scholarly journals Pre-harvesting, harvesting, and transport of soybean to brazilian ports: Bioeconomic losses

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e744997878
Author(s):  
Erlei Jose Alessio Barbosa ◽  
Dileta Regina Moro Alessio ◽  
João Pedro Velho ◽  
João Costa Filho ◽  
Nilson Luiz Costa
Keyword(s):  
Economic Impacts ◽  
International Market ◽  
Storage Losses ◽  
Storage Studies ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Brazilian Ports

The objective of this review was to carry out a scientific systematization on the logistics of soybean chain in Brazil, focusing on losses during harvest, storage, and transport of soy, to demonstrate the economic impacts of losses in the soybean chain. The survey of works related to the theme was conducted in the bases Scopus, SciELO, and in the CAPES portal. In the development of the review, 10 articles were used about the logistics of soybeans in Brazil, 22 studies related to losses in the pre-harvest and soybean harvest, 22 involving soybean transportation and storage losses. The organization of the Brazilian soybean chain is complex due to soybean expansion and the territorial extension of Brazil. The pre-harvest and harvest losses are well explained, but significant losses still occur due to lack of regulation in the harvesters, which can be solved through the training of the operators. Concerning losses during transport and storage, studies are needed to quantify quantitative losses, as these losses may be determinant for the rural entrepreneur's profitability, as well as for the Brazilian competitiveness in the international market in terms of costs.

Sugar beet from field clamps -harvest quality and storage loss

2018 ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Surface Damage ◽  
Invert Sugar ◽  
Root Tip ◽  
Soil Conditions ◽  
Storage Losses ◽  
Commercial Sugar ◽  
And Storage ◽  
High Storage

Harvest quality of sugar beet varies according to soil conditions, harvester type and setting, and variety, too. Harvest quality may affect storage losses, in particular when injuries occur. To determine the harvest quality of commercial sugar beet and to quantify resulting storage losses, 92 commercial sugar beet clamps were sampled across Germany and information about harvest conditions were gathered. At IfZ, soil tare, leaf residues, topping diameter, root tip breakage and surface damage of the beets were determined. The beets were stored in 6 replicates in a climate container at 9°C for 10 weeks. The results demonstrate a rather good harvesting quality of sugar beet in Germany. Soil moisture at harvest did not affect harvest quality and storage losses. Very light, but also heavier soils lead to inferior harvest quality (soil tare, root tip breakage, damage) and slightly higher storage losses compared to the typical loam soils. Significant differences occurred between the three harvester types (companies). In general, high root tip breakage and severe surface damage of the beet was related to a high infestation with mould and rots, high invert sugar contents after storage and high sugar losses. Out of the five most planted varieties, in particular one turned out to be very susceptible to damage, resulting in high storage losses. The factor analysis suggests that the effect of harvester / harvester setting and of variety is more important for harvest quality and storage losses of sugar beet than soil conditions at harvest. Therefore, attention should be paid to optimize these conditions.

scholarly journals Rheological behavior and storage studies of sprouted onion pastes from four onion varieties

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 101271
Author(s):  
Ishrat Majid ◽  
B.N. Dar ◽  
Vikas Nanda ◽  
Mona S Alwahibi ◽  
Jawaher Alkahtani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheological Behavior ◽  
Storage Studies ◽  
And Storage

scholarly journals Evaluation of Rabi Onion Genotypes for Storage Characteristics (Six Months Period)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
K.S. Rathod ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Field Experiment ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Rabi Season ◽  
Storage Losses ◽  
Randomized Block Design ◽  
Check Variety ◽  
Storage Studies ◽  
Storage Characteristics

A field experiment entitled, “Evaluation of rabi onion genotypes for storage characteristics (six month period)” was conducted during rabi season, 2017-18 at “Scheme for Research on Onion Storage”, Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri. Dist. Ahmednagar (Maharashtra) India. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Block Design with seventeen genotypes and one check variety i.e. N-2-4-1 treatments replicated three times. In storage studies results indicated that, the minimum storage losses (Sprouting losses (%), Rotting losses (%), PLW losses (%) & Total losses) were recorded by the genotypes T7, T11 and T10.The minimum sprouting losses (after 6 month storage) was recorded in genotype T11 (1.41 %). It was followed by genotype viz. T7 and T10 (1.51 %). The maximum sprouting losses (after 6 month storage) was recorded in genotype T17 (4.06 %). Rotting losses (after 6 month storage) ranged between T11 (3.19) to T4 (7.46) per cent. The minimum PLW loss was recorded in genotype T7 (14.98 %), followed by genotype viz. T11 (15.64 %), T10 (15.85 %) and T6 (17.16 %). The maximum PLW loss was recorded in genotype T17 (33.26 %). The minimum total losses (after 6-month storage) was recorded by genotype T11 (21.34 %). While the maximum total losses (after 6-month storage) was recorded in T4 (36.49 %). Considering the above results, it could be concluded that, among the seventeen genotypes T7 (RHROR–7), T10 (RHROR–10) and T11 (RHROR–11) found promising for further evaluation.

The effects of maxgrass treatment of bale silage on the performance of beef cattle

1992 ◽  
Vol 1992 ◽  
pp. 148-148
Author(s):  
J R Weddell
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Octanoic Acid ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Soluble Carbohydrate ◽  
Animal Performance ◽  
Storage Losses ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Water Soluble Carbohydrate ◽  
And Storage

Studies with beef cattle (Kennedy and Carson, 1991) and dairy cattle (Chamberlain et al, 1990) have shown responses in dry matter intake of silage and animal performance through applying Maxgrass silage additive to unwilted herbage ensiled in clamps. Maxgrass (BP Chemicals Ltd) contains (weight/volume) 68% ammonium hexamethanoate, 11% ammonium hexapropanoate and 2% octanoic acid.Research at Aberdeen has shown the benefits of using both inoculant (Weddell, 1990a) and formic acid based (Weddell, 1990b) additives on big bale silage which now constitutes around 15% of the total silage dry matter ensiled in the UK. The present study compared the effects on silage composition, animal performance and storage losses of Maxgrass treated with untreated big bale silage.Second cut perennial ryegrass herbage was wilted to a mean DM content of 230 g/kg then baled by fixed chamber baler. Mean water soluble carbohydrate was 100 g/kg DM. Alternate groups of six bales were left untreated or treated with Maxgrass silage additive at 7.4 1/tonne wilted grass.

Electrochemical hydrogen evolution and storage studies on bismuth nano hexagons

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (47) ◽  
pp. 21642-21648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Gupta ◽  
Rini Singh ◽  
Garima Agarwal ◽  
Kanad Ray ◽  
S.L. Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Evolution ◽  
Storage Studies ◽  
And Storage

Effect of Alfalfa Cultivar and Bale Wrap Type on Dry Matter and Forage Quality of Large Round Bales in Outdoor Storage

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 975-982
Author(s):  
Amanda S. Reiter ◽  
Craig C. Sheaffer ◽  
M. Scotty Wells ◽  
Amanda M. Grev ◽  
Marcia A. Hathaway ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dry Matter ◽  
Forage Quality ◽  
List Type ◽  
Storage Losses ◽  
Feeding Value ◽  
Large Round ◽  
Time Required ◽  
And Storage

HighlightsTime to bind a round bale was longest for twine (56 s) compared to B-Wrap® (28 s) and net wrap (18 s).Alfalfa cultivar had minimal effects on changes in dry matter and forage quality of round bales stored outdoors.Dry matter losses were 7% for twine bales, 5% for net wrap bales, while B-Wrap® bales maintained DM in outdoor storage.Deleterious changes in forage quality were generally observed after =180 days of outdoor storage. Abstract. Large round bales are commonly fed to livestock; however, it has been well documented that outdoor storage can negatively impact dry matter (DM) and forage quality. To reduce storage losses and improve feeding value, new wrap types and alfalfa cultivars have been developed; however, these options have not been extensively investigated. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to evaluate the time required to bind large round bales, determine changes in DM and forage quality, and examine the economics of reduced-lignin and conventional alfalfa hay bound in twine, net wrap, and B-Wrap® while in outdoor storage. Hay was baled into 24 large round bales; 12 bales each of reduced-lignin and conventional alfalfa. Within each cultivar, four replicates were bound with each wrap type. Using stopwatches, the time to bind each bale was recorded. At the time of harvest, and every 90±3 days for 365 days, individual bales were weighed and cored to determine changes in DM and forage quality. Significance was set at P = 0.05. Time to bind a bale was longest for twine, intermediate for B-Wrap®, and shortest for net wrap (P < 0.01). Alfalfa cultivar had minimal effects on the parameters measured; therefore, the interaction between wrap type and storage length was reported. After 365 days in outdoor storage, DM losses were 7% for twine bales, 5% for net wrap bales, while B-Wrap® bales maintained DM. Changes in forage quality were observed at =180 days of storage where nonstructural carbohydrates were decreased and insoluble fiber components were concentrated. B-Wrap® bales had a higher value compared to net wrap and twines bales at 180 and 270 days in storage. These results suggest that B-Wrap® was better able to shed precipitation which preserved forage quality and bale value compared to large round bales bound in net wrap and twine in long term, outdoor storage. Keywords: B-Wrap®, Bale value, Net wrap, Reduced-lignin alfalfa, Twine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document