scholarly journals Blood Donation Fear, Perceived Rewards, Self-Efficacy, and Intention to Return Among Whole Blood Donors in China: A Social Cognitive Perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhong Li ◽  
Shuge Lei ◽  
Xiaoming Li ◽  
Yilun Zhao ◽  
Yudong Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Social Cognitive ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Extrinsic Rewards ◽  
Cognitive Perspective ◽  
Intrinsic Rewards ◽  
Intention To Return

With the increasing demand from aging population and seasonal blood shortage, recruiting and retaining blood donors has become an urgent issue for the blood collection centers in China. This study aims to understand intention to donate again from a social cognitive perspective among whole blood donors in China through investigating the association between the blood donation fear, perceived rewards, self-efficacy, and intention to return. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six cities, which are geographically and socioeconomically distinct areas in Jiangsu, China. Respondents completed a self-administrated questionnaire interviewed by two well-trained medical students. A total of 191 blood donors were included in the current study. Descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, and a generalized linear regression model were used to explore the association between demographic characteristics, psychological factors, and intention to donate again. After controlling other covariates, donors with higher fear scores reported lower intention to return (p = 0.008). Association between self-efficacy and intention to return was statistically significant (p < 0.001), whereas the association between intrinsic rewards (p = 0.387), extrinsic rewards (p = 0.939), and intention to return were statistically insignificant. This study found that either intrinsic rewards or extrinsic rewards are not significantly associated with intention to donate again among whole blood donors in China, and fear is negatively associated with intention to donate again. Therefore, purposive strategies could be enacted beyond appeals to rewards and focus on the management of donors’ fear.

The Informed Consent Process in Whole Blood Donation

2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 947-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay A. Alaishuski ◽  
Rodney D. Grim ◽  
Ronald E. Domen
Keyword(s):  
West Nile Virus ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Positive Test ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
West Nile ◽  
Eligibility Requirements

Abstract Context.—Informed consent in transfusion medicine has been an area lacking of significant research and it is unknown if donors fully comprehend the risks associated with whole blood donation. Objective.—To assess the adequacy of the informed consent process in whole blood donation. Design.—A brief questionnaire was constructed and distributed to whole blood donors visiting various fixed and mobile donor sites of the Central Pennsylvania Blood Bank. Questions consisted of demographic information; donor opinions of information content, length, and comprehension; and a short quiz pertaining to donor risks and eligibility. Results.—Analysis of 849 surveys demonstrated that donors comprehended a mean of 73.5% of the various donor eligibility and risks that were surveyed. Female and younger donors scored statistically higher on comprehension questions compared with male and older counterparts. Donors were most aware of (1) donor eligibility requirements related to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome comprehension, (2) the risk of dizziness postdonation, and (3) having lived in a certain country (93.7%–95.6% comprehension, respectively). Donors were least aware of (1) the risk of a possible referral to a physician for outstanding medical conditions or positive test results, (2) the risk of a positive test result, and (3) West Nile virus testing information (22.4%–49.3% comprehension, respectively). Conclusions.—Whole blood donors believed that they were giving informed consent, but a significant percentage of donors were unaware of several of the risks associated with blood donation, including participation in West Nile virus research testing. Our data suggest that donors do not fully comprehend the risks of whole blood donation and that repetition of information to the donor, and in multiple formats, strengthens the level of comprehension and thus the informed consent process.

scholarly journals Motivating Factors and Potential Deterrents to Blood Donation in High School Aged Blood Donors

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Finck ◽  
Alyssa Ziman ◽  
Matthew Hoffman ◽  
Michelle Phan-Tang ◽  
Shan Yuan
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Motivating Factors ◽  
Donor Pool ◽  
Adequate Supply ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Active Donor

Background. To ensure an adequate supply of blood, collection centers must design campaigns that successfully recruit and maintain an active donor pool. Understanding factors that motivate and deter individuals from donating may help centers develop targeted recruitment campaigns. These factors among high school aged blood donors have not yet been fully investigated. Study Design and Methods. A voluntary, anonymous survey was administered to student donors at high school mobile blood drives. The survey instrument asked the students to rate several potential motivating factors in their importance in the decision to donate blood and several potential deterring factors in their future decision whether or not to donate blood again. The survey also asked the students to rate the desirability of several potential incentives. Results. Motivating factors that reflected prosocial, empathetic, and altruistic thoughts and beliefs were rated highly by students. Pain from phlebotomy was most commonly chosen as potential deterrent. Movie tickets and cookies/snacks at the drive were rated as the most attractive incentives. Conclusion. High school aged blood donors are similar to other donor groups in their expressed motives for donating blood. This group may be unique in the factors that deter them from donating and in their preferences for different incentives.

Comparison of whole blood collection and double-unit erythrocytapheresis in preoperative autologous blood donation

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 542-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyoung Kim ◽  
Hyung Suk Kim ◽  
Yang Hyun Kim ◽  
Ji Seon Choi ◽  
Hoon Joo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Autologous Blood ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Autologous Blood Donation ◽  
Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation

scholarly journals Comparison of four methods to measure haemoglobin concentrations in whole blood donors (COMPARE): a diagnostic accuracy study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Bell ◽  
Michael Sweeting ◽  
Anna Ramond ◽  
Ryan Chung ◽  
Stephen Kaptoge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Haemoglobin Concentration ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Haematology Analyser ◽  
Haemoglobin Measurement ◽  
Accuracy Study ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

SUMMARYObjectiveTo compare four haemoglobin measurement methods in whole blood donors.BackgroundTo safeguard donors, blood services measure haemoglobin concentration in advance of each donation. NHS Blood and Transplant’s (NHSBT) usual method has been capillary gravimetry (copper sulphate), followed by venous HemoCue® (spectrophotometry) for donors failing gravimetry. However, gravimetry/venous HemoCue® results in 10% of donors being inappropriately bled (i.e., with haemoglobin values below the regulatory threshold).MethodsThe following were compared in 21,840 blood donors (aged ≥18 years) recruited from 10 mobile centres of NHSBT in England, with each method compared with the Sysmex XN-2000 haematology analyser, the reference standard: 1) gravimetry/venous HemoCue®; 2) “post donation” approach, i.e., estimating current haemoglobin concentration from that measured by a haematology analyser at a donor’s most recent prior donation; 3) capillary HemoCue®; and 4) non-invasive spectrometry (MBR Haemospect® or Orsense NMB200®). We assessed each method for sensitivity; specificity; proportion of donors who would have been inappropriately bled, or rejected from donation (“deferred”) incorrectly; and test preference.ResultsCompared with the reference standard, the methods ranged in test sensitivity from 17.0% (MBR Haemospect®) to 79.0% (HemoCue®) in men, and from 19.0% (MBR Haemospect®) to 82.8% (HemoCue®) in women. For specificity, the methods ranged from 87.2% (MBR Haemospect®) to 99.9% (gravimetry/venous HemoCue®) in men, and from 74.1% (Orsense NMB200®) to 99.8% (gravimetry/venous HemoCue®) in women. The proportion of donors who would have been inappropriately bled ranged from 2.2% in men for HemoCue® to 18.9% in women for MBR Haemospect®. The proportion of donors who would have been deferred incorrectly with haemoglobin concentration above the minimum threshold ranged from 0.1% in men for gravimetry/venous HemoCue® to 20.3% in women for OrSense®. Most donors preferred non-invasive spectrometry.ConclusionIn the largest study reporting head-to-head comparisons of four methods to measure haemoglobin prior to blood donation, our results support replacement of venous HemoCue® with the capillary HemoCue® when donors fail gravimetry. These results have had direct translational implications for NHS Blood and Transplant in England.

An automated motivational interview promotes donation intention and self‐efficacy among experienced whole blood donors

Transfusion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 2876-2884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina E. Livitz ◽  
Christopher R. France ◽  
Janis L. France ◽  
Kristen R. Fox ◽  
Brett Ankawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Motivational Interview ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Donation Intention

scholarly journals Longer-term efficiency and safety of increasing the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): extension study of a randomised trial of 20 757 blood donors

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e510-e520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Kaptoge ◽  
Emanuele Di Angelantonio ◽  
Carmel Moore ◽  
Matthew Walker ◽  
Jane Armitage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Blood Donors ◽  
Blood Donation ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Interval Extension
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document