scholarly journals Toward an Individual Binaural Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting and Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iko Pieper ◽  
Manfred Mauermann ◽  
Birger Kollmeier ◽  
Stephan D. Ewert

The individual loudness perception of a patient plays an important role in hearing aid satisfaction and use in daily life. Hearing aid fitting and development might benefit from individualized loudness models (ILMs), enabling better adaptation of the processing to individual needs. The central question is whether additional parameters are required for ILMs beyond non-linear cochlear gain loss and linear attenuation common to existing loudness models for the hearing impaired (HI). Here, loudness perception in eight normal hearing (NH) and eight HI listeners was measured in conditions ranging from monaural narrowband to binaural broadband, to systematically assess spectral and binaural loudness summation and their interdependence. A binaural summation stage was devised with empirical monaural loudness judgments serving as input. While NH showed binaural inhibition in line with the literature, binaural summation and its inter-subject variability were increased in HI, indicating the necessity for individualized binaural summation. Toward ILMs, a recent monaural loudness model was extended with the suggested binaural stage, and the number and type of additional parameters required to describe and to predict individual loudness were assessed. In addition to one parameter for the individual amount of binaural summation, a bandwidth-dependent monaural parameter was required to successfully account for individual spectral summation.

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 233121651880569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten van Beurden ◽  
Monique Boymans ◽  
Mirjam van Geleuken ◽  
Dirk Oetting ◽  
Birger Kollmeier ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 317-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. J. Moore ◽  
Brian R. Glasberg

2007 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 3062
Author(s):  
Ying-Hui Lai ◽  
Yang-Ming Jhou ◽  
Sheunn-Tsong Young

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Sanchez-Lopez ◽  
Michal Fereczkowski ◽  
Tobias Neher ◽  
Sébastien Santurette ◽  
Torsten Dau

Data-driven profiling allows uncovering complex hidden structures in a dataset and has been used as a diagnostic tool in various fields of work. In audiology, the clinical characterization of hearing deficits for hearing-aid fitting is typically based on the pure-tone audiogram only. Implicitly, this relies on the assumption that the audiogram can predict a listener's supra-threshold hearing abilities. Sanchez-Lopez et al. [Trends in hearing vol. 22 (2018)] hypothesized that the hearing deficits of a given listener, both at hearing threshold and at supra-threshold sound levels, result from two independent types of "auditory distortions". The authors performed a data-driven analysis of two large datasets with results from numerous tests, which led to the identification of four distinct "auditory profiles". However, the definition of the two types of distortion was challenged by differences between the two datasets in terms of the selected tests and type of listeners included in the datasets. Here, a new dataset was generated with the aim of overcoming those limitations. A heterogeneous group of listeners (N = 75) was tested using measures of speech intelligibility, loudness perception, binaural processing abilities and spectro-temporal resolution. The subsequent data analysis allowed refining the auditory profiles proposed by Sanchez-Lopez et al. (2018). Besides, a robust iterative data-driven method is proposed here to reduce the influence of the individual data in the definition of the auditory profiles. The updated auditory profiles may provide a useful basis for improved hearing rehabilitation, e.g. through profile-based hearing-aid fitting.


1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C. J. Moore ◽  
J. I. Alcantara ◽  
M. A. Stone ◽  
B. R. Glasberg

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Risberg ◽  
Robyn M. Cox

A custom in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aid fitting was compared to two over-the-ear (OTE) hearing aid fittings for each of 9 subjects with mild to moderately severe hearing losses. Speech intelligibility via the three instruments was compared using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test. The relationship between functional gain and coupler gain was compared for the ITE and the higher rated OTE instruments. The difference in input received at the microphone locations of the two types of hearing aids was measured for 10 different subjects and compared to the functional gain data. It was concluded that (a) for persons with mild to moderately severe hearing losses, appropriately adjusted custom ITE fittings typically yield speech intelligibility that is equal to the better OTE fitting identified in a comparative evaluation; and (b) gain prescriptions for ITE hearing aids should be adjusted to account for the high-frequency emphasis associated with in-the-concha microphone placement.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. DiGiovanni ◽  
Travis L. Riffle

The search for best practices in hearing aid fittings and aural rehabilitation has generally used the audiogram and function stemming from peripheral sensitivity. In recent years, however, we have learned that individuals respond differently to various hearing aid and aural rehabilitation techniques based on cognitive abilities. In this paper, we review basic concepts of working memory and the literature driving our knowledge in newer concepts of hearing aid fitting and aural rehabilitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document