Anankastia or Psychoticism? Which One Is Better Suited for the Fifth Trait in the Pathological Big Five: Insight From the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Perspective

Both the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 (Section III) classification systems introduced dimensional models of personality disorders, with five broad domains called the Pathological Big Five. Nevertheless, despite large congruence between the two models, there are also substantial differences between them, with the most evident being the conceptualization of the fifth dimension: Anankastia in the ICD-11 vs. Psychoticism in the DSM-5. The current paper seeks an answer to the question of which domain is structurally better justified as the fifth trait in the dimensional model of personality disorders. For this purpose, we provided both a conceptual and empirical comparison of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 models, adopting the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits—a comprehensive model of personality structure built on the basis of the higher-order factors of the Big Five—as a reference framework. Two studies were conducted: the first on a sample of 242 adults (52.9% female; Mage = 30.63, SDage = 11.82 years), and the second on a sample of 355 adults (50.1% female; Mage = 29.97, SDage = 12.26 years) from the non-clinical population. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), and the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Questionnaire–Short Form (CPM-Q-SF) were administered in both studies, together with the PID-5BF+M algorithm for measuring a common (ICD-11 + DSM-5) six-domain model. Obtained empirical findings generally support our conceptual considerations that the ICD-11 model more comprehensively covered the area of personality pathology than the DSM-5 model, with Anankastia revealed as a more specific domain of personality disorders as well as more cohesively located within the overall personality structure, in comparison to Psychoticism. Moreover, the results corroborated the bipolar relations of Anankastia vs. Disinhibition domains. These results also correspond with the pattern of relationships found in reference to the Big Five domains of normal personality, which were also included in the current research. All our findings were discussed in the context of suggestions for the content and conceptualization of pathological personality traits that flow from the CPM as a comprehensive model of personality structure including both pathological and normal poles of personality dimensions.

Download Full-text

Personality functioning scale: A scale to assess DSM-5’s Criterion A personality disorders

Interpersona An International Journal on Personal Relationships ◽

10.5964/ijpr.v14i1.3925 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 40-53

Author(s):

Juliana Beatriz Stover ◽

Mercedes Fernández Liporace ◽

Alejandro Castro Solano

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Personality Disorders ◽

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Check List ◽

Personality Functioning ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Short Scale ◽

Criterion A ◽

Symptom Check List

The Section III on Emerging Measures and Models included in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, introduces a hybrid alternative approach, dimensional-categorical, to diagnose personality disorders. The Criterion A establishes the assessment of the impairment in personality functioning in terms of two dimensions: self and interpersonal. The present study was aimed at developing a short scale to measure both dimensions. The sample was composed of 342 adults from Buenos Aires city and its outskirts, with ages ranging from 19 to 82 years old (M = 39.90, SD = 13.75). Data were gathered using the Personality Functioning Scale, developed in this study, as well as the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 Brief Form, the Mental Health Continuum Short Form, and the Symptom Check List-27. A principal components analysis conducted on 28 items found 2 factors, interpersonal and self. Internal consistency, estimated by ordinal Alphas, achieved values between .92 and .86 whilst Cronbach’s Alphas were .88 and .87. Significant and positive correlations between the Personality Functioning Scale scores on the one hand, and the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 Brief Form scores and the Symptom Check List-27 score on the other, were found. Negative correlations between PFS scores and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form were calculated. As a result, a short scale with adequate psychometric features, suitable to assess Criterion A in adult Argentinian population has been developed.

Download Full-text

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population

BMC Psychology ◽

10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Jens C. Thimm ◽

Stian Jordan ◽

Bo Bach

Keyword(s):

Psychometric Properties ◽

Big Five ◽

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Big Five Traits ◽

Norwegian Population

Download Full-text

Comparison of categorical and dimensional approaches to the diagnosis of personality disorders

V M BEKHTEREV REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY AND MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY ◽

10.31363/2313-7053-2020-4-15-25 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 15-25

Author(s):

T. G. Gadisov ◽

A. A. Tkachenko

Keyword(s):

Comparative Study ◽

Personality Disorders ◽

Big Five ◽

Factor Model ◽

Five Factor Model ◽

Personality Structure ◽

Categorical Approach ◽

Personal Traits ◽

Clinical Method ◽

Neo Five Factor Inventory

Summary. Objective: A comparative study of the personality structure from the perspective the Five-factor personality model (“Big Five”) in mentally healthy and in people with personality disorders depending on the leading radical determined by the clinical method.Materials and methods: a comparative study of personality structures in the mentally healthy (13 people) and in individuals with personality disorders (47 people) was carried out. To assess the personality structure, the NEO-Five Factor Inventory questionnaire was used. Persons with personality disorders were divided into groups in accordance with the leading radical: 24 — with emotionally unstable; 13 — with a histrionic; 6 — with schizoid; 4 — with paranoid radicals.Results: There were no differences in the values of the domains of the Five-Factor personality model between a group of individuals with personality disorders and the norm. The features of domain indicators of the Five-factor personality model were revealed in individuals with personality disorder depending on theradical.Conclusion: The NEO-Five Factor Inventory questionnaire, like most other tools from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model, is not suitable for assessing a person in terms of assigning it to variants of a mental disorder. When comparing the categorical and dimensional approaches to assessing the structure of personality disorders, it was found that the obligate personality traits identified using the categorical approach are fully reflected in the «Big Five» in individuals with a leading schizoid radical. The relations of obligate personal traits with the domains of the Five-factor model of personality in individuals with other (paranoid, histrionic,and emotionally unstable) radicals are less clear.

Download Full-text

The Personality Inventory Scales: A Self-Rating Clinical Instrument for Diagnosis of Personality Disorder

Psychological Reports ◽

10.2466/pr0.1991.69.3f.1235 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 69 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 1235-1246 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

J. Wesley Burgess

Keyword(s):

Personality Disorders ◽

Diagnostic Interview ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Personality Structure ◽

Clinical Settings ◽

Everyday Language ◽

Clinical Assessments ◽

Standardized Interview ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Clinical Instrument

A personality inventory was developed as an aid in securing history and beliefs relevant to the assessment of personality structure and the diagnosis of personality disorders. The inventory was developed by restating DSM diagnostic criteria in everyday language, rewording the resulting statements in the form of True/False questions, and placing these questions in a short, self-paced booklet which subjects could complete in about 15 minutes. The following assessments were made and discussed: construct validity, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, comparison with a standardized interview, and comparison with actual clinical assessments. The personality inventory is discussed as a useful accompaniment to the diagnostic interview in clinical settings and for research into personality structure and personality disorders.

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form in Chinese undergraduate students and clinical patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-45917/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Panwen Zhang ◽

Zirong Ouyang ◽

Shulin Fang ◽

Jiayue He ◽

Lejia Fan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Personality Disorders ◽

Measurement Invariance ◽

Undergraduate Students ◽

Factor Model ◽

Clinical Sample ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item measuring tool evaluating maladaptive personality traits for the diagnosis of personality disorders(PDs). As a promising scale, its impressive psychometric properties have been verified in some countries, however, there have no studies about the utility of PID-5-BF in Chinese settings. The current study aimed to explore the maladaptive personality factor model which was culturally adapted in China and examine psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form among Chinese undergraduate students and clinical patients.Methods: 7155 undergraduate students and 451 clinical patients completed the Chinese version of PID-5-BF. 228 students were chosen randomly for test-retest reliability at a 4-week interval. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to discover the most suitable construct in Chinese, measurement invariance(MI), internal consistency, and external validity were also calculated.Results: An exploratory six-factor model was supported more suitable in both samples(Undergraduate sample: CFI = 0.905, TLI = 0.888, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.039; Clinical sample: CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.886, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.060), adding a new factor“Interpersonal Relationships”. Measurement invariance across non-clinical and clinical sample was established (configural, weak, strong MI, and partial strict MI). Aside from acceptable internal consistency (Undergraduate sample: alpha=0.84, MIC=0.21; Clinical sample: alpha=0.86, MIC=0.19) and test-retest reliability(0.73), the association with 220-item PID-5 was significant(r = 0.93, p < 0.01), and six PDs measured by Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+) were correlated with expected domains of PID-5-BF.Conclusions: The PID-5-BF is a convenient and useful screening tool for personality disorders with a novel six-factor model in Chinese settings, with the main difference for the Negative Affect domain.

Download Full-text

Personality Inventory for DSM-5--Short Form; Norwegian Version

PsycTESTS Dataset ◽

10.1037/t60114-000 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Jens C. Thimm ◽

Stian Jordan ◽

Bo Bach

Keyword(s):

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Norwegian Version

Download Full-text

The Psychometric Properties of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Colombian Clinic Sample

Universitas Psychologica ◽

10.11144/javeriana.upsy18-1.ppoi ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 1-15

Author(s):

Alberto Ferrer ◽

Nora Helena Londoño ◽

Esther Calvete ◽

Robert F. Krueger

Keyword(s):

Risk Taking ◽

Concurrent Validity ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Clinical Population ◽

Factor Analyses ◽

Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽

Order Analysis ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Confirmatory Factor ◽

Organization Models

Objective: to validate the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Colombian clinical population and the gender differences. Participants: 341 patients between 18 and 60 years of age, 60% of women. Method: Confirmatory Factor Analyses (AFC) and concurrent validity whit PBQ-SF. Results: supported the existence of the 25 first-order factors. In terms of domains (second-order analysis), several organization models were posed. The results supported the model proposed by Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, and Skodol (2012): c2(2661, n = 341) = 3350, RMSEA = 0.028 (90% CI: 0.025; 0.030), CFI = 0.99, NNFI=0.99. Men scored significantly higher than women on grandiosity, irresponsibility, manipulativeness, risk-taking, antagonism, and disinhibition. Women scored significantly higher than men on emotional lability and intimacy avoidance. The concurrent validity of PID with the PBQ-SF was high, giving support to the traits of personality disorder models of the DSM-5.

Download Full-text

Translation of Big-Five Personality Questionnaire into Turkish and comparing it with Five Factor Personality Inventory Short Form

Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry ◽

10.5455/apd.220580 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Arkun Tatar

Keyword(s):

Big Five ◽

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Personality Questionnaire

Download Full-text

Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology

Assessment ◽

10.1177/1073191116676889 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 25 (5) ◽

pp. 596-607 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Jaime L. Anderson ◽

Martin Sellbom ◽

Randall T. Salekin

Keyword(s):

Factor Structure ◽

Short Form ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

External Criterion ◽

Reliability Factor ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Dimensional Measure ◽

Scale Scores ◽

Personality Psychopathology

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition ( DSM-5) Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup developed the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) for the assessment of the alternative trait model for DSM-5. Along with this measure, the American Psychiatric Association published an abbreviated version, the PID-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF). Although this measure is available on the DSM-5 website for use, only two studies have evaluated its psychometric properties and validity and no studies have examined the U.S. version of this measure. The current study evaluated the reliability, factor structure, and construct validity of PID-5-BF scale scores. This included an evaluation of the scales’ associations with Section II PDs, a well-validated dimensional measure of personality psychopathology, and broad externalizing and internalizing psychopathology measures. We found support for the reliability of PID-5-BF scales as well as for the factor structure of the measure. Furthermore, a series of correlation and regression analyses showed conceptually expected associations between PID-5-BF and external criterion variables. Finally, we compared the correlations with external criterion measures to those of the full-length PID-5 and PID-5–Short form. Intraclass correlation analyses revealed a comparable pattern of correlations across all three measures, thereby supporting the use of the PID-5-BF as a screening measure of dimensional maladaptive personality traits.

Download Full-text