scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Conversion Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Sang Shin ◽  
Kyu-pyo Kim ◽  
Jae Jeong ◽  
Heung-Moon Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Free Survival

The clinical benefit and potential risks of conversion surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have not been fully investigated in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Therefore, this has been evaluated in a retrospective, prospective cohort-based analysis. Between October 2005 and April 2017, 135 patients (65 with BRPC and 70 with LAPC) received conversion surgery after NACT. Exploratory analysis to assess clinical outcomes in comparison with patients who underwent upfront surgery in the same time period (n = 359) was also conducted. NACT with gemcitabine-based regimens (including gemcitabine monotherapy, gemcitabine-capecitabine combination, and gemcitabine-erlotinib combination) was used in 69 patients (51%) and FOLFIRINOX in 66 patients (49%). The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) from the time of surgery was 25.4 months (95% CI, 18.6–32.2 months) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.8–11.2 months), respectively. The median OS and progression-free survival from the initiation of NACT was 29.7 months (95% CI, 22.5–36.8 months) and 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.5–14.4 months), respectively. In the exploratory analysis, conversion surgery after NACT was associated with a better median OS and DFS than upfront surgery (vs. 17.1 months; 95% CI, 15.5–18.7 months; p = 0.001 and vs. 7.1 months; 95% CI, 6.4–7.8 months; p = 0.005, respectively). There was no difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups, and conversion surgery after NACT showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications than upfront surgery (38% vs. 27%, p = 0.03). Conversion surgery after NACT is a feasible and effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with BRPC and LAPC. Further clinical trials investigating optimal therapeutic strategies for BRPC and LAPC are warranted.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Junho Kang ◽  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Sang Hyun Shin ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
Jae Ho Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety Issues ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
N Stage

312 Background: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been widely investigated, the magnitude of the clinical benefit and the potential risk of NACT followed by surgery compared with upfront surgery remains unclear for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: This retrospective, prospective cohort-based analysis included 135 patients who underwent NACT followed by surgery and 359 patients who received upfront surgery for LAPC between October 2005 and April 2017. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from surgery were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in gender (male, 53% vs 56%) and age (median 60 vs 61 years) between the NACT followed by surgery group and upfront surgery group. As NACT, gemcitabine-based regimens and FOLFIRINOX were used in 69 (51%) and 66 (49%) patients, respectively. The NACT followed by surgery group showed significantly less advanced T stage (T3–4, 93% vs 99%, p = 0.001) and N stage (N+, 49% vs 71%, p < 0.001) than the upfront surgery group. NACT followed by surgery was significantly associated with better OS (median, 25.4 [18.6–32.2] vs 17.1 [15.5–18.7] months, p = 0.001) and DFS (median, 9.0 [95% CI, 6.8–11.2] vs 7.1 [6.4–7.8] months, p = 0.005) than upfront surgery. These results were consistent in the multivariate analysis for OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56–0.96], p = 0.02) and DFS (aHR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.56–0.93], p = 0.01). There was no difference in length of hospital stay (median 13 vs 17 days, p = 0.14) for surgery between the two groups, and the NACT followed by surgery group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complication than the upfront surgery group (38% vs 27%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The present study revealed that NACT followed by surgery may provide survival benefit compared with upfront surgery in LAPC without causing significant safety issues.

Efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: Intention-to-treat population analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 720-720
Author(s):  
Inhwan Hwang ◽  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Kyu-Pyo Kim ◽  
Jae Ho Byun ◽  
Jae Ho Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Free Survival

720 Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC) are heterogeneous disease entity with various prognosis. Based on the phase III PRODIGE trial, (m)FOLFIRINOX has been widely used for the management of patients with BRPC and LAUPC. Considering the lack of large phase 3 trial of (m)FOLFIRINOX for BRPC and LAUPC, real-life evidences of (m)FOLFIRINOX are needed. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 199 patients who received at least one dose of (m)FOLFIRINOX between February 2013 and January 2017 were included. Endpoints of this study were objective response rates (ORR), surgical resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 60 years (range, 33-79) and 62.3% of patients were male. Pancreas head (n=112, 56.3%) was the most common primary tumor site, followed by body (n=42, 21.1%) and multifocal (n=34, 17.1%). By an independent radiology review, patients were classified to BRPC (n=75, 37.7%) and LAUPC (n=124, 62.3%). With median 40.3 months (95% CI, 36.7-43.8) of follow-up duration in surviving patients, ORR was 26.6% (n=53), median PFS and OS were 10.6 months (95% CI, 9.5-11.7) and 17.1 months (95% CI, 13.2-20.9), respectively. There was no difference in PFS and OS between BRPC and LAUPC (median PFS, 11.1 months [95% CI, 8.8-13.5] vs. 10.1 months [95% CI, 8.4-11.8], p=0.47); (median OS, 18.4 months [95% CI, 16.1-20.8] vs. 17.1 months [95% CI, 13.2-20.9], p=0.50). Curative-intent surgery (R0 and R1) was done in 63 patients (33.2%, 49 for R0 and 14 for R1) after treatment with (m)FOLFIRINOX. Resection rates were 58.2% in BRPC patients and 19.4% in LAUPC patients (p<0.001). In patients who underwent curative-intent surgery, median disease-free survival since surgery was 10.4 months (95% CI, 8.3-12.5 ) and there was no difference according to the baseline disease extent (BRPC vs. LAUPC): 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-12.5) vs. 12.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-20.3), p=0.37. Conclusions: (m)FOLFIRINOX is effective therapy for BRPC and LAUPC patients. Significant proportion of patients could receive curative-intent surgery.

scholarly journals A novel event-free survival endpoint in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110595
Author(s):  
Pascal Hammel ◽  
Ewa Carrier ◽  
Mairead Carney ◽  
Mark Eisner ◽  
Thomas Fleming
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Free Survival

The treatment paradigm for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is evolving rapidly. The development of neoadjuvant therapies composed of combination therapies and the evaluation of their impact on conversion to borderline resectable (BR) status, resection, and ultimately overall survival (OS) are presently being pursued. These efforts justify re-visiting study endpoints in order to better predict therapeutic effects on OS, by capturing not only the achievement of R0 resection at the end of induction therapy but also the long-term reductions in the rate of local and distal recurrence. The proposed herein event-free survival (EFS) endpoint, with its novel definition specific to LAPC, is formulated to achieve these objectives. It is an analog to disease-free survival (DFS) endpoint in the adjuvant setting applied to the neoadjuvant setting and may be a valuable surrogate endpoint for this patient population.

scholarly journals FOLFIRINOX in borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095329
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Inhwan Hwang ◽  
Tae Jun Song ◽  
Sang Soo Lee ◽  
Jae Ho Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Conversion Surgery ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Despite the scarcity of data based on randomized trials, FOLFIRINOX is widely used in the management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We investigated the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with BRPC and LAPC. Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included a total of 199 consecutive patients with BRPC or LAPC who received conventional or modified FOLFIRINOX between February 2013 and January 2017. An independent radiologist reviewed all baseline computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans were reviewed for vascular invasion status. Results: With median follow-up duration of 40.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.7–43.8] in surviving patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.6 (95% CI, 9.5–11.7) and 18.1 (95% CI, 16.0–20.3) months, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate was 66.0% (95% CI, 65.3–66.7%), and the 2-year OS rate was 37.2% (95% CI, 36.5–37.9%). PFS and OS did not differ between BRPC and LAPC groups [median PFS, 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.8–13.5) versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 8.4–11.8), p = 0.47; median OS, 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.1–20.8) versus 17.1 months (95% CI, 13.2–20.9), p = 0.50]. Curative-intent conversion surgery (R0/R1) was performed in 63 patients (31.7%). C•A 19-9 response, objective tumor response to FOLFIRINOX, and conversion surgery were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion: FOLFIRINOX was effective for management of BRPC and LAPC. Given the potential for cure, a significant proportion of patients can undergo conversion curative-intent surgery following FOLFIRINOX.

Taxanes-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced nonmetastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12033-e12033
Author(s):  
Tahir Mehmood ◽  
Muhammad Ali ◽  
Kamran Saeed ◽  
Atif Munawar ◽  
Sadaf Usman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free

e12033 Background: Pakistan has the highest rate of breast cancer for any South Asian population and majority of the patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. We report on response and survival of primary locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer in women treated with neoadjuvant Adriamycin/Taxanes (AT) based regimens at our institute. Methods: Between 1995 to 2009 the hospital information system identified 517 women with pathologically confirmed locally advanced breast cancer. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with AT based regimen followed by surgery. Median age was 43 years (range 17-71 years). AJCC stage; stage II 54% and stage III 46% of the patients. Axillary nodes were palpable in 72% of the patients at presentation. Histological sub-types; infiltrating ductal carcinoma 95%, infiltrating lobular carcinoma 3% and others 2% respectively. Pathological grade was I/II in 44% and grade III 56% of the patients. ER, PR, and Her2-neu receptors were positive in 44%, 40% and 24% of the patients respectively. Twenty one percent of the patients had triple negative breast cancer. Post operative radiotherapy was delivered to 94% of the patients. Patients with positive ER/PR receptors also received hormonal manipulation. Results: Following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, pathological response was; complete response (CR) 13.5%, partial response 21%, stable disease 52% and progressive disease in 13% of the patients respectively. Breast conservation was possible in 36% of the patients. The 5 year disease free survival in patients with and without CR was 81% and 36% respectively. On multivariate analysis, T stage (p = 0.001) and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.001) were found to be independent predictors for disease free survival. Conclusions: Pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a predictor of long term survival. Chemotherapy regimens with high response rates merit evaluation in randomized trials to improve outcome in locally advanced breast cancer.

Mamographic density and disease-free survival in [HR+, HER2-] locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11536-e11536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerin Ingrid Rojas ◽  
Raymundo Flores ◽  
Claudio J Flores ◽  
Joseph A. Pinto ◽  
Henry Leonidas Gomez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (22) ◽  
pp. 2654-2668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward P. Balaban ◽  
Pamela B. Mangu ◽  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Somnath Mukherjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
American Society ◽  
Comorbidity Profile

Purpose To provide evidence-based recommendations to oncologists and others for treatment of patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. Methods American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, gastroenterology, palliative care, and advocacy experts and conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 2002 to June 2015. Outcomes included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. Results Twenty-six randomized controlled trials met the systematic review criteria. Recommendations A multiphase computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis should be performed. Baseline performance status and comorbidity profile should be evaluated. The goals of care, patient preferences, psychological status, support systems, and symptoms should guide decisions for treatments. A palliative care referral should occur at first visit. Initial systemic chemotherapy (6 months) with a combination regimen is recommended for most patients (for some patients radiation therapy may be offered up front) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and a favorable comorbidity profile. There is no clear evidence to support one regimen over another. The gemcitabine-based combinations and treatments recommended in the metastatic setting (eg, fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials involving locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer. If there is local disease progression after induction chemotherapy, without metastasis, then radiation therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy may be offered also with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2 and an adequate comorbidity profile. If there is stable disease after 6 months of induction chemotherapy but unacceptable toxicities, radiation therapy may be offered as an alternative. Patients with disease progression should be offered treatment per the ASCO Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treatment Guideline. Follow-up visits every 3 to 4 months are recommended. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/guidelines/LAPC and www.asco.org/guidelines/MetPC and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document