Analysis Radiation Monitoring in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug - Yugra (2009-2018)

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 118-128
Author(s):  
V. Tilles ◽  
A. Poberezhnyi ◽  
V. Samoilov
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Radiation Accidents ◽  
Radiation Sources ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Khanty Mansi Autonomous

Based on the analysis of open data from government reports and Rosstat data, a significant increase in the number of radiation accidents in the territory of the Khanty–Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra was established, namely, 9 times in 2015–2017. It is noted that annually the maximum radiation doses close to the maximum are received by loggers of oil–producing organizations, and the use of ionizing radiation sources in logging operations is steadily increasing. Recommendations on improving radiation monitoring, as well as clarification in the Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation, are offered.

scholarly journals THE RESULTS OF FUNCTIONING OF THE UNIFIED SYSTEM OF INDIVIDUAL DOSE CONTROL OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION CITIZENS BASED ON THE 2017 DATA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 98-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. Barkovsky ◽  
R. R. Akhmatdinov ◽  
R. R. Akhmatdinov ◽  
N. K. Baryshkov ◽  
A. M. Biblin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Individual Dose ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Radiation Sources ◽  
Dose Control ◽  
Group A ◽  
Staff Group ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Group B

The article presents the results of the generalized analysis of the data on staff, patient, and public doses from ionizing radiation obtained from the Unified System of Individual Dose Control for 2017. The analysis is conducted on the basis of the annual data from the forms of Federal State Statistical. Observation No.1-DOZ (staff individual doses), No.2-DOZ (doses from radiation accidents), No.3-DOZ (patient doses) and No.4- DOZ (public doses from natural and technogenically impacted background). The information is submitted by the organizations and territories under the supervision of the Rospotrebnadzor and FMBA of the Russian Federation. The article is based on the data obtained within the framework of Radiation-Hygiene passportization. In 2017, 18 324 organizations working with the artificial radiation sources submitted the form No.1-DOZ. The form No.1-DOZ contains data on 235 271 staff individual doses, 215 290 of the staff group A and 19 981 the staff group B with individual monitoring. In 2017, the average individual dose for the staff group A was 1,23 mSv, the staff group B – 0,67 mSv. In 2017, 13 036 healthcare organizations submitted the form No.3- DOZ. According to the No.3-DOZ data, more than 286 mln. X-ray procedures were conducted in the Russian Federation in 2017. An average dose per capita from medical exposure was 0,55 mSv/year and a mean dose per an X-ray examination was 0,28 mSv. In 2017, the form No.4-DOZ contained data on 8 130 measurements of gamma-radiation dose rate in wooden houses, 1 557 measurements in one-storey stone houses, 126 550 measurements in multi-storey stone houses and 178 138 measurements on the open ground As well as the results of 4 417 measurements of radon concentration levels in wooden houses, 5 971 measurements in one-storey stone houses, 57 461 measurements in multi-storey stone houses. The public average effective dose from natural ionizing radiation sources corresponded to 3.34 mSv/year, the average values for the subjects of the Russian Federation fall in the range from 2,15 mSv/year (Nenets Autonomous Okrug) to 8,9 mSv/year (Altai republic). The article includes the Annexes with the final generalized forms of the Unified System of Individual Dose Control in 2017 based on the forms of statistical observations No. 1-, 3- and 4-DOZ of the subjects of the Russian Federation.

About Defining the Borders of Radioactive Contamination Zones as a Result of Large Radiation Accidents. Message I. Post-Accident Analysis of Chernobyl Zoning Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
А. Скоробогатов ◽  
A. Skorobogatov ◽  
М. Герменчук ◽  
M. Germenchuk ◽  
А. Симонов ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Radioactive Contamination ◽  
Chernobyl Accident ◽  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Accident Analysis ◽  
Radiation Accidents ◽  
Chernobyl Npp ◽  
The Russian Federation

Purpose: Retrospective analysis of the process of defining the zones of radioactive contamination zones formed after the Chernobyl accident. Results: Summary of events related to liquidation of the Chernobyl NPP (ChNPP) accident consequences is given in the context of defining the radioactive contamination zones. Experience of zoning of the territories exposed to radioactive contamination due to the Chernobyl NPP accident during 1986–2015 in Belarus and the Russian Federation has revealed the following: - Zones of radioactive contamination as a result of the ChNPP accident have been finally defined by the regulatory-legal acts only by 1991 – in five years after the Chernobyl accident; - At present, the zones of radioactive contamination zones legally correspond to the borders of settlements that were given a certain status of the radioactively contaminated territory. This leads, in particular, to paradoxical "automatic" reduction of radioactive contamination zonesareas due to abolition of settlements with no inhabitants. Absence of the established borders of radioactive contamination zones creates difficulties in substantiation of the measures related to radiation monitoring, rehabilitation of radioactively contaminated areas and their return to economic circulation. Conclusions: Experience of eliminating mitigation of the Chernobyl NPP accident consequences shows that the absence of modern and scientifically justified procedures of defining the borders of radioactive contamination zones results not only in an inadequate assessment of the scales of consequences, but also does not allow effective differentiating the inventory and scale of necessary measures on population protection.

Big Data-driven management in education

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 86-91
Author(s):  
OLGA FIOFANOVA ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Digital Data ◽  
Managerial Decision ◽  
Strategic Objectives ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article discusses a new technology in the field of administration – a method of data-based management. In the field of education, analytics is the necessary manager’s competence to fulfill his work duties. The author identified the problem of transforming legal norms when working with open data, which did not affect the change in institutional and cultural norms of “data- based management” in managerial decision-making practice. The article provides a comparative analysis of the professional standards’ requirements and educational programs for the managerial personnel’s professional development in the field of education. The author analyzed two aspects of the development of a data-based management system: personnel – the development of educational programs for training managerial specialists who can use such technology, and infrastructure – the development of digital open data services and digital data processing services for making managerial decisions. The tasks of developing education through the analysis of data for assessing its quality are reflected in the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On national goals and strategic objectives for the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024” and can be implemented based on the professional capital of managers using tools for analyzing such data. It is necessary to improve the interaction of electronic information exchange services for more effective information interaction and the construction of analytical reporting. This will allow for the efficient integration of data from different information systems and electronic resources and obtain the necessary data of the information of interest.

scholarly journals Characteristics of industrial cultivation and requirements to fresh cut flowers in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 126-129
Author(s):  
O. A. Shchuklina ◽  
I. N. Voronchikhina ◽  
A. D. Alenicheva ◽  
I. N. Klimenkova ◽  
V. V. Voronchikhin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Research Field ◽  
Cut Flowers ◽  
Open Ground ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Fresh Cut ◽  
Growing Conditions ◽  
Analytical Centers

Relevance. The specifics of the fresh cut flowers market in the Russian Federation is such, that 85-100% of the total volume of flowers sold is imported. The most popular flowers among Russian consumers are roses (up to 60% in the total share of fresh flowers), chrysanthemums and carnations, all of which require certain growing conditions. Recently, the market of local seasonal flowers has begun to develop, the main players in which are small farms or household plots. Material and methods. This article presents the data about market analysis of fresh cut flowers in Russia for the last five years (2015-2020). For this analysis were used the methods applied in economics. The main information database of this research includes data from official state statistics; open data from analytical centers; federal and regional regulations; data from the Federal agency for technical regulation and Metrology; reference materials of specialized data on research field; data from industry-specific portals; sites; articles and reviews written by producers of fresh cut flowers in Russia and worldwide. Results. Russia is one of the top six importers of fresh cut flowers in the world. The most popular flower among Russian consumers is a rose. There is not much suitable soil and climatic conditions in Russia for growing it on a commercial scale in the open ground. In 2018-2019 according to Rosstat data the number of flowers, grown for cutting in Russia, was estimated 263,3 billion pieces. However, now Russian flower producers are not able to meet domestic demand for fresh flowers, so there is no almost export.

scholarly journals Results of the 20-year period of functioning of the Federal Databank on the natural radiation doses to the population of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-125
Author(s):  
T. A. Kormanovskaya ◽  
R. R. Akhmatdinov ◽  
G. A. Gorskiy
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Annual Effective Dose ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Natural Radiation ◽  
Radiation Background ◽  
Natural Sources ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Mean

This study is focused on the analysis of the results of the functioning of the Federal Databank on the doses to the public of the Russian Federation from natural and man-made modified radiation background as a part of Joint governmental system of control and accounting of the doses from ionizing exposure in 2001-2020. The mean individual annual effective dose of the public of the Russian Federation from natural sources of ionizing exposure, calculated based on the data from all measurements in 2001-2020, is equal to 3,36 mSv/year. The study includes the analysis of the problems and perspectives of the improvement of the system of the data collection on the levels of exposure of the public of the Russian Federation from natural sources.

scholarly journals New approaches to biological dosimetry: development of complex biodosimetric systems (review of foreign literature)

2019 ◽  
pp. 90-96
Author(s):  
N. V. Sotnik ◽  
V. L. Rybkina ◽  
T. V. Azizova
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Biological Markers ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Accurate Estimate ◽  
Dose Assessment ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Biological Dosimetry ◽  
Radiation Accidents ◽  
Combined Use

Relevance. In case of emergency due to large-scale radiation accidents, biological dosimetry becomes a critical tool for early radiation dose assessment and enables identification of individuals exposed to ionizing radiation and facilitates further medical follow-up decisions.Intention. To assess the feasibility of a number of biological markers for bioindication and biodosimetry purposes based on literature data.Methodology. Literature sources were searched in MEDLINE databases, PubMed, CyberLeninka, elibrary.ru, using the terms: radiation, irradiation, biodosimetry. The review presents the results of studies from full-text sources of literature in English.Results and Discussion. Depending on an accidental exposure scenario, various biodosimetry techniques should be used to assess radiation doses with optimal accuracy and speed. In addition to physical methods and clinical techniques used to assess radiation doses, biological dosimetry defines a level of ionizing radiation exposure for certain individuals and is useful in making decisions about medical treatment strategy. To date, combined use of several biological markers within a biodosimetry system providing reliable radiation dose estimates.Conclusion. Analysis of the data presented in the review showed that combined use of several biological markers and development of a complex biodosimetric system will provide a more accurate estimate of doses, which is especially important in case of radiation accidents and incidents when physical dosimetry data are not available.

scholarly journals The Radiation Situation in the Area of the Meteorit-5 Peaceful Nuclear Explosion

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-102
Author(s):  
A. V. Titov ◽  
◽  
N. K. Shandala ◽  
Iu. S. Belskikh ◽  
D. V. Isaev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Waste ◽  
Waste Management ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Nuclear Explosion ◽  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Radioactive Waste Management ◽  
The Russian Federation

Pursuant to relevant provision of the Federal Law No. 190-FZ On Radioactive Waste Management and Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation of July 11, 2011, radioactive waste generated due to the peaceful uses of nuclear charges has been attributed to the non-retrievable radioactive waste (RW) category. Accordingly, relevant RW subsoil areas are currently considered as facilities holding non-retrievable RW with periodic radiation monitoring that should be performed and certain measures provided to ensure the long-term safety of the population. The article presents the results of a radiation survey performed in 2019 for the site with non-retrievable RW inventory generated from the Meteorite-5 peaceful nuclear explosion.

Organization System of the Causal Relationship between Diseases, Disability and Death of the Citizens Affected by Radiation Factors in the Russian Federation

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Андрей Бушманов ◽  
Andrey Bushmanov ◽  
Ю. Удалов ◽  
Yu. Udalov ◽  
Н. Рыжман ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Causal Relationship ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Chernobyl Accident ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Advisory Council ◽  
Normative Documents ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Special Risk

There are two Advisory councils on the territory of the Russian Federation: the Interdepartmental Advisory Council (IAC) and Military Medical Commission (MMC) – where citizens may apply to establish the cause of a disease, disability and death from exposure to ionizing radiation. The article describes the normative documents and the legislative base which regulates work of IAC and MMC on the establishment of a causal relationship between diseases, disability and death of the citizens, exposed to radiation from the Chernobyl accident. Categories of citizens who are eligible to apply for the examination to establish causation of the disease, disability and death as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation in IAC and MMC are defined. MMC can treat only military servants, personnel and citizens, passing military service (equal service), service in bodies and organizations of Prosecutor's office, the actions of high-risk units, who took part in liquidation of consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Veterans of special risk subdivisions, and all other citizens exposed to radiation due to the Chernobyl accident may apply to IAC.

Problems of Population Radiation Safety Support in Case of Radiation Accidents

2018 ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
С. Гончаров ◽  
S. Goncharov ◽  
Г. Аветисов ◽  
G. Avetisov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Radiation Safety ◽  
Disaster Medicine ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
Radiation Accidents ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article presents the results of 25-old activity of the head agency of the Service for Disaster Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation – All Russian Centre for Disaster Medicine «Zaschita» (ARCDM «Zaschita») of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the sphere of medical support of population in case of radiation accidents. The Service is a functional subsystem of the Unified State system of prevention and liquidation of emergency situations, intended for elimination of medical and sanitary consequences of emergency situation. In Russia, it is legally established that in case of radiation accident the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia (the FMBA of Russia) is responsible for radiation safety of the population living in the NPP surveillance zone (approximately 25 km). Responsibility for the radiation safety of the rest of the population living outside the surveillance zone is assigned to the Service for disaster medicine. In accordance with the current document “Model content of the protection plan of the population in case of an accident at the radiation facility” developed by the Ministry of Emergency Situations, mandatory protective measures are provided in the territory that radius is 25 km around the radiation object (planning zones of preventive and emergency measures). Early planning in the restrictive planning zone is not envisaged, and protective measures outside the 100-kilometer zone are considered inappropriate. The article presents the concept developed by the specialists of ARCDM «Zaschita» for drafting protection of the subjects of the Russian Federation for the nuclear power plants operating on the territory of Russia. The concept is based on experience of consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident. The concept argues that the outer boundary of the planning area for protective measures around nuclear power plants should have an outer radius of 1000 km. Radius of the emergency planning area is 100 km. The problems of preparedness for radiation safety of population support in case of radiation accidents are discussed. They are: the need for elaboration of regulatory and normative documents of the federal level on obligatory advance planning of protective measures against the possibility of radiation accidents on radiation-hazardous objects from the nuclear power plants on the territory of Russia for the population, not supervised by the FMBA of Russia (living both in the observation zone and abroad) and regulating the need and procedure of planning, organization and carrying out in case of necessity iodine prophylaxis for the population on territories up to 1000 km from operating NPPs of Russia. Same approaches to the solution of the considered problems are suggested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document