scholarly journals The Results of Applying Different Methodologies to 10 Years of Quantitative Precipitation Estimation in Catalonia Using Weather Radar

Geomatics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-368
Author(s):  
Tomeu Rigo ◽  
Maria Carmen Llasat ◽  
Laura Esbrí
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Daily Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Weather Stations ◽  
Point Data ◽  
Single Polarization

The single polarization C-Band weather radar network of the Meteorological Service of Catalonia covers the entire region (32,000 km2), which allows it to apply a series of corrections that improve preliminary estimations of the rainfall field (hourly and daily). In addition, an automatic re-processing using automatic weather stations helps to incorporate ground-based information. The last process of the quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) is running the end-product again eight days later, when the data have been reviewed and corrected in the case of detecting anomalies in the radar or gauge data. These corrections are applied operationally, with the fields generated and stored automatically. The QPE fields are generated in the GeoTIFF format, allowing easy use with multiple applications and simplifying processes such as quality control. In this way, the analysis of a 10 year period of GeoTIFF QPE daily data compared with ground rainfall values is introduced. The results help to understand different points regarding the functioning of the network such as the dependance on the type of precipitation and the seasonality. In addition, the description of a heavy rainfall episode (22 October 2019) shows the variations and improvements in the different products. The main conclusions refer to how using GeoTIFF combined with point data (rain gauges), it is possible to ensure simple but effective quality control of an operational radar network.

A Neural-Network Quality Control scheme for improved Quantitative Precipitation Estimation accuracy on the UK weather radar network

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nawal Husnoo ◽  
Timothy Darlington ◽  
Sebastián Torres ◽  
David Warde
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Ground Clutter ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
The Uk

AbstractIn this work, we present a new Quantitative-Precipitation-Estimation (QPE) quality-control (QC) algorithm for the UK weather radar network. The real-time adaptive algorithm uses a neural network (NN) to select data from the lowest useable elevation scan to optimize the combined performance of two other radar data correction algorithms: ground clutter mitigation (using CLEAN-AP) and vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR) correction. The NN is trained using 3D tiles of observed uncontaminated weather signals that are systematically combined with ground-clutter signals collected under dry weather conditions. This approach provides a way to simulate radar signals with a wide range of clutter contamination conditions and with realistic spatial structures while providing the uncontaminated “truth” with respect to which the performance of the QC algorithm can be measured. An evaluation of QPE products obtained with the proposed QC algorithm demonstrates superior performance as compared to those obtained with the QC algorithm currently used in operations. Similar improvements are also illustrated using radar observations from two periods of prolonged precipitation, showing a better balance between overestimation errors from using clutter-contaminated low-elevation radar data and VPR-induced errors from using high-elevation radar data.

scholarly journals Application of Attenuation Correction to Quantitative Precipitation Estimation on C-Band Weather Radar in Bengkulu

2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 012054
Author(s):  
M F Handoyo ◽  
M P Hadi ◽  
S Suprayogi
Keyword(s):  
Attenuation Correction ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Signal Interference ◽  
Active System ◽  
Estimation Errors ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation

Abstract A weather radar is an active system remote sensing tool that observes precipitation indirectly. Weather radar has an advantage in estimating precipitation because it has a high spatial resolution (up to 0.5 km). Reflectivity generated by weather radar still has signal interference caused by attenuation factors. Attenuation causes the Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) by the C-band weather radar to underestimate. Therefore attenuation correction on C-band weather radar is needed to eliminate precipitation estimation errors. This study aims to apply attenuation correction to determine Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) on the c-band weather radar in Bengkulu in December 2018. Gate-by-gate method attenuation correction with Kraemer approach has applied to c-band weather radar data from the Indonesian Agency for Meteorology and Geophysics (BMKG) weather radar network Bengkulu. This method uses reflectivity as the only input. Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) has obtained by comparing weather radar-based rain estimates to 10 observation rain gauges over a month with the Z-R relation equation. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is used to calculate the estimation error. Weather radar data are processed using Python-based libraries Wradlib and ArcGIS 10.5. As a result, the calculation between the weather radar estimate precipitation and the observed rainfall obtained equation Z=2,65R1,3. The attenuation correction process with Kreamer's approach on the c-band weather radar has reduced error in the Qualitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE). Corrected precipitation has a smaller error value (r = 0.88; RMSE = 8.38) than the uncorrected precipitation (r = 0.83; RMSE = 11.70).

scholarly journals Weather Radar Network Benefit Model for Flash Flood Casualty Reduction

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Y. N. Cho ◽  
James M. Kurdzo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Process ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Flood Warning ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Radar Networks ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Meteorological Radar

ABSTRACTA monetized flash flood casualty reduction benefit model is constructed for application to meteorological radar networks. Geospatial regression analyses show that better radar coverage of the causative rainfall improves flash flood warning performance. Enhanced flash flood warning performance is shown to decrease casualty rates. Consequently, these two effects in combination allow a model to be formed that links radar coverage to flash flood casualty rates. When this model is applied to the present-day contiguous U.S. weather radar network, results yield a flash flood–based benefit of $316 million (M) yr−1. The remaining benefit pools are more modest ($13 M yr−1 for coverage improvement and $69 M yr−1 maximum for all areas of radar quantitative precipitation estimation improvements), indicative of the existing weather radar network’s effectiveness in supporting the flash flood warning decision process.

scholarly journals Use of dual-polarization weather radar quantitative precipitation estimation for climatology

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanel Voormansik ◽  
Roberto Cremonini ◽  
Piia Post ◽  
Dmitri Moisseev
Keyword(s):  
Weather Radar ◽  
Early Warning Systems ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Reflectivity Data ◽  
First Time

Abstract. Accurate, timely and reliable precipitation observations are mandatory for hydrological forecast and early warning systems. In the case of convective precipitations, traditional rain gauges networks often miss precipitation maxima, due to density limitations and high spatial variability of rainfall field. Despite several limitations like attenuation or partial beam-blockings, the use of C-band weather radar has become operational in most of European weather services. Traditionally, weather radar-based quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) are derived by horizontal reflectivity data. Nevertheless, dual-polarization weather radar can overcome a number of shortcomings of the legacy horizontal reflectivity based estimation. For the first time, the present study analyses one of the longest datasets from fully operational polarimetric C-band weather radars; those ones are located in Estonia and in Italy, in very different climate conditions and environments. The study focuses on long-term observations of summertime precipitation and their quantitative estimations by polarimetric observations. From such derived QPEs accumulations for 1 hour, 24 hours and one month durations are calculated and compared with reference rain gauges to quantify uncertainties and evaluate performances.

scholarly journals Generation and Verification of Rainfall Estimates from 10-Yr Volumetric Weather Radar Measurements

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1223-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard Goudenhoofdt ◽  
Laurent Delobbe
Keyword(s):  
Mean Field ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Precipitation Regime ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Field Bias ◽  
Rain Rates

Abstract Volumetric measurements from a C-band weather radar in Belgium are reprocessed over the years 2005–14 to improve the quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE). The data quality is controlled using static clutter and beam blockage maps and clutter identification based on vertical gradients, horizontal texture, and satellite observations. A new QPE is obtained using stratiform–convective classification, a 40-min averaged vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR), a brightband identification, and a specific transformation to rain rates for each precipitation regime. The rain rates are interpolated on a 500-m Cartesian grid, linearly accumulated, and combined with hourly rain gauge measurements using mean field bias or kriging with external drift (KED). The algorithms have been fine-tuned on 13 cases with various meteorological situations. A detailed validation against independent daily rain gauge measurements reveals the importance of VPR correction. A 10-yr verification shows a significant improvement of the new QPE, especially at short and long range, with roughly 50% increase in coverage. Adding the KED allows average improvements of 38%, 35%, and 80% for the mean absolute difference, the multiplicative error spread, and the fraction of good estimates, respectively. The benefit is higher in widespread situations and increases when considering higher rainfall amounts. The mitigation of radar artifacts is clearly visible on 10-yr statistics, including mean annual totals, probabilities to exceed 10 mm, and maxima for hourly and daily accumulation. The correlation of mean totals with rain gauges increases from 0.54 to 0.66 with the new QPE and to 0.8 adding KED.

scholarly journals Bayesian Echo Classification for Australian Single-Polarization Weather Radar with Application to Assimilation of Radial Velocity Observations

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1341-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. J. Rennie ◽  
M. Curtis ◽  
J. Peter ◽  
A. W. Seed ◽  
P. J. Steinle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weather Radar ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Threshold Method ◽  
Ground Clutter ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Routine Monitoring ◽  
Single Polarization ◽  
Anomalous Propagation

AbstractThe Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s operational weather radar network comprises a heterogeneous radar collection covering diverse geography and climate. A naïve Bayes classifier has been developed to identify a range of common echo types observed with these radars. The success of the classifier has been evaluated against its training dataset and by routine monitoring. The training data indicate that more than 90% of precipitation may be identified correctly. The echo types most difficult to distinguish from rainfall are smoke, chaff, and anomalous propagation ground and sea clutter. Their impact depends on their climatological frequency. Small quantities of frequently misclassified persistent echo (like permanent ground clutter or insects) can also cause quality control issues. The Bayes classifier is demonstrated to perform better than a simple threshold method, particularly for reducing misclassification of clutter as precipitation. However, the result depends on finding a balance between excluding precipitation and including erroneous echo. Unlike many single-polarization classifiers that are only intended to extract precipitation echo, the Bayes classifier also discriminates types of nonprecipitation echo. Therefore, the classifier provides the means to utilize clear air echo for applications like data assimilation, and the class information will permit separate data handling of different echo types.

scholarly journals Quantitative Precipitation Estimation using Overlapped Area in Radar Network

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-121
Author(s):  
Jeongho Choi ◽  
Myoungsun Han ◽  
Chulsang Yoo ◽  
Jiho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Precipitation Estimation

scholarly journals Quantitative Precipitation Estimation by Combining Rain gauge and Meteorological Radar Network in Viet Nam

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 36-50
Author(s):  
Chiho Kimpara ◽  
Michihiko Tonouchi ◽  
Bui Thi Khanh Hoa ◽  
Nguyen Viet Hung ◽  
Nguyen Minh Cuong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Viet Nam ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Meteorological Radar

scholarly journals Intercomparison of snowfall estimates derived from the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and the ground based weather radar network over Sweden

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 8157-8189
Author(s):  
L. Norin ◽  
A. Devasthale ◽  
T. S. L'Ecuyer ◽  
N. B. Wood ◽  
M. Smalley
Keyword(s):  
High Latitude ◽  
Precipitation Amount ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Skill Scores ◽  
Satellite Sensors ◽  
Observing Systems

Abstract. To be able to estimate snowfall accurately is important for both weather and climate applications. Ground-based weather radars and space-based satellite sensors are often used as viable alternatives to rain-gauges to estimate precipitation in this context. The Cloud Profiling Radar (CPR) onboard CloudSat is especially proving to be a useful tool to map snowfall globally, in part due to its high sensitivity to light precipitation and ability to provide near-global vertical structure. The importance of having snowfall estimates from CloudSat/CPR further increases in the high latitude regions as other ground-based observations become sparse and passive satellite sensors suffer from inherent limitations. Here we intercompared snowfall estimates from two observing systems, CloudSat and Swerad, the Swedish national weather radar network. Swerad offers one of the best calibrated data sets of precipitation amount at very high latitudes that are anchored to rain-gauges and that can be exploited to evaluate usefulness of CloudSat/CPR snowfall estimates in the polar regions. In total 7.2×105 matchups of CloudSat and Swerad over Sweden were inter-compared covering all but summer months (October to May) from 2008 to 2010. The intercomparison shows encouraging agreement between these two observing systems despite their different sensitivities and user applications. The best agreement is observed when CloudSat passes close to a Swerad station (46–82 km), when the observational conditions for both systems are comparable. Larger disagreements outside this range suggest that both platforms have difficulty with shallow snow but for different reasons. The correlation between Swerad and CloudSat degrades with increasing distance from the nearest Swerad station as Swerad's sensitivity decreases as a function of distance and Swerad also tends to overshoots low level precipitating systems further away from the station, leading to underestimation of snowfall rate and occasionally missing the precipitation altogether. Further investigations of various statistical metrics, such as the probability of detection, false alarm rate, hit rate, and the Hanssen–Kuipers skill scores, and the sensitivity of these metrics to snowfall rate and the distance from the radar station, were carried out. The results of these investigations highlight the strengths and the limitations of both observing systems at the lower and upper ends of snowfall distributions and the range of uncertainties that could be expected from these systems in the high latitude regions.

scholarly journals Impact of the Altitudinal Gradients of Precipitation on the Radar QPE Bias in the French Alps

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Faure ◽  
Guy Delrieu ◽  
Nicolas Gaussiat
Keyword(s):  
Ground Level ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Altitudinal Gradients ◽  
French Alps ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Data Processing

In the French Alps the quality of the radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) is limited by the topography and the vertical structure of precipitation. A previous study realized in all the French Alps, has shown a general bias between values of the national radar QPE composite and the rain gauge measurements: a radar QPE over-estimation at low altitude (+20% at 200 m a.s.l.), and an increasing underestimation at high altitudes (until −40% at 2100 m a.s.l.). This trend has been linked to altitudinal gradients of precipitation observed at ground level. This paper analyzes relative altitudinal gradients of precipitation estimated with rain gauges measurements in 2016 for three massifs around Grenoble, and for different temporal accumulations (yearly, seasonal, monthly, daily). Comparisons of radar and rain gauge accumulations confirm the bias previously observed. The parts of the current radar data processing affecting the bias value are pointed out. The analysis shows a coherency between the relative gradient values estimated at the different temporal accumulations. Vertical profiles of precipitation detected by a research radar installed at the bottom of the valley also show how the wide horizontal variability of precipitation inside the valley can affect the gradient estimation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document