scholarly journals Biased Coupling to β-Arrestin of Two Common Variants of the CB2 Cannabinoid Receptor

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Turu ◽  
Eszter Soltész-Katona ◽  
András Dávid Tóth ◽  
Cintia Juhász ◽  
Miklós Cserző ◽  
...  

β-arrestins are partners of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), regulating their intracellular trafficking and signaling. Development of biased GPCR agonists, selectively targeting either G protein or β-arrestin pathways, are in the focus of interest due to their therapeutic potential in different pathological conditions. The CB2 cannabinoid receptor (CB2R) is a GPCR involved in various functions in the periphery and the central nervous system. Two common occurring variants of CB2R, harboring Q63R or L133I missense mutations, have been implicated in the development of a diverse set of disorders. To evaluate the effect of these mutations, we characterized the binding profile of these mutant CB2 receptors to G proteins and β-arrestin2. Although their ability to inhibit cAMP signaling was similar, the Q63R mutant had increased, whereas the L133I mutant receptor had decreased β-arrestin2 binding. In line with these observations, the variants also had altered intracellular trafficking. Our results show that two common variants of the CB2 receptor have biased signaling properties, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of the associated disorders and may offer CB2R as a target for further development of biased receptor activation strategies.

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (17) ◽  
pp. 5413
Author(s):  
Luciana M. Leo ◽  
Mary E. Abood

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor highly expressed throughout the central nervous system that is a promising target for the treatment of various disorders, including anxiety, pain, and neurodegeneration. Despite the wide therapeutic potential of CB1, the development of drug candidates is hindered by adverse effects, rapid tolerance development, and abuse potential. Ligands that produce biased signaling—the preferential activation of a signaling transducer in detriment of another—have been proposed as a strategy to dissociate therapeutic and adverse effects for a variety of G-protein coupled receptors. However, biased signaling at the CB1 receptor is poorly understood due to a lack of strongly biased agonists. Here, we review studies that have investigated the biased signaling profile of classical cannabinoid agonists and allosteric ligands, searching for a potential therapeutic advantage of CB1 biased signaling in different pathological states. Agonist and antagonist bound structures of CB1 and proposed mechanisms of action of biased allosteric modulators are used to discuss a putative molecular mechanism for CB1 receptor activation and biased signaling. Current studies suggest that allosteric binding sites on CB1 can be explored to yield biased ligands that favor or hinder conformational changes important for biased signaling.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 3734-3744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oualid Sbai ◽  
Carine Monnier ◽  
Catherine Dodé ◽  
Jean‐Philippe Pin ◽  
Jean‐Pierre Hardelin ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 811-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda M.C. van der Lee ◽  
Marion Blomenröhr ◽  
Antoon A. van der Doelen ◽  
Jesse W.Y. Wat ◽  
Niels Smits ◽  
...  

Receptor redistribution and β-arrestin recruitment assays provide a G-protein-subtype-independent method to measure ligand-stimulated activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. In particular β-arrestin assays are becoming an increasingly popular tool for drug discovery. The authors have compared a high-content-imaging-based Redistribution® assay and 2 nonimaging-based β-arrestin recruitment assays, Tango™ and PathHunter ™, for the cannabinoid receptor 1. Inasmuch as all 3 assays use receptors that are modified at the C-terminus, the authors verified their pharmacology via detection of Gαi coupling of the receptor in cAMP assays using reference ligands. The potencies and efficacies of the cannabinoid receptor agonists CP55,940 and WIN55,212-2 correlated well between the 3 assays, and are comparable with the measured ligand binding affinities. The inverse agonist SR141716 decreased basal signal in all 3 assays, but only in the Tango bla assay a reliable EC50 could be determined for this compound, suggesting that Tango is the most suitable assay for the identification of new inverse agonists. Both the Redistribution and the PathHunter assay could discriminate partial agonists from full agonists, whereas in the Tango assay partial agonists behaved as full agonists. Only the PathHunter cells allowed detection of cannabinoid receptor activation via β-arrestin recruitment and Gαi-protein-mediated inhibition of cAMP, thus enabling the identification of biased ligands that differ in these cellular effects. The characteristics and limitations of the different assays are discussed. ( Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2009:811-823)


2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamonchanok Sansuk ◽  
Xavier Deupi ◽  
Ivan R. Torrecillas ◽  
Aldo Jongejan ◽  
Saskia Nijmeijer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document