scholarly journals Chimney Graft Technique Combined With Embolization for Treating Ruptured Aortic Arch Lesions

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianhao Bao ◽  
Yuxi Zhao ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Mingwei Wu ◽  
Zhaoxiang Zeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Endovascular Embolization ◽  
Type I ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Early Term ◽  
Primary Operation ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Chimney Graft

Background: This study aimed to share the experience in applying the chimney graft technique combined with embolization for treating aortic arch rupture under emergency conditions and evaluating early-term results in these patients.Methods: This study retrospectively included patients with ruptured aortic arch lesions who received the chimney graft technique combined with embolization between March 2016 and March 2021. The primary endpoint was a technical success, deemed as successful stent graft deployment to the planned location, patency of the target branch vessel, and absence of significant type I endoleak. The secondary endpoint was clinical success defined with the size of false lumen in follow-up remaining unchanged or decreasing over time, 30-day mortality, complication, and primary patency of chimney graft.Results: This study included 12 patients (age, 61 ± 12 years; male, 83%). Five patients (42%) received single chimney, one patient (8%) received double chimney, and six patients (50%) received triple chimney. Intraoperative type I endoleak occurred in six patients (50%) who underwent endovascular embolization in the primary operation. Post-operative type I endoleak, evaluated by computed tomography angiography examination following the primary operation, occurred in seven patients (58%), including one patient who received endovascular embolization two times. All patients with post-operative type I endoleak were successfully re-treated using coil and Onyx glue within 1 week, and the median length of stay was 22 ± 11 days (range: 7–44 days). Overall technical success was 100%. Eleven patients had completed their follow-up (median, 12 months, range: 1–34 months), and one patient was out of contact. The 30-day mortality was 9% (1/11, post-operative death of a patient with cerebral hemorrhage). No major complications and no chimney compression, migration, occlusion, or stenosis were recorded during follow-up. Seven patients (58%) have ≥6 months of clinical follow-up time with appropriate imaging. In four (57%) of these patients, diameter stabilization was detected, whereas three (43%) experienced significant reduction (≥5 mm).Conclusion: The patients in this study had satisfactory early-term outcomes. The chimney graft technique combined with coil and Onyx glue embolization may be a safe and effective treatment for ruptured aortic arch lesions under emergency conditions.

Candy-Plug Generation II for False Lumen Occlusion in Chronic Aortic Dissection: Feasibility and Early Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 782-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Eleshra ◽  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
Nikolaos Tsilimparis ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Martin Scheerbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Chronic Aortic Dissection ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Aortic Remodeling

Purpose: To present the early results of false lumen (FL) occlusion in chronic aortic dissection using the Candy-Plug generation II (CP II), which has a self-closing fabric channel that obviates the need for separate occlusion of its center. Materials and Methods: Fourteen consecutive patients (mean age 60±11 years; 10 men) with persistent FL backflow and aneurysm formation at the thoracic segment in chronic aortic dissection underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with FL occlusion using the refined CP II. Primary endpoints were technical success (successful deployment) and clinical success (no FL backflow at the CP II level). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality and morbidity and aortic remodeling during follow-up. Results: Technical success was 100%. One patient required additional intraprocedural FL embolization at the CP II level due to persistent FL backflow on final angiography (clinical success 93%), though there was no flow through the CP II center. There were no intraprocedural complications. Immediate complete FL occlusion was achieved in 12 patients; the other 2 required reintervention. One had contrast enhancement in the distal FL proximal to the CP II and was treated with coil embolization. The other patient had persistent type I endoleak at the level of the left subclavian artery (LSA) and underwent left carotid–LSA bypass and proximal stent-graft extension. One patient died due to retrograde type A aortic dissection that was not related to CP II placement. Over a mean 8-month follow-up (range 3–12), 9 patients had computed tomography angiography; 8 patients had evidence of aortic remodeling, while 1 aneurysm sac was stable. Conclusion: The CP II reduces the number of procedural steps and offers good seal, with minimal morbidity and mortality and a high rate of aortic remodeling.

Homemade Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Complete Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Dissections

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludovic Canaud ◽  
Baris Ata Ozdemir ◽  
Lucien Chassin-Trubert ◽  
Julien Sfeir ◽  
Pierre Alric ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Covered Stent ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Fenestrated Stent Graft ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for complete endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch dissections. Materials and Methods: From July 2014 through September 2018, 35 patients (mean age 66±11 years; 25 men) underwent homemade fenestrated stent-graft repair of acute (n=16) or chronic (n=10) complicated type B aortic dissections (n=16) and dissecting aortic arch aneurysms subsequent to surgical treatment of acute type A dissections (n=9). Nineteen (54%) procedures were emergent. Results: Zone 2 single-fenestrated stent-grafts were used in 25 cases; the remaining 10 were double-fenestrated stent-grafts deployed in zone 0. Median time for stent-graft modification was 18 minutes (range 16–20). Technical success was achieved in all cases. An immediate distal type I endoleak was treated intraoperatively. Among the double-fenestrated stent-graft cases, the left subclavian artery fenestration could not be cannulated in 2 patients and revascularization was required. Partial coverage of the left common carotid artery necessitated placement of a covered stent in 3 cases. One (3%) patient had a stroke without permanent sequelae. Two type II endoleaks required additional covered stent placement at 5 and 7 days postoperatively, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 6% (2 patients with ruptured aortic arch aneurysm). During a mean follow-up of 17.6±13 months, there was no aortic rupture or retrograde dissection. One late type I endoleak was treated with additional proximal fenestrated stent-graft placement. One type II endoleak is currently under observation. One additional patient died (unrelated to the aorta); overall mortality was 9%. All supra-aortic trunks were patent. Conclusion: The use of homemade fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular repair of aortic arch dissections is feasible and effective for total endovascular aortic arch repair. Durability concerns will need to be assessed in additional studies with long-term follow-up.

Application of an extracorporeal prefenestrated stent graft in endovascular repair of ascending aorta and aortic arch lesions

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812095087
Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Lei Bai ◽  
Yujing Zhang ◽  
Jianglong Liu ◽  
Xiaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Type I ◽  
Stent Grafting ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Type I Endoleak

Objectives Aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch is a serious condition. Treatment using traditional surgical methods has certain disadvantages. This study investigated the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular repair of aortic dissection using an external prefenestrated stent. Methods We present a series of aortic dissection cases involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch treated with an external prefenestrated stent. Results Postoperative follow-up of the patients showed that all stents were released at the proper position and that branch vessels were not occluded, and there were no instances of type I endoleak. One patient died suddenly one week after surgery; another experienced retrograde type A aortic dissection in the second week; and type I endoleak occurred in one patient in the first week, although this resolved within six months. No serious complications such as cerebrovascular events, acute spinal cord ischemia, and paraplegia occurred during the perioperative period. All patients had false lumen thrombosis in the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Conclusion Prefenestrated stent grafting is a feasible treatment option for repairing an entry tear in the ascending aorta.

Chimney technique in the endovascular management of complex aortic disease

Vascular ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 251-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A Antoniou ◽  
Andrew Schiro ◽  
Stavros A Antoniou ◽  
Finn Farquharson ◽  
David Murray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Type I ◽  
Early Type ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Chimney Technique ◽  
Aortic Pathology ◽  
Type I Endoleak

The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature reporting on the chimney technique and perform an analysis of the outcomes. A search of electronic databases was undertaken to identify all studies reporting on the outcome of the chimney technique. The selected articles were divided into those reporting on the treatment of aortic pathology involving the visceral and those involving the supra-aortic branches. Twenty-one articles reporting on the treatment of juxta/supra-renal aorta and aortic arch disease in 102 and 37 patients, respectively, were identified. In the visceral group, an overall technical success rate of 91% was achieved, the perioperative major morbidity and mortality rates were 17 and 5%, respectively, and an early type I endoleak developed in 13 patients (13%). During follow-up, one patient died of intestinal ischemia. In the supra-aortic group, the technical success rate was recorded in 95%, and three patients (8%) developed an early type I endoleak. Three patients (13%) required conversion to open surgery during follow-up. In conclusion, this technique may be viewed as a complementary technique in high-surgical-risk patients.

Amplatzer Vascular Plug for Complicated Residual DeBakey Type 1 Aortic Dissection in the Aortic Arch

2021 ◽  
pp. 155698452098379
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Ikeda ◽  
Michael Shih ◽  
Robert Y. Rhee ◽  
Benjamin A. Youdelman
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Type I ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Complete Thrombosis ◽  
One Year ◽  
Hemiarch Replacement

Surgical treatment of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection does not address the entire aorta, which can leave anatomically complex residual aortic dissection in the aortic arch and descending aorta. Open repair has been the standard treatment for this pathology. When the lesions are located in the aortic arch, re-do total arch replacement needs to be performed. Plug placement to close small entry tears in the aortic arch has been reported. This article reports about a 79-year-old man who underwent hemiarch replacement for acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. One year later, his proximal descending aorta dilated to 6.3 cm. The patient was treated with Amplatzer plug in the false lumen, and a stent graft was placed in the true lumen. Follow-up computed tomography scan confirmed complete thrombosis of the false lumen in the descending aorta which had decreased from 6.3 to 4.0 cm. Plug placement in the false lumen in the aortic arch is a potential treatment strategy for anatomically complex residual aortic dissection to induce thrombosis of the false lumen and encourage remodeling.

Treatment of a type Ia endoleak following EVAR using a custom-made inner branch device.

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110627
Author(s):  
Gino Gemayel GG ◽  
Michel Montessuit MM ◽  
Anouche Gemayel GA
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Type I ◽  
Novel Technology ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Aortic Cuff

Objectives We represent two cases of late proximal type I endoleak following EVAR with aneurysm expansion that were treated with a custom-made graft with inner branches. Methods Two patients of 87 and 82 years old were operated by EVAR 6 and 8 years ago for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Both had proximal type I endoleak with aneurysm sac expansion. Open surgery had a high risk, and a proximal aortic extension with a simple aortic cuff was not possible neither because previous EVAR grafts were already at the level of the renal arteries. A custom-made endograft with inner branches was planned as a fenestrated graft was not technically possible. Results We successfully treated both patients using a custom-made graft with four inner branches from Jotec (Cryolife, Kennesaw, GA). Three months’ follow-up CT scan did not show any endoleaks. All target vessels were patent with good conformability of the bridging stents. Conclusion The treatment of proximal type I endoleak using inner branches’ endografts is feasible. This novel technology might broaden the indications for complex aortic repair in a group of patients where fenestrated endografts are not possible.

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) and Chimney EVAS in the Treatment of Failed Endovascular Aneurysm Repairs

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwan Youssef ◽  
Sebastian Zerwes ◽  
Rudolf Jakob ◽  
Oroa Salem ◽  
Fritz Dünschede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Multiple Organ ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Graft Thrombosis ◽  
Type Ia ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Chimney Graft ◽  
Bifurcated Graft

Purpose: To assess the technical success and clinical outcome of reinterventions using the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System to treat complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients (mean age 79 years; 14 men) with prior EVAR were treated with EVAS between March 2014 and December 2015 at 2 institutions. The failed prior EVARs included 13 bifurcated endografts, 1 bifurcated graft plus fenestrated cuff, and 1 tube endograft. Endoleaks were the predominant indications: type Ia in 10 and type III in 5 (3 type IIIa and 2 type IIIb). All patients presented with progressive aortic aneurysms (median 7.85-cm diameter; range 6.5–11). Eight patients were treated on an urgent or emergency basis (6 symptomatic aneurysms and 2 contained ruptures). All patients underwent Nellix relining of the failed stent-graft; 10 had chimney (Ch) procedures in combination with EVAS (chEVAS) because the proximal landing zones were inadequate. Results: Technical success was 100%. All endoleaks were successfully sealed, and no additional intervention was required. No further endoleak after EVAS or chEVAS was recorded. Endobag protrusion occurred in 1 case without sequelae. One elderly patient with ruptured aneurysm died from multiple organ failure 2 months postoperatively. One renal artery guidewire injury led to nephrectomy because of active bleeding. No reinterventions, aneurysm-related mortalities, graft thrombosis, endoleaks, or chimney graft occlusions were observed during a median follow-up of 8 months (range 3–24). Conclusion: The present preliminary experience demonstrates that the use of EVAS/chEVAS is feasible for treatment of failed EVAR. This technique may be used as bailout or an alternative treatment when other established methods are infeasible or not available.

Real-World Experience with Type I Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Adams ◽  
Margaret C. Tracci ◽  
Sahir Sabri ◽  
Kenneth J. Cherry ◽  
John F. Angle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural History ◽  
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Spontaneous Resolution ◽  
Type I ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
History Of ◽  
Aortic Pathologies ◽  
Initial Results

Endoleaks are a frequent complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and will likely increase in incidence with application of the technique to more complicated aortic anatomy and a wider range of thoracic aortic pathologies. Management generally consists of aggressive repair of Type I endoleaks; however, the natural history of Type I endoleaks after TEVAR remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence and characteristics of Type I endoleaks and to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with Type I endoleaks after TEVAR. A single-center retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent TEVAR over a 4-year period. Type I endoleaks were detected in 21 per cent (27 of 129) of patients on post-deployment aortography or CT angiography. During a mean follow-up of 750.63 ± 483 days, 59 per cent (16 of 27) closed spontaneously; 30 per cent (eight of 27) required secondary endovascular intervention; and 11 per cent (three of 27) have persisted with no increase in maximum aortic diameter. No patients have died or required open surgical conversion as a result of their Type I endoleak. Although accurate predictors of spontaneous resolution of Type I endoleaks have yet to be definitively characterized, our initial results suggest that it may be safe to observe small Type I endoleaks given that a large percentage resolve spontaneously and no endoleak-related deaths have occurred.

Secondary Procedures Following Iliac Branch Device Treatment of Aneurysms Involving the Iliac Bifurcation: The pELVIS Registry

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos P. Donas ◽  
Mirjam Inchingolo ◽  
Piergiorgio Cao ◽  
Carlo Pratesi ◽  
Giovanni Pratesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specific Treatment ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
Iliac Arteries ◽  
Type I Endoleak ◽  
Secondary Procedures ◽  
Sealing Zone ◽  
Crossover Bypass ◽  
Iliac Bifurcation

Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and reasons for secondary procedures in patients treated with iliac branch devices (IBDs) for isolated iliac aneurysm or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation. Methods: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 575 surgical-high-risk patients (mean age 72.0±8.4 years; 558 men) with isolated iliac aneurysms (n=79) or aortoiliac aneurysms involving the iliac bifurcation (n=496) were treated with placement of 650 ZBIS or Gore IBDs (75 bilateral) in 6 European centers. The primary outcome was procedure-related reinterventions for occlusion or high-grade (>70%) stenosis of the bridging device, occlusion of the ipsilateral common or external iliac artery (EIA), type I/III endoleak, rupture, or infection following IBD implantation. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed based on preset definitions of comorbidities, aneurysm morphology, intraoperative variables, and follow-up strategies. Results: Nine (1.6%) reinterventions were performed within 30 days for occlusion or endoleak. Among 10 (1.5%) occluded EIAs ipsilateral to a deployed IBD, 6 underwent a reintervention with additional stent placement after thrombolysis (n=4) or a femorofemoral or iliofemoral crossover bypass (n=2). Three of 14 patients with early type I endoleak had a reintervention for an insufficient proximal sealing zone (stent-grafts in 2 common iliac arteries and 1 bifurcated endograft). Mean clinical and radiological follow-up were 32.6±9.9 and 29.8±21.1 months, respectively. Forty-two (7.3%) patients underwent reinterventions in the follow-up period. The overall postoperative reintervention rate was 8.9%. Both external and common iliac segments occluded in 30 (4.6%) IBDs; 2 patients had a crossover bypass and 14 were treated with endovascular techniques. In the other 14 patients, no specific treatment was performed. Seven (1.2%) patients with isolated EIA occlusion were treated during follow-up. Nineteen of the overall 28 patients with type I endoleak underwent endovascular repair. The other 9 were under radiological surveillance due to less significant (<5 mm) sac increase. No reintervention was performed to recanalize 11 (1.6%) occluded internal iliac arteries. Conclusion: Midterm experience with placement of IBDs is associated with a low incidence of secondary procedures due to type I endoleaks and occlusions. The main reasons for reinterventions seem to be short proximal sealing zone and poor conformability of the ZBIS device in elongated EIAs.

Non-Standard Management of Target Vessels With the Inner Branch Arch Endograft: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110586
Author(s):  
Jose I. Torrealba ◽  
Konstantinos Spanos ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
Thomas Gandet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery ◽  
Left Vertebral Artery ◽  
Type I ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Standard Management

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate early and mid-term results of non-standard management of the supraaortic target vessels with the use of the inner branch arch endograft in a single high-volume center. Material and methods: A single-center retrospective study including all patients undergoing implantation of an inner branch arch endograft from December 2012 to March 2021, who presented a non-standard management of the supraaortic target vessels (any bypass other than a left carotid-subclavian or landing in a dissected target vessel). Technical success, mortality, reinterventions, endoleak (EL), and aortic remodeling at follow-up were analyzed. Results: Twenty-four patients were included. In 17 (71%) cases, the non-standard management was related to innominate artery (IA) compromise (12 with IA dissection, 2 with short IA, 2 with short proximal aortic landing zone that required occlusion of IA, 1 with occluded IA after open arch repair). Two (8%) cases were related to an aberrant right subclavian artery (RSA), 1 patient (4%) due to the concomitant presence of a left vertebral artery (LVA) arising from the arch and an occluded left subclavian artery (LSA), and another patient presented with an occluded LSA distal to a dominant vertebral artery. Three (13%) cases were exclusively related to management in patients with genetic aortic syndromes. Twenty (83%) patients had a previous type A aortic dissection. Ten (42%) patients presented a thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and 8 (33%) patients an arch aneurysm, 6 of them associated to false lumen (FL) perfusion. There were 2 (8%) perioperative minor strokes, and 1 patient with perioperative mortality. Seven patients presented an early type I endoleak, all resolved at follow-up. Seven patients required reinterventions during follow-up (7 reinterventions related to continuous false lumen perfusion, 3 related to Type Ia endoleak, 2 related to surgical bypass). All patients who presented with FL perfusion had complete FL thrombosis at follow-up. No patient presented aneurysm growth at follow-up. Conclusions: The use of the inner branch arch endograft with a non-standard management of the supraaortic target vessels is a possible option. Despite a high reintervention rate, regression or stability of the aneurysmal diameter was achieved in all the patients with follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document