Multi-scale Material Modeling and Print Simulation for “First Time Right” Additive Manufacturing

Author(s):  
Olivier Lietaer ◽  
Sylvain Bouillon ◽  
Elodie Seignobos ◽  
Lucie Berger
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Stelios K. Georgantzinos ◽  
Georgios I. Giannopoulos ◽  
Panteleimon A. Bakalis

This paper aims to establish six-dimensional (6D) printing as a new branch of additive manufacturing investigating its benefits, advantages as well as possible limitations concerning the design and manufacturing of effective smart structures. The concept of 6D printing, to the authors’ best knowledge, is introduced for the first time. The new method combines the four-dimensional (4D) and five-dimensional (5D) printing techniques. This means that the printing process is going to use five degrees of freedom for creating the final object while the final produced material component will be a smart/intelligent one (i.e., will be capable of changing its shape or properties due to its interaction with an environmental stimulus). A 6D printed structure can be stronger and more effective than a corresponding 4D printed structure, can be manufactured using less material, can perform movements by being exposed to an external stimulus through an interaction mechanism, and it may learn how to reconfigure itself suitably, based on predictions via mathematical modeling and simulations.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2100229
Author(s):  
Fergal B. Coulter ◽  
Ruth E. Levey ◽  
Scott T. Robinson ◽  
Eimear B. Dolan ◽  
Stefano Deotti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 103520
Author(s):  
Xin Lin ◽  
Kunpeng Zhu ◽  
Min Zhou ◽  
Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh ◽  
Qing-guo Wang

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Weng Hoh Lee ◽  
Linmin Wu ◽  
Hyun-Hee Choi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 7559
Author(s):  
Elena Bassoli ◽  
Silvio Defanti ◽  
Emanuele Tognoli ◽  
Nicolò Vincenzi ◽  
Lorenzo Degli Esposti

High cost, unpredictable defects and out-of-tolerance rejections in final parts are preventing the complete deployment of Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) on an industrial scale. Repeatability, speed and right-first-time manufacturing require synergistic design approaches. In addition, post-build finishing operations of LPBF parts are the object of increasing attention to avoid the risk of bottlenecks in the machining step. An aluminum component for automotive application was redesigned through topology optimization and Design for Additive Manufacturing. Simulation of the build process allowed to choose the orientation and the support location for potential lowest deformation and residual stresses. Design for Finishing was adopted in order to facilitate the machining operations after additive construction. The optical dimensional check proved a good correspondence with the tolerances predicted by process simulation and confirmed part acceptability. A cost and time comparison versus CNC alone attested to the convenience of LPBF unless single parts had to be produced.


Author(s):  
Zhuo Wang ◽  
Chen Jiang ◽  
Mark F. Horstemeyer ◽  
Zhen Hu ◽  
Lei Chen

Abstract One of significant challenges in the metallic additive manufacturing (AM) is the presence of many sources of uncertainty that leads to variability in microstructure and properties of AM parts. Consequently, it is extremely challenging to repeat the manufacturing of a high-quality product in mass production. A trial-and-error approach usually needs to be employed to attain a product with high quality. To achieve a comprehensive uncertainty quantification (UQ) study of AM processes, we present a physics-informed data-driven modeling framework, in which multi-level data-driven surrogate models are constructed based on extensive computational data obtained by multi-scale multi-physical AM models. It starts with computationally inexpensive metamodels, followed by experimental calibration of as-built metamodels and then efficient UQ analysis of AM process. For illustration purpose, this study specifically uses the thermal level of AM process as an example, by choosing the temperature field and melt pool as quantity of interest. We have clearly showed the surrogate modeling in the presence of high-dimensional response (e.g. temperature field) during AM process, and illustrated the parameter calibration and model correction of an as-built surrogate model for reliable uncertainty quantification. The experimental calibration especially takes advantage of the high-quality AM benchmark data from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). This study demonstrates the potential of the proposed data-driven UQ framework for efficiently investigating uncertainty propagation from process parameters to material microstructures, and then to macro-level mechanical properties through a combination of advanced AM multi-physics simulations, data-driven surrogate modeling and experimental calibration.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Yang ◽  
Yan Lu ◽  
Simin Li ◽  
Jennifer Li ◽  
Yande Ndiaye ◽  
...  

Abstract To accelerate the adoption of Metal Additive Manufacturing (MAM) for production, an understanding of MAM process-structure-property (PSP) relationships is indispensable for quality control. A multitude of physical phenomena involved in MAM necessitates the use of multi-modal and in-process sensing techniques to model, monitor and control the process. The data generated from these sensors and process actuators are fused in various ways to advance our understanding of the process and to estimate both process status and part-in-progress states. This paper presents a hierarchical in-process data fusion framework for MAM, consisting of pointwise, trackwise, layerwise and partwise data analytics. Data fusion can be performed at raw data, feature, decision or mixed levels. The multi-scale data fusion framework is illustrated in detail using a laser powder bed fusion process for anomaly detection, material defect isolation, and part quality prediction. The multi-scale data fusion can be generally applied and integrated with real-time MAM process control, near-real-time layerwise repairing and buildwise decision making. The framework can be utilized by the AM research and standards community to rapidly develop and deploy interoperable tools and standards to analyze, process and exploit two or more different types of AM data. Common engineering standards for AM data fusion systems will dramatically improve the ability to detect, identify and locate part flaws, and then derive optimal policies for process control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document