scholarly journals KARAKTERISTIK, PENGELOLAAN DAN PEMERIKSAAN BADAN HUKUM YAYASAN DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Y. Sogar Simamora
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Authorized Capital ◽  
The Way ◽  
Transparency And Accountability

<p>Yayasan adalah badan hukum yang didirikan untuk mencapai tujuan tertentu di bidang sosial, keagamaan, dan kemanusiaan. Pendirian yayasan diawali dengan pemisahan harta kekayaan pendiri untuk dimasukkan sebagai modal awal yayasan. Pemisahan harta kekayaan pendiri ke dalam yayasan tersebut Ɵ dak dapat diberi makna investasi karena secara fi loso fi pendirian yayasan bersifat nirlaba. Dalam prak Ɵ knya terjadi penyimpangan dalam pengelolaan, kon fl ik antar pengurus serta penyalahgunaan lembaga yayasan. Tulisan ini akan mengkaji bagaimana prinsip dan aturan hukum dalam pengelolaan yayasan sebagai hukum privat dan bagaimana pengelolaan oleh organ yayasan berdasarkan prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis norma Ɵ f dapat disimpulkan bahwa berdasarkan cara pendiriannya yayasan tergolong badan hukum privat. Prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam mewujudkan good governance dalam pengelolaan yayasan diperlukan untuk memas Ɵ kan bahwa organ yayasan menjalankan tugasnya semata-mata untuk mencapai tujuan yayasan, selain itu perlu adanya pemeriksaan terhadap yayasan untuk memas Ɵ kan organ yayasan Ɵ dak melakukan pelanggaran hukum dan lalai dalam menjalankan tugasnya</p><p>The founda Ɵ on is a legal en Ɵ ty established to achieve speci fi c goals in the areas of social, religious, and humanitarian. The establishment of the founda Ɵ on begins with the separa Ɵ on of founder(s) assets to be incorporated as the authorized capital founda Ɵ on. Separa Ɵ on founder(s) assets into founda Ɵ ons can not be given meaning as investment, because the founding founda Ɵ ons philosophy is non-pro fi t. In prac Ɵ ce there are devia Ɵ ons in the management of the con fl ict between the board and the abuse of the ins Ɵ tu Ɵ on founda Ɵ on. This paper will examine how the principles and the rule of law in the management of a founda Ɵ on and how management by organs of the founda Ɵ on based on principles of transparency and accountability. By using norma Ɵ ve methods can be concluded that based on the way its establishment, the founda Ɵ on belonging to private legal en Ɵ Ɵ es. Principles of transparency and accountability in achieving good governance in the management founda Ɵ on required to ensure that the founda Ɵ on organ du Ɵ es solely to achieve the purpose of the founda Ɵ on, in addi Ɵ on to the need for an examina Ɵ on of the founda Ɵ on to ensure that the fund did not perform organ o ff ense and negligent in performing their du Ɵ es.</p>

DEKADENSI PEMILIHAN HAKIM AGUNG OLEH DPR RI

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-104
Author(s):  
Rustam Magun Pikahulan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Status ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The Plato's conception of the rule of law states that good governance is based on good law. The organization also spreads to the world of Supreme Court justices, the election caused a decadence to the institutional status of the House of Representatives as a people's representative in the government whose implementation was not in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court. Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No.27/PUU-XI/2013 explains that the House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only approve or disapprove candidates for Supreme Court Justices that have been submitted by the Judicial Commission. In addition, the proportion of proposed Supreme Court Justices from the judicial commission to the House of Representatives (DPR) has changed, whereas previously the Judicial Commission had to propose 3 (three) of each vacancy for the Justices, now it is only one of each vacant for Supreme Court Judges. by the Supreme Court. The House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only "approve" or "disagree" the Supreme Judge candidates nominated by the Judicial Commission.

Good Governance

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk Addink
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
National Level ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Modern State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Further Development

The pivotal aim of this book is to explain the creation, development, and impact of good governance from a conceptual, principal perspective and in the context of national administrative law. Three lines of reasoning have been worked out: developing the concept of good governance; specification of this concept by developing principles of good governance; and implementation of these principles of good governance on the national level. In this phase of further development of good governance, it is important to have a clear concept of good governance, presented in this book as the third cornerstone of a modern state, alongside the concepts of the rule of law and democracy. That is a rather new national administrative law perspective which is influenced by regional and international legal developments; thus, we can speak about good governance as a multilevel concept. But the question is: how is this concept of good governance further developed? Six principles of good governance (which in a narrower sense also qualify as principles of good administration) have been further specified in a systematic way, from a legal perspective. These are the principles of properness, transparency, participation, effectiveness, accountability, and human rights. Furthermore, the link has been made with integrity standards. The important developments of each of these principles are described on the national level in Europe, but also in countries outside Europe (such as Australia, Canada, and South Africa). This book gives a systematic comparison of the implementation of the principles of good governance between countries.

The Clinton Administration and Africa: A View from Nairobi, Kenya

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-74
Author(s):  
Korwa G. Adar
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Cold War ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Driving Force ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Clinton Administration ◽  
African Continent ◽  
Post Cold War ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Human Rights Movement

There is nothing more fundamental to Africans who are concerned with the future of the African continent than the issues of democracy, human rights, good governance, and the rule of law. These basic human liberties, among other concerns, constitute the central driving force behind what is often referred to as Africa’s “second liberation.” The primary purpose of this article is to assess the Clinton administration’s role in this second liberation, particularly in terms of its involvement in issues of democracy and human rights. This assessment is offered from the perspective of an individual who has been directly involved in the prodemocracy and human rights movement in Kenya. This article focuses on whether the Clinton administration’s policies are still heavily influenced by classic U.S. conceptions of realpolitik, or if enlightened leadership more in line with a neo-Wilsonian idealpolitik—as official rhetoric suggests—has permitted a fundamental departure in favor of a more coherent and tangible democracy and human rights foreign policy stance in the post-Cold War era.

scholarly journals From the Court to the Classroom: Judges’ Work in International Judicial Education

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toby S. Goldbach
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
The United States ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Judicial Education ◽  
And Training ◽  
Scholarly Attention ◽  
The Way

49 Cornell International Law Journal 618 (2016).This Article explores international judicial education and training, which are commonly associated with rule of law initiatives and development projects. Judicial education programs address everything from leadership competencies and substantive review of human rights legislation to client service and communication, skills training on docket management software, and alternative dispute resolution. Over the last twenty years, judicial education in support of the rule of law has become big business both in the United States and internationally. The World Bank alone spends approximately U.S. $24 million per year for funded projects primarily attending to improving court performance. And yet, the specifics of judicial education remains unknown in terms of its place in the industry of rule of law initiatives, the number of judges who act as educators, and the mechanisms that secure their participation. This Article focuses on the judges’ experiences; in particular, the judges of the Supreme Court of Israel who were instrumental in establishing the International Organization of Judicial Training.Lawyers, development practitioners, justice experts, and government officials participate in training judges. Less well known is the extent to which judges themselves interact internationally as learners, educators, and directors of training institutes. While much scholarly attention has been paid to finding a global juristocracy in constitutional law, scholars have overlooked the role that judges play in the transnational movement of ideas about court structure, legal procedure, case management, and court administration. Similarly, scholarship examines the way legal norms circulate, the source of institutional change, and the way “transnational legal processes” increase the role of courts within national legal systems. There is little scholarly attention, however, to judges as actors in these transnational processes. This Article situates judicial education and training within the context of judicial functions as an example of judicial involvement in non-caserelated law reform. This Article challenges the instrumental connection between judicial education and the rule of law, arguing that international judicial education became a solution at the same time that the problem— a rule of law deficit— was being identified. This Article also explores whether international judicial education can stand as an instantiation of a global judicial dialogue. Judges have immersed themselves in foreign relations. They are, however, less strategic in pushing their ideological agenda than literature about judges and politics would suggest. This Article argues that judges experience politics as a series of partial connections, which resemble most legal actors’ engagement with the personal and the political.

scholarly journals Engaging Foreign Law: Not So Liberally

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (75) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Pierre Legrand
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Local Knowledge ◽  
Comparative Law ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Thought ◽  
Foreign Law ◽  
Georgetown University ◽  
The Way

Taking its cue from a remarkable institutional initiative owing to the Georgetown University Law Center, this essay contests some of the key assumptions that have informed liberalism’s cosmopolitan turn. In particular, the argument addresses the way in which liberal legal thought has handled a doctrine widely known as “the rule of law”. The text challenges the universalizing drive having informed the dissemination of “the rule of law” and the attendant marginalization of culture in the form of the decredibilization of local knowledge. The paper suggests that “comparative law” can offer a valuable opportunity for the liberal self to revisit its uniformizing ideological commitments  — although not “comparative law” of the mainstream brand.

scholarly journals The Region Governance Review of Barru Regency to Actualize Good and Clean Governments

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-69
Author(s):  
Aksah Kasim ◽  
Andi Heridah
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Regional Governance ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Strategic Vision ◽  
The Government

The factors of the region governance review of Barru regency to actualize good governance and clean government are the region the government have not applied the equity properly and optimally, uphold the rule of law, worked effectively, effectiveness, and accountability, and formulated and implemented the strategic vision. This study is expected to explain, find, and describe the regional governance review in Barru Regency to actualize for good governance and clean government in the implementation of regional autonomy.

The Rule of Law and Good Governance

2019 ◽  
pp. 75-90
Author(s):  
Henk Addink
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Common Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Government ◽  
Continental Tradition

The concept of the rule of law has different—common law and continental—historical roots and traditional perspectives. The common law tradition is more focused on limiting the powers of the state, whereas the continental tradition focuses on not just to limit but also to empower the government. But both systems have a focus on the rule of law. The rule of law in the classical liberal tradition is based on four elements: legality, division and balance of powers, independent judicial control, and protection of fundamental rights. The differences between rule of law and rechtsstaat are: different concepts of the state, mixed legal systems and different approaches of a constitution, and different perspectives on human rights. There are two levels of development: a model in which law is a way of structuring and restricting the power of the state, the second level is more subjective and has important individual positions. The concept of good governance related to these developments makes clear the need to broaden the concept of the rule of law.

An Overview of Good Governance

2019 ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Henk Addink
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Institutional Framework ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Government

Good governance is needed because of legislative gaps, prevention of corruption, maladministration, and mismanagement, and fragmentation of administrative law norms. The concept of good governance has been developed in addition to aspects which can already be found in the rule of law and democracy concepts but are also related to the institutional framework of the government. The term ‘government’ is used for all the powers in the state; the administration is only one of these powers. These powers must fulfil certain norms, principles which sometimes are unwritten and developed by the judiciary or the ombudsman but more and more codified in the frame of the general (administrative) legislation. All the institutions of the government are involved in the development of these principles of good governance. There is not only a separation between the powers of the state, but more and more there are interactions between these powers in the development of principles of good governance and, hence, there is a balance between these principles. Therefore, there are different producers and sources of good governance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document