scholarly journals Chronic Breast Pain Prior to Breast Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Worse Acute Postoperative Pain Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1887
Author(s):  
Marium M. Raza ◽  
Ruth Zaslansky ◽  
Debra B. Gordon ◽  
Jeanne M. Wildisen ◽  
Marcus Komann ◽  
...  

Acute postoperative pain is associated with adverse short and long-term outcomes among women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Previous studies identified preexisting pain as a predictor of postoperative pain, but rarely accounted for pain location or chronicity. This study leveraged a multinational pain registry, PAIN OUT, to: (1) characterize patient subgroups based on preexisting chronic breast pain status and (2) determine the association of preexisting chronic pain with acute postoperative pain-related patient-reported outcomes and opioid consumption following breast cancer surgery. The primary outcome was a composite score comprising the mean of pain intensity and pain interference items from the International Pain Outcomes Questionnaire. The secondary outcome was opioid consumption in the recovery room and ward. Among 1889 patients, we characterized three subgroups: no preexisting chronic pain (n = 1600); chronic preexisting pain elsewhere (n = 128) and; chronic preexisting pain in the breast with/without pain elsewhere (n = 161). Controlling for covariates, women with preexisting chronic breast pain experienced more severe acute postoperative pain and pain interference (β = 1.0, 95% CI = 0.7-1.3, p < 0.001), and required higher doses of opioids postoperatively (β = 2.7, 95% CI = 0.6–4.8, p = 0.013). Preexisting chronic breast pain may be an important risk factor for poor pain-related postoperative outcomes. Targeted intervention of this subgroup may improve recovery.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Mirian López ◽  
María Luz Padilla ◽  
Blas García ◽  
Javier Orozco ◽  
Ana María Rodilla

Background. Acute postoperative pain (APP) has a high incidence in breast surgery, and opioids are the most commonly used drugs for its management; however, they are not free from systemic side effects, which may increase comorbidity. In the past few years, opioid-free anaesthesia has been favoured with promising results. Methods. We conducted a descriptive study including 71 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery. The opioid group (n = 41) received fentanyl for induction, remifentanil for maintenance, and rescue morphine before waking up, whereas the ketamine group (n = 30) received a ketamine bolus for induction followed by continuous ketamine infusion during surgery. Later, the presence and intensity of pain were registered, using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS 1–10) for pain, at different times in the recovery room, at 24 hours and at 3 months. Results. Administration of ketamine is more effective than opioid use for APP prevention in breast cancer surgery because the ketamine group presented with less pain than the opioid group ( p  < 0.05) at all measured times. When there was pain, patients in the ketamine group gave a lower score to its intensity ( p  < 0.05). Conclusions. Ketamine could reduce the incidence of APP in breast cancer surgery, compared to opioids.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1227-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale J. Langford ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
Claudia West ◽  
Jon D. Levine ◽  
Deborah Hamolsky ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline Albi-Feldzer ◽  
Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme E ◽  
Smail Hamouda ◽  
Cyrus Motamed ◽  
Pierre-Yves Dubois ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The efficacy of local anesthetic wound infiltration for the treatment of acute and chronic postoperative pain is controversial and there are no detailed studies. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of ropivacaine wound infiltration on chronic pain after breast surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 236 patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized (1:1) to receive ropivacaine or placebo infiltration of the wound, the second and third intercostal spaces and the humeral insertion of major pectoralis. Acute pain, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting were assessed every 30 min for 2 h in the postanesthesia care unit and every 6 h for 48 h. Chronic pain was evaluated 3 months, 6 months, and 1 yr after surgery by the brief pain inventory, hospital anxiety and depression, and neuropathic pain questionnaires. Results: Ropivacaine wound infiltration significantly decreased immediate postoperative pain for the first 90 min, but did not decrease chronic pain at 3 months (primary endpoint), or at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months, the incidence of chronic pain was 33% and 27% (P = 0.37) in the ropivacaine and placebo groups, respectively. During follow-up, brief pain inventory, neuropathic pain, and anxiety increased over time in both groups (P &lt; 0.001) while depression remained stable. No complications occurred. Conclusion: This multicenter, prospective study shows that ropivacaine wound infiltration after breast cancer surgery decreased immediate postoperative pain but did not decrease chronic pain at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benno Rehberg ◽  
Stanislas Mathivon ◽  
Christophe Combescure ◽  
Yannick Mercier ◽  
Georges L. Savoldelli

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 626-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen L. Poleshuck ◽  
Jennifer Katz ◽  
Carl H. Andrus ◽  
Laura A. Hogan ◽  
Beth F. Jung ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Van Onselen ◽  
Bradley E. Aouizerat ◽  
Laura B. Dunn ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
Claudia West ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeanne Massingill, LMT, MLD, CST, KT, NMT ◽  
Cara Jorgensen, LMT ◽  
Jacqueline Dolata, MBA ◽  
Ashwini R. Sehgal, MD

Background: Chronic localized pain and decreased upper extremity mobility commonly occur following breast cancer surgery and may persist despite use of pain medication and physical therapy.Purpose: We sought to determine the value of myofascial massage to address these pain and mobility limitations.Setting: The study took place at a clinical massage spa in the U.S. Midwest. The research was overseen by MetroHealth Medical Center’s Institutional Review Board and Case Center for Reducing Health Disparities research staff.Participants: 21 women with persistent pain and mobility limitations 3–18 months following breast surgery.Research Design: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial where intervention patients received myofascial massages and control patients received relaxation massages.Intervention: Intervention participants received 16 myofascial massage sessions over eight weeks that focused on the affected breast, chest, and shoulder areas. Control participants received 16 relaxation massage sessions over eight weeks that avoided the affected breast, chest, and shoulder areas. Participants completed a validated questionnaire at the beginning and end of the study that asked about pain, mobility, and quality of life.Main Outcome Measures: Outcome measures include change in self-reported pain, self-reported mobility, and three quality-of-life questions.Results: At baseline, intervention and control participants were similar in demographic and medical characteristics, pain and mobility ratings, and quality of life. Compared to control participants, intervention participants had more favorable changes in pain (-10.7 vs. +0.4, p < .001), mobility (-14.5 vs. -0.8, p < .001), and general health (+29.5 vs. -2.5, p = .002) after eight weeks. All intervention and control participants reported that receiving massage treatments was a positive experience.Conclusions: Myofascial massage is a promising treatment to address chronic pain and mobility limitations following breast cancer surgery. Further work in several areas is needed to confirm and expand on our study findings.


Pain ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale J. Langford ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
Claudia M. West ◽  
Laura B. Dunn ◽  
Jon D. Levine ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 1044-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger L Hovind ◽  
Inger S Bredal ◽  
Alfhild Dihle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document