Comparison Analysis between Korean Central Institute for the Deaf Sentence and Korean Hearing in Noise Test Sentence

Author(s):  
Jeong Hun Jang ◽  
Hyun Kyung Chang ◽  
Hyun Young Park ◽  
Jae Chul Yoo ◽  
Yong-Hwi An ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 358-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Vaillancourt ◽  
Chantal Laroche ◽  
Chantal Mayer ◽  
Cynthia Basque ◽  
Madeleine Nali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Danieli ◽  
Maria Cecília Bevilacqua
Keyword(s):  

OBJETIVO: Estudar comparativamente a habilidade de reconhecimento de fala no silêncio e na presença de ruído competitivo em crianças usuárias de implante coclear utilizando dois diferentes processadores de fala. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadas 26 crianças usuárias do implante coclear Nucleus 24M/24K, da Cochlear Corporation®, divididas em dois grupos de acordo com o processador de fala utilizado. O Grupo 1 foi composto por 16 crianças que faziam uso do processador de fala Sprint e o Grupo 2 foi composto por 10 crianças que faziam uso do processador de fala Freedom. Foi aplicado o Hearing in Noise Test - versão em Português/Brasil, em campo livre, na condição de silêncio e na presença de ruído competitivo. RESULTADOS: O desempenho do Grupo 2 (Freedom) foi superior ao desempenho do Grupo 1 (Sprint) em todas as condições de avaliação, sendo evidenciada diferença entre eles na condição de silêncio. CONCLUSÃO: O processador de fala apresentou influência significativa na percepção de fala de crianças usuárias dos implantes cocleares Nucleus 24K e 24M. As características de pré-processamento do som presentes no processador de fala Freedom podem ter contribuído para o melhor desempenho do Grupo 2 nos testes de percepção de fala realizados. Novos estudos são necessários para complementação destes achados.


Author(s):  
Suhani Sharma ◽  
Rajesh Tripathy ◽  
Udit Saxena

Speech in noise tests that measure the perception of speech in presence of noise are now an important part of audiologic tests battery and hearing research as well. There are various tests available to estimate the perception of speech in presence of noise, for example, connected sentence test, hearing in noise test, words in noise, quick speech-in-noise test, bamford-kowal-bench speech-in-noise test, and listening in spatialized noise-sentences. All these tests are different in terms of target age, measure, procedure, speech material, noise, normative, etc. Because of the variety of tests available to estimate speech-in-noise abilities, audiologists often select tests based on their availability, ease to administer the test, time required in running the test, age of the patient, hearing status, type of hearing disorder and type of amplification device if using. A critical appraisal of these speech-in-noise tests is required for the evidence based selection and to be used in audiology clinics. In this article speech-in-noise tests were critically appraised for their conceptual model, measurement model, normatives, reliability, validity, responsiveness, item/instrument bias, respondent burden and administrative burden. Selection of a standard speech-in-noise test based on this critical appraisal will also allow an easy comparison of speech-in-noise ability of any hearing impaired individual or group across audiology clinics and research centers. This article also describes the survey which was done to grade the speech in noise tests on the various appraisal characteristics.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Hällgren ◽  
Birgitta Larsby ◽  
Stig Arlinger

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronique Vaillancourt ◽  
Chantal Laroche ◽  
Chantal Mayer ◽  
Cynthia Basque ◽  
Madeleine Nali ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (08) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick N. Plyler ◽  
Ashley Blair Hill ◽  
Timothy D. Trine

The present study investigated the effects of expansion time constants on the objective performance of 20 hearing instrument users fitted binaurally with digital in-the-ear products. Objective performance was evaluated in quiet using the Connected Speech Test and in noise using the Hearing in Noise Test. Results indicated that objective performance in quiet and in noise decreased as the expansion time constant increased. Furthermore, expansion time constants affected the objective performance of listeners with varying degrees of hearing loss in a similar manner.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Allan Sharpe ◽  
Elizabeth L. Camposeo ◽  
Wasef K. Muzaffar ◽  
Meredith A. Holcomb ◽  
Judy R. Dubno ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to examine how age and implanted ear contribute to functional outcomes with cochlear implantation (CI). A retrospective review was performed on 96 adults who underwent unilateral CI. Older adults with right-ear implants had higher Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) scores at 1 year by 10.3% (p = 0.06). When adjusted to rationalized arcsine units (rau), right-ear HINT scores in older adults were higher by 12.1 rau (p = 0.04). Older adults had an 8.9% advantage on the right side compared to the left in post- versus preimplant scores for consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant words (p = 0.05). No significant differences were observed for younger adults. In conclusion, although adults of all ages experience improvements in speech perception following CI, there might be a subtle but consistent right-ear advantage in older adults.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marte Myhrum ◽  
Ole Edvard Tvete ◽  
Mariann Gjervik Heldahl ◽  
Inger Moen ◽  
Sigfrid D. Soli
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 239-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Stuart ◽  
Jianliang Zhang ◽  
Shannon Swink

Background: Bilingual (BL) listeners' difficulties in adverse noise conditions are exacerbated when perceiving their second language (L2) relative to their first language (L1). Perception of L2 is also significantly poorer by BL listeners compared to native monolingual (ML) listeners. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of stationary and nonstationary energetic noise maskers on L1 and L2 speech perception in native and nonnative listeners. Research Design: A mixed multivariate quasi-experimental design was employed. Study Sample: Two groups of 12 ML English-speaking and BL Mandarin-English-speaking normal-hearing young adult female volunteers participated. Data Collection and Analysis: An adaptive technique was employed to determine reception thresholds for sentences (RTSs) in quiet and in backgrounds of competing continuous and interrupted noise. The noises differed only in their temporal continuity. The sentence stimuli employed consisted of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT). ML participants received the HINT stimuli while the BL participants received both HINT and MHINT stimuli. Between-group differences in RTSs were examined for the same stimuli (i.e., HINT) and for L1 stimuli (i.e., HINT vs. MHINT). Within-group differences in RTSs were examined with the BL participants' perception of L1 and L2 stimuli (i.e., MHINT vs. HINT). The amount of “release from masking” (i.e., the difference of RTS signal-to-noise ratios [SNRs] in interrupted and continuous noise) was also examined between and within groups. Results: In quiet there was no significant difference in mean RTSs between the BL and ML participants with their respective L1 stimuli; MLs had significantly lower mean RTSs in English compared to the BLs; and mean RTSs for the BLs were significantly lower for L1 versus L2 stimulus. In noise, a significantly higher RTS SNR was found for the MLs in continuous noise but not interrupted noise for L1 stimuli compared to the BLs; BLs had a significantly higher mean RTSs in English compared to the MLs; and BLs had significantly higher mean RTSs for L2 versus L1 stimuli. The release from masking was significantly greater for MLs compared to BLs with their respective L1 stimuli and with the same English stimuli. There was no significant difference for the BLs' release from masking with L1 versus L2 stimulus. Conclusion: BL listeners display significantly poorer performance when perceiving nonnative L2 sentences in quiet and in continuous and interrupted noise relative ML listeners. When listening to their respective native L1 sentences, only a difference in continuous noise was found. This difference was attributed to differential masking effect on the English stimuli. Similar performance in the interrupted noise between the ML and BL participants with L1 stimuli and the equivalent release from masking with the BL participants for both L1 and L2 stimuli suggest comparable basic auditory temporal resolving capacities between these ethnic groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document