scholarly journals Entropy-Based Video Steganalysis of Motion Vectors

Entropy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Sadat ◽  
Karim Faez ◽  
Mohsen Saffari Pour
2012 ◽  
Vol 482-484 ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Deng ◽  
Yun Jie Wu ◽  
Lin Na Zhou

The motion vector (MV)-based steganography embeds the secret messages by modifying the motion vectors. So the traditional video steganalytic schemes cannot detect the presence of the hidden messages by MV-based steganography. In this paper, a novel calibration-based steganalytic scheme against MV-based steganography is presented. The features are derived from the shift differences between the original and calibrated MVs, and then the feature vector is constructed. Using the extracted feature vectors, the support vector machine (SVM) is trained to detect the presence of stego videos. Compared with other features, the proposed features have better performance even with the low embedding strength.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 155014772199273
Author(s):  
Jianyi Liu ◽  
Cong Zhang ◽  
Ru Zhang ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Jie Cheng

Aiming at the problems existing in existing steganalysis algorithms, this article proposes Motion Vector Coding Cost Change video steganalysis features based on Improved Motion Vector Reversion-Based features and Subtractive Probability of Coding Cost Optimal Matching features based on Subtractive Probability of Optimal Matching features from the perspective of the change of coding cost. Motion Vector Coding Cost Change features can be well consistent with the coding cost before recoding by analyzing the sub-pixel coding cost of recoding. By counting the sub-pixel coding costs of motion vectors before and after video recoding, the Sum of Absolute Difference values of motion vectors instead of predicted residuals are applied to steganalysis and detection, and the steganographic algorithm based on motion vectors is effectively detected. Experiments show that Motion Vector Coding Cost Change features have higher detection accuracy than Add-or-Subtract-One, Improved Motion Vector Reversion-Based, and other typical features in various steganography methods, and Subtractive Probability of Coding Cost Optimal Matching features have higher detection effect and better robustness than Subtractive Probability of Optimal Matching features.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian WANG ◽  
Jimin LIANG ◽  
Zejun HU

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (17th International Conference) ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Shaimaa El Sharkawy ◽  
Mona Safar ◽  
Mohamed Gad

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-90
Author(s):  
Zheng Zeng ◽  
Shiqiu Liu ◽  
Jinglei Yang ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Ling‐Qi Yan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1702
Author(s):  
Kévin Barbieux ◽  
Olivier Hautecoeur ◽  
Maurizio De Bartolomei ◽  
Manuel Carranza ◽  
Régis Borde

Atmospheric Motion Vectors (AMVs) are an important input to many Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. EUMETSAT derives AMVs from several of its orbiting satellites, including the geostationary satellites (Meteosat), and its Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites. The algorithm extracting the AMVs uses pairs or triplets of images, and tracks the motion of clouds or water vapour features from one image to another. Currently, EUMETSAT LEO satellite AMVs are retrieved from georeferenced images from the Advanced Very-High-Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) on board the Metop satellites. EUMETSAT is currently preparing the operational release of an AMV product from the Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) on board the Sentinel-3 satellites. The main innovation in the processing, compared with AVHRR AMVs, lies in the co-registration of pairs of images: the images are first projected on an equal-area grid, before applying the AMV extraction algorithm. This approach has multiple advantages. First, individual pixels represent areas of equal sizes, which is crucial to ensure that the tracking is consistent throughout the processed image, and from one image to another. Second, this allows features that would otherwise leave the frame of the reference image to be tracked, thereby allowing more AMVs to be derived. Third, the same framework could be used for every LEO satellite, allowing an overall consistency of EUMETSAT AMV products. In this work, we present the results of this method for SLSTR by comparing the AMVs to the forecast model. We validate our results against AMVs currently derived from AVHRR and the Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI). The release of the operational SLSTR AMV product is expected in 2022.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 1409-1416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigenori Otsuka ◽  
Shunji Kotsuki ◽  
Takemasa Miyoshi

Abstract Space–time extrapolation is a key technique in precipitation nowcasting. Motions of patterns are estimated using two or more consecutive images, and the patterns are extrapolated in space and time to obtain their future patterns. Applying space–time extrapolation to satellite-based global precipitation data will provide valuable information for regions where ground-based precipitation nowcasts are not available. However, this technique is sensitive to the accuracy of the motion vectors, and over the past few decades, previous studies have investigated methods for obtaining reliable motion vectors such as variational techniques. In this paper, an alternative approach applying data assimilation to precipitation nowcasting is proposed. A prototype extrapolation system is implemented with the local ensemble transform Kalman filter and is tested with the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) product. Data assimilation successfully improved the global precipitation nowcasting with the real-case GSMaP data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document