scholarly journals Endoscopic Ultrasound for Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeichi Yoshida ◽  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Masayuki Kitano
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Familial Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Lesion ◽  
Pancreatic Cancers ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Detection of small pancreatic cancers, which have a better prognosis than large cancers, is needed to reduce high mortality rates. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most sensitive imaging modality for detecting pancreatic lesions. The high resolution of EUS makes it particularly useful for detecting small pancreatic lesions that may be missed by other imaging modalities. Therefore, EUS should be performed in patients with obstructive jaundice in whom computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not identify a definite pancreatic lesion. Interest in the use of EUS for screening individuals at high risk of pancreatic cancer, including those with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and familial pancreatic cancer is growing. Contrast-enhanced EUS can facilitate differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions as well as malignant cystic lesions. In addition, EUS-guided fine needle aspiration can provide samples of small pancreatic lesions. Thus, EUS and EUS-related techniques are essential for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

scholarly journals Utility of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Early Diagnosis of Small Pancreatic Cancer

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Kensuke Tanioka ◽  
Yuki Kawaji ◽  
Takashi Tamura ◽  
Junya Nuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasonography ◽  
Multidetector Row Computed Tomography ◽  
Diagnostic Ability ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Pancreatic Solid Lesion ◽  
Small Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

This study aimed to assess whether contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS), compared to multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for early diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer (PC). Between March 2010 and June 2018, all three imaging modalities and surgery were performed for patients with a pancreatic solid lesion measuring ≤20 mm; diagnostic ability was compared among modalities. Fifty-one of 60 patients were diagnosed with PC (PC size in 41 patients: 11–20 mm; 10 patients: ≤10 mm). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (11–20 mm) detection were 95%/83%/94%, 78%/83%/79%, and 73%/33%/68%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS was significantly superior compared with MDCT and MRI (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (≤10 mm) detection were 70%/100%/77%, 20%/100%/38%, and 50%/100%/62%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS tended to be superior to that of MDCT (p = 0.025). The sensitivity of MDCT for PC (≤10 mm) detection was significantly lower than that for PC (11–20 mm) detection (20% vs. 78%; p = 0.001). CH-EUS, compared to MDCT and MRI, is useful for diagnosing small PCs.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Ultrasound for Detection of Liver Metastasis: Hope or Hype?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupam Kumar Singh ◽  
Surinder S. Rana
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasound ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Hepatic Lesions ◽  
Enhanced Computed Tomography ◽  
Metastatic Liver

AbstractTransabdominal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the common diagnostic tests for the detection of hepatic lesions. Use of enhanced and advanced MRI technique, that is, diffusion weighted MRI and hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, has further improved the accuracy of detection of metastatic liver lesions ≤10 mm in diameter. However, even with these advanced imaging modalities sensitivity is low for lesions smaller than 10 mm when compared with standard intraoperative ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an emerging imaging modality with resolution sufficient to detect and sample lesions as small as 5 mm in diameter. In this news and views, we have discussed the role of standard and enhanced EUS for the detection of metastatic liver lesions.

scholarly journals A269 EUS-GUIDED ROSE FNA AND CNB FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC CANCER: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 146-147
Author(s):  
A Almudaires ◽  
G Williams ◽  
S E Gruchy ◽  
A Morgenthau
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Pancreatic Lesion ◽  
Site Evaluation

Abstract Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with Rapid On Site Evaluation (ROSE EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy (EUS-CNB) are widely used for the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. There is no known published randomized control trial that compares between the two modalities. Given the aggressive nature of pancreatic cancer, it is crucial to make a prompt diagnosis in order to initiate treatment in a timely fashion. Aims This study compares the diagnostic performance of ROSE EUS-FNA and EUS-CNB for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Methods A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent ROSE EUS-FNA and/ or EUS-CNB for solid pancreatic lesion. Diagnostic yield (defined as percentage of diagnostic samples), diagnostic accuracy (defined as percentage of correct diagnosis), sensitivity and specificity for malignancy were compared between ROSE EUS- FNA and EUS- CNB. Baseline characteristics for both patients and lesions were also obtained. Results A total of 82 patients with solid pancreatic lesions were reviewed. 84 EUS with 61 FNA and 74 CNB were performed. The diagnostic yield was 42/61 (69%) and 59/74 (79.7%) for FNA and CNB respectively (P 0.166). The diagnostic accuracy was 33/61 (54%) and 53/74 (71%) for FNA and CNB respectively (P 0.0326). 50 patients underwent both FNA and CNB during the same EUS. The calculated diagnostic yield among this subgroup was 33/50 (66%) and 39/50 (78%) for FNA and CNB respectively (P 0.265); with diagnostic accuracy of 26/50 (52%) for FNA and 34/50 (68%) for CNB (P 0.152). The diagnostic accuracy after combining both techniques was 40/50 (80%). The incremental increase in diagnostic yield by combining both methods was 12/50 (24%) and 6/50 (12%) relative to FNA and CNB respectively. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy for FNA and CNB was 60.8% and 92.7%, respectively. The specificity was 100% for both methods. Conclusions EUS-guided CNB is a superior method of assessing solid pancreatic lesion and pancreatic malignancy with better diagnostic yield and accuracy and higher sensitivity than ROSE EUS-FNA. Funding Agencies None

scholarly journals Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and the Role of the Cytopathologist in Solid Pancreatic Lesion Diagnosis

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahzad Iqbal ◽  
David Friedel ◽  
Mala Gupta ◽  
Lorna Ogden ◽  
Stavros N. Stavropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Pancreatic Lesion ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Close Interaction

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most sensitive imaging modality for solid pancreatic lesions. The specificity, however, is low (about 75%). It can be increased to 100% with an accuracy of 95% by the addition of fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Cytopathology plays an important role. The final diagnosis is based upon the correlation of clinical, EUS, and cytologic features. A close interaction with the cytopathologist is required in improving the diagnostic yield. In this paper, we present an overview of the role of EUS-guided FNA and importance of close interaction with the cytopathologist. Day to day examples of different solid pancreatic lesions have been presented at the end.

scholarly journals Infected Pancreatic Necrosis Mimicking Pancreatic Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 436-442
Author(s):  
Jun Heo
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Necrotizing Pancreatitis ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Infected Pancreatic Necrosis ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Fine Needle

Although infected pancreatic necrosis can develop as a result of rare conditions involving trauma, surgery, and systemic infection with an uncommon pathogen, it usually occurs as a complication of pancreatitis. Early phase of acute pancreatitis can be either edematous interstitial pancreatitis or necrotizing pancreatitis. The late complications of pancreatitis can be divided into pancreatic pseudocyst due to edematous interstitial pancreatitis or walled-off necrosis due to necrotizing pancreatitis. During any time course of pancreatitis, bacteremia can provoke infection inside or outside the pancreas. The patients with infected pancreatic necrosis may have fever, chills, and abdominal pain as inflammatory symptoms. These specific clinical presentations can differentiate infected pancreatic necrosis from other pancreatic diseases. Herein, I report an atypical case of infected pancreatic necrosis in which abdominal pain, elevation of white blood cell, and fever were not found at the time of admission. Rather, a 10-kg weight loss (from 81 to 71 kg) over 2 months nearly led to a misdiagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The patient was finally diagnosed based on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. This case highlights that awareness of the natural course of pancreatitis and infected pancreatic necrosis is important. In addition, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration should be recommended for the diagnosis and treatment of indeterminate pancreatic lesions in selected patients.

scholarly journals The value of contrast-enhanced FLAIR magnetic resonance imaging in detecting meningeal abnormalities in suspected cases of meningitis compared to conventional contrast-enhanced T1WI sequences

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Hamza Kamr ◽  
Mohamed Gaber Eissawy ◽  
Amr Saadawy
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Effective Management ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Flair Sequence ◽  
Csf Analysis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Abstract Background Early diagnosis of meningitis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would be useful for appropriate and effective management, decrease morbidity and mortality, and provide better diagnosis and treatment. The objective of the current study is to compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced FLAIR (CE-FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1WI (CE-T1WI) in the detection of meningeal abnormalities in suspected cases of meningitis. Results Out of 45 patients, 37 patients were confirmed to have meningitis on CSF analysis. Out of the 37 patients, 34 patients were positive on CE-FLAIR sequence and 27 were positive on CE-T1WI. The sensitivity of CE-FLAIR sequence was 91.9% and specificity 100%, while the sensitivity of CE-T1WI sequence was 73% and specificity 100%. Conclusion CE-FLAIR is more sensitive than CE-T1WI in diagnosis of meningitis. It is recommended to be used in any cases with clinically suspected meningitis.

scholarly journals Improvement of the Diagnosis of Isoattenuating Pancreatic Carcinomas by Defining their Characteristics on Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography and Endosonography with Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA)

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 776
Author(s):  
Robert Psar ◽  
Ondrej Urban ◽  
Marie Cerna ◽  
Tomas Rohan ◽  
Martin Hill
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Duct ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Pancreatic Head ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Secondary Signs

(1) Background. The aim was to define typical features of isoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas on computed tomography (CT) and endosonography and determine the yield of fine-needle aspiration endosonography (EUS-FNA) in their diagnosis. (2) Methods. One hundred and seventy-three patients with pancreatic carcinomas underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT followed by EUS-FNA at the time of diagnosis. Secondary signs on CT, size and location on EUS, and the yield of EUS-FNA in isoattenuating and hypoattenuating pancreatic cancer, were evaluated. (3) Results. Isoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas occurred in 12.1% of patients. Secondary signs of isoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas on CT were present in 95.2% cases and included dilatation of the pancreatic duct and/or the common bile duct (85.7%), interruption of the pancreatic duct (76.2%), abnormal pancreatic contour (33.3%), and atrophy of the distal parenchyma (9.5%) Compared to hypoattenuating pancreatic carcinomas, isoattenuating carcinomas were more often localized in the pancreatic head (100% vs. 59.2%; p < 0.001). In ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis, the optimal cut-off value for the size of isoattenuating carcinomas on EUS was ≤ 25 mm (AUC = 0.898). The sensitivity of EUS-FNA in confirmation of isoattenuating and hypoattenuating pancreatic cancer were 90.5% and 92.8% (p = 0.886). (4) Conclusions. Isoattenuating pancreatic head carcinoma can be revealed by indirect signs on CT and confirmed with high sensitivity by EUS-FNA.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Peritoneal Deposits in Undiagnosed Ascites by Advanced Endoscopic Ultrasound Imaging Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 049-050
Author(s):  
Surinder Singh Rana ◽  
Ravi Sharma ◽  
Rajesh Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Ascitic Fluid ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Enhancement Pattern ◽  
Etiological Diagnosis ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Biochemical Evaluation ◽  
Repeat Sampling

AbstractEtiology of ascites can be usually determined with ascitic fluid cytological and biochemical evaluation. Occasionally, the cause of ascites cannot be determined despite repeated ascitic fluid evaluations. These patients with undiagnosed ascites usually undergo diagnostic laparotomy/laparoscopy for etiological diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can help in resolving the diagnostic conundrum of undiagnosed ascites by visualizing as well as sampling peritoneal and omental deposits/thickening. However, rarely fine-needle aspiration from deposits may be falsely negative and patient may need repeat sampling. Newer EUS imaging techniques such as elastography and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS by providing additive information on stiffness and enhancement pattern of the lesion can help in differential diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document