scholarly journals Previous Extrapulmonary Malignancies Impact Outcomes in Patients With Surgically Resected Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Ying Lee ◽  
Min-Shu Hsieh ◽  
Hsien-Chi Liao ◽  
Pei-Hsing Chen ◽  
Xu-Heng Chiang ◽  
...  

Background: As the overall survival of patients with cancer continues to improve, the incidence of second primary malignancies seems to be increasing. Previous studies have shown controversial results regarding the survival of patients with primary lung cancer with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. This study aimed to determine the clinical picture and outcomes of this particular subgroup of patients.Materials and Methods: We included 2,408 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer at our institute between January 1, 2011 and December 30, 2017 in this retrospective study. Medical records were extracted and clinicopathological parameters and postoperative prognoses were compared between patients with lung cancer with and without previous extrapulmonary malignancies.Results: There were 200 (8.3%) patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Breast cancer (30.5%), gastrointestinal cancer (17%), and thyroid cancer (9%) were the most common previous extrapulmonary malignancies. Age, sex, a family history of lung cancer, and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels were significantly different between the two groups. Patients with previous breast or thyroid cancer had significantly better overall survival than those without previous malignancies. Conversely, patients with other previous extrapulmonary malignancies had significantly poorer overall survival (p < 0.001). The interval between the two cancer diagnoses did not significantly correlate with clinical outcome.Conclusion: Although overall survival was lower in patients with previous extrapulmonary malignancies, previous breast or thyroid cancer did not increase mortality. Our findings may help surgeons to predict prognosis in this subgroup of patients with primary lung cancer.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yadong Gao ◽  
Jianwei Qiu ◽  
Liugen Gu ◽  
Yanmei Yang ◽  
Haifeng Kang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The present study aimed to assess the incidence, characteristics, and survival of secondary primary lung cancer after primary esophageal cancer (EC-LC). Methods: The patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who developed SPLC and patients with first primary lung cancer (LC-1) were retrospectively reviewed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries covering 2000 to 2016. The risk of secondary primary lung cancer using standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated among patients with EC. Overall survival and characteristics were compared between patients with EC-LC and patients with LC-1.Results: In comparison with the general population, the patients with EC had a higher risk for developing secondary primary lung cancer (SIR =1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-2.05). There was a significant difference with regard to the year of diagnosis, sex, grade and stage between the secondary primary lung squamous carcinoma after EC (EC-LUSC) and first primary lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC-1) patients. A statistically significant difference with respect to race, sex, age, year, grade and stage was found between the secondary primary lung adenocarcinoma after EC (EC-LUAD) and first primary lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD-1) patients. A history of EC was found to be an independent risk factor of death for lung squamous carcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma patients in localized stage based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, propensity score-matching analysis and multiple imputation.Conclusion: There is a significantly increased risk of secondary primary lung cancer in EC survivors and a history of EC adversely affects overall survival in individuals who subsequently develop localized EC-LUSC and EC-LUAD. Clinicians should moderately strengthen lung tissue protection during the management of EC patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyuan Qian ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
Yan Feng ◽  
Shenglan Meng ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundLung cancer as a second primary malignancy is increasingly common, but the clinical characteristics of second primary non-small cell lung cancer after cervix cancer (CC-NSCLC) in comparison with first primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC1) is unknown.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology and EndResults (SEER) cancer registry between 1998 and 2010 was used to conduct a large population-based cohort analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as prognostic data were systematically analyzed. We further compared overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts. Risk factors of secondary primary lung cancer in cervical cancer patients were also analyzed.Results557 (3.52%) had developed second primary lung cancer after cervix cancer and 451 were eligible for inclusion in the final analyses. In comparison to NSCLC1, patients with CC-NSCLC had a higher rate of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (36.59% vs. 19.07%, p<0.01). Median OS was longer for CC-NSCLC than for NSCLC1 before propensity score matching (PSM) (16 vs. 13months) but there was no significant difference after PSM. High-risk factors in cervical cancer to developing CC-NSCLC include: 50-79years old, black race (OR 1.417; 95%CI 1.095-1.834; p<0.05)and history of radiotherapy (OR 1.392; 95%CI 1.053-1.841; p<0.05).Conclusion50-79years old, black race and history of radiotherapy were independent risk factors of second primary lung cancer in cervical cancer patient. CC-NSCLC patients had distinctive clinical characteristics and a better prognosis compared with NSCLC1 patients.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3581-3581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuhya Kommalapati ◽  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Gaurav Goyal

Abstract Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common type of adult leukemia, with ~21,000 estimated new cases in 2018. Prior retrospective studies have suggested an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in CLL patients. Population-based studies on the risk of SPMs in CLL are limited, especially in the last decade with improvements in prognostic and therapeutic tools over the last decade. As the survival of CLL patient improves, it may lead to more survivors who are at risk of developing SPMs. In this study, we sought to evaluate the risk of development of SPMs among CLL patients diagnosed from 2000-2014. Methods: We used the SEER 18 registries for the calculation of risk of SPMs and included CLL cases that were confirmed histologically between 2000-2014 (https://seer.cancer.gov/). SPMs diagnosed within 2 months of primary CLL diagnosis were excluded. Time to SPM was calculated by subtracting second malignancy survival/follow-up time from CLL survival/follow-up time. The SEER*Stat Multiple Primary-SIR tool was used to calculate SIRs for secondary malignancies by comparing these patients' subsequent cancer experience with the number of cancers that would be expected based on incidence rates for the general U.S. population. These analyses were adjusted for age, gender, race, and year of CLL diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with development of SPM. Results: The study cohort included 46,164 patients with CLL. After a median follow up of 50 months (range 1-179), 5220 (11.3%) patients developed a total of 5,738 subsequent malignancies. As compared to that of general population, CLL patients had a higher risk of developing SPMs (SIR: 1.40 [95%CI:1.37-1.44]) and the risk was much higher for hematologic malignancies (SIR: 2.63 [95%CI:2.47-2.80]) as compared to solid organ malignancies (SIR: 1.25 [95%CI: 1.22-1.29]). In addition to known common SPMs in CLL (lymphoma, melanoma, lung cancer, and prostate cancer), there was an elevated risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukemia (SIR 5.43), chronic myeloid leukemia (SIR 2.18), thyroid cancer (SIR 2.09), and kidney cancer (SIR 1.70) (Table). Out of the 5220 patients who developed SPMs, 437 (8.3%) patients developed two subsequent second primary malignancies, and 81 (1.5%) patients developed > 2 subsequent primary cancers, which was significantly more than the endemic rate (SIR, 1.40; p <.05). Of the 5738 SPMs, 1095 (19%) occurred in 2-11 months, 2822 (49%) in 1-5 years, 1499 (26%) in 6-10 years and 321 (6%) beyond 10 years of CLL diagnosis (Figure). On logistic regression, males had higher odds of developing SPMs than females (OR: 1.46 [95% CI: 1.38-1.56], p<0.0001) and the patients diagnosed with from 2000-2007 had higher odds of developing SPMs as compared to those diagnosed from 2007-2014 (OR: 2.28 [95%CI: 2.15-2.42], p<0.0001]. The risk of developing SPM did not differ based on the age, race and between the patients who received first line therapy and no initial therapy. CLL patients who developed SPMs had significantly less median overall survival as compared to that of patients who did not develop SPMs (93 vs 109 months, p<0.05). Conclusion: In this large population-based study, CLL patients had an elevated risk of developing second primary hematologic and solid malignancies. The specific types of SPMs were varied, ranging from common ones such as lymphoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, to uncommon ones such as thyroid cancer, kidney cancer, and chronic myeloid leukemia. The patients who were diagnosed after 2007 had a lower risk of developing SPMs as compared to those diagnosed before. There is a need for studies evaluating immunological repertoire of CLL and its impact on development of SPMs. Knowledge of these SPMs may help physicians with their early detection. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S49
Author(s):  
Frank Walsh ◽  
Mark W. Rolfe ◽  
Lary A. Robinson ◽  
Eric Sommers ◽  
Daniel A. Orlando ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. S319-S320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Summer Han ◽  
Gabriel A. Rivera ◽  
Iona Cheng ◽  
Scarlett Gomez ◽  
Sylvia K. Plevritis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-128
Author(s):  
Fumihiro Ishibashi ◽  
Hajime Tamura ◽  
Yukiko Matsui ◽  
Yasumitsu Moriya ◽  
Toshihiko Iizasa

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Hong ◽  
Rongrong Wei ◽  
Chuang Nie ◽  
Anastasiia Leonteva ◽  
Xu Han ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess and predict risk and prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients with second primary malignancy (SPM). Methods: LC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2016 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to evaluate SPM risk. Cox regression and competing risk models were applied to assess the factors associated with overall survival, SPM development and LC-specific survival. Nomograms were built to predict SPM probability and overall survival. Results & conclusion: LC patients remain at higher risk of SPM even though the incidence declines. Patients with SPM have a better prognosis than patients without SPM. The consistency indexes for nomograms of SPM probability and overall survival are 0.605 (95% CI: 0.598–0.611) and 0.644 (95% CI: 0.638–0.650), respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document