scholarly journals Partial Versus Total Omentectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 4971
Author(s):  
Shion Wei Chai ◽  
Suo-Hsien Wang ◽  
Chih-Yuan Wang ◽  
Yi-Chan Chen ◽  
Ruey-Shyang Soong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Disease Free

Background: Surgical treatment is the key to cure localized gastric cancer. There is no strong evidence that supports the value of omentectomy. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and efficiency of partial and total omentectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. All studies that compared total and partial omentectomy as treatments for gastric cancer were included. The primary outcomes were patients’ overall survival and disease-free survival, while the secondary outcomes were perioperative outcome and postoperative complications. Results: A total of nine studies were examined, wherein 1043 patients were included in the partial omentectomy group, and 1995 in the total omentectomy group. The partial omentectomy group was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.98, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%), shorter operative time, and lesser blood loss than the total omentectomy group. In addition, no statistically significant difference was observed in the number of dissected lymph nodes, length of hospital stays, complication rate, and disease-free survival. Conclusions: Our results show that, compared with total omentectomy in gastric cancer surgery, partial omentectomy had non-inferior oncological outcomes and comparable safety outcomes.

Open Versus Endoscopic Approach for Sinonasal Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Hur ◽  
Paul Zhang ◽  
Alison Yu ◽  
Natalie Kim-Orden ◽  
Lynn Kysh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Endoscopic Approach ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

Background Open resection (OR) of sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNM) traditionally has been the gold standard for treatment. However, endoscopic resection (ER) has recently become a surgical alternative. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes between OR and ER of SNM. Methods A literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was performed. Two reviewers independently screened for original studies comparing survival outcomes between OR and ER for SNM. Data were systematically collected on study design, patient demographics, outcomes, and level of evidence. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Meta-analysis of overall survival and disease-free survival was performed using random-effects models. Results The initial search yielded 2078 abstracts, of which 9 cohort studies were included for a total of 510 patients from 6 different countries. The average quality of all included studies using the NOS was 7.7 stars. Six out of 7 studies reported no differences in the stages of SNM between patients receiving ER versus OR. Overall survival was longer in the ER group versus OR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.95). There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between groups (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.28–1.25). Conclusion Based on the available literature, an endoscopic approach for SNM resection has survival outcomes that are similar or greater compared to an open approach.

Clinical impact of postgastrectomy sarcopenia on the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 311-311
Author(s):  
Beom Jin Kim ◽  
Eun Sun Lee ◽  
Joong-Min Park ◽  
In Gyu Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fat Volume ◽  
Disease Free

311 Background: There is a lack of research on newly developed sarcopenia postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors and the clinical impact of postgastrectomy sarcopenia on the prognosis in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data from 430 consecutive GC patients who underwent surgical resection at Chung-Ang University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2015. Their skeletal muscle mass and abdominal fat volume were measured by abdominal CT imaging. Results: A total of 425 patients were analyzed in the study. The mean age was 62 years old and male were 301 (70.8%). Of these, 42 patients (9.9%) were diagnosed as pre-operative sarcopenia. Compared with non-sarcopenic group, pre-operative sarcopenia groups showed more female, higher BMI, less alcoholic, and less smoking. However, there was no significant difference in 5 - year overall survival and disease free survival between the groups (p = 0.836 and p = 0.638, respectively). Among 381 non-sarcopenic patients, 48 patients (12.6%) were diagnosed as newly developed sarcopenia in one year after gastric resection. Compared with non-sarcopenic group, the newly developed sarcopenic group showed more male, more undifferentiated tumor, lower hemoglobin level, less alcoholic, less smoking, and presence of diabetes mellitus. However, there was no significant difference in the 5 - year overall survival and disease free survival among non-sarcopenic, sarcopenic, and newly developed sarcopenic groups (p = 0.521 and p = 0.534, respectively). The relationship between preoperative body fat volume and postoperative muscle mass showed a significant correlation (rho = 0.296, p < 0.001), but only BMI was significantly associated with long term survival. Conclusions: Although newly developed sarcopenia after surgery did not affect the survival rate, patients with nutritional risk of sarcopenia after surgical resection may require early evaluation of nutritional status and nutritional support.

Clinical impact of newly developed sarcopenia after surgical resection for gastric cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Beom Jin Kim ◽  
Eun Sun Lee ◽  
Jae Yong Park ◽  
Jae Gyu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fat Volume ◽  
Disease Free

145 Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors and the clinical impact of of newly developed sarcopenia after surgical resection on the prognosis in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data from 430 consecutive GC patients who underwent surgical resection at Chung-Ang University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2015. Their skeletal muscle mass and abdominal fat volume were measured by abdominal CT imaging. Results: A total of 425 patients were analyzed in the study. The mean age was 62 years old and male were 301 (70.8%). Of these, 42 patients (9.9%) were diagnosed as pre-operative sarcopenia. Compared with non-sarcopenic group, pre-operative sarcopenia groups showed more female, higher BMI, less alcoholic, and less smoking. However, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival and disease free survival between the groups (p=0.836 and p=0.638, respectively). Among 381 non-sarcopenic patients, 48 patients (12.6%) were diagnosed as newly developed sarcopenia in one year after gastric resection. Compared with non-sarcopenic group, the newly developed sarcopenic group showed more male, more undifferentiated tumor, lower hemoglobin level, less alcoholic, less smoking, and presence of diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, newly developed sarcopenic group showed more total fat area, especially more subcutaneous fat area and lower VFA / SFA ratio in the abdominal CT imaging. However, there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival and disease free survival among non-sarcopenic, sarcopenic, and newly developed sarcopenic groups (p=0.521 and p=0.534, respectively). The relationship between preoperative body fat volume and postoperative muscle mass showed a significant correlation (rho = 0.296, p <0.001), but only BMI was significantly associated with long term survival. Conclusions: Although newly developed sarcopenia after surgery did not affect the survival rate, patients with nutritional risk of sarcopenia after surgical resection may require early evaluation of nutritional status and nutritional support.

scholarly journals Does Extended Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage Really Bring Benefit on Patients With Gastric Cancer? A Meta-Analysis of Published Clinical Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Tao ◽  
Xiao-Yu Liu ◽  
Yu-Xi Cheng ◽  
Bing Kang ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Peritoneal Lavage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Curative Gastrectomy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

PurposeThe purpose of the current meta-analysis is to analyze whether extended intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) can bring benefit on short-term outcomes or survival for patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to May 3, 2021, to find eligible studies. Postoperative complications, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and peritoneal recurrence–free survival (PRFS) were compared between EIPL group and No EIPL group.ResultsA total of five randomized controlled trials with 1,790 patients were included in the current meta-analysis. No difference was found in baseline information (p &gt; 0.05). After pooling up the data of overall postoperative complications, no significant difference was found between EIPL group and No EIPL group (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.51 to 1.53, P = 0.65). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between EIPL group and No EIPL group in terms of OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.36 to 1.64, P = 0.49), DFS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.33, P = 0.87), and PRFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.43, P = 0.86). In terms of subgroup analysis of OS, no significant difference was found as well (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.82 to 1.34, P = 0.69).ConclusionsEIPL did not bring benefit in terms of short-term outcomes or survival. Therefore, EIPL is not recommended for patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

scholarly journals Disease-Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Adjuvant Trials of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (21) ◽  
pp. 1600-1607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Oba ◽  
Xavier Paoletti ◽  
Steven Alberts ◽  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Jacqueline Benedetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Overexpression of NUAK1 is associated with disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-tian Ye ◽  
Ai-jun Guo ◽  
Peng-fei Yin ◽  
Xian-dong Cao ◽  
Jia-cong Chang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Value of Preoperative Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores in Predicting Overall Survival and Disease-Free Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 1998-2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Aurello ◽  
Simone Maria Tierno ◽  
Giammauro Berardi ◽  
Federico Tomassini ◽  
Paolo Magistri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Predictive Prognostic Value of Tissue-Based MicroRNA Expression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Troiano ◽  
F. Mastrangelo ◽  
V.C.A. Caponio ◽  
L. Laino ◽  
N. Cirillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Mirna Expression ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common type of cancer characterized by a low survival rate, mostly due to local recurrence and metastasis. In view of the importance of predicting tumor behavior in the choice of treatment strategies for OSCC, several studies have attempted to investigate the prognostic value of tissue biomarkers, including microRNA (miRNA). The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between miRNA expression and survival of OSCC patients. Studies were identified by searching on MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment of studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were collected from cohort studies comparing disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with high miRNA expression compared to those with low expression. A total of 15 studies featuring 1,200 OSCC samples, predominantly from Asia, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Poor prognosis correlated with upregulation of 9 miRNAs (miR-21, miR-455-5p, miiR-155-5p, miR-372, miR-373, miR-29b, miR-1246, miR-196a, and miR-181) and downregulation of 7 miRNAs (miR-204, miR-101, miR-32, miR-20a, miR-16, miR-17, and miR-125b). The pooled hazard ratio values (95% confidence interval) related to different miRNA expression for overall survival and disease-free survival were 2.65 (2.07–3.39) and 1.95 (1.28–2.98), respectively. The results of this meta-analysis revealed that the expression levels of specific miRNAs can robustly predict prognosis of OSCC patients.

TP1.2.3Oncological Outcomes of Organ Preservation Strategies - Local Excision Procedures and ‘Watchful Waiting’ In Management of Low Rectal Cancers – A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
A R Aspari ◽  
V Ramesh ◽  
G Kumar ◽  
S N Narayanasamy ◽  
A O Gumber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Organ Preservation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Rectal Cancers ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Objective To evaluate local recurrence, metastases, and survival outcomes of `wait and watch’ (WW) strategy and local excision (LE) of tumours, in comparison to the present standard practice of total mesorectal excision (TME) for locally advanced rectal cancers. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed databases, and sources of Grey literature. Study Selection Randomised and non-randomised prospective studies, retrospective studies with propensity-score-matched analyses. Data Extraction and Synthesis These were carried out independently by two reviewers. A random-effects methodology was used for meta-analyses. Data was presented keeping with the 27-item PRISMA checklist. Main Outcomes The primary outcomes of interest were local recurrence, distant metastases, disease-free-survival and overall-survival, which were assessed in comparison to those associated with radical surgeries (TME). Results 7 of the 16 studies in the systematic review were included for the quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. Local recurrence rates were comparable amongst patients in WW group and LE group to those undergoing TME. [Risk ratio (RR) 3.07/1.41; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.86-10.95/0.66-3.01; P = 0.08/P=0.89 respectively]. Rates of distant metastases in the WW group and LE group were comparable to those undergoing TME [RR = 0.71/0.94; 95% CI 0.22-2.30/0.55-1.61; P = 0.56/ P = 0.83 respectively]. The median 3-year disease-free survival among patients undergoing WW, LE procedure, and TME were 88%, 80%, and 78.2% respectively; and the median 3-year overall survival among the three groups were 96%, 93%, and 89.5% respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Organ-preservation strategies appear to be a viable treatment option in the management of rectal-cancers. Further research is warranted to provide stronger levels of evidence on organ-preservation strategies.

scholarly journals Prognostic Indications of Elevated MCT4 and CD147 across Cancer Types: A Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory D. Bovenzi ◽  
James Hamilton ◽  
Patrick Tassone ◽  
Jennifer Johnson ◽  
David M. Cognetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cd147 Expression ◽  
Cancer Types ◽  
Disease Free

Background. Metabolism in the tumor microenvironment can play a critical role in tumorigenesis and tumor aggression. Metabolic coupling may occur between tumor compartments; this phenomenon can be prognostically significant and may be conserved across tumor types. Monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) play an integral role in cellular metabolism via lactate transport and have been implicated in metabolic synergy in tumors. The transporters MCT1 and MCT4 are regulated via expression of their chaperone, CD147.Methods. We conducted a meta-analysis of existing publications on the relationship between MCT1, MCT4, and CD147 expression and overall survival and disease-free survival in cancer, using hazard ratios derived via multivariate Cox regression analyses.Results. Increased MCT4 expressions in the tumor microenvironment, cancer cells, or stromal cells were all associated with decreased overall survival and decreased disease-free survival (p<0.001for all analyses). Increased CD147 expression in cancer cells was associated with decreased overall survival and disease-free survival (p<0.0001for both analyses). Few studies were available on MCT1 expression; MCT1 expression was not clearly associated with overall or disease-free survival.Conclusion. MCT4 and CD147 expression correlate with worse prognosis across many cancer types. These results warrant further investigation of these associations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document