scholarly journals Triple-Regimen of Vemurafenib, Irinotecan, and Cetuximab for the Treatment of BRAFV600E-Mutant CRC: A Case Report and Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Min Cho ◽  
Abdullah Esmail ◽  
Maen Abdelrahim
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Triple Regimen ◽  
Hepatic Metastatic Disease ◽  
Braf Mutant

Mutation of the BRAF proto-oncogene is found in approximately 10% of colorectal cancers (CRC), with much of the mutation conferred by a V600E mutation. Unlike other CRC subtypes, BRAF-mutant CRC have had relatively limited response to conventional therapies and overall poor survival. We present the case of a 75-year-old man with severe nonischemic cardiomyopathy on a LifeVest who was found to have a transverse colonic mass with widespread hepatic metastatic disease and was subsequently found to have BRAFV600E-mutant CRC (MSI High/dMMR). After a failed therapy with FOLFOX and pembrolizumab, the patient was started on a regimen of vemurafenib, irinotecan, and cetuximab (VIC) based on the SWOG 1406 trial which had shown improved progression-free survival and response rate for the treatment of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic CRC. After 40 cycles of VIC, the patient attained complete response and is in remission off chemotherapy with significant improvement. This case highlights the effectiveness of the triple-regimen of vemurafenib, irinotecan, and cetuximab as a treatment option for BRAFV600E-mutant CRC, which is a treatment regimen based on the SWOG 1406 trial, and also demonstrates the synergistic role of BRAFV600E inhibitors and EGFR inhibitors in the treatment of BRAFV600E-mutant CRC.

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

scholarly journals High Expression of GSDMC Is Associated with Poor Survival in Kidney Clear Cell Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yun-Qian Cui ◽  
Fei Meng ◽  
Wen-Li Zhan ◽  
Zhou-Tong Dai ◽  
Xinghua Liao
Keyword(s):  
Potential Role ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma ◽  
High Expression ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Free Survival

This study is aimed at exploring the potential role of GSDMC in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC). We analyzed the expression of GSDMC in 33 types of cancers in TCGA database. The results showed that the expression of GSDMC was upregulated in most cancers. We found a significant association between high expression of GSDMC and shortened patient overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease-specific survival. In vitro experiments have shown that the expression of GSDMC was significantly elevated in KIRC cell lines. Moreover, decreased expression of GSDMC was significantly associated with decreased cell proliferation. In summary, we believe that this study provides valuable data supporting future clinical treatment.

Clinical outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma receiving chemoimmunotherapy in the PRIMA study is not affected by FCGR3A and FCGR2A polymorphisms

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (13) ◽  
pp. 2650-2657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Ghesquières ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
John Francis Seymour ◽  
Marie-Hélène Delfau-Larue ◽  
Fritz Offner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance

Abstract In patients with follicular lymphoma treated with single-agent rituximab, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the FCGR3A gene are known to influence response and progression-free survival. The prognostic role of FCGR3A and FCGR2A polymorphisms in patients with follicular lymphoma treated with rituximab and chemotherapy combination remains controversial and has not been evaluated in the context of rituximab maintenance. FCGR3A and FCGR2A single nucleotide polymorphisms were evaluated in, respectively, 460 and 455 patients treated in the PRIMA study to investigate whether these were associated with response rate and patient outcome after rituximab chemotherapy induction and 2-year rituximab maintenance. In this representative patient cohort, complete and unconfirmed complete responses after rituximab chemotherapy were observed in 65%, 67%, 66% (P = .86) and 60%, 72%, 66% (P = .21) of FCGR3A VV, VF, FF and FCGR2A HH, HR, RR carriers, respectively. After 2 years of rituximab maintenance (or observation), response rates did not differ among the different genotypes. Progression-free survival measured from either treatment initiation or randomization to observation or maintenance was not influenced by these polymorphisms. These data indicate that FCGR3A and FCGR2A polymorphisms do not influence response rate and outcome when rituximab is combined with chemotherapy or used as maintenance treatment. The PRIMA study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00140582.

Treatment exceeds expectations with vemurafenib monotherapy in a patient with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1754-1758
Author(s):  
Mesut Yilmaz ◽  
Şermin Güven Meşe
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Therapy Options ◽  
Modern Era ◽  
Braf Mutant

Introduction Patients with distant metastatic melanoma has a poor prognosis, with a reported median survival time of six to eight months. In modern era, survival has prolonged with the immunotherapy and targeted therapy options. Potent and selective BRAF inhibitors have been developed that specifically inhibit mutated BRAF over other RAF kinases. Vemurafenib was the first selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed to target the V600E allele of BRAF-mutant melanoma. Case Report In this report, we present a case of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic melanoma, which is being treated with vemurafenib monotherapy with complete response for about seven years. Management and Outcome The patient is still being treated with vemurafenib and radiologic complete response is ongoing for about seven years. Discussion Patients treated with BRAF inhibitors monotherapy had promising response rates and improvement in the progression-free survival and overall survival, but melanoma cells became resistant very quickly, affecting the progression. In this case, we present a case that has permanent response to vemurafenib monotherapy.

ABVD Versus Modified Stanford V Versus MOPPEBVCAD With Optional and Limited Radiotherapy in Intermediate- and Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Final Results of a Multicenter Randomized Trial by the Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (36) ◽  
pp. 9198-9207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo G. Gobbi ◽  
Alessandro Levis ◽  
Teodoro Chisesi ◽  
Chiara Broglia ◽  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Drug Doses ◽  
Advanced Hodgkin’S Lymphoma

Purpose In this multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial on advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapy regimens, doxorubicin, vinblastine, mechlorethamine, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, and prednisone (Stanford V) and mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, epidoxirubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, lomustine, doxorubicin, and vindesine (MOPPEBVCAD), were compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) as standard therapy to select which regimen would best support a reduced radiotherapy program, which was limited to ≤ two sites of either previous bulky or partially remitting disease (a modification of the original Stanford program). Patients and Methods Three hundred fifty-five patients with stage IIB, III, or IV HL were randomly assigned. Three hundred thirty-four patients were assessable for the study and received six cycles of ABVD (n = 122), three cycles of Stanford V (n = 107), or six cycles of MOPPEBVCAD (n = 106); radiotherapy was administered to 76, 71, and 50 patients in these three arms, respectively. Results The complete response rates for ABVD, Stanford V, and MOPPEBVCAD were 89%, 76% and 94%, respectively; 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) and progression-free survival rates were 78%, 54%, 81% and 85%, 73%, and 94%, respectively (P < .01 for comparison of Stanford V with the other two regimens). Corresponding 5-year overall survival rates were 90%, 82%, and 89% for ABVD, Stanford V, and MOPPEBVCAD, respectively. Stanford V was more myelotoxic than ABVD but less myelotoxic than MOPPEBVCAD, which had larger reductions in the prescribed drug doses. Conclusion When associated with conditioned and limited (not adjuvant) radiotherapy, ABVD and MOPPEBVCAD were superior to Stanford V chemotherapy in terms of response rate and FFS and progression-free survival. Patients were irradiated less often after MOPPEBVCAD, but this regimen was more toxic. ABVD is still the best choice when it is combined with optional, limited irradiation.

Combination of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (VMPT) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Phase I/II Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 407-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Maria Teresa Ambrosini ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Patrizia Pregno ◽  
Norbert Pescosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Of Therapy

Abstract BACKGROUND: In newly diagnosed patients, the addition of thalidomide or bortezomib (Velcade™) to the standard oral melphalan/prednisone combination significantly increased response rate and event-free survival. In this multicenter, open-label, non randomized, phase I/II trial, the safety/efficacy profile of the 4 drug combination, bortezomib (Velcade™), melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (VMPT) was evaluated in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. METHODS: Bortezomib was administered by IV bolus on days 1, 4, 15, 22 at three dose levels: in the first cohort (10 patients) at 1.0 mg/m2; in the second cohort (10 patients) at 1.3 mg/m2and in the third cohort (10 patients) at 1.6 mg/m2. Oral melphalan was administered at 6 mg/m2 on days 1–5, oral prednisone at 60 mg/m2 on days 1–5. Thalidomide was delivered at 50 mg on days 1–35. Each course was repeated every 35 days for a total of 6 courses. RESULTS: Thirty patients, median age 66 years (range 38–79), with relapsed or refractory myeloma were enrolled. Fourteen patients received VMPT as second line of therapy, 16 as third line. Twenty patients received prior autologous transplant, 10 conventional chemotherapy and 9 thalidomide-based regimens. After a median of 6 courses, 20 patients (67%) achieved a partial response (PR) including 13 patients (43%) who achieved at least a very good partial response (VGPR). Among patients who received VMPT as second line treatment, the PR rate was 79%, and the immunofixation negative complete response rate 36%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 61%, and the 1-year survival from study entry was 84%. Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included: infections (5 patients), fatigue (1), vasculitis (1) and peripheral neuropathy (2); no grade 4 toxicities were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Initial results showed that VMPT is an effective salvage therapy with a high proportion of responses. Toxicities were manageable. The incidence of neurotoxicities was unexpectedly low.

Weekly Topotecan for Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Tolerability and Efficacy Study—The Israeli Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Safra ◽  
Tara Berman ◽  
Adelya Yachnin ◽  
Ilan Bruchim ◽  
Mihai Meirovitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Tubal Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical activity and toxicity of weekly topotecan in a large cohort of epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), and tubal cancer patients.MethodsRecords of patients with recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan (4.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle) after failure of more than 1 prior regimen were retrospectively reviewed in 8 centers in Israel.ResultsTwo hundred four patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 62 years (range, 27–89 years); 121 (59.3%) were platinum sensitive. Patients were exposed to a median of 2 previous lines (range, 1–9), and 48.5% received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 2.5–112 months). Overall response rate was 26.5%, of which 11 patients (5.4%) had complete response, and 43 patients (21.1%) had partial response. Clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 65.7%. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5–4.5 months). There was no significant difference between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients regarding response rate or progression-free survival. Median overall survival from disease diagnosis was 45.0 months (95% CI, 40.04–49.6 months) and 16.0 months (95% CI, 12.3–19.7 months) from initiation of topotecan therapy. Overall survival was significantly different between patients with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease (19.9 vs 10.8 months, respectively, P = 0.003; 95% CI, 8.1–16.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that only platinum sensitivity and topotecan line were associated with overall survival. Weekly topotecan was well tolerated—with only 16.7% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities. There were no other grade 4 toxicities, and only 6.9% grade 3 toxicities.ConclusionsIn this large cohort of recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer, weekly topotecan was well tolerated with good clinical benefit rate, comparable to previous studies.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

scholarly journals Improved Progression-Free Survival for Bulky and Non-Bulky Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Consolidative Radiation Therapy: A Bi-Institutional Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusef Ali Syed ◽  
Cecilia Jiang ◽  
Jeffrey Switchenko ◽  
Khadija Kirmani ◽  
Chris Kelsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma

Abstract Background: The role of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not fully established. Retrospective data provide evidence for the use of consolidative RT in stage III-IV DLBCL and emerging data from randomized studies address the role of RT in bulky disease for these patients.Methods: Patient with stage III-IV DLBCL treated at two institutions who achieved clinical complete response to systemic therapy were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the impact of consolidative RT. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: One hundred eighty-eight patients received systemic therapy consisting of R-CHOP (79%), another Rituximab-based regimen (9%), or chemotherapy alone (12%). Clinical response was assessed using conventional CT or PET-CT. Sixty-eight patients (36%) received consolidative RT (median dose 30 Gy). Consolidative RT conferred a 36.7% absolute benefit in five-year progression-free survival (85.9% vs. 49.2%, log rank p < 0.0001), and a 14.5% absolute benefit in five-year overall survival (87.4% vs. 72.9%, log rank p = 0.0134). On multivariable analysis, consolidative RT was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.52, p < 0.001). Patients receiving consolidative RT demonstrated significantly improved PFS for tumors measuring both <5 cm (log rank p = 0.0454) and ³5 cm (log rank p = 0.0003).Conclusions: For patients with stage III-IV DLBCL who achieve clinical complete response after systemic therapy, consolidative RT improves PFS for all patients, including those with non-bulky disease. This benefit persists in the setting of rituximab-based systemic therapy.

Bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide for relapsed multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 2767-2772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Maria Teresa Ambrosini ◽  
Giulia Benevolo ◽  
Patrizia Pregno ◽  
Norbert Pescosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Initial Results

AbstractIn multiple myeloma (MM), the addition of thalidomide or bortezomib to the standard oral melphalan/prednisone combination significantly increased response rate and event-free survival. In this multicenter phase 1/2 trial, dosing, safety, and efficacy of the 4-drug combination, bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (VMPT) was determined. Bortezomib was administered at 3 dose levels (1.0 mg/m2, 1.3 mg/m2, or 1.6 mg/m2) on days 1, 4, 15, and 22; melphalan was given at a dose of 6 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and prednisone at 60 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5. Thalidomide was delivered at 50 mg on days 1 through 35. Each course was repeated every 35 days. The maximum tolerated dose of bortezomib was 1.3 mg/m2. Thirty patients with relapsed or refractory MM were enrolled; 20 patients (67%) achieved a partial response (PR) including 13 patients (43%) who achieved at least a very good PR. Among 14 patients who received VMPT as second-line treatment, the PR rate was 79% and the immunofixation-negative complete response rate 36%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 61%, and the 1-year survival from study entry was 84%. Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse events included infections (5 patients), fatigue (1), vasculitis (1), and peripheral neuropathy (2); no grade 4 toxicities were recorded. Initial results showed that VMPT is an effective salvage therapy with a very high proportion of responses. The incidence of neurotoxicities was unexpectedly low.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document