scholarly journals SOS Games as an Alternative Game for Warming Up in Sports

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-188
Author(s):  
Touvan Juni Samodra ◽  
Uray Gustian ◽  
Astiati Astiati
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Movement Activity ◽  
School Students ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Measurement Results ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Different Levels

This study aimed to test the SOS game used as a means to warm up. SOS games were usually played on paper. The trial game consists of 3 different levels. This game could be used as a movement activity to warm up. With some modifications, this game was tested. The trial was conducted on junior high school students, totaling 40 students. The data was obtained by measuring the pulse. Pulse was measured by counting the pulse in the neck for 10 seconds. The calculation result is multiplied by 6 to determine the number of pulses per minute—data analysis by comparing the measurement results with heating criteria based on age. The results showed that the first trial had a pulse rate of 142. Based on trial with 40 samples each at level 1, 140 level 2, 143, and level 3, 143 beats per minute. All of these pulses were in the exercise pulse. So it can be recommended that this game be used for heating purposes.

scholarly journals IDENTIFIKASI KESALAHAN MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP BERDASARKAN TAHAPAN KASTOLAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-100
Author(s):  
Antonia Dwi Raharti ◽  
Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

The study aims to identify kinds of high school students’ misrepresent in doing their tasks and to provide the appropriate scaffolding as a solution to help the students. This is a qualitative descriptive research. The research subject consists of three junior high school students who have different abilities in Mathematics. They were selected out of 92 students. This research studied the conceptual errors, procedural mistakes, and students’ technical mistakes in working on the problems based on the stages of Kastolan mistakes and the scaffoldings given. Furthermore, the data were collected by using the way of testing, interviewing and documenting techniques. The research data were guarantee validated with the triangulation method. The result of the research showed that there were some errors done by the students in doing the tasks. They were the conceptual errors, procedural mistakes, and technical errors. The scaffoldings given to help the students do the tasks for Level 1 (environmental provisions), Level 2 (explaining, reviewing dan restructuring), and Level 3 (developing conceptual thinking).

Analysis the proportional reasoning abilities of senior high school students in solving mathematical problems

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-122
Author(s):  
Dhuwi Novita Sari ◽  
Helti Lygia Mampouw
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Senior High School Students

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan penalaran proporsional siswa SMA dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Subjek pada penelitian deskriptif kualitatif ini adalah 3 siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Salatiga berkemampuan matematika tinggi. Instrumen utama adalah peneliti sendiri, didukung oleh instrumen tes dan pedoman wawancara. Data hasil tes dan wawancara dianalisis menggunakan langkah reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketiga subjek memiliki kemampuan penalaran proporsional yang berbeda dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Kemampuan penalaran proporsional subjek S cenderung berada pada level 1 dengan menunjukkan strategi menggunakan gambar dan membuat perbandingan kualitatif. Kemampuan penalaran proporsional subjek F cenderung berada pada level 2 dengan menunjukkan strategi menghubungkan model melalui perhitungan numerik, menggunakan unit komposit, dan menggunakan penalaran kuantitatif. Kemampuan penalaran proporsional subjek M cenderung berada pada level 3 dengan menunjukkan strategi menggunakan cara formal dan mengetahui hubungan invarian dan kovarian. Ketiga subjek menunjukkan kemampuan penalaran proporsional pada level 0 dalam memecahkan masalah yang memerlukan perbandingan aditif dan multiplikatif dengan hanya menggambarkan situasi perubahan dalam pandangan aditif.

scholarly journals MATHEMATICAL JUSTIFICATION OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN STATISTICS

MATHEdunesa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-304
Author(s):  
Masyita Putri Firdausy ◽  
Abdul Haris Rosyidi
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mathematical Justification ◽  
Level 2

Justification is the process of justifying a claim that is supported with evidence. Justification is the center of mathematics. Justification plays an important role in learning because it can help students improve understanding of mathematical concepts. By using a qualitative approach, this study aims to analyze the mathematical justification of high school students in solving problems on statistical topics. This research was conducted on 122 high school students by giving justification test questions on the topic of statistics resulted in 17% (21 students) included in the level justification level 3, 16% (19 students) included in level 2, 47% (47 students) included in level 1, and 20% (25 students) the rest are included in level 0. Further analysis was carried out to see the mathematical justification process by each level. The mathematical justification process consists of three stages, 1) the process of recognition; 2) the development process (building-with), and 3) understanding (awareness) process. Level 3 and level 2 students can recognize the problem and determine the right strategy to solve the problem, level 3 and level 2 students are also able to execute the strategy and interpret the results of the calculations they have done. The difference in level 3 and level 2 students lies in the understanding the concepts they have. Level 1 students can recognize problems and determine solution strategies. Although level 1 students can recognize and do calculations well, level 1 students fail in interpreting the results of calculations performed. While students who are level 0 are not able to recognize the problem, so level 0 students do not carry out the justification process.

scholarly journals Analysis of High School Students’ Argumentation Ability in the topic of Buffer Solution

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ninda Dwi Cahya Devi ◽  
Elfi Susanti VH ◽  
Nurma Yunita Indriyanti
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
School Students ◽  
Buffer Solution ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

<div class="WordSection1"><p>Argumentation is scientific discourse in science learning that is used as a link between knowledge from an environment and concepts in science learning. Through argumentation skills can be controlled student understanding in connecting facts with concepts in learning. This study aims to analyze students' argumentation ability on buffer solution subject. Students' argumentation ability is divided into 4 levels; level 1 (claims), level 2 (claims with data), level 3 (claims with data and one rebuttal), and level 4 (claims with more than one rebuttal). Data analysis was done by a qualitative descriptive method using a case study method. The case study method was chosen so that a study of 92 students who were research participants could be carried out in depth and comprehensive. The results obtained that the students' argumentation ability was at level 1 and level 2 argumentation. This shows that students' argumentation skills are still at low and medium levels. The results of this study can be used as a basis for improving the quality of teaching and further research.</p><strong><em></em></strong><em></em><em></em></div><em><br clear="all" /> </em>

scholarly journals Morpho-phonological levels and grammaticalization in Karimojong: A review of the evidence

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-169
Author(s):  
Diane Lesley- Lesley-Neuman
Keyword(s):  
Phonological Processes ◽  
Linguistic Structure ◽  
Surface Irregularities ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
The Right ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
Phonological Rules ◽  
Verbal Complex

An analysis of the affixation processes and the phonological rules governing [ATR] harmony in Karimojong verbs permits the organization of derivational processes into three levels. On each level specific groups of morphemes are affixed and the resultant derived words undergo defined sets of phonological processes. On Level 1 a feature filling [±ATR] harmony rule applies, in which the [ATR] feature spreads bi-directionally from the principal root vowel across the root and all Level 1 affixes. However, there are also localized disharmonic domains created by phonologized co-articulation effects of consonants and dissimilation rules for vowels. On Level 2, suffixation of Tense-Mood-Aspect (TMA) markers at the right edge of the verbal complex triggers [+ATR] feature spreading leftward across the derived word. On Level 3 affixation does not trigger [ATR] harmony processes, and both affix vowels and the derivational complexes to which they are added retain their [ATR] features. Some Karimojong affixes exhibit behaviors characteristic of two different levels, depending on context; these affixes are proposed to be in transition between levels. The three levels are proposed to result from diachronic evolution, and their relative chronological development can be established by (1) correspondences to landmarks within the cross-linguistically attested agreement system grammaticalization cline, which groups affixes according to ordering universals, and (2) the existence of successive evolutionary cycles of frequentive morphology. A model of the morphology-phonology interface is proposed in which linguistic structure internal to the morpheme channels the spread of [ATR] features. The model provides an explanation for surface irregularities that originated at the time of areal vowel mergers in Nilotic languages (Dimmendaal, 2002).

scholarly journals Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa ditinjau dari Level Geometri Van Hiele SMP Kelas VII

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Azwar Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Probability Sampling ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Van Hiele ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

This study aims to determine the distribution of student geometry levels based on Van Hiele's theory and find out the differences in students' mathematics learning outcomes in grade VII junior high school. The sampling technique is probability sampling and a sample of 182 students is obtained. Data collection techniques used were Van Hiele level geometry tests and test results. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and anova with a significance level of 5%. The results showed that only 170 students were included in the Van Hiele geometry level, namely 62 students were at level 0, 97 students were at level 1, 5 students were at level 2, and as many as 6 students are at level 3. In the inferential analysis based on analysis of variance (two-way anova) concludes that for learning outcomes based on Van Hiele level geometry obtained Fcount = 13.793 > Ftable = 9.28 means H0 is rejected means that there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes based on Van Hiele geometry level.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui distribusi level geometri siswa berdasarkan teori Van Hiele dan mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa di kelas VII SMP. Menggunakan teknik probability sampling dan diperoleh sampel sebanyak 182 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes level geometri Van Hiele dan tes hasil belajar. Analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan anova dengan taraf signifikansi sebesar 5%. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari 182 sampel, hanya 170 siswa yang termasuk dalam level geometri Van Hiele yaitu 62 siswa berada pada level 0, sebanyak 97 siswa pada level 1, sebanyak 5 siswa pada level 2, dan  6 siswa pada level 3. Analisis anova dua arah diperoleh Fhitung = 13,793 > Ftabel = 9,28 berarti H0  ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika berdasarkan level geometri Van Hiele.

scholarly journals Kemampuan Literasi Sains Fisika Siswa SMP Kelas VII Di Sumatera Selatan Menggunakan Kerangka PISA (Program for International Student Assesment)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nely Andriani ◽  
Saparini Saparini ◽  
Hamdi Akhsan
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Scientific Literacy ◽  
Science Literacy ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Level 2

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan literasi sains fisika siswa SMP Kelas VII di Sumatera Selatan menggunakan kerangka PISA. Metode penelitian adalah deskriptif kuantitatif untuk mendapatkan gambaran kemampuan literasi sains dalam IPA (fisika) siswa tanpa memberikan perlakuan kepada siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data berbentuk tes tertulis.  Penilaian disesuaikan dengan kriteria penilaian PISA. Variabel penelitian ini adalah pencapaian kemampuan literasi sains siswa pada konten fisik. Sampel diambil dengan menggunakan purposive sampling meliputi SMP N 1 kota Palembang, SMP N 1 kota Prabumulih, dan SMP N 1 kabupaten Ogan Ilir pada semester ganjil tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Hasil Penelitian diperoleh persentase pencapaian siswa yang paling tinggi pada level 2 sebesar 54,9 dan terendah pada level 5 yaitu hanya sebesar 28,1 dari skala maksimum 100. Secara keseluruhan rerata persentase hasil kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMP di Sumatera Selatan berdasarkan Kompetensi Proses Sains, yaitu 47,1. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMP di Sumatera Selatan secara keseluruhan ditinjau dari level soal dan kompetensi proses sains diperoleh hasil masih sangat rendah. This research aims to analyze the ability of Physics Science Literacy of Grade VII Middle School Students in South Sumatra by using the PISA Framework. The research method is a quantitative descriptive method that aims to get a picture of scientific literacy abilities in science (physics) students without giving treatment to students. The assessment is adjusted to the PISA assessment criteria. The variables of this study was the achievement of students' science literacy skills in physical content. Data collection techniques by written tests. Samples were taken using purposive sampling and the research sample are SMP N 1 kota Palembang, SMP N 1 kota Prabumulih, dan SMP N 1 Kabupaten Ogan Ilir The results of the study showed that the highest percentage of student’s achievement at level 2 was 54.9 and the lowest was at level 5, which was only 28.1 from the maximum 100 scale. While the overall percentage of the results of the scientific literacy skills of junior high school students in South Sumatra was based on Science Process Competence. that is 47.1. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it can be concluded that the scientific literacy skills of junior high school students in South Sumatra as a whole in terms of the level of questions and competency of science processes are still very low.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCIENCE STUDENT WORKSHEET WITH COGNITIVE CONFLICT STRATEGIES TO REDUCE MISCONCEPTION ON HEAT CONCEPT

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heny Ekawati Haryono
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Conflict ◽  
Standard Test ◽  
Science Student ◽  
School Students ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Conflict Strategies ◽  
Different Levels

<em>This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of science worksheets with cognitive conflict strategies to reduce student heat misconceptions. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Lamongan by using one group pretest-posttest design. The data obtained in this study is quantitative data, and the number of students in VII grade is 50, students are called to complete the research if the proportion of correct answers is more significant than the standard achievement test. While the class is said to complete the study if 85% of students can reach the standard test criteria. The researcher obtained information about the level of mastery of students' concepts by using N-gain, one method in the descriptive qualitative analysis. It shows the different levels of student mastery before and after treatment given. The effectiveness of the Science Worksheet will be analyzed from the acquisition of learning outcomes. This yields 0.94 points which means that the value of N-Gain is in the sufficient category, it can be said that the application of the Science Worksheet with cognitive conflict strategies can reduce heat misconceptions of junior high school students.</em>

scholarly journals Kompleksitas Argumentasi Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik pada Jenjang SD, SMP, dan SMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Nur Fildzah Amalia ◽  
Riandi Riandi ◽  
Ari Widodo ◽  
Diana Rochintaniawati
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Middle School ◽  
Elementary School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Elementary Students ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Socioscientific Issues ◽  
School Students ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 2

The Student’s argument can be raised and developed using socioscientific issues. Socio-scientific issues about health is one of the social problems that the subject of public debate. This study aims to describe the complexity of the arguments in elementary school, middle school, and high school. The three level of education is a school which is shaded by one of the Foundation in Bandung. Participants involved in the study consisted of 31 elementary students, 14 middle school students, and 23 high school students. Data taken using a quisioner consist of five items concerning socioscientific issues as well as individual interviews based on the answers to the test written description. Data identified using Toulmin Argumentation Adaptation Pattern (TAP), which consists of four levels, namely, level 1 (claim), level 2 (claims, data and / or warrants), level 3 (claims, data / warrant, backing), and level 4 (claims, data / warrant, backing, qualifier). The results showed that the development of increasingly rising complexity of arguments according to their level. The complexity of the arguments on elementary students reached level 2-3, middle school and high school reached level 3. Percentage of level 3 more ascending towards the middle school to high school. Meanwhile, if viewed from the dominates of the arguments category level, level 2 emerged as the dominant category in elementary school, middle school, and high school.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document