scholarly journals Educational interventions on breast cancer in men and women: a necessity in primary healthcare

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayra de Carmen Ortega Jiménez ◽  
Deysi Emilia García Rodríguez ◽  
Brenda Hidalgo Mares ◽  
Marcela Ortega Jiménez
2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1083-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Nilsson ◽  
Marit Holmqvist ◽  
Leif Bergkvist ◽  
Ingrid Hedenfalk ◽  
Mats Lambe ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (14) ◽  
pp. 1396-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suleiman Alfred Massarweh ◽  
George W. Sledge ◽  
Dave P. Miller ◽  
Debbie McCullough ◽  
Valentina I. Petkov ◽  
...  

Purpose Limited data exist on the molecular biology, treatment, and outcomes of breast cancer in men, and much of our understanding in this area remains largely an extrapolation from data in women with breast cancer. Materials and Methods We studied men and women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score (RS) results. Differences in clinical characteristics and gene expression were determined, and distribution of RS results was correlated with 5-year breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival. Results There were 3,806 men and 571,115 women. Men were older than women (mean age, 64.2 v 59.1 years; P < .001). RS < 18 predominated in both genders, but RS ≥ 31 was more frequent in men (12.4% v 7.4%; P < .001), as were very low scores (RS < 11; 33.8% v 22.1%; P < .001). Mean gene expression was higher in men for the estrogen receptor (ER), proliferation, and invasion groups. ER was lowest and progesterone receptor was highest in women younger than 50 years of age, with a progressive increase in ER with age. Men younger than 50 years of age had slightly lower ER and progesterone receptor compared with older men. Survival data were available from SEER for 322 men and 55,842 women. Five-year BCSS was 99.0% (95% CI, 99.3% to 99.9%) and 95.9% (95% CI, 87.6% to 98.7%) for men with RS < 18 and RS 18-30, respectively, and for women, it was 99.5% (95% CI, 99.4% to 99.6%) and 98.6% (95% CI, 98.4% to 98.8%), respectively. RS ≥ 31 was associated with an 81.0% 5-year BCSS in men (95% CI, 53.3% to 93.2%) and 94.9% 5-year BCSS (95% CI, 93.9% to 95.7%) in women. Five-year BCSS and overall survival were lower in men than in women. Conclusion This study reveals some distinctive biologic features of breast cancer in men and an important prognostic role for RS testing in both men and women.


1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge Stalsberg ◽  
David B. Thomas ◽  
Karin A. Rosenblatt ◽  
L. Margarita Jimenez ◽  
Anne McTiernan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Lampi ◽  
Fredrik Carlsson ◽  
Pär-Daniel Sundvall ◽  
Marcela Jaime Torres ◽  
Peter Ulleryd ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rational antibiotic prescribing is crucial to combat antibiotic resistance. Optimal strategies to improve antibiotic use are not known. Strama, the Swedish strategic program against antibiotic resistance, has been successful in reducing antibiotic prescription rates. This study investigates whether two specific interventions directed toward healthcare centers, an informational visit and a self-evaluation meeting, played a role in observed reduction in rates of antibiotic prescriptions in primary healthcare. Methods The study was a retrospective, observational, empirical analysis exploiting the variation in the timing of the interventions and considering past prescriptions through use of estimations from dynamic panel data models. Primary healthcare data from 2011 to 2014 were examined. Data were from public and private primary healthcare centers in western Sweden. The key variables were prescription of antibiotics and indicator variables for the two interventions. Results The first intervention, an educational information intervention, decreased the number of prescriptions among public healthcare centers, but this effect was only temporary. We found no proof that the second intervention, a self-evaluation meeting at the healthcare center, had an impact on the reduction of prescriptions. Conclusions Single educational interventions aimed at influencing rates of antibiotic prescriptions have limited impact. A multifaceted approach is needed in efforts to reduce the use of antibiotics in primary health care.


Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (15) ◽  
pp. 3558-3568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda C. Harlan ◽  
Jo Anne Zujewski ◽  
Marc T. Goodman ◽  
Jennifer L. Stevens

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 98212-98222
Author(s):  
Edwilson Gonçalves Riso Filho ◽  
Gabriel Aurélio Camargo E Silva ◽  
Sofia de Barros Jesus ◽  
Erika Carvalho Aquino ◽  
Luciana Vieira Queiroz Labre

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262468
Author(s):  
Susanna Hilda Hutajulu ◽  
Yayi Suryo Prabandari ◽  
Bagas Suryo Bintoro ◽  
Juan Adrian Wiranata ◽  
Mentari Widiastuti ◽  
...  

Purpose To investigate factors associated with delays in presentation and diagnosis of women with confirmed breast cancer (BC). Methods A cross-sectional study nested in an ongoing prospective cohort study of breast cancer patients at Dr Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, was employed. Participants (n = 150) from the main study were recruited, with secondary information on demographic, clinical, and tumor variables collected from the study database. A questionnaire was used to gather data on other socioeconomic variables, herbal consumption, number of healthcare visits, knowledge-attitude-practice of BC, and open-ended questions relating to initial presentation. Presentation delay (time between initial symptom and first consultation) was defined as ≥3 months. Diagnosis delay was defined as ≥1 month between presentation and diagnosis confirmation. Impact on disease stage and determinants of both delays were examined. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the length and distribution of delays by disease stage. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the association between delays, cancer stage and factors. Results Sixty-five (43.3%) patients had a ≥3-month presentation delay and 97 (64.7%) had a diagnosis confirmation by ≥1 month. Both presentation and diagnosis delays increased the risk of being diagnosed with cancer stage III-IV (odds ratio/OR 2.21, 95% CI 0.97–5.01, p = 0.059 and OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.28–7.19, p = 0.012). Visit to providers ≤3 times was significantly attributed to a reduced diagnosis delay (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.37, p <0.001), while having a family history of cancer was significantly associated with increased diagnosis delay (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.03–5.04, p = 0.042). The most frequent reasons for delaying presentation were lack of awareness of the cause of symptoms (41.5%), low perceived severity (27.7%) and fear of surgery intervention (26.2%). Conclusions Almost half of BC patients in our setting had a delay in presentation and 64.7% experienced a delay in diagnosis. These delays increased the likelihood of presentation with a more advanced stage of disease. Future research is required in Indonesia to explore the feasibility of evidence-based approaches to reducing delays at both levels, including educational interventions to increase awareness of BC symptoms and reducing existing complex and convoluted referral pathways for patients suspected of having cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document