scholarly journals Perioperative Morbidity and Complications in Patients With an Established Ileostomy Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto A. Uribe ◽  
Tristan E. Weaver ◽  
Marco Echeverria-Villalobos ◽  
Luis Periel ◽  
Haixia Shi ◽  
...  

Background: Recently formed ileostomies may produce an average of 1,200 ml of watery stool per day, while an established ileostomy output varies between 600–800 ml per day. The reported incidence of renal impartment in patients with ileostomy is 8–20%, which could be caused by dehydration (up to 50%) or high output stoma (up to 40%). There is a lack of evidence if an ileostomy could influence perioperative fluid management and/or surgical outcomes.Methods: Subjects aged ≥18 years old with an established ileostomy scheduled to undergo an elective non-ileostomy-related major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia lasting more than 2 h and requiring hospitalization were included in the study. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of perioperative complications within 30 days after surgery.Results: A total of 552 potential subjects who underwent non-ileostomy-related abdominal surgery were screened, but only 12 were included in the statistical analysis. In our study cohort, 66.7% of the subjects were men and the median age was 56 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 48-59). The median time from the creation of ileostomy to the qualifying surgery was 17.7 months (IQR: 8.3, 32.6). The most prevalent comorbidities in the study group were psychiatric disorders (58.3%), hypertension (50%), and cardiovascular disease (41.7%). The most predominant surgical approach was open (8 [67%]). The median surgical and anesthesia length was 3.4 h (IQR: 2.5, 5.7) and 4 h (IQR: 3, 6.5), respectively. The median post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay was 2 h (IQR:0.9, 3.1), while the median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 5.6 days (IQR: 4.1, 10.6). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 50% (n = 6). Two subjects (16.7%) had a moderate surgical wound infection, and two subjects (16.7%) experienced a mild surgical wound infection. In addition, one subject (7.6%) developed a major postoperative complication with atrial fibrillation in conjunction with moderate hemorrhage.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the presence of a well-established ileostomy might not represent a relevant risk factor for significant perioperative complications related to fluid management or hospital readmission. However, the presence of peristomal skin complications could trigger a higher incidence of surgical wound infections.

1983 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
SARAH F. GRAPPEL ◽  
LILLIAN PHILLIPS ◽  
HUGH B. LEWIS ◽  
D. GWYN MORGAN ◽  
PAUL ACTOR

1995 ◽  
Vol 170 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Chalkiadakis ◽  
Constantin Gonnianakis ◽  
Aristidis Tsatsakis ◽  
Andreas Tsakalof ◽  
Manolis Michalodimitrakis

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Edwards ◽  
Allen B. Kaiser ◽  
Scott Tapper ◽  
William H. Edwards ◽  
Raymond S. Martin ◽  
...  

1970 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
B Thapa ◽  
D Karn ◽  
K Mahat

Background Surgical wound infection is a common problem among patients who undergo operation. Several factors play important role in this infection process including endemic nosocomial infection without proper infection control measures. Objectives To study the occurrence of the pathogens in post-operative wound infections, their antibiotic resistance patterns, and comparison with published reports. Methods Various specimens obtained from the surgical wound during a period of four months were processed for bacteriological culture in the Department of Microbiology, Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu. Antibiotic susceptibility test was performed by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test for pathogens isolated. The relevant literatures were searched and compared with the present study. Results Among 79 culture positive cultures, Citrobacter sp. (n=23) was most frequently isolated from surgical wound infection. Twenty strains were multidrug resistant. In comparison with other studies, this study highlights the emergence multi-drug resistant Citrobacter sp. as a leading cause of surgical wound infection. E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter sp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus sp., and Enterobacter sp. were also isolated from 19, 13, 10, 8, 2, 2, and 2 cultures, respectively. More than 50% of these pathogens were resistant to most of the β-lactam antibiotics tested and most of them were multi-drug resistant while these pathogens showed variable level of resistance to fluroquinolones and amino glycosides. Conclusion The frequent isolation of multi-drug resistant nosocomial strains of Citrobacter sp. in surgical wound infection is a remarkable trend. This pathogen and their resistant genes could be endemic to the institution and can cause difficult-to-treat infection if infection control committee is not revitalized and infection control strategies are not implemented. Key words Citrobacter sp.; Multi-drug resistant; surgical wound infection. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njdvl.v9i1.5762 NJDVL 2010; 9(1): 10-14


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (51) ◽  
pp. 5470-5473
Author(s):  
Amanjee Bharti ◽  
Ram Nagina Sinha ◽  
Anuradha Sharma ◽  
Pallavi Kumari ◽  
Kumari Neha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document