scholarly journals The Network Structure of Personality Pathology in Adolescence With the 100-Item Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short-Form (PID-5-SF)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Y. See ◽  
Theo A. Klimstra ◽  
Angélique O. J. Cramer ◽  
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Keyword(s):  
Network Structure ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Dsm 5

Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime L. Anderson ◽  
Martin Sellbom ◽  
Randall T. Salekin
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
External Criterion ◽  
Reliability Factor ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Dimensional Measure ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Personality Psychopathology

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition ( DSM-5) Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup developed the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) for the assessment of the alternative trait model for DSM-5. Along with this measure, the American Psychiatric Association published an abbreviated version, the PID-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF). Although this measure is available on the DSM-5 website for use, only two studies have evaluated its psychometric properties and validity and no studies have examined the U.S. version of this measure. The current study evaluated the reliability, factor structure, and construct validity of PID-5-BF scale scores. This included an evaluation of the scales’ associations with Section II PDs, a well-validated dimensional measure of personality psychopathology, and broad externalizing and internalizing psychopathology measures. We found support for the reliability of PID-5-BF scales as well as for the factor structure of the measure. Furthermore, a series of correlation and regression analyses showed conceptually expected associations between PID-5-BF and external criterion variables. Finally, we compared the correlations with external criterion measures to those of the full-length PID-5 and PID-5–Short form. Intraclass correlation analyses revealed a comparable pattern of correlations across all three measures, thereby supporting the use of the PID-5-BF as a screening measure of dimensional maladaptive personality traits.

Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Short Form (PID-5-SF): Reliability, Factorial Structure, and Relationship With Functional Impairment in Dual Diagnosis Patients

Assessment ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 853-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Díaz-Batanero ◽  
Juan Ramírez-López ◽  
Sara Domínguez-Salas ◽  
Fermín Fernández-Calderón ◽  
Óscar M. Lozano
Keyword(s):  
Dual Diagnosis ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Factorial Structure ◽  
Dsm 5

scholarly journals Personality functioning scale: A scale to assess DSM-5’s Criterion A personality disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-53
Author(s):  
Juliana Beatriz Stover ◽  
Mercedes Fernández Liporace ◽  
Alejandro Castro Solano
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Check List ◽  
Personality Functioning ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Short Scale ◽  
Criterion A ◽  
Symptom Check List

The Section III on Emerging Measures and Models included in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, introduces a hybrid alternative approach, dimensional-categorical, to diagnose personality disorders. The Criterion A establishes the assessment of the impairment in personality functioning in terms of two dimensions: self and interpersonal. The present study was aimed at developing a short scale to measure both dimensions. The sample was composed of 342 adults from Buenos Aires city and its outskirts, with ages ranging from 19 to 82 years old (M = 39.90, SD = 13.75). Data were gathered using the Personality Functioning Scale, developed in this study, as well as the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 Brief Form, the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, and the Symptom Check List-27. A principal components analysis conducted on 28 items found 2 factors, interpersonal and self. Internal consistency, estimated by ordinal Alphas, achieved values between .92 and .86 whilst Cronbach’s Alphas were .88 and .87. Significant and positive correlations between the Personality Functioning Scale scores on the one hand, and the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 Brief Form scores and the Symptom Check List-27 score on the other, were found. Negative correlations between PFS scores and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form were calculated. As a result, a short scale with adequate psychometric features, suitable to assess Criterion A in adult Argentinian population has been developed.

scholarly journals The Role of Dimensional Maladaptive Personality Traits and Severity of Personality Pathology in Predicting Substance Use

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-266
Author(s):  
Fatima Vaezipour ◽  
◽  
Mahdi Amini ◽  
Alireza Nazem ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Statistical Population ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Low Correlation ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Relationship

Objective: In recent decades, the relationship between personality traits and attitudes toward substance use has attracted much attention. Accordingly, evidence suggested a significant direct relationship between personality traits and the tendency to substance use. However, studies on the relationship between the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Edition (DSM–5) (PID-5) PID-5 model, personality pathology, and the tendency to substance use are scarce. Moreover, our survey revealed that no studies had been conducted in this respect in Iran. Drug abuse, as a prevalent condition, is of numerous etiologies, one of which is maladaptive personality traits. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between maladaptive characteristics and the severity of personality disorders in predicting substance use tendency. Methods: This descriptive research was conducted from January 2018 to December 2019 in Tehran City, Iran. The statistical population of this study consisted of 300 healthy individuals with substance abuse disorder referring to substance dependence treatment centers who were selected by the convenience sampling method. Data gathering tools were the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF), the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD), and the Addiction Tendency Questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed by correlation and stepwise multiple regression analysis methods using SPSS. Results: The current study results revealed that drug use tendency is significantly associated with personality traits. Among the maladaptive traits, antagonism had the highest correlation with drug use (0.45). Moreover, the obtained data indicated a low correlation (0.014) between the severity of drug tendency and personality traits, according to PID-5. Conclusion: The current study results revealed that drug use tendency is significantly associated with personality traits. Among the maladaptive traits, antagonism had the highest correlation with drug use (0.45). Moreover, the obtained data indicated a low correlation (0.014) between the severity of drug tendency and personality traits, according to PID-5.

scholarly journals Getting the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 ready for clinical practice: Norm values and correlates in a representative sample from the German population

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Rek ◽  
André Kerber ◽  
Christoph J. Kemper ◽  
Johannes Zimmermann
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Functioning ◽  
Representative Sample ◽  
Public Mental Health ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
German Population ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Norm Values

BackgroundThe Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is the gold-standard self-report tool to assess personality pathology according to five maladaptive trait domains (Criterion B) and may also be used to estimate the severity of personality problems (Criterion A). Previous research incorporating the PID-5 has often been limited by sample selection biases and relatively arbitrarily set cut-off values. Thus, our aim was to establish norm values and scrutinize the nomological net of the PID-5 Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+) using a representative sample from the general population.MethodsWe used data (N=4,727) from the ongoing GESIS panel, which includes a representative German sample. Participants completed the PID5BF+ and various measures of psychological functioning. Descriptive norms based on the cumulative percentile distributions and model-based norms for different versions of the PID-5 based on multiple group graded response models were determined. Moreover, the nomological net of PID5BF+ scales was examined using multiple linear and logistic regression analyses.ResultsWe established representative norm values for each of the five PID5BF+ domains and the total score, and present model-based norms for four different PID-5 versions. Results confirmed that self-reported personality pathology was associated with lower socio-economic status and greater psychological disturbances.ConclusionOur empirically-based representative norm values of the PID5BF+ provide a reference framework for practitioners and researchers to evaluate and interpret the PID-5. Moreover, we highlight the relevance of personality pathology not only in clinical settings but also for wider societal functioning and public mental health.

A Family Study of the DSM-5 Section III Personality Pathology Model Using the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5)

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 753-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea C. Katz ◽  
Danelle Hee ◽  
Christine I. Hooker ◽  
Stewart A. Shankman
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Family Study ◽  
Familial Aggregation ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Personality Pathology ◽  
Dimensional Model ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Study Methodology

In Section III of the DSM-5, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) proposes a pathological personality trait model of personality disorders. The recommended assessment instrument is the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5), an empirically derived scale that assesses personality pathology along five domains and 25 facets. Although the PID-5 demonstrates strong convergent validity with other personality measures, no study has examined whether it identifies traits that run in families, another important step toward validating the DSM-5's dimensional model. Using a family study method, we investigated familial associations of PID-5 domain and facet scores in 195 families, examining associations between parents and offspring and across siblings. The Psychoticism, Antagonism, and Detachment domains showed significant familial aggregation, as did facets of Negative Affect and Disinhibition. Results are discussed in the context of personality pathology and family study methodology. The results also help validate the PID-5, given the familial nature of personality traits.

scholarly journals Anankastia or Psychoticism? Which One Is Better Suited for the Fifth Trait in the Pathological Big Five: Insight From the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Włodzimierz Strus ◽  
Patryk Łakuta ◽  
Jan Cieciuch
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Personality Inventory ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Personality Structure ◽  
Comprehensive Model ◽  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Fifth Dimension

Both the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 (Section III) classification systems introduced dimensional models of personality disorders, with five broad domains called the Pathological Big Five. Nevertheless, despite large congruence between the two models, there are also substantial differences between them, with the most evident being the conceptualization of the fifth dimension: Anankastia in the ICD-11 vs. Psychoticism in the DSM-5. The current paper seeks an answer to the question of which domain is structurally better justified as the fifth trait in the dimensional model of personality disorders. For this purpose, we provided both a conceptual and empirical comparison of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 models, adopting the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits—a comprehensive model of personality structure built on the basis of the higher-order factors of the Big Five—as a reference framework. Two studies were conducted: the first on a sample of 242 adults (52.9% female; Mage = 30.63, SDage = 11.82 years), and the second on a sample of 355 adults (50.1% female; Mage = 29.97, SDage = 12.26 years) from the non-clinical population. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), and the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Questionnaire–Short Form (CPM-Q-SF) were administered in both studies, together with the PID-5BF+M algorithm for measuring a common (ICD-11 + DSM-5) six-domain model. Obtained empirical findings generally support our conceptual considerations that the ICD-11 model more comprehensively covered the area of personality pathology than the DSM-5 model, with Anankastia revealed as a more specific domain of personality disorders as well as more cohesively located within the overall personality structure, in comparison to Psychoticism. Moreover, the results corroborated the bipolar relations of Anankastia vs. Disinhibition domains. These results also correspond with the pattern of relationships found in reference to the Big Five domains of normal personality, which were also included in the current research. All our findings were discussed in the context of suggestions for the content and conceptualization of pathological personality traits that flow from the CPM as a comprehensive model of personality structure including both pathological and normal poles of personality dimensions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document