scholarly journals Emerging Screening Approaches in the Development of Nrf2–Keap1 Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (18) ◽  
pp. 4445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Hang Leung ◽  
Jia-Tong Zhang ◽  
Guan-Jun Yang ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Quan-Bin Han ◽  
...  

Due to role of the Keap1–Nrf2 protein–protein interaction (PPI) in protecting cells from oxidative stress, the development of small molecule inhibitors that inhibit this interaction has arisen as a viable approach to combat maladies caused by oxidative stress, such as cancers, neurodegenerative disease and diabetes. To obtain specific and genuine Keap1–Nrf2 inhibitors, many efforts have been made towards developing new screening approaches. However, there is no inhibitor for this target entering the clinic for the treatment of human diseases. New strategies to identify novel bioactive compounds from large molecular databases and accelerate the developmental process of the clinical application of Keap1–Nrf2 protein–protein interaction inhibitors are greatly needed. In this review, we have summarized virtual screening and other methods for discovering new lead compounds against the Keap1–Nrf2 protein–protein interaction. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of different strategies, and the potential of this PPI as a drug target in disease therapy.

Author(s):  
Afolashade Toritseju Onunkun ◽  
Opeyemi Iwaloye ◽  
Olusola Olalekan Elekofehinti

Background: Oxidative stress is a significant player in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein1/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/antioxidant response element (Keap1/Nrf2/ARE) signaling pathway serves as the essential defense system to mitigate oxidative stress. Nrf2 is responsible for the mitigation of oxidative stress while Keap1 represses Nrf2’s activation upon binding. Identification of Nrf2 activators has started to pick up enthusiasm as they can be used as therapeutic agents against diabetes mellitus. One of the ongoing mechanisms in the activation of Nrf2 is to disrupt Keap1/Nrf2 protein-protein interaction. This study aimed at using computational analysis to screen natural compounds capable of inhibiting Keap1/Nrf2 protein-protein interaction. Methods: A manual curated library of natural compounds was screened against crystal structure of Keap1 using glide docking algorithm. Binding free energy of the docked complexes, and adsorption, digestion, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties were further employed to identify the hit compounds. The bioactivity of the identified hit against Keap1 was predicted using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model. Results: A total of 7 natural compounds (Compound 222, 230, 310, 208, 210, 229 and 205) identified from different medicinal plants were found to be potent against Keap1 based on their binding affinity and binding free energy. The internal validated model kpls_radial_30 with R2 of 0.9109, Q2 of 0.7287 was used to predict the compounds’ bioactivities. Compound 205 was considered as the ideal drug candidate because it showed moderation for ADME properties, had predicted pIC50 of 6.614 and obeyed Lipinski’s rule of five. Conclusion: This study revealed that Compound 205, a compound isolated from Amphipterygium adstringens is worth considering for further experimental analysis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 228-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Meng ◽  
Hua Tang ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Chengshi Jiang ◽  
Li Su ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1591-1591
Author(s):  
Jolanta E. Grembecka ◽  
Kristin Graf ◽  
Yali Kong ◽  
Michael Douvas ◽  
Tomasz Cierpicki ◽  
...  

Abstract Core binding factor (CBF) is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of RUNX1 (CBFα) and CBFβ subunits which are essential for normal blood cell development. CBFβ functions to increase the DNA-binding of the RUNX1 subunit 20–40 fold and to protect the RUNX1 subunit against ubiqitination and proteasome degradation, making this protein-protein interaction critical for CBF function. Two of the most common translocations involving the subunits of CBF are the inv(16) and the t(8;21) which produce the chimeric proteins CBFβ-SMMHC and AML1-ETO, respectively, which are associated with the development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). The AML1-ETO fusion protein is a dominant inhibitor of wildtype RUNX1-CBFβ activity in vivo and causes a blockage in normal hematopoiesis, predisposing for the development of leukemia. The interaction between CBFβ and AML1-ETO is critical for its function, therefore treatments targeting AML1-ETO and blocking its interaction with CBFβ are highly likely to be therapeutically beneficial. The CBFβ-SMMHC fusion protein causes dysregulation of CBF function by means of anomalously tight binding to RUNX1. Since binding to RUNX1 is required for the dysfunction associated with CBFβ-SMMHC, this interaction represents an excellent target for inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy. We have initiated efforts to develop small molecule inhibitors of the RUNX1-CBFβ interaction as possible therapeutics for the treatment of the associated leukemias. Both virtual screening searches, focused on the X-ray structures of RUNX1 Runt domain and CBFβ, and high-throughput screening of NCI (National Cancer Institute) and Maybridge fragment libraries were used to identify initial lead compounds interacting with these proteins and blocking heterodimerization of CBF. Compounds were tested experimentally by FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) and ELISA for their inhibition of RUNX1-CBFβ interaction. This resulted in a number of initial lead compounds targeting either the Runt domain or CBFβ and inhibiting this protein-protein interaction. Based on the docking mode selected lead compounds were further optimized using medicinal chemistry approaches to increase their affinity and determine the structure-activity relationships (SAR). This resulted in several compounds with low micromolar affinity (IC50 < 10 μM) which effectively block the heterodimerization of CBF in vitro and in a cell-based assay. Interestingly, compounds targeting CBFβ bind to a site displaced from the binding interface for RUNX1 as shown by the NMR-based docking, i.e. these compounds function as allosteric inhibitors of this protein-protein interaction. The most potent compounds were tested either in the Kasumi-1 leukemia cell line harboring t(8;21) translocation or in the ME-1 cell line with inv(16), resulting in a blockage of proliferation, induction of apoptosis and differentiation of these cells. These compounds represent the first small molecule inhibitors targeting CBF and inhibiting this interaction. They represent good starting points for the development of therapeutically useful inhibitors. Several approaches are being explored to modify these compounds to achieve selectivity towards AML1-ETO or CBFβ-SMMHC oncoproteins versus wild type proteins.


ChemBioChem ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (17) ◽  
pp. 1810-1816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos D. Georgakopoulos ◽  
Sandeep K. Talapatra ◽  
Jemma Gatliff ◽  
Frank Kozielski ◽  
Geoff Wells

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document