Abstract 16680: Endovascular Therapy of Svc Syndrome-a Systematic Review

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Hussain Azizi ◽  
Irfan Shafi ◽  
Matthew Zhao ◽  
Vladimir Lakhter ◽  
Riyaz Bashir
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Restenosis Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Svc Syndrome

Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the occlusion of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for majority of these patients. We performed a systematic review of available literature to assess the contemporary technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rate of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from 1988 to 2019 for studies on Endovascular Therapy for SVC syndrome. After screening 709 records, 13 studies were included. Screening was conducted using Rayyan QCRI software for systemic reviews. Studies included full-length journal articles on SVC syndrome and ET among adults (18+ years). Case reports, or case series with <20 patients were excluded. Data analysis was performed using OpenMeta software. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Q and I 2 statistics. We evaluated the end-points of the technical success, restenosis rate and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting Results: A meta-analysis of 13 studies included a total of 1024 patients. The results of our meta-analysis show a weighted technical success rate of 98.6% (95% CI 0.97 – 0.99) (Fig. 1A), restenosis rate of 11.8% (95 CI 0.08-0.14) (Fig 1B) and recurrence rate of 9.9% (95% CI 0.06-0.13) (Fig 1C). Our studies had a substantial heterogeneity (I 2 ) of 52-80%. Figures:Figure 1A Figure 1B Figure 1C Conclusions: Our systematic review revealed high technical success rate, low restenosis, and recurrence rates after endovascular therapy supporting the paradigm of endovascular therapy as first line treatment for patients with SVC syndrome. Disclosures: Dr. Bashir has equity interest in Thrombolex Inc.

scholarly journals Safety, Efficacy, and Outcomes of N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate Glue Injection through the Endoscopic or Radiologic Route for Variceal Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2298
Author(s):  
Olivier Chevallier ◽  
Kévin Guillen ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Comby ◽  
Thomas Mouillot ◽  
Nicolas Falvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Glue ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Number Of Patients

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to assess the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) injection for the treatment of variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were searched for English-language studies published from January 1980 to December 2019 and including patients who had injection of NBCA for variceal GIB. Two independent reviewers extracted and evaluated the data from eligible studies. Exclusion criteria were sample size <5, article reporting the use of NBCA with other embolic agents, no extractable data, and duplicate reports. NBCA was injected during endoscopy in 42 studies and through a direct percutaneous approach for stomal varices in 1 study. The study’s endpoints were: Technical success, 30-day rebleeding, and 30-day overall and major complications. The estimated overall rates were computed with 95% confidence intervals, based on each study rate, weighted by the number of patients involved in each study. In total, 43 studies with 3484 patients were included. The technical success rate was 94.1% (95% CI: 91.6–96.1%), the 30-day rebleeding rate was 24.2% (18.9–29.9%), and 30-day overall and major complications occurred in 15.9% (11.2–21.3%) and 5.3% (3.3–7.8%) of patients, respectively. For treating variceal GIB, NBCA injection is a safe and effective method that demonstrates high technical success rate and very low major complication rate.

scholarly journals Endoscopic biliary self-expandable metallic stent in malignant biliary obstruction with or without sphincterotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. E26-E35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Mangiavillano ◽  
Amedeo Montale ◽  
Leonardo Frazzoni ◽  
Mario Bianchetti ◽  
Amrita Sethi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Metallic Stent ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Expandable Metallic Stent ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background and aim To assess the rate of adverse events and the technical success rate of biliary stenting with or without EBS.  Methods A literature search up to February 2017 was performed. Studies assessing adverse events (AEs) and technical success rates of stenting with or without EBS were considered. Results Seven studies (870 patients; 12 treatment arms) were included. Early AEs, i. e. those occurring within 30 days, were significantly lower in no-EBS vs. EBS-group (11 % vs. 20.1 %; OR: 0.36, 95 %CI: 0.13 – 1.00). Rates of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis were not significantly different in the two groups (no-EBS vs. EBS: 6.1 % vs 5 %; OR: 1.33, 95 %CI: 0.68 – 2.59). The rate of bleeding was significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs EBS: 0 % vs 5 %; OR: 0.12, 95 % CI: 0.03 – 0.45). Rates of cholangitis were significantly lower in patients without EBS (no-EBS vs. EBS: 3.3 % vs. 7.4 %; OR: 0.38, 95 %CI: 0.17 – 0.83). Both late AEs and mortality rates did not significantly differ between no-EBS and EBS patients (19.9 % vs. 18.9 %; OR: 0.93, 95 %CI: 0.56 – 1.53, and 2.5 % vs. 2.9 %; OR: 1.18, 95 %CI: 0.22 – 6.29, respectively). The technical success rate for stent insertion also did not differ (98 % vs. 97.6 %; OR: 1.05, 95 %CI: 0.42 – 2.63). Conclusion EBS seems to be associated, in the first 30 days after the procedure, with an increased risk of cholangitis and bleeding. No difference was observed in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

scholarly journals Recurrence Rates After Microvascular Decompression in Patients With Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia and Its Influencing Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on 8,172 Surgery Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangyu Chen ◽  
Yuming Niu ◽  
Fan Meng ◽  
Pan Xu ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Microvascular Decompression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Recurrence ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

Background: Primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) is known to reoccur following microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery. However, the rates and contributing factors related to PTN recurrence remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to explore the postoperative recurrence rates and related influencing factors of patients with PTN after MVD. Additionally, recurrence rates after different treatments were compared to provide guidelines for clinicians.Methods: We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses in accordance with the preferred reporting items of the PRISMA guidelines. We searched nine databases, namely, the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases, from establishment to July 13, 2020, selecting for studies about the long-term postoperative efficacy of MVD in the treatment of PTN. Factors associated with higher recurrence rates after MVD and long-term postoperative results of other treatments underwent formal meta-analysis, where odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The dose-response model was used to inspect the associations between several factors and higher recurrence rates.Results: Seventy-four studies (8,172 patients, 32 case series studies, and 42 non-randomized controlled trials) were analyzed in our research. Overall, 956 out of 8,172 patients relapsed, and the pooled recurrence rate was 0.096 (0.080–0.113). Influencing factors of relatively higher recurrence rates included atypical trigeminal neuralgia symptoms, lack of nerve groove, non-arterial compression, patients who were 50–60 years old, and longer disease duration. Dose–response analysis showed that the recurrence rate had a significant trend with the published year and the follow-up time. Simultaneously, the recurrence rate of MVD treatment was much lower than that of conventional drug treatment, gamma knife surgery, percutaneous balloon compression, and radiofrequency thermocoagulation. When the surgical technique was improved or combined with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR), the postoperative recurrence rates were significantly reduced.Conclusions: Even for PTN patients who have a successful operation, ~10% of them will still relapse. This research identifies several factors that can affect the recurrence rate. Compared with other operations, MVD has a relatively lower recurrence rate. Our analysis suggests that improved surgical techniques and combining PSR and MVD will yield better results.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42020159276.

scholarly journals Transradial Approach for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 599-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max M. Meertens ◽  
Eugene Ng ◽  
Stanley E. K. Loh ◽  
Miny Samuel ◽  
Barend M. E. Mees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Access Methods ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Transradial Access

Purpose: To present a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the transradial approach for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal interventions to the traditional transfemoral access. Methods: A search of the public domain databases MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library Databases was performed to identify studies related to the use of the transradial approach for infra-aortic procedures. Meta-analysis was used to compare the transradial to the transfemoral route in terms of procedure success, complications, procedure parameters, and hospital length of stay. Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Nineteen studies containing 638 patients with transradial access for lower limb interventions were selected. Lesions were treated from the aortic bifurcation down to the popliteal artery. The mean technical success rate was 90.9%, conversion to a transfemoral approach was necessary in 9.9%, and complications were reported in 1.9%. The meta-analysis included 4 comparative studies involving 114 transradial and 208 transfemoral procedures. There was no significant advantage of either approach in terms of procedure success (OR 5.0, 95% CI 0.49 to 50.83, p=0.17), but the risk of developing a complication was significantly lower (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.86, p=0.03) with the transradial approach. Conclusion: Transradial access for lower limb endovascular interventions can be performed with comparable technical success and a lower overall complication profile compared to transfemoral access.

scholarly journals Endovascular Stenting of Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Dissections: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 856-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Pham ◽  
Rudy J. Rahme ◽  
Omar Arnaout ◽  
Michael C. Hurley ◽  
Richard A. Bernstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Artery Dissection ◽  
Endovascular Management ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Endovascular Stenting ◽  
Technical Success Rate

Abstract BACKGROUND: Carotid and vertebral artery dissections are a leading cause of stroke in young individuals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the published safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for extracranial artery dissection. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify all cases of endovascular management of extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissections. RESULTS: For carotid dissections, our review yielded 31 published reports including 140 patients (153 vessels). Reported etiologies were traumatic (48%, n = 64), spontaneous (37%, n = 49), and iatrogenic (16%, n = 21). The technical success rate of stenting was 99%, and the procedural complication rate was 1.3%. Mean angiographic follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 2-72 months) and revealed in-stent stenosis or occlusion in 2% of patients. Mean clinical follow-up was 17.7 months (range, 1-72 months), and neurological events were seen in 1.4% of patients. For vertebral artery dissections, our review revealed 8 reports including 10 patients (12 vessels). Etiologies were traumatic (60%, n = 6), spontaneous (20%, n = 2), and iatrogenic (20%, n = 2). There was a 100% technical success rate. The mean angiographic follow-up period was 7.5 months (range, 2-12 months). No new neurological events were reported during a mean clinical follow-up period of 26.4 months (range, 3-55 months). CONCLUSION: Endovascular management of extracranial arterial dissection continues to evolve. Current experience shows that this treatment option is safe and technically feasible. Prospective randomized trials compared with medical management are needed to further elucidate the role of stenting.

scholarly journals Endoscopic techniques to reduce recurrence rates after colorectal EMR: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gijs Kemper ◽  
Ayla S. Turan ◽  
Erik J. Schoon ◽  
Ruud W. M. Schrauwen ◽  
Ludger S. M. Epping ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
High Recurrence Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Soft Coagulation ◽  
Procedural Complication

Abstract Background Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for large lateral spreading and sessile polyps. The reported high recurrence rate of approximately 20% is however one of the major drawbacks. Several endoscopic interventions have been suggested to reduce recurrence rates. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of endoscopic interventions targeting the EMR margin to reduce recurrence rates. Methods We searched in PubMed and Ovid for studies comparing recurrence rates after interventions targeting the EMR margin with standard EMR. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate at the first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) assessed histologically or macroscopically. For the meta-analysis, risk ratios (RRs) were calculated and pooled using a random effects model. The secondary outcome was post-procedural complication rates. Results Six studies with a total of 1335 lesions were included in the meta-analysis. The techniques performed in the intervention group targeting the resection margin were argon plasma coagulation, snare tip soft coagulation, extended EMR, and precutting EMR. The interventions reduced the adenoma recurrence rate with more than 50%, resulting in a pooled RR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.18, 0.76) comparing the intervention group with the control groups. Overall post-procedural complication rates did not increase significantly in the intervention arm (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.65, 2.58). Conclusion Interventions targeting the EMR margin decrease recurrence rates and may not result in more complications.

Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Goudakos ◽  
Sarantis Blioskas ◽  
Angelos Nikolaou ◽  
Konstantinos Vlachtsis ◽  
Peter Karkos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Occurrence Rate ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
External Group ◽  
Approach Group ◽  
Inverted Papillomas

Background Pure endoscopic surgery (functional endoscopic sinus surgery) has been increasingly replacing external approaches in the management of sinonasal inverted papillomas. Objective To analyze and compare the effectiveness of pure endoscopic procedure with external or combined procedures to paranasal inverted papillomas, including the experience from two institutions in North Greece, over a 20-year period. Methods Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE (1952–2016), EMBASE (1974–2016), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Review of all English-language studies comparing endoscopic and open techniques. Odds ratios (ORs), risk ratio, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and tests for heterogeneity were reported. Recurrence rates according to initial tumor stage. Results In total, 2451 patients had been enrolled in the 23 studies, published between 1992 and 2014. All the included articles are graded as level IV evidence. Among the 1526 patients of the endoscopic group, 212 (13.8%) had recurrence, with the mean time of recurrence to range from 14 to 46.6 months. In the external approach group, 111 (18.7%) of the 592 patients had recurrence, with the time of recurrence to range from 7 to 92 months. The recurrence rate in the combined approach group was 12.9%. The occurrence rate of recurrence attributable to the surgical choice was significantly different between endoscopic and external group (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40–0.92; P = 0.02; 14.9% vs. 18.8% in endoscopic and external group, respectively). Conclusions The present systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that endoscopic approach seems a favorable treatment option of sinonasal inverted papillomas and confirms the global recommendation that is the gold standard in the treatment of such nose lesions, revealing a lower recurrence rate compared to external approaches.

Is percutaneous access superior to cutdown access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A meta-analysis

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110327
Author(s):  
Guoshan Bi ◽  
Quanwen Wang ◽  
Guozuo Xiong ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Dongyang Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Access ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Objective The objective is to investigate whether percutaneous access (pEVAR) is superior to cutdown access (cEVAR) in terms of safety and efficacy during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 1999 to December 2020 for studies reporting on the comparison between percutaneous and cutdown techniques for endovascular repair of AAAs. Outcomes evaluated were technical success rates, access site-related complications and operative time, and hospital stay. Results Four randomized controlled trials and nine observational studies with a total of 1683 patients comprising 2715 groin accesses were eligible for the meta-analysis. pEVAR was associated with a lower risk of overall complications (odds ratio (OR) = 0.63; p = .005) and seroma/lymphorrhea (OR, 0.18; p = .0001) and shortened operation time (MD = −39.04; p = .002) and the length of hospital stay (MD = −0.75; p < .00001) compared with cEVAR. The technical success rate for pEVAR was 95.1% (694/729), with an overall OR of 0.27 (95% CI 0.14–0.55, p = .0003) comparing pEVAR with cEVAR. Furthermore, pEVAR did not increase the risk of site infection, femoral artery thrombosis, postoperative hematoma, nerve injury, dissection, and bleeding. Conclusion Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair is a safe and effective method for the treatment of AAA. It reduces the risk of overall complications and shortens the operation time and hospital stay. The technical success rate of pEVAR is lower than that of cEVAR, which may be linked to the selection of patients, operator experience, and the use of ultrasound. Large definitive trials are required to draw robust conclusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document