scholarly journals Evaluating the Greenhouse Gas Impact from Biomass Gasification Systems in Industrial Clusters - Methodology and Examples

Author(s):  
Kristina M. Holmgren ◽  
Thore Berntsson ◽  
Eva Andersson ◽  
Tomas Rydberg
Author(s):  
Yimin Zhang ◽  
Shiva Habibi ◽  
Heather L. MacLean

The electricity generation sector is far from sustainable; in Ontario, 77% of electricity consumed is generated from non-renewable sources such as coal, natural gas and nuclear. As a result, this sector contributes significantly to many environmental challenges including global warming, smog formation, and acid deposition. It is critical to improve the sustainability of electricity generation through the incorporation of sustainable design concepts. Sustainable design takes into account the environmental performance of a product or process over its entire life cycle (including design and development, raw material acquisition, production, use, and end-of-life). Innovative design has resulted in new technologies for electricity generation. Generating electricity from biomass is one of the alternative technologies which could have the potential to improve the sustainability of the electricity generation sector. In this research we examine various scenarios for displacing coal-based generation. Coal gasification is a mature technology and to replace some or all of the feedstock with biomass, a re-design of some portions of the electricity generation technology are required. The technical changes in the process depend on several issues including the physical and chemical characteristics of biomass. We evaluate the environmental performance of electricity generation from agricultural residues through conducting a life cycle inventory for three biomass-to-electricity scenarios for the Province of Ontario; 1) a 5% co-firing of agricultural residues with coal in existing coal plants, 2) a 15% co-firing of agricultural residues with coal in existing coal plants, and 3) a hypothetical power plant which produces electricity from 100% agricultural residues using biomass gasification technology. For comparison purposes, we analyze a current coal only option using plant specific data. We quantify life cycle energy use, greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions for electricity. Our results suggest that on a life cycle basis electricity generated from biomass can achieve a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 4% (for the 5% biomass co-firing) to 96% (for the 100% biomass gasification) compared to the coal-only option. Similarly, reductions in air pollutant emissions (sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter) range from 4% to 98%. Our study indicates that life cycle analysis is a useful tool for assisting decision makers in the selection of more sustainable design options for future electricity generation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 495-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siming You ◽  
Huanhuan Tong ◽  
Joel Armin-Hoiland ◽  
Yen Wah Tong ◽  
Chi-Hwa Wang

2011 ◽  
Vol 236-238 ◽  
pp. 264-267
Author(s):  
Ying Ying Guo ◽  
Yang Sheng Liu

Bioenergy is a renewable energy with such advantages as low cost, simple construction, and it is also quite economic and effective. The bioenergy application directly displaces greenhouse gas emissions and does not contaminate environment. Based on these characteristics, biomass as a source of bioenergy has been attracting much more concern in recent years. This paper aims to introduce mechanism of biomass gasification, types of gasifiers, applications and research progress at home.


Author(s):  
Peiran Zhao ◽  
Abbas Tamadon ◽  
Dirk Pons

CONTEXT– Energy is widely involved in human activity and corresponding emissions of SOX, NOX and CO2 from energy generation processes affect global climate change. Clean fuels are desired by society because of their reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Hydrogen is once such candidate fuel. Much hydrogen is produced from fossil fuel, with biomass being an alternative process. OBJECTIVE– The project compared the environmental impact of hydrogen production by natural gas steam reforming vs. biomass gasification. METHOD–Environmental impact was calculated from the input and output data from life cycle inventory analysis. The impact assessment was focused on greenhouse gas emission, acidification, and eutrophication. Models of the two processes were developed and analysed in OpenLCA. The agribalyse database was used to connect inventory flow data to environmental impacts. FINDINGS– For all three metrics, biomass gasification had lower impacts than natural gas steam reforming, sometimes by large margins. For biomass gasification the silica sand production contributes most to all three impact categories, whereas for natural gas steam reforming it is the LPG extraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document