scholarly journals Decreasing Postoperative Pulmonary Complication Following Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Individuals with Colorectal Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis in a Propensity Score–Weighted Cohort Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Yih-Jong Chern ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Ching-Chung Cheng ◽  
Jing-Rong Jhuang ◽  
Chien-Yuh Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Competing Risk ◽  
Competing Risk Analysis ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Laparoscopy Group

Advanced age is a risk factor for major abdominal surgery due to a decline in physical function and increased comorbidities. Although laparoscopic surgery provides good results in most patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), its effect on elderly patients remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgeries in elderly patients with CRC. Total 1350 patients aged ≥75 years who underwent curative resection for stage I–III primary CRC were enrolled retrospectively and were divided into open surgery (846 patients) and laparoscopy (504 patients) groups. After propensity score weighting to balance an uneven distribution, a competing risk analysis was used to analyze the short-term and long-term outcomes. Postoperative mortality rates were lower in the laparoscopy group, especially due to pulmonary complications. Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the open surgery group. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and competing risk analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. Laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with CRC significantly decreased pulmonary-related postoperative morbidity and mortality in this large cohort study. Laparoscopic surgery is a favorable method for elderly patients with CRC than open surgery in terms of less hospital stay and similar oncological outcomes.

scholarly journals Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yih Jong Chern ◽  
Hsin-Yuan Hung ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Jy-Ming Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Postoperative Stay ◽  
Conversion Rates

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic surgery has achieved good results in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in CRC patients aged above 75 years at a single tertiary medical center.Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2015, we studied 967 patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis in a single institution. Of the enrolled subjects, 305 underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 662 received open laparotomy surgery.Results: Compared to the patients who received open surgery, those received laparoscopic surgery had prominent shorter postoperative stay (10.3 vs. 13.5 days p < 0.001) and similar postoperative mortality (p = 0.082) and morbidity (p = 0.354). In the laparoscopy cohort, 6 of 305 patients were converted to open surgery and 1 died. The long-term overall survival, cancer-specific survival and recurrence rate were all similar between both cohorts in each stage.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is suitable for elderly patients due to shorter postoperative stay, similar long-term outcomes with open surgery and acceptably low conversion rates. For long-term overall and oncological outcome, the results of laparoscopic surgery were similar to that of open surgery in each TNM stage.

scholarly journals Advantage of Laparoscopy Surgery for Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients without Compromising Oncologic Outcome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yih Jong Chern ◽  
Hsin-Yuan Hung ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Jy-Ming Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Postoperative Stay ◽  
Conversion Rates

Abstract Backgrounds: Laparoscopic surgery has achieved good results in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in CRC patients aged above 75 years at a single tertiary medical center.Methods: Between January 2009 and December 2015, we studied 967 patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis in a single institution. Of the enrolled subjects, 305 underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 662 received open laparotomy surgery.Results: Compared to the patients who received open surgery, those received laparoscopic surgery had prominent shorter postoperative stay (10.3 vs. 13.5 days p < 0.001) and similar postoperative mortality (p = 0.082) and morbidity (p = 0.354). In the laparoscopy cohort, 6 of 305 patients were converted to open surgery and 1 died. The long-term overall survival, cancer-specific survival and recurrence rate were all similar between both cohorts in each stage.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is suitable for elderly patients due to shorter postoperative stay, similar long-term outcomes with open surgery and acceptably low conversion rates. For long-term overall and oncological outcome, the results of laparoscopic surgery were similar to that of open surgery in each TNM stage.

scholarly journals Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yih Jong Chern ◽  
Hsin-Yuan Hung ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Jy-Ming Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Postoperative Stay ◽  
Conversion Rates

Abstract Background: Laparoscopic surgery has achieved significant results in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in patients with CRC aged above 75 years at a single tertiary medical center.Methods: We analyzed 967 patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis between January 2009 and December 2015, in a single institution. Of the enrolled patients, 305 underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 662 received open laparotomy surgery.Results: Compared to the patients who underwent open surgery, those who received laparoscopic surgery had significantly shorter postoperative stay (10.3 vs. 13.5 days p < 0.001) and similar postoperative morbidity (p = 0.354) and mortality (p = 0.082). In the laparoscopy cohort, six of 305 patients were converted to open surgery and one died. The long-term overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence rate were similar between both cohorts in each stage.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is suitable for elderly patients owing to shorter postoperative stay, similar long-term outcomes with open surgery, and acceptable low conversion rates. For long-term overall and oncological outcomes, the results of laparoscopic surgery were similar to that of open surgery in each TNM stage.

scholarly journals Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yih-Jong Chern ◽  
Hsin-Yuan Hung ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Jy-Ming Chiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Postoperative Stay ◽  
Conversion Rates

Abstract Background Laparoscopic surgery has achieved significant results in elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we compared the short-term and long-term outcomes of open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in patients with CRC aged above 75 years at a single tertiary medical center. Methods We analyzed 967 patients who underwent curative resection for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastasis between January 2009 and December 2015, in a single institution. Of the enrolled patients, 305 underwent laparoscopic surgery, and 662 received open laparotomy surgery. Results Compared to the patients who underwent open surgery, those who received laparoscopic surgery had significantly shorter postoperative stay (10.3 vs. 13.5 days p < 0.001) and similar postoperative morbidity (p = 0.354) and mortality (p = 0.082). In the laparoscopy cohort, six of 305 patients were converted to open surgery and one died. The long-term overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and recurrence rate were similar between both cohorts in each stage. Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery is suitable for elderly patients owing to shorter postoperative stay, similar long-term outcomes with open surgery, and acceptable low conversion rates. For long-term overall and oncological outcomes, the results of laparoscopic surgery were similar to that of open surgery in each TNM stage.

scholarly journals One-Stage Total Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Metastasis. Is It Safe and Feasible?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sena ◽  
Arcangelo Picciariello ◽  
Fabio Marino ◽  
Marta Goglia ◽  
Aldo Rocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
One Stage

Liver is the main target organ for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. It is estimated that ~25% of CRC patients have synchronous metastases at diagnosis, and about 60% of CRC patients will develop metastases during the follow up. Although several teams have performed simultaneous laparoscopic resections (SLR) of liver and colorectal lesions, the feasibility and safety of this approach is still widely debated and few studies on this topic are present in the literature. The purpose of this literature review is to understand the state of the art of SLR and to clarify the potential benefits and limitations of this approach. Several studies have shown that SLR can be performed safely and with short-term outcomes similarly to the separated procedures. Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resections combine the advantages of one stage surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Several reports compared the short-term outcomes of one stage laparoscopic resection with open resections and showed a similar or inferior amount of blood loss, a similar or lower complication rate, and a significant reduction of hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery respect to open surgery but much longer operating times for the laparoscopic technique. Few retrospective studies compared long term outcomes of laparoscopic one stage surgery with the outcomes of open one stage surgery and did not identify any differences about disease free survival and the overall survival. In conclusion, hepatic and colorectal SLR are a safe and effective approach characterized by less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery of intestinal function, and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, laparoscopic approach is associated to lower rates of surgical complications without significant differences in the long-term outcomes compared to the open surgery.

scholarly journals Primary hemiarthroplasty after unstable trochanteric fracture in elderly patients: mortality, readmission and reoperation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzu-Chieh Lin ◽  
Pin-Wen Wang ◽  
Chun-Teng Lin ◽  
Yu-Jun Chang ◽  
Ying-Ju Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Competing Risk ◽  
Competing Risk Analysis ◽  
Long Term Outcomes

Abstract Background Most unstable trochanteric fractures are treated with internal fixation and often with high complication rates. Hemiarthroplasty might be an alternative method in difficult condition, especially in unstable comminuted fracture in fragile bone. However, few have investigated the long-term outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for unstable trochanteric fracture. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of trochanteric fracture after primary hemiarthroplasty using competing risk analysis on their long-term outcomes, including mortality, readmission and reoperation. Methods We studied a total of 2798 patients over 60 years old, with a mean age of 79 years, of which 68% are females and 67.23% have at least one comorbidity. They underwent a hemiarthroplasty for unstable trochanteric fracture during the period between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010 and were follow-up until the end of 2012, or death. Survival analysis and Cox model were used to characterize mortality. Competing risk analysis and Fine and Gray model were used to estimate the cumulative incidences of the first readmission and the first reoperation. Results The follow-up mortality rate for 1-year was 17.94%; 2-year, 29.76%; 5-year, 56.8%; and 10-year, 83.38%. The cumulative incidence of the first readmission was 16.4% for 1-year and 22.44% for 3-year. The cumulative incidence of the first reoperation was 13.87% for 1-year, 18.11% for 2-year, 25.79% for 5-year, and 38.24% for 10-year. Male gender, older age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and lower insured amount were all risk factors for the overall mortality. Older age and higher CCI were risk factors for the first readmission. Older age was a protective factor for reoperation, which is likely due to the competing death. Conclusions The mortality and revision rates after hemiarthroplasty for unstable trochanteric fracture are acceptable as a salvage procedure for this fragile sub-population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document