scholarly journals Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Only for Ovarian Cancer Liver Metastasis

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Xue Wu ◽  
Miao-Ling Chen ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Jian-Jun Han
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Chemotherapy Group ◽  
Effective Option

PurposeTo compare the feasibility and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in patients with ovarian cancer liver metastasis (OCLM).MethodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 60 patients diagnosed with OCLM between May 2015 to February 2017 were included. All patients with ovarian cancer received chemotherapy and primary cytoreductive surgery before. Thirty patients underwent RFA and chemotherapy, and thirty patients only took chemotherapy. The overall survival (OS), CA-125 levels, and serum AST and ALT levels were compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the RFA group, the 1-,2-, and 3-year OS rates after RFA were 93.3%, 80.0%, and 53.3%, respectively. Serum AST and ALT levels were both elevated after RFA (p=0.0004, p<0.0001). In the chemotherapy group, the 1-,2-, and 3-year OS rates were 79.5%, 60.1%, and 42.1%, respectively. Levels of serum AST and ALT were stable. CA-125 levels for both groups were also available.ConclusionBased on our analysis of a single institution’s series of patients with OCLM, RFA could be a feasibly effective option in the management of OCLM.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastasis From Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Initial Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1261-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baoxian Liu ◽  
Guangliang Huang ◽  
Chunlin Jiang ◽  
Ming Xu ◽  
Bowen Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Alternative Treatment Strategy

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of liver metastasis from ovarian cancer (OC).MethodsA retrospective review was performed on 11 patients (mean age, 53.0 ± 10.1 years) with 22 liver metastases (mean diameter, 2.0 ± 0.8 cm) from OC undergone RFA. Radiofrequency ablation was carried out with Starburst XL electrodes (RITA Medical System, Mountain View, CA) or Cool-tip electrodes (Cool-tip Systems; Valleylab, Boulder, CO). The tumor response, time to progression, and survival after RFA were assessed.ResultsComplete ablation was achieved for all lesions. The technique effectiveness was 100%. During the follow-up period, local tumor progression was observed in 1 (4.5%) of 22 lesions. The median time to progression was 8.0 months after RFA. Three patients died because of disease progression after 13, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The mean overall survival time after RFA was 53.1 ± 10.0 months, with the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 100%, 61%, and 61%, respectively. No major complications were encountered.ConclusionsRadiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment strategy is feasible and effective for selected patients with liver metastasis from OC, providing a high rate of local tumor control.

Sorafenib in Combination With Gemcitabine in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Study of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Welch ◽  
Hal W. Hirte ◽  
Laurie Elit ◽  
Russel J. Schilder ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Response Evaluation Criteria

Objectives:Antiangiogenic strategies have demonstrated efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Sorafenib is a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Gemcitabine has known activity against EOC. A phase 1 clinical trial of this combination suggested activity in ovarian cancer with no dose-limiting toxicity. This phase 2 study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and sorafenib in patients with recurrent EOC.Methods:Patients with recurrent EOC after platinum-based chemotherapy and who had subsequently received up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenous [IV]) was administered weekly for 7 of 8 weeks in the first cycle, then weekly for 3 weeks of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Sorafenib (400 mg p.o. bid) was given continuously. The primary end point for this trial was objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 response, time to progression, overall survival, and toxicity.Results:Forty-three patients were enrolled, and 33 completed at least 1 cycle. Two patients had a partial response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors objective response rate = 4.7%). Ten patients (23.3%) maintained response or stable disease for at least 6 months. GCIG CA-125 response was 27.9%. The median time to progression was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 13.0 months. Hematologic toxicity was common but manageable. The most common nonhematologic adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, hypokalemia, and diarrhea.Conclusion:This trial of gemcitabine and sorafenib in recurrent EOC did not meet its primary efficacy end point, but the combination was associated with encouraging rates of prolonged stable disease and CA-125 response.

Impact of pleural effusion in ovarian cancer: A retrospective study in Lleida, Spain.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17534-e17534
Author(s):  
Eleonor Paola Murata ◽  
Silvia Bielsa ◽  
Marina Pardina ◽  
Antonieta Salud Salvia ◽  
Laura Porcel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Medical Reports ◽  
Stage Ivb

e17534 Background: The presence of pleural effusion in the evolution of patients with ovarian cancer is not uncommon. In one series of 123 patients, malignant pleural effusion at the diagnoses was observed in 29%, and 70% during the course of the disease. Methods: This observational, retrospective study included patients with ovarian cancer and pleural effusion between July 2007 and December 2019 in Lleida, province of Catalonia, Spain. Data were collected from electronic medical reports. This study analyzed the clinical features of ovarian cancer patients with pleural effusion and its impact on their survival. Results: Data from 189 patients with ovarian cancer were collected. The median age was 63 years old. Pleural effusion was observed in 81 patients, 55 at the diagnosis and 26 in the disease evolution. Fifty five percent were confirmed as malignant etiology. Most of the patients were diagnosed with an advanced stage (38.3% stage IIIC, 12.3% stage IVA, 40.7% stage IVB), and 74.1% were high-grade serous carcinoma. When the pleural effusion was observed at the diagnosis, the median overall survival was 20.8 vs 69.3 months in the absence of it (p < 0.001). When the pleural effusion was observed at any time of the disease, the median overall survival was 26.7 vs 90.4 months without it (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, patients with ovarian cancer and pleural effusion, at diagnosis or in the course of the disease, experienced reduced survival compared with the absence of it.

TRUST: Trial of Radical Upfront Surgical Therapy in advanced ovarian cancer (ENGOT ov33/AGO‐OVAR OP7)

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1327-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andreas du Bois ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Christina Fotopoulou ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinoma ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundPrimary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy has been considered standard management for patients with advanced ovarian cancer over decades. An alternative approach of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently reported by two randomized phase III trials (EORTC‐GCG, CHORUS), which were criticized owing to important limitations, especially regarding the rate of complete resection.Primary ObjectiveTo clarify the optimal timing of surgical therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.Study HypothesisPrimary cytoreductive surgery is superior to interval cytoreductive surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Trial DesignTRUST is an international open, randomized, controlled multi-center trial investigating overall survival after primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent interval cytoreductive surgery in patients with FIGO stage IIIB–IVB ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma. To guarantee adequate surgical quality, participating centers need to fulfill specific quality assurance criteria (eg, ≥50% complete resection rate in upfront surgery for FIGO IIIB–IVB patients, ≥36 debulking-surgeries/year) and agree to independent audits by TRUST quality committee delegates. Patients in the primary cytoreductive surgery arm undergo surgery followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, whereas patients in the interval cytoreductive surgery arm undergo 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy after histologic confirmation of the disease, followed by interval cytoreductive surgery and subsequently, 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. The intention of surgery for both groups is complete tumor resection according to guideline recommendations.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaMajor inclusion criteria are suspected or histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma FIGO stage IIIB–IVB (IV only if resectable metastasis). Major exclusion criteria are non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and borderline tumors; prior chemotherapy for ovarian cancer; or abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy.Primary EndpointOverall survival.Sample Size772 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAccrual completion approximately mid-2019, results are expected after 5 years' follow-up in 2024.Trial RegistrationNCT02828618.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document