scholarly journals T-Cell-Replete Versus ex vivo T-Cell-Depleted Haploidentical Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia and Other Haematological Malignancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Kleinschmidt ◽  
Meng Lv ◽  
Asaf Yanir ◽  
Julia Palma ◽  
Peter Lang ◽  
...  

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a potentially curative option for children with high-risk or refractory/relapsed leukaemias. Traditional donor hierarchy favours a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) over an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD), followed by alternative donors such as haploidentical donors or unrelated cord blood. However, haploidentical HSCT (hHSCT) may be entailed with significant advantages: besides a potentially increased graft-vs.-leukaemia effect, the immediate availability of a relative as well as the possibility of a second donation for additional cellular therapies may impact on outcome. The key question in hHSCT is how, and how deeply, to deplete donor T-cells. More T cells in the graft confer faster immune reconstitution with consecutively lower infection rates, however, greater numbers of T-cells might be associated with higher rates of graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD). Two different methods for reduction of alloreactivity have been established: in vivo T-cell suppression and ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD). Ex vivo TCD of the graft uses either positive selection or negative depletion of graft cells before infusion. In contrast, T-cell-repleted grafts consisting of non-manipulated bone marrow or peripheral blood grafts require intense in vivo GvHD prophylaxis. There are two major T-cell replete protocols: one is based on post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), while the other is based on anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG; Beijing protocol). Published data do not show an unequivocal benefit for one of these three platforms in terms of overall survival, non-relapse mortality or disease recurrence. In this review, we discuss the pros and cons of these three different approaches to hHSCT with an emphasis on the significance of the existing data for children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Merli ◽  
Marianne Ifversen ◽  
Tony H. Truong ◽  
Hanne V. Marquart ◽  
Jochen Buechner ◽  
...  

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment plays a central role in risk stratification and treatment guidance in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). As such, MRD prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a major factor that is independently correlated with outcome. High burden of MRD is negatively correlated with post-transplant survival, as both the risk of leukaemia recurrence and non-relapse mortality increase with greater levels of MRD. Despite growing evidence supporting these findings, controversies still exist. In particular, it is still not clear whether multiparameter flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which is used to recognise immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, can be employed interchangeably. Moreover, the higher sensitivity in MRD quantification offered by next-generation sequencing techniques may further refine the ability to stratify transplant-associated risks. While MRD quantification from bone marrow prior to HSCT remains the state of the art, heavily pre-treated patients may benefit from additional staging, such as using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to detect focal residues of disease. Additionally, the timing of MRD detection (i.e., immediately before administration of the conditioning regimen or weeks before) is a matter of debate. Pre-transplant MRD negativity has previously been associated with superior outcomes; however, in the recent For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) study, pre-HSCT MRD positivity was associated with neither relapse risk nor survival. In this review, we discuss the level of MRD that may require pre-transplant therapy intensification, risking time delay and complications (as well as losing the window for HSCT if disease progression occurs), as opposed to an adapted post-transplant strategy to achieve long-term remission. Indeed, MRD monitoring may be a valuable tool to guide individualised treatment decisions, including tapering of immunosuppression, cellular therapies (such as donor lymphocyte infusions) or additional immunotherapy (such as bispecific T-cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy).


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5435-5435
Author(s):  
Rimke Oostvogels ◽  
Rieuwert Hoppes ◽  
Henk Lokhorst ◽  
Robbert M Spaapen ◽  
Huib Ovaa ◽  
...  

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), alone or followed by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), is a potentially curative treatment for various hematological malignancies. In an HLA-matched transplantation setting, the therapeutic graft-versus-tumor (GvT) effect is mediated by donor T-cells directed at minor histocompatibility antigens (mHags), which are HLA-bound polymorphic peptides. Unfortunately, most patients don’t achieve complete response or relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and thus still require additional therapies. Immunotherapy aimed at hematopoietically restricted mHags could theoretically provide an ideal method to augment the GvT effect, without causing GvHD. The most relevant mHags for immunotherapy are those antigens that are only expressed on hematopoietic tissue, are presented by frequent HLA molecules and display an equally balanced population frequency. UTA2-1 and HA-1 are two of these most broadly applicable mHags identified up until now and are therefore included in on-going clinical trials of mHag-peptide loaded dendritic cell vaccination in patients with various hematological malignancies. Another method for mHag-based immunotherapy could be adoptive transfer of ex vivo cultured mHag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). However, initial results of both methods, also from preclinical models and trials in patients with solid tumors, postulate the necessity for improved strategies for efficient ex vivo and in vivo induction of tumour specific CTLs. We here show for the HLA-A*02 restricted epitopes UTA2-1 and HA-1 that their MHC binding and consequent T cell reactivity can be improved through the incorporation of certain newly designed non-proteogenic amino acids at crucial MHC anchoring positions. With this novel approach we designed superior altered peptide ligands (APLs) for both epitopes, of which the best modifications not only increased MHC binding and stability, but also improved recognition by antigen specific T cells. Most importantly, these optimised peptides gave rise to superior antitumor T cell responses in vitro and in vivo in comparison to the native epitope, as they induced significantly enhanced proliferation of peptide-specific T cells with retained cytotoxic potential against malignant targets expressing the natural UTA2-1 antigen. Hence, these APLs designed with non-proteogenic amino acids with enhanced MHC-affinity and immunogenicity may improve the therapeutic outcome of mHag-based vaccination strategies, or can be utilized for ex vivo antigen-specific T cell enrichment and expansion for transfer into patients with haematological malignancies. Disclosures: Lokhorst: Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson-Cilag: Honoraria; Mudipharma: Honoraria.


2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Calvo ◽  
Leila Ronceray ◽  
Nathalie Dhédin ◽  
Jochen Buechner ◽  
Anja Troeger ◽  
...  

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) represent a challenging group of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients with specific needs. While there is growing evidence from comparative studies that this age group profits from intensified paediatric-based chemotherapy, the impact and optimal implementation of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the overall treatment strategy is less clear. Over recent years, improved survival rates after myeloablative allogeneic HSCT for ALL have been reported similarly for AYAs and children despite differences in transplantation practise. Still, AYAs appear to have inferior outcomes and an increased risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality in comparison with children. To further improve HSCT outcomes and reduce toxicities in AYAs, accurate stratification and evaluation of additional or alternative targeted treatment options are crucial, based on specific molecular and immunological characterisation of ALL and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment during therapy. Age-specific factors such as increased acute toxicities and poorer adherence to treatment as well as late sequelae might influence treatment decisions. In addition, educational, social, work, emotional, and sexual aspects during this very crucial period of life need to be considered. In this review, we summarise the key findings of recent studies on treatment approach and outcomes in this vulnerable patient group after HSCT, turning our attention to the different approaches applied in paediatric and adult centres. We focus on the specific needs of AYAs with ALL regarding social aspects and supportive care to handle complications as well as fertility issues. Finally, we comment on potential areas of future research and concisely debate the capacity of currently available immunotherapies to reduce toxicity and further improve survival in this challenging patient group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document