scholarly journals Gender-Based Drink Stereotypes and Consumption Intentions: A Study With the U.S. Millennials

Author(s):  
Alexander H. Updegrove ◽  
Melissa A. Salinas ◽  
Eryn Nicole O’Neal ◽  
Heather A. Alaniz
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 155708512098760
Author(s):  
Beth E. Richie ◽  
Valli Kalei Kanuha ◽  
Kayla Marie Martensen

The movements for racial justice, health equity, and economic relief have been activated in the contentious and challenging climate of 2020, with COVID-19 and social protest. In this context, feminist scholars, anti-violence advocates, and transformative justice practitioners have renewed their call for substantive changes to all forms of gender-based violence. This article offers a genealogy of the battered women’s movement in the U.S. from the lived experiences of two longtime activists. These reflections offer an analysis of the political praxis which evolved over the past half century of the anti-violence movement, and which has foregrounded the current social, political, and ideological framing of gender-based violence today. We conclude with a view to the future, focusing on the possibilities for transformative justice and abolition feminism as a return to our radical roots and ancestral histories.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Eileen Díaz McConnell ◽  
Neal Christopherson ◽  
Michelle Janning

In 2019, the U.S. Women’s National Team earned its fourth FIFA Women’s World Cup. Has gendered commentary in media coverage about the U.S. Women’s National Team changed since winning their first World Cup 20 years ago? Drawing on 188 newspaper articles published in three U.S. newspapers in 2019, the analyses contrast media representations of the 2019 team with a previous study focused on coverage of the 1999 team. Our analysis shows important shifts in the coverage over time. The 1999 team was popular because of their contradictory femininity in which they were “strong-yet-soft.” By 2019, the team’s popularity was rooted in their talent, hard work, success, and refusal to be silent about persisting gender-based disparities in sport and the larger society.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107780122110260
Author(s):  
Chiara C. Packard

Research has revealed how antiviolence activism can become entangled with the state's punitive agenda, leading to what some have called “carceral feminism.” However, this scholarship focuses primarily on the U.S. context. Additionally, few studies examine the cultural battles about gender-based violence that emerge in television media, a site of cultural struggle and meaning making. This study conducts a quantitative and qualitative content analysis of 46 Indian television panel broadcasts following a highly publicized rape in New Delhi in 2012. I find that elite state actors pursue punitive agendas, but feminists and other panelists engage in discursive resistance to this approach.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13621-e13621
Author(s):  
Yvonne Sada ◽  
Efthalia Zafeiropoulou ◽  
Peter Richardson ◽  
Jennifer Kramer ◽  
Israel Christie ◽  
...  

e13621 Background: Males have excess risk of most digestive cancers; whether cancer mainly due to virus (stomach), lifestyle including obesity/alcohol (colon/esophagus), or both (liver). We evaluated for secular trends in gender-specific incidence, mortality and survival for these cancers in the U.S. Methods: We used official U.S. Cancer Statistics [USCS] data (2000-2016) to calculate annual age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates (IR/MR). It covers >98% population/all states (vs. SEER-10 statewide registries, covers <1/3rd African-Americans/Whites). We calculated mortality-to-incidence rate ratios (MIR), an established 5-year survival proxy. We used Joinpoint to assess trends in average annual percentage change (AAPC). Results: Table shows age-adjusted IRs and MRs for colon, esophagus and stomach cancer decreased for men and women (all AAPCs negative, all significant but stomach IR women), with both liver IR/MR significantly increasing in both genders. Gender differences in relative burden were seen (e.g., MRs in colon>esophagus>liver>stomach in men vs. colon>stomach>liver>esophagus in women), with greatest male excess in esophagus (e.g., 4.4-fold IR). MIRs suggested less favorable survival (higher=worse) for men for esophagus/colon. Conclusion: Substantial gender disparity persists in digestive cancers, with male excess gap decreasing for colon and increasing for liver. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Tiffany Sanford-Jenson ◽  
Marla H. Kohlman

The U.S. military has garnered considerable scrutiny over how successfully it has incorporated women into full participation. With the formal infusion of women into the Armed Services in the last half of the twentieth century, scholars have begun to examine women’s military experiences as they have entered into new occupational roles, putting women ever closer to controversial combat-related work. Accompanying these increased career opportunities are age-old risks reported in the civilian workplace, including the increased likelihood of harassment, rape, discrimination, subjugation, and other types of gender-based inequality. This chapter provides a detailed synthesis of myriad social movement experiences for women in the military as they have sought to define new roles and participate more fully in the all-volunteer forces. Specifically, the chapter examines sexist practice, combat inclusion, sexual victimization, expansion of reproductive health care, veteran’s benefits, and legal avenues for women’s social movements both in public and private spheres.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1150-1157
Author(s):  
Summer Forester ◽  
Cheryl O'Brien

AbstractThe global coronavirus pandemic has reified divisions, inequity, and injustices rooted in systems of domination such as racism, sexism, neoliberal capitalism, and ableism. Feminist scholars have theorized these interlocking systems of domination as the “continuum of violence.” Building on this scholarship, we conceptualize the U.S. response to and the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic as reflective of the continuum of violence. We argue that crises like pandemics expose the antidemocratic and exclusionary practices inherent in this continuum, which is especially racialized and gendered. To support our argument, we provide empirical evidence of the continuum of violence in relation to COVID-19 vis-à-vis the interrelated issues of militarization and what feminists call “everyday security,” such as public health and gender-based violence. The continuum of violence contributes theoretically and practically to our understanding of how violence that the pandemic illuminates is embedded in broader systems of domination and exclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document