scholarly journals New Data, Old Story: Molecular Data Illuminate the Tribal Relationships among Rove Beetles of the Subfamily Staphylininae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Tihelka ◽  
Margaret K. Thayer ◽  
Alfred F. Newton ◽  
Chenyang Cai
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Phylogenetics ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Rove Beetles ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
Rove Beetle ◽  
Tree Inference ◽  
Traditional Sense ◽  
Inference Methods

The megadiverse subfamily Staphylininae traditionally belonged to the best-defined rove beetle taxa, but the advent of molecular phylogenetics in the last decade has brought turbulent changes to the group’s classification. Here, we reevaluate the internal relationships among the tribes of Staphylininae by implementing tree inference methods that suppress common sources of systematic error. In congruence with morphological data, and in contrast to some previous phylogenetic studies, we unambiguously recover Staphylininae and Paederinae as monophyletic in the traditional sense. We show that the recently proposed subfamily Platyprosopinae (Arrowinus and Platyprosopus) is a phylogenetic artefact and reinstate Arrowinus as a member of Arrowinini stat. res. and Platyprosopus as a member of Platyprosopini stat. res. We show that several recent changes to the internal classification of the subfamily are phylogenetically unjustified and systematically unnecessary. We, therefore, reestablish Platyprosopini, Staphylinini, and Xantholinini as tribes within Staphylininae (all stat. res.) and recognize Coomaniini as a tribe (stat. nov.) rather than subfamily. Consequently, the traditional ranks of the subtribes Acylophorina, Afroquediina, Amblyopinina, Antimerina, †Baltognathina, Cyrtoquediina, Erichsoniina, Hyptiomina, Indoquediina, Quediina, and Tanygnathinina are restored (all stat. res.). We review the current classification of Staphylininae and discuss sources of incongruence in multigene phylogenies.

scholarly journals Phylogeny of the stink bug tribe Chlorocorini (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae) based on DNA and morphological data: the evolution of key phenotypic traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno C. Genevcius ◽  
Caroline Greve ◽  
Samantha Koehler ◽  
Rebecca B. Simmons ◽  
David A. Rider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Predatory Behavior ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Phylogenetic Study ◽  
Phenotypic Traits ◽  
Stink Bug ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
The Family

ABSTRACTPentatomidae is the third largest family of true bugs, comprising over 40 tribes. Few tribes have been studied in a phylogenetic context, and none of them have been examined using molecular data. Moreover, little is known about the evolution of key morphological characters widely used in taxonomic and phylogenetic studies at multiple levels. Here, we conduct a phylogenetic study of the tribe Chlorocorini (Pentatominae) combining 69 morphological characters and five DNA loci. We use the inferred phylogeny to reconstruct the evolution of key morphological characters such as the spined humeral angles of the pronotum, a dorsal projection on the apices of the femora and characters of male genitalia. We provide solid evidence that the tribe as currently recognized is not monophyletic based both on DNA and morphological data. The genera Arvelius Spinola and Eludocoris Thomas were consistently placed outside of the Chlorocorini, while the remaining genera were found to form a monophyletic group. We also show that nearly all morphological diagnostic characters for the tribe are homoplastic. The only exception is the development of the hypandrium, which, contrary to expectations for genital traits, showed the slowest evolutionary rates. In contrast, the most rapidly evolving trait is the length of the ostiolar ruga, which may be attributed to selection favoring anti-predatory behavior and other functions of its associated scent glands. Lastly, we also provide a preliminary glimpse of the main phylogenetic relationships within the Pentatomidae, which indicates that most of the included subfamilies and tribes are not monophyletic. Our results suggest that the current subfamily-level classification of Pentatomidae is not adequate to reflect its evolutionary history, and we urge for a more complete phylogeny of the family.

scholarly journals The phylogenetic conundrum of Lutzia (Diptera: Culicidae: Culicini): a cautionary account of conflict and support

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Kitching ◽  
C. Lorna Culverwell ◽  
Ralph E. Harbach
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Generic Status ◽  
Strong Signal ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
Data Support

Lutzia Theobald was reduced to a subgenus of Culex in 1932 and was treated as such until it was restored to its original generic status in 2003, based mainly on modifications of the larvae for predation. Previous phylogenetic studies based on morphological and molecular data have provided conflicting support for the generic status of Lutzia: analyses of morphological data support the generic status whereas analyses based on DNA sequences do not. Our previous phylogenetic analyses of Culicini (based on 169 morphological characters and 86 species representing the four genera and 26 subgenera of Culicini, most informal group taxa of subgenus Culex and five outgroup species from other tribes) seemed to indicate a conflict between adult and larval morphological data. Hence, we conducted a series of comparative and data exclusion analyses to determine whether the alternative positions of Lutzia are due to conflicting signal or to a lack of strong signal. We found that separate and combined analyses of adult and larval data support different patterns of relationships between Lutzia and other Culicini. However, the majority of conflicting clades are poorly supported and once these are removed from consideration, most of the topological disparity disappears, along with much of the resolution, suggesting that morphology alone does not have sufficiently strong signal to resolve the position of Lutzia. We critically examine the results of other phylogenetic studies of culicinine relationships and conclude that no morphological or molecular data set analysed in any study conducted to date has adequate signal to place Lutzia unequivocally with regard to other taxa in Culicini. Phylogenetic relationships observed thus far suggest that Lutzia is placed within Culex but further data and extended taxon sampling are required to confirm its position relative to Culex.

Phylogenetic relationships and classification of the Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snake genera Geodipsas and Compsophis based on morphological and molecular data

Zootaxa ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 1517 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK GLAW ◽  
ZOLTÁN T. NAGY ◽  
MIGUEL VENCES
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
Close Relationships ◽  
Original Description ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Molecular Phylogenetic ◽  
Species Groups ◽  
Morphological And Molecular Data

Based on a specimen found at Montagne d'Ambre in northern Madagascar morphologically agreeing with Compsophis albiventris Mocquard, 1894, we report on the rediscovery of this enigmatic snake genus and species and its molecular phylogenetic relationships. Compsophis albiventris, considered to be the only representative of its genus and unreported since its original description, bears strong morphological similarities to species of Geodipsas Boulenger, 1896. A molecular phylogeny based on DNA sequences of three mitochondrial and nuclear genes (complete cytochrome b, fragments of 16S rRNA and c-mos) in Compsophis albiventris and three Geodipsas species corroborated close relationships between C. albiventris and Geodipsas boulengeri, and showed that the genera Compsophis and Geodipsas together form a monophyletic unit. Despite the general similarities, morphological data and chromatic features support the existence of two species groups, corresponding to Compsophis and Geodipsas. We consequently consider Geodipsas as a subgenus of Compsophis and transfer all species currently in Geodipsas into the genus Compsophis.

scholarly journals Phylogenetic studies of eucalypts: fossils, morphology and genomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Bayly
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequencing ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
Recent Advances ◽  
History Of ◽  
Morphological And Molecular Data ◽  
Economic Use ◽  
Insight Into

The eucalypt group includes seven genera: Eucalyptus, Corymbia, Angophora, Eucalyptopsis, Stockwellia, Allosyncarpia and Arillastrum. Knowledge of eucalypt phylogeny underpins classification of the group, and facilitates understanding of their ecology, conservation and economic use, as well as providing insight into the history of Australia’s flora. Studies of fossils and phylogenetic analyses of morphological and molecular data have made substantial contributions to understanding of eucalypt relationships and biogeography, but relationships among some genera are still uncertain, and there is controversy about generic circumscription of the bloodwood eucalypts (genus Corymbia). Relationships at lower taxonomic levels, e.g. among sections and series of Eucalyptus, are also not well resolved. Recent advances in DNA sequencing methods offer the ability to obtain large genomic datasets that will enable improved understanding of eucalypt evolution.

scholarly journals ULASAN Kajian Filogenetika Molekuler dan Peranannya dalam Menyediakan Informasi Dasar untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Sumber Genetik Anggrek

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Topik Hidayat ◽  
Adi Pancoro
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Molecular Phylogenetics ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Intergeneric Hybrids ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
Molecular Phylogenetic ◽  
Ornamental Crops

<p>Early information<br />resulted from molecular phylogenetic studies of many important<br />ornamental crops is often less attention to many<br />growers and farmers. Phylogenetics is one of the most preferable<br />method in systematics to reconstruct evolutionary<br />relationships of groups of biological organisms in order to<br />understand their biodiversities. This has been revolutionized<br />by DNA sequences data. In this method, a group of organisms<br />that shares many identical characteristics are considered<br />to be closely related; deriving from a common<br />ancestor and is assumed to have similar genetic patterns<br />and biochemical properties. By these basic principles,<br />molecular phylogenetics plays important roles in revealing a<br />basic knowledge on pattern of relationships to which<br />genetic resources can be improved. Over the past decade,<br />botanists have done several thousand phylogenetic analyses<br />based on molecular data of economically and horticulturally<br />important crops. Orchids are the best example for this.<br />There is no doubt that most orchid plants had played roles in<br />horticulture and hybridization. At present, many infrageneric<br />and intergeneric hybrids are available commercially. Successful<br />hybridization can be achieved if two or more individual<br />plants understudy are closely related in respect to their<br />genetics and evolution.</p>

scholarly journals Phylogeny, evolution, and classification of the ant genus Lasius, the tribe Lasiini, and the subfamily Formicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendon E Boudinot ◽  
Marek L Borowiec ◽  
Matthew M Prebus
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Phylogenetics ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Social Parasitism ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Species Group ◽  
Total Evidence ◽  
Death Process ◽  
Ancestral State ◽  
Fossil Species

Within the Formicidae, the higher classification of nearly all subfamilies has been recently revised due to the findings of molecular phylogenetics. Here, we integrate morphology and molecular data to holistically address the evolution and classification of the ant genus Lasius, its tribe Lasiini, and their subfamily Formicinae. We accomplish this through a critical re-examination of morphology of extant and fossil taxa, molecular phylogenetic analyses, total-evidence dating under fossilized birth-death process, phylogeography, and ancestral state estimation. We use these results to provide revised taxonomic definitions for the Lasiini and select genera, and we provide a key to the genera of the Lasiini with emphasis on the Lasius genus group. We find that the crown Lasiini originated around the end of the Cretaceous on the Eurasian continent and is divisible into four morphologically distinct clades: Cladomyrma, the Lasius genus group, the Prenolepis genus group, and a previously undetected lineage we name XXXgen. n. The crown of the Lasius genus group is considerably younger than that of the Prenolepis genus group, indicating that extinction has played a major role in the evolution of the former clade. Lasius itself is divided into two well-supported monophyletic groups which are approximately equally speciose. We present evidence that temporary social parasitism and fungiculture arose in Lasius two times independently. Additionally, we recover the paraphyly of three Lasius subgenera and propose replacing all subgenera with an informal species group classification: Lasius = Acanthomyopssyn. rev., = Austrolasiussyn. n., = Cautolasiussyn. n., = Chthonolasius vsyn. n., = Dendrolasiussyn. n. Total-evidence analysis reveals that the Baltic-region amber fossil species Lasius pumilus and Pseudolasius boreus are misplaced to genus; we therefore designate XXXgen. n. for the former and XXXgen. n. for the latter. Further, we transfer XXX and Glaphyromyrmex out of the tribe, considering the former to be incertae sedis in the subfamily, and the latter a member of the Formicini (tribal transfer). Two final taxonomic actions are deemed necessary: synonymy of Lasius escamole Reza, 1925 with Liometopum apiculatum Mayr, 1870 syn. n. (subfamilial transfer), and transfer of Paratrechina kohli to Anoplolepis (tribal transfer, forming A. kohli (Forel, 1916) n. comb.).

scholarly journals The tribe Scrophularieae (Scrophulariaceae): A Review of Phylogenetic Studies

Hacquetia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrshid Riahi ◽  
Farrokh Ghahremaninejad
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Hybrid Speciation ◽  
The North ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
Phylogenetic Reconstructions ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis ◽  
History Of ◽  
Review Reports

Abstract Molecular data have been increasingly used to study the phylogenetic relationships among many taxa, including scrophs. Sometimes they have provided phylogenetic reconstructions that are in conflict with morphological data leading to a re-evaluation of long-standing evolutionary hypotheses. In this paper, we review reports of the recent knowledge of the phylogenetic relationships within Scrophularieae (2011–2017). The results of these analyses led to the following conclusions. (1) Species of Scrophularia have undergone one or more Miocene migration events occurred from eastern Asia to the North America with subsequent long dispersal and diversification in three main directions. (2) Allopolyploid and aneuploid hybrid speciation between Scrophularia species can occur, so hybridization and polyploidy have an important role for history of diversification. (3) The ancestral staminode type for the genus Scrophularia seems to be a large staminode. (4) Monophyly of the genus Verbascum with respect to the genus Scrophularia is strongly supported. (5) Oreosolen, is not monophyletic, because all accessions of Oreosolen were nested within Scrophularia. We discuss methods of data collection and analysis, and we describe the areas of conflict and agreement between molecular phylogenies.

DISTATIS: A Promising Framework to Integrate Distance Matrices in Molecular Phylogenetics.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermin Agüero-Chapin ◽  
Yuliana Jiménez ◽  
Aminael Sánchez-Rodríguez ◽  
Reinaldo Molina-Ruiz ◽  
Oscar Vivanco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Species Delimitation ◽  
Phylogenetic Trees ◽  
Molecular Phylogenetics ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Reproduction Mode ◽  
Alignment Free ◽  
Morphological Criteria ◽  
Distance Matrices ◽  
Ascospore Morphology

Background: Molecular phylogenetic algorithms frequently disagree with the approaches considering reproductive compatibility and morphological criteria for species delimitation. The question stems if the resulting species boundaries from molecular, reproductive and/or morphological data are definitively not reconcilable; or if the existing phylogenetic methods are not sensitive enough to agree morphological and genetic variation in species delimitation. Objectives : We propose to DISTATIS as an integrative framework to combine alignment-based (AB) and alignment-free (AF) distance matrices from ITS2 sequences/structures to shed light whether Gelasinospora and Neurospora are sister but independent genera? Methodology: We aimed at addressing this standing issue by harmonizing genus-specific classification based on their ascospore morphology and ITS2 molecular data. To validate our proposal, three phylogenetic approaches: i) traditional alignment-based, ii) alignment-free and iii) novel distance integrative (DI)-based were comparatively evaluated on a set of Gelasinospora and Neurospora species. All considered species have been extensively characterized at both the morphological and reproductive levels and there are known incongruences between their ascospore morphology and molecular data that hampers genus-specific delimitation. Results: Traditional AB phylogenetic analyses fail at resolving the Gelasinospora and Neurospora genera into independent monophyletic clades following ascospore morphology criteria. In contrast, AF and DI approaches produced phylogenetic trees that could properly delimit the expected monophyletic clades. Conclusions: The DI approach outperformed the AF one in the sense that it could also divide the Neurospora species according to their reproduction mode.

scholarly journals Are molecular data supplanting morphological data in modern phylogenetic studies?

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
SETH M. BYBEE ◽  
JENNIFER M. ZASPEL ◽  
KYLE A. BEUCKE ◽  
CLARE H. SCOTT ◽  
BRADLEY W. SMITH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Data ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies

Further phylogenetic studies of the Polychaeta using 18S rDNA sequence data

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 949-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A. Hall ◽  
Pat A. Hutchings ◽  
Donald J. Colgan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Cladistic Analysis ◽  
Sister Group ◽  
Morphological Data ◽  
Phylogenetic Studies ◽  
Rdna Sequence Data ◽  
Substantial Progress ◽  
18S Rdna Sequence

The integration of molecular and morphological approaches has produced substantial progress in understanding the higher classification of most major invertebrate groups. The striking exception to this is the Polychaeta. Neither the membership nor the higher classification of this group has been robustly established. Major inconsistencies exist between the only comprehensive cladistic analysis of Polychaeta using morphological data and the DNA sequence studies covering all or part of the taxon.We have compiled a dataset of available nearly complete 18S ribosomal DNA sequences and collected an additional 22 sequences (20 Polychaeta in 19 taxa, one Myzostomida and one Phoronida) to obtain more comprehensive coverage of polychaete diversity for this gene. Analyses of the data do not resolve all inconsistencies among current hypotheses of polychaete phylogeny. They do support the recognition (in whole or part) of some clades such as the Eunicida, Phyllodocida and Terebellida that have been proposed on morphological grounds. Our analyses contradict the Canalipalpata and the Scolecida. Although the polychaete sister-group to the Clitellata is not clearly resolved in our analyses, the clitellates are always recovered as a derived clade within the Polychaeta. Increased taxon sampling is required to elucidate further the phylogeny of the Polychaeta.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document