scholarly journals Anxiety Levels Predict Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women Undergoing Oral Bisphosphonates: A Two-Year Follow-Up

Author(s):  
Gabriella Martino ◽  
Federica Bellone ◽  
Carmelo M. Vicario ◽  
Agostino Gaudio ◽  
Andrea Caputo ◽  
...  

Clinical psychological factors may predict medical diseases. Anxiety level has been associated with osteoporosis, but its role on bone mineral density (BMD) change is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the association between anxiety levels and both adherence and treatment response to oral bisphosphonates (BPs) in postmenopausal osteoporosis. BMD and anxiety levels were evaluated trough dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), respectively. Participants received weekly medication with alendronate or risedronate and were grouped according to the HAM-A scores into tertiles (HAM-A 3 > HAM-A 2 > HAM-A 1). After 24 months, BMD changes were different among the HAM-A tertiles. The median lumbar BMD change was significantly greater in both the HAM-A 2 and HAM-A 3 in comparison with the HAM-A 1. The same trend was observed for femoral BMD change. Adherence to BPs was >75% in 68% of patients in the HAM-A 1, 79% of patients in the HAM-A 2, and 89% of patients in the HAM-A 3 (p = 0.0014). After correcting for age, body mass index, depressive symptoms, and the 10-yr. probability of osteoporotic fractures, anxiety levels independently predicted lumbar BMD change (β = 0.3417, SE 0.145, p = 0.02). In conclusion, women with higher anxiety levels reported greater BMD improvement, highlighting that anxiety was associated with adherence and response to osteoporosis medical treatment, although further research on this topic is needed.

Author(s):  
Xuanliang Neil Dong ◽  
Patricia Cussen ◽  
Timothy Lowe ◽  
David Di Paolo ◽  
Joyce Ballard

Hip fractures are among the most common types of osteoporotic fractures that affect one in three women and one in six men over the age of 50 [1]. It is well known that loss of bone mass, quantified by bone mineral density using Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), is associated with the increasing risk of bone fractures. However, bone mineral density (BMD) alone cannot fully explain changes in fracture risks [2, 3]. In particular, BMD is not able to predict fracture risks for women with osteopenia, in which a BMD T-score is between −1.0 and −2.5. This suggests additional factors (i.e., bone quality) should be considered in predicting fracture risks [4].


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 2262-2269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claes Ohlsson ◽  
Anna Darelid ◽  
Martin Nilsson ◽  
Johanna Melin ◽  
Dan Mellström ◽  
...  

Abstract Context: Peak bone mass is an important factor in the lifetime risk of developing osteoporosis. Large, longitudinal studies investigating the age of attainment of site-specific peak bone mass are lacking. Objective and Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were to determine the site-specific development of peak bone mass in appendicular and axial skeletal sites and in the trabecular and cortical bone compartments, using both dual x-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography. Design, Setting, and Population: In total, 833 men [aged 24.1 ± 0.6 yr (mean ± sd)] from the original population-based Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinants Study (n = 1068) were included in this follow-up examination at 61.2 ± 2.3 months. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry, whereas cortical and trabecular volumetric bone mineral density and bone size were measured by peripheral computed tomography at baseline and at the 5-yr follow-up. Results: During the 5-yr study period, aBMD of the total body, lumbar spine, and radius increased by 3.4, 4.2, and 7.8%, respectively, whereas a decrease in aBMD of the total hip of 1.9% was observed (P < 0.0001). Increments of 2.1 and 0.7% were seen for cortical volumetric bone mineral density of the radius and tibia, respectively (P < 0.0001), whereas cortical thickness increased by 3.8% at the radius and 6.5% at the tibia due to diminished endosteal circumference (radius 2.3% and tibia 4.6%, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: aBMD decreased at the hip but increased at the spine and radius, in which the increment was explained by continued mineralization and augmented cortical thickness due to endosteal contraction in men between ages 19 and 24 yr.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Amira A. Atta ◽  

Although increased awareness of morbidity and costs related to osteoporotic fractures, real progress achieved only through early detection of osteoporosis before any fractures occur. Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) is commonly used for diagnosis of osteoporosis by measuring bone mineral density (BMD


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document