin cohort consisting of 12 590 individuals were analysed for the presence of ACPA using anti-CCP2 ELISA. All ACPA-positive samples were further tested on ELISAs for four peptide-specific ACPA. RA cases were identified by linkage to the Swedish National Patient Register at inclusion and after a median follow-up of 37 months (IQR 31–49).Results350 out of 12 590 individuals had a positive anti-CCP2 test, measuring ACPA. Of these, 103 had an RA diagnosis at the time of blood donation and inclusion. During a median follow-up of 3 years, an additional 21 of the remaining 247 ACPA-positive individuals developed RA. Overall, a positive anti-CCP2 test had a positive predictive value of 29% for prevalent RA at inclusion (negative predictive value of 99.6%). High titres (>3× cut-off) of anti-CCP2 increased the positive predictive value to 48% (negative predictive value of 99.5%). ACPA-positive individuals without RA had lower anti-CCP2 titres and fewer peptide-specific ACPA than ACPA-positive patients with RA and higher C reactive protein levels than ACPA-negative individuals without RA.ConclusionPresence of ACPA and especially high titres of anti-CCP2 have a high diagnostic accuracy for an RA diagnosis in a population setting.

scholarly journals DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASOUND IN THE DETECTION OF PNEUMOTHORAX IN CHEST TRAUMA PATIENTS WITH CT AS THE GOLD STANDARD

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danquale Vance Kynshikhar ◽  
Chaman Lal Kaushal ◽  
Ashwani Tomar ◽  
Neeti Aggarwal
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Chest Trauma ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Chest Ultrasound

Background: To study the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax in chest trauma patients with CT as the Gold Standard Methods: The present study was conducted from 31th July 2018 to 30th July 2019. A total of 36 patients were enrolled in the study. Results: By chest ultrasound, pneumothorax was detected in 15 of 24 patients. The sensitivity of chest ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumothorax was 62.5%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 54.14% and accuracy was 75%. Conclusion: Chest ultrasound can play an important role in the emergency department aiding a physician for bedside rapid and accurate diagnosis of pneumothorax without interruption in the resuscitation process and without transferring the patient to the radiology section. Keywords: Ultrasound, CT, Pneumothorax

scholarly journals Prevalence and identification of anxiety disorders in pregnancy: the diagnostic accuracy of the two-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2)

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e023766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selina Nath ◽  
Elizabeth G Ryan ◽  
Kylee Trevillion ◽  
Debra Bick ◽  
Jill Demilew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Stratified Sampling ◽  
Generalised Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Population Prevalence

ObjectiveTo estimate the population prevalence of anxiety disorders during pregnancy and investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the two-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-2) for a) GAD and b) any anxiety disorder.DesignCross-sectional survey using a stratified sampling design. Sampling weights were used in the analysis to adjust for the bias introduced by the stratified sampling.SettingInner-city maternity service, South London.Participants545 pregnant women were interviewed after their first antenatal appointment; 528 provided answers on the GAD-2 questions.Main outcome measuresDiagnosis generated by the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (SCID).ResultsPopulation prevalence of anxiety disorders was 17% (95% CI 12% to 21%): 5% (95% CI 3% to 6%) for GAD, 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%) for social phobia, 8% (95% CI 5% to 11%) for specific phobia and 2% (95% CI 1% to 4%) for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prevalence was unclear due to higher levels of reluctance to respond to PTSD interview questions but sensitivity analyses suggest population prevalence maybe up to 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%). Weighted sensitivity of GAD-2 for GAD (cut-off ≥3) was 69%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 26%, negative predictive value 98% and likelihood ratio 7.35. For any anxiety disorder the weighted sensitivity was 26%, specificity 91%, positive predictive value 36%, negative predictive value 87% and likelihood ratio 2.92.ConclusionsAnxiety disorders are common but GAD-2 generates many false positives and may therefore be unhelpful in maternity services.

scholarly journals Lung ultrasound assessment for pneumothorax following transbronchial lung cryobiopsy

2021 ◽  
pp. 00045-2021
Author(s):  
Christian B. Laursen ◽  
Pia Iben Pietersen ◽  
Niels Jacobsen ◽  
Casper Falster ◽  
Amanda Dandanell Juul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Patient Discharge ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment ◽  
Prolonged Observation ◽  
Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy ◽  
Design And Methods

BackgroundIatrogenic pneumothorax is a common and clinically important transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) complication. A study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of immediate postprocedure lung ultrasound for diagnosing iatrogenic pneumothorax in patients suspected of interstitial lung disease (ILD) undergoing TBCB.Study design and methodsIn patients undergoing TBCB due to suspected ILD, LUS of the anterior surface of the chest was performed immediately after the TBCB procedure prior to extubation. Presence of lung point was used as a definite sign of pneumothorax. Chest X-ray (CXR) performed routinely 2 h after TBCB was used as reference standard.ResultsA total of 141 consecutive patients were included. Postprocedure LUS identified definite pneumothorax in 5 patients (3.6%)(95%CI: 1.5–8.3%). 2-hour CXR identified 19 patients (13.5%)(95%CI: 8.7–20.2%) with pneumothorax following TBCB. The diagnostic accuracy of LUS for diagnosing pneumothorax was: sensitivity 21.1% (95% CI: 6.1–45.6%), specificity 99.2% (95% CI: 95.5–100.0%), positive predictive value 80.0% (95%CI: 28.4–99.5%), and negative predictive value 89.0% (95%CI: 82.5–93.7%). Postprocedure LUS had a clinical impact in 5 patients (3.6%) (95%CI: 1.5–8.3), in which 4 had pleural drain inserted prior to extubation and 1 patient had prolonged observation prior to extubation.InterpretationLUS performed immediately following TBCB have a clinical impact by identifying patients with pneumothorax in need of immediate treatment prior to extubation, and to monitor pneumothorax size during in the operating room. Supplementary imaging prior to patient discharge is however still needed since the majority of pneumothoraxes develop later in the postprocedure period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document