scholarly journals Acute Myocardial Infarction and Daylight Saving Time Transitions: Is There a Risk?

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-557
Author(s):  
Viktor Čulić ◽  
Thomas Kantermann
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Transitional Period ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
The Moment

Available evidence on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the days after the spring daylight saving time (DST) transition suggests either a modest increase or no risk increase. Partial sleep deprivation and enhanced circadian clock misalignment have been implicated as the underlying mechanisms for increased AMI risk, probably via enhanced thrombo-inflammatory processes and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Most of the studies, as we suggest as a perspective here, have used potentially inappropriate control periods, including the two post-transitional weeks, because adjustment after the spring DST transition lasts at least four weeks for all chronotypes and probably even beyond this period for late chronotypes. The most plausible conclusions, at the moment, for the risk of AMI after the spring DST transition are: (1) the risk is increased, (2) a relatively modest risk increase could be currently underestimated or in some studies undetected, (3) late chronotypes and/or individuals with high levels of social jetlag (a proxy for circadian clock misalignment) could be more affected by the phenomenon, and (4) underlying pathophysiological mechanisms should be further explored. As a significant part of world’s population continues to be affected by the biannual clock change, the question of increased AMI risk in the post-transitional period remains an intriguing public health issue.

scholarly journals Daylight saving time and acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Manzoli ◽  
M E Flacco ◽  
F Bravi ◽  
T Carradori ◽  
R Cappadona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Summary Relative Risk

Abstract Background The current evidence on the effects of daylight saving time (DST) transitions on major cardiovascular diseases is limited, and available results are conflicting. We carried out the first meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following DST transitions. Methods We searched MedLine and Scopus up to December 31, 2018, with no language restriction, to retrieve cohort or case-control studies evaluating AMI incidence among adults (≥18y) in the week following spring and/or autumn DST shifts versus control periods. A summary relative risk of AMI was computed after: (1) spring, (2) autumn, (3) both transitions considered together versus control weeks. Stratified analyses were performed by gender and age. Data were combined using a generic inverse-variance approach. Results Seven studies (>115,000 subjects) were included in the analyses. A significantly higher risk of AMI (Odds Ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) was observed in the two weeks following spring or winter DST transitions. The risk increase was however significant only after the spring shift (OR: 1.05; 1.02-1.07), while AMI incidence in the week after winter DST transition was comparable to control periods (OR 1.01; 0.98-1.04). No substantial differences by age or gender emerged. Conclusions The risk of AMI increases modestly but significantly following DST transitions, supporting the proposal of DST shifts discontinuation. Additional studies fully adjusting for potential confounders are required to confirm the present findings. Key messages The risk of acute myocardial infarction increases modestly but significantly following DST transitions. Although preliminary, our findings support the proposal of DST shifts discontinuation.

scholarly journals Daylight saving time does not seem to be associated with number of percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction in the Netherlands

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Derks ◽  
◽  
S. Houterman ◽  
G. S. C. Geuzebroek ◽  
P. van der Harst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Acute Mi

Abstract Background In multiple studies, the potential relationship between daylight saving time (DST) and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been investigated, with mixed results. Using the Dutch Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) registry facilitated by the Netherlands Heart Registration, we investigated whether the transitions to and from DST interact with the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI. Methods We assessed changes in hospital admissions for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-STEMI (NSTEMI) undergoing PCI between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We compared the incidence rate of PCI procedures during the first 3 or 7 days after the transition with that during a control period (2 weeks before transition plus second week after transition). Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using Poisson regression. Potential gender differences were also investigated. Results A total of 80,970 PCI procedures for STEMI or NSTEMI were performed. No difference in incidence rate a week after the transition to DST in spring was observed for STEMI (IRR 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.03) or NSTEMI (IRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96–1.12). After the transition from DST in autumn, the IRR was also comparable with the control period (STEMI: 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.12, and NSTEMI: 0.98, 95% CI 0.91–1.06). Observing the first 3 days after each transition yielded similar results. Gender-specific results were comparable. Conclusion Based on data from a large, nationwide registry, there was no correlation between the transition to or from DST and a change in the incidence rate of PCI for acute MI.

scholarly journals Daylight Saving Time and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Manfredini ◽  
Fabio Fabbian ◽  
Rosaria Cappadona ◽  
Alfredo De Giorgi ◽  
Francesca Bravi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: The available evidence on the effects of daylight saving time (DST) transitions on major cardiovascular diseases is limited and conflicting. We carried out the first meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following DST transitions. Methods: We searched cohort or case-control studies evaluating the incidence of AMI, among adults (≥18 y), during the weeks following spring and/or autumn DST shifts, versus control periods. The search was made in MedLine and Scopus, up to 31 December 2018, with no language restriction. A summary odds ratio of AMI was computed after: (1) spring, (2) autumn or (3) both transitions considered together. Meta-analyses were also stratified by gender and age. Data were combined using a generic inverse-variance approach. Results: Seven studies (>115,000 subjects) were included in the analyses. A significantly higher risk of AMI (Odds Ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01–1.06) was observed during the two weeks following spring or autumn DST transitions. However, although AMI risk increased significantly after the spring shift (OR: 1.05; 1.02–1.07), the incidence of AMI during the week after winter DST transition was comparable with control periods (OR 1.01; 0.98–1.04). No substantial differences were observed when the analyses were stratified by age or gender. Conclusion: The risk of AMI increases modestly but significantly after DST transitions, supporting the proposal of DST shifts discontinuation. Additional studies that fully adjust for potential confounders are required to confirm the present findings.

Abstract WMP51: Risk and Timing of of Ischemic Stroke Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander E Merkler ◽  
Gino Gialdini ◽  
Santosh Murthy ◽  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
Babak Navi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Absolute Increase ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Immortal Time Bias ◽  
Acute Mi ◽  
The Absolute

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) has long been reported as a risk factor for ischemic stroke, but the magnitude and duration of risk remains uncertain. Methods: We performed a crossover-cohort study using inpatient and outpatient claims data from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2008 through 2014. We identified all patients ≥66 years of age with a first-recorded hospitalization for acute MI. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. All predictors and outcomes were defined using previously validated ICD-9-CM codes. To exclude stroke that may have been due to percutaneous coronary intervention, we included only cases of ischemic stroke that occurred after discharge from the MI hospitalization. We compared the risk of ischemic stroke in successive 4-week periods during the 12 weeks after MI versus the corresponding 4-week periods 1 year later. To avoid immortal time bias, we limited our cohort to patients who remained alive and insured throughout the 15 month study period. Odds ratios (OR) and absolute risk differences were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel estimator for matched data. Results: We identified 22,798 patients with an acute MI in whom the mean age was 77.4 (±7.9) years and 50.3% were women. In the 12 weeks after discharge, 216 patients (0.95%) developed a stroke, as compared to 21 (0.09%) patients in the corresponding 12-week period 1 year later. The absolute increase in stroke risk was 0.45% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.55%) in the first 4 weeks after acute MI compared to the 4-week time period 1 year later, corresponding to an OR of 18.2 (95% CI, 8.1-50.6). The absolute risk increase was 0.24% (95% CI, 0.16-0.31%) during weeks 5-8 (OR, 8.7; 95% CI, 4.0-22.6) and 0.17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.23%) during weeks 9-12 (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.7-14.1). Conclusions: Acute MI is associated with a substantially elevated short-term risk of ischemic stroke. This risk was independent of periprocedural stroke risk in the setting of coronary reperfusion therapies.

scholarly journals Are daylight saving time transitions associated with changes in myocardial infarction incidence? Results from the German MONICA/KORA Myocardial Infarction Registry

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Kirchberger ◽  
Kathrin Wolf ◽  
Margit Heier ◽  
Bernhard Kuch ◽  
Wolfgang von Scheidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Daylight Saving Time ◽  
Daylight Saving

Abstract 569: NT-proBNP is an Important Independent Predictor of Clinical Events after Primary PCI for STEMI

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin A Ezekowitz ◽  
Jeffery A Bakal ◽  
Kurt Huber ◽  
Pierre Theroux ◽  
Stefan K James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Cart Model ◽  
Primary Composite Outcome

Acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI) remains a major global public health issue. Despite advances in therapy, patients remain at risk for death, repeat myocardial infarction (MI) shock and heart failure (HF). Novel markers that predict those at risk are needed. We studied 903 STEMI patients in The Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial (which enrolled STEMI patients presenting < 6 hrs of symptom onset who were to undergo primary PCI) in a case-control design (cases selected based on the trial’s primary composite outcome - death, shock or HF - and matched on age, gender and infarct location to controls). NT-proBNP (pg/ml) was measured at randomization and 24 hrs. Outcomes (individually and the composite) of death, shock, and HF at 90 days were examined by quartiles of NT-proBNP. A CART model was used to categorize adjusted risk. NT-proBNP was higher in patients who had events. Patients with higher NT-proBNP levels at baseline (median symptom onset to randomization 2.7 hrs) and 24 hrs had more events (composite p<0.001; death p<0.0001; HF p<0.0001; shock p=0.05) - See figure . Using the CART model (adjusted for age, gender and infarct location), baseline Killip class and NT-proBNP could further subcategorize patients into 90 day mortality categories 4%, 10%, 30%, and 53%. In fact, only 4 patients (1%) with a 24 hour NT-proBNP <999 pg/ml had any event in the next 90 days. Although the overall prognosis in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI is good, NT-proBNP performed early and at 24 hrs provides important prognostic information for predicting negative outcomes i.e. shock, heart failure and death. Figure. Kaplan-Meier curve for the primary composite outcome stratified by baseline NT-proBNP (a), or 24 hour NT-proBNP (b).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document