scholarly journals Safety, Efficacy, and Outcomes of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Injection through the Endoscopic or Radiologic Route for Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2298
Author(s):  
Olivier Chevallier ◽  
Kévin Guillen ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Comby ◽  
Thomas Mouillot ◽  
Nicolas Falvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Glue ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Number Of Patients

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) injection for the treatment of variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were searched for English-language studies published from January 1980 to December 2019 and including patients who had injection of NBCA for variceal GIB. Two independent reviewers extracted and evaluated the data from eligible studies. Exclusion criteria were sample size <5, article reporting the use of NBCA with other embolic agents, no extractable data, and duplicate reports. NBCA was injected during endoscopy in 42 studies and through a direct percutaneous approach for stomal varices in 1 study. The study’s endpoints were: Technical success, 30-day rebleeding, and 30-day overall and major complications. The estimated overall rates were computed with 95% confidence intervals, based on each study rate, weighted by the number of patients involved in each study. In total, 43 studies with 3484 patients were included. The technical success rate was 94.1% (95% CI: 91.6–96.1%), the 30-day rebleeding rate was 24.2% (18.9–29.9%), and 30-day overall and major complications occurred in 15.9% (11.2–21.3%) and 5.3% (3.3–7.8%) of patients, respectively. For treating variceal GIB, NBCA injection is a safe and effective method that demonstrates high technical success rate and very low major complication rate.

Abstract 16680: Endovascular Therapy of Svc Syndrome-a Systematic Review

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Hussain Azizi ◽  
Irfan Shafi ◽  
Matthew Zhao ◽  
Vladimir Lakhter ◽  
Riyaz Bashir
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Restenosis Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Svc Syndrome

Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the occlusion of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for majority of these patients. We performed a systematic review of available literature to assess the contemporary technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rate of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from 1988 to 2019 for studies on Endovascular Therapy for SVC syndrome. After screening 709 records, 13 studies were included. Screening was conducted using Rayyan QCRI software for systemic reviews. Studies included full-length journal articles on SVC syndrome and ET among adults (18+ years). Case reports, or case series with <20 patients were excluded. Data analysis was performed using OpenMeta software. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Q and I 2 statistics. We evaluated the end-points of the technical success, restenosis rate and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting Results: A meta-analysis of 13 studies included a total of 1024 patients. The results of our meta-analysis show a weighted technical success rate of 98.6% (95% CI 0.97 – 0.99) (Fig. 1A), restenosis rate of 11.8% (95 CI 0.08-0.14) (Fig 1B) and recurrence rate of 9.9% (95% CI 0.06-0.13) (Fig 1C). Our studies had a substantial heterogeneity (I 2 ) of 52-80%. Figures:Figure 1A Figure 1B Figure 1C Conclusions: Our systematic review revealed high technical success rate, low restenosis, and recurrence rates after endovascular therapy supporting the paradigm of endovascular therapy as first line treatment for patients with SVC syndrome. Disclosures: Dr. Bashir has equity interest in Thrombolex Inc.

scholarly journals Modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy technique without endoscopic or nasogastric access

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reda Tabashy ◽  
Amira Darwish ◽  
Ashraf Ibrahim ◽  
Mohamed Gad El-Mola
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Fluoroscopic Guidance ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (MPRG) technique under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance without endoscopic or nasogastric access. Results The study included 24 patients: 10 males and 14 females whose ages ranged from 44 to 80 years old. Ten patients had esophageal cancer and 14 patients had neck cancer. Technical success was achieved in 23 out of the 25 procedures (92%). Two procedures failed (8%) and were converted to the conventional technique by using the nasogastric tube. No major complications were reported. Minor complications were observed in 5 patients (20%): intraperitoneal air and contrast leakage in 4 patients and focal mucosal dissection by the contrast in 1 patient. Conclusion The MPRG has high technical success rate, is safe with no major complications, and is most feasible when endoscopic or nasogastric access cannot be performed.

scholarly journals Endoscopic biliary self-expandable metallic stent in malignant biliary obstruction with or without sphincterotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. E26-E35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Mangiavillano ◽  
Amedeo Montale ◽  
Leonardo Frazzoni ◽  
Mario Bianchetti ◽  
Amrita Sethi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background and aim To assess the rate of adverse events and the technical success rate of biliary stenting with or without EBS.  Methods A literature search up to February 2017 was performed. Studies assessing adverse events (AEs) and technical success rates of stenting with or without EBS were considered. Results Seven studies (870 patients; 12 treatment arms) were included. Early AEs, i. e. those occurring within 30 days, were significantly lower in no-EBS vs. EBS-group (11 % vs. 20.1 %; OR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.13 – 1.00). Rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis were not significantly different in the two groups (no-EBS vs. EBS: 6.1 % vs 5 %; OR: 1.33, 95 %CI: 0.68 – 2.59). The rate of bleeding was significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs EBS: 0 % vs 5 %; OR: 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.03 – 0.45). Rates of cholangitis were significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs. EBS: 3.3 % vs. 7.4 %; OR: 0.38, 95 %CI: 0.17 – 0.83). Both late AEs and mortality rates did not significantly differ between no-EBS and EBS patients (19.9 % vs. 18.9 %; OR: 0.93, 95 %CI: 0.56 – 1.53, and 2.5 % vs. 2.9 %; OR: 1.18, 95 %CI: 0.22 – 6.29, respectively). The technical success rate for stent insertion also did not differ (98 % vs. 97.6 %; OR: 1.05, 95 %CI: 0.42 – 2.63). Conclusion EBS seems to be associated, in the first 30 days after the procedure, with an increased risk of cholangitis and bleeding. No difference was observed in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Transradial Approach for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max M. Meertens ◽  
Eugene Ng ◽  
Stanley E. K. Loh ◽  
Miny Samuel ◽  
Barend M. E. Mees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Transradial Access

Purpose: To present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions to the traditional transfemoral access. Methods: A search of the public domain databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Databases was performed to identify studies related to the use of the transradial approach for infra-aortic procedures. Meta-analysis was used to compare the transradial to the transfemoral route in terms of procedure success, complications, procedure parameters, and hospital length of stay. Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Nineteen studies containing 638 patients with transradial access for lower limb interventions were selected. Lesions were treated from the aortic bifurcation down to the popliteal artery. The mean technical success rate was 90.9%, conversion to a transfemoral approach was necessary in 9.9%, and complications were reported in 1.9%. The meta-analysis included 4 comparative studies involving 114 transradial and 208 transfemoral procedures. There was no significant advantage of either approach in terms of procedure success (OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.49 to 50.83, p=0.17), but the risk of developing a complication was significantly lower (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.86, p=0.03) with the transradial approach. Conclusion: Transradial access for lower limb endovascular interventions can be performed with comparable technical success and a lower overall complication profile compared to transfemoral access.

scholarly journals Endovascular Stenting of Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissections: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 856-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Rudy J. Rahme ◽  
Omar Arnaout ◽  
Michael C. Hurley ◽  
Richard A. Bernstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Artery Dissection ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Endovascular Stenting ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract BACKGROUND: Carotid and vertebral artery dissections are a leading cause of stroke in young individuals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the published safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for extracranial artery dissection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify all cases of endovascular management of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections. RESULTS: For carotid dissections, our review yielded 31 published reports including 140 patients (153 vessels). Reported etiologies were traumatic (48%, n = 64), spontaneous (37%, n = 49), and iatrogenic (16%, n = 21). The technical success rate of stenting was 99%, and the procedural complication rate was 1.3%. Mean angiographic follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 2-72 months) and revealed in-stent stenosis or occlusion in 2% of patients. Mean clinical follow-up was 17.7 months (range, 1-72 months), and neurological events were seen in 1.4% of patients. For vertebral artery dissections, our review revealed 8 reports including 10 patients (12 vessels). Etiologies were traumatic (60%, n = 6), spontaneous (20%, n = 2), and iatrogenic (20%, n = 2). There was a 100% technical success rate. The mean angiographic follow-up period was 7.5 months (range, 2-12 months). No new neurological events were reported during a mean clinical follow-up period of 26.4 months (range, 3-55 months). CONCLUSION: Endovascular management of extracranial arterial dissection continues to evolve. Current experience shows that this treatment option is safe and technically feasible. Prospective randomized trials compared with medical management are needed to further elucidate the role of stenting.

Safety of Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Visceral Artery Pseudoaneurysms: Incidence of Intraprocedural Rupture

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-366
Author(s):  
Masashi Shimohira ◽  
Keiichi Nagai ◽  
Kengo Ohta ◽  
Yusuke Sawada ◽  
Keita Nakayama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization ◽  
Arterial Embolization ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Visceral Artery ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Advanced Level ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
A Minor

Introduction: Transcatheter arterial embolization is the first-line treatment for visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPAs); however, the intraprocedural rupture of pseudoaneurysms is an important complication. The present study was performed to evaluate the safety of embolization for VAPAs, including the incidence of intraprocedural rupture. Methods: Among 56 consecutive patients with 57 VAPAs who underwent treatment between April 2009 and October 2020, 46 patients with 47 VAPAs underwent embolization. Complications related to embolization including intraprocedural rupture, the technical success rate, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Complications that required extended hospitalization, an advanced level of care, or resulted in permanent adverse sequelae or death were classified as major complications, while the remainder were considered to be minor. Technical success was defined as the completion of embolization. Results: The intraprocedural rupture of pseudoaneurysms occurred in 3 out of 47 VAPAs treated with embolization (6%) and resulted in minor complications. One liver abscess requiring drainage was regarded as a major complication (2%). Focal infarction after embolization was observed as a minor complication in 20 cases. Complications occurred in 24 out of 47 cases (51%), comprising one major complication (2%) and 23 minor complications (48%). The technical success rate was 100% (47/47). Fifty-three out of 56 patients (95%) were alive in a median follow-up period of 18 months (range: 2 days-137 months). Conclusions: Embolization is safe and useful for the treatment of VAPAs; however, the intraprocedural rupture of pseudoaneurysms may occur, and, thus, care is needed during this procedure.

Is percutaneous access superior to cutdown access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A meta-analysis

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110327
Author(s):  
Guoshan Bi ◽  
Quanwen Wang ◽  
Guozuo Xiong ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Dongyang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Access ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objective The objective is to investigate whether percutaneous access (pEVAR) is superior to cutdown access (cEVAR) in terms of safety and efficacy during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 1999 to December 2020 for studies reporting on the comparison between percutaneous and cutdown techniques for endovascular repair of AAAs. Outcomes evaluated were technical success rates, access site-related complications and operative time, and hospital stay. Results Four randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies with a total of 1683 patients comprising 2715 groin accesses were eligible for the meta-analysis. pEVAR was associated with a lower risk of overall complications (odds ratio (OR) = 0.63; p = .005) and seroma/lymphorrhea (OR, 0.18; p = .0001) and shortened operation time (MD = −39.04; p = .002) and the length of hospital stay (MD = −0.75; p < .00001) compared with cEVAR. The technical success rate for pEVAR was 95.1% (694/729), with an overall OR of 0.27 (95% CI 0.14–0.55, p = .0003) comparing pEVAR with cEVAR. Furthermore, pEVAR did not increase the risk of site infection, femoral artery thrombosis, postoperative hematoma, nerve injury, dissection, and bleeding. Conclusion Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective method for the treatment of AAA. It reduces the risk of overall complications and shortens the operation time and hospital stay. The technical success rate of pEVAR is lower than that of cEVAR, which may be linked to the selection of patients, operator experience, and the use of ultrasound. Large definitive trials are required to draw robust conclusions.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of TIPS versus BRTO on Bleeding Gastric Varices: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi Wen Wang ◽  
Jin Chao Liu ◽  
Fang Zhao ◽  
Wen Guang Zhang ◽  
Xu Hua Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatic Encephalopathy ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rebleeding Rate

Background and Aim. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a threat to patients with gastric varices (GVs). Previous studies have concluded that both transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) are effective treatments for patients with GV. We aimed to compare the efficiency and outcomes of these two procedures in GV patients through meta-analysis. Methods. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords: GV, bleeding, TIPS, and BRTO to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The overall survival (OS) rate, imminent haemostasis rate, rebleeding rate, technical success rate, procedure complication rate (hepatic encephalopathy and aggravated ascites), and Child-Pugh score were evaluated. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TIPS and BRTO for GV due to portal hypertension were included in our meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and assessed the study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), and 95% CIs using random effects models. Results. A total of nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the OS rate (RR, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.98); P=0.03) and rebleeding rate (RR, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.75 to 3.90); P<0.00001). TIPS had a higher incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy (RR, 16.11 (95% CI, 7.13 to 36.37); P<0.00001). There was no significant difference between TIPS and BRTO in the immediate haemostasis rate (RR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.10); P=0.84), technical success rate (RR, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.16); P=0.16), aggravated ascites rate (RR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.33 to 1.09); P=0.10), or Child-Pugh change (MD, 0.22 (95% CI, −0.21 to 0.65); P=0.31). Conclusions. In this meta-analysis, BRTO brought more benefits to patients, with a higher OS rate and lower rebleeding rate. BRTO is a feasible method for GVB.

Single-center comparison of the efficacy and complications of arterial vascular closure devices in interventional radiology

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Elmasri ◽  
Stephen T. Kee ◽  
John M. Moriarty ◽  
Antoinette Gomes ◽  
Edward W. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Manual Compression ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Laboratory Parameters ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Vascular Closure Devices

Introduction Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are commonly used to achieve hemostasis of arterial access sites, but there is little comparative data on the variety of VCDs currently in clinical use. We reviewed the VCD experience at our institution to determine the safest and most effective VCD. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 907 consecutive arterial procedures in interventional radiology from June 2012 to June 2014 was performed. Five VCDs were used: Angio-Seal (n = 478), FISH (n = 56), Mynx (n = 56), Perclose (n = 61), and Starclose (n = 68). Patients who underwent manual compression (n = 188) without use of VCDs were also studied as a comparison group. Patient demographics and pre-procedural laboratory parameters were recorded. The technical success rate for achievement of hemostasis and complication rates were noted. Results Complete hemostasis rate (aka technical success rate) was 93.5% for Angio-Seal, 83.9% for FISH, 53.6% for Mynx, 73.7% for Perclose, 76.5% for Starclose, and 91.5% for manual compression. The differences among the devices were statistically significant (p<0.001). Fourteen major complications (1.5%) were encountered: nine with Angio-Seal (1.9%), one with Mynx (1.8%), one with Starclose (1.5%), and three with manual compression (1.6%); these differences were not statistically significant. Of the demographic and laboratory parameters studied, none were significantly correlated with hemostasis failure or development of complications. Conclusions In our single-center institutional experience, Angio-Seal is the device with the best technical success rate. Major complications of VCDs were rare, with no statistically significant difference between devices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document