scholarly journals Epigenetic Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Perrier ◽  
Audrey Didelot ◽  
Pierre Laurent-Puig ◽  
Hélène Blons ◽  
Simon Garinet

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated to be highly efficient in treating solid tumors; however, many patients have limited benefits in terms of response and survival. This rapidly led to the investigation of combination therapies to enhance response rates. Moreover, predictive biomarkers were assessed to better select patients. Although PD-L1 expression remains the only validated marker in clinics, molecular profiling has brought valuable information, showing that the tumor mutation load and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were associated to higher response rates in nearly all cancer types. Moreover, in lung cancer, EGFR and MET mutations, oncogene fusions or STK11 inactivating mutations were associated with low response rates. Cancer progression towards invasive phenotypes that impede immune surveillance relies on complex regulatory networks and cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Epigenetic modifications, such as the alteration of histone patterns, chromatin structure, DNA methylation status at specific promoters and changes in microRNA levels, may alter the cell phenotype and reshape the tumor microenvironment, allowing cells to grow and escape from immune surveillance. The objective of this review is to make an update on the identified epigenetic changes that target immune surveillance and, ultimately, ICI responses, such as histone marks, DNA methylation and miR signatures. Translational studies or clinical trials, when available, and potential epigenetic biomarkers will be discussed as perspectives in the context of combination treatment strategies to enhance ICI responses in patients with solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
Mirzagaleb Tillyashaykhov ◽  
◽  
Elena Boyko ◽  
Shakhnoza Jumaniyazova

The review is focused on studying the immunosuppressive mechanisms acting in the microenvironment of renal cell carcinoma tumors. The report contains a collection of basic literature materials on the study of tumor growth factors that boost tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. The tumor microenvironment (TME) limits the immune surveillance of tumor-associated antigens and the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although renal cell carcinoma is one of several tumor types sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, the efficacy of these agents is likely to be limited by different tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells of bone marrow that make up the TME. Several strategies aimed at eliminating the onset of these cells in tumor tissue or neutralizing their immunosuppressive function have shown encouraging results in animal tumor models and clinical trials.Keywords: cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), tumor microenvironment (MEV), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), regulatory T cells (Tregs), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), tumor-associated macrophages (TAM), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
George Abraham ◽  
Vijay Patil ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Nandini Menon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Uqba Khan ◽  
Kaylee Ho ◽  
Eun Kyeong Hwang ◽  
Cristian Peña ◽  
Julianna Brouwer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii427
Author(s):  
M. Riudavets Melia ◽  
L.P. del Carpio ◽  
I. Gabriela Sullivan ◽  
A. Barba Joaquín ◽  
P. Maroto Rey ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi5-vi5
Author(s):  
Joshua Friedman ◽  
Adilia Hormigo

Abstract INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of cancers. It is known that cancer including glioblastoma (GBM) induces an immunosuppression. Bevacizumab by normalizing blood vessels in the tumor can facilitate immune surveillance and potentially improve the efficacy of ICI in GBM patients. We analyze GBM patients with recurrent disease treated with ICI and bevacizumab. METHODS We retrospectively review records of patients diagnosed with recurrent GBM treated at our institution with Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab and bevacizumab and evaluate for tolerance and outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-one patients, 12 men and 9 women with median age 62 (range 36–78) and KPS 70 (range 60–90) were treated with a median of 10 ICI cycles (range 4–29) and 5 of bevacizumab (range 0–21). A total of 8 patients (38%) had immune-related adverse events (IRAE): 3 grade 1, 3 grade 2 and 2 grade 3. A patient with pneumonitis required cessation of ICI. Median OS for the 21 patients was 22 months (range 6–41). The 7 patients that had MGMT detected in their tumors had a median OS of 27 months (range 23–41) compared to a survival of 21 months (range 6–24) for the 13 patients that had MGMT undetected. One had undetermined MGMT and her OS was 21 months. The median survival for all the patients from onset of ICI was 10 months (range 1–25) and 10 of them (47.6%) survived > 12 months. DISCUSSION The development of IRAE was common but self-limiting, allowing continuation of the treatment in all but one patient. The combination of ICI and bevacizumab increased survival. Our data needs to be interpreted with caution, as it is a retrospective analysis of a small group of patients. However, these results warrant prospective studies using the combination of ICI and bevacizumab to treat recurrent GBM.


Author(s):  
Kimberly Levinson ◽  
Oliver Dorigo ◽  
Krista Rubin ◽  
Kathleen Moore

Immunotherapy, mainly in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has been transformative in both solid tumor and hematologic malignancies. Patients with previously terminal illnesses have experienced profound responses of great durability with these agents, fueling excitement among patients and providers regarding their use. Unfortunately, the gains seen in some solid tumors have not been replicated in a large percentage of patients with gynecologic cancer. This review focuses on the clinical benefits seen to date, toxicities and management when using ICIs, ways to improve prediction of who should receive immunotherapy, and a discussion of next-generation immunotherapy with cellular therapeutics and how these might relate to gynecologic cancers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document