scholarly journals Marginal Bone Loss around Implants with Internal Hexagonal and Internal Conical Connections: A 12-Month Randomized Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5427
Author(s):  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno ◽  
Ada Concha-Jeronimo ◽  
Lucia Lopez-Chaichio ◽  
Roque Rodriguez-Alvarez ◽  
Elena Sanchez-Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Radiographic Measurements ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Main Outcome Variable ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Implant Prosthesis

The aim of this study was to analyze the differences in terms of the marginal bone level (MBL) around implants with either an internal conical or an internal hexagonal implant–prosthesis connection. A randomized clinical trial included patients in need of a single implant-supported restoration. The implant–prosthesis connection was either internal conical or internal hexagonal while maintaining the same type of implant macro- and microarchitecture. Clinical and radiographical variables were registered up to 12 months of follow-up, including MBL. A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The main outcome variable, MBL 12 months after prosthesis delivery, was statistically different in both groups: −0.25 (0.12) vs. −0.70 (0.43) (conical vs. hexagonal; p = 0.033). Differences were also observed at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits as well as for the MBL change from prosthesis delivery to the 12-month follow-up (−0.15 (0.13) vs. −0.56 (0.44); conical vs. hexagonal; p = 0.023). Correlations between MBL around the implants and radiographic measurements on the adjacent teeth, buccal bone to implant, tissue thickness or keratinized tissue were not significant neither globally nor when analyzed independently by group. In view of such results, it can be concluded that single-unit restorations with internal hexagonal-connection implants induce higher marginal bone loss after 12 months of follow-up from prosthesis delivery than internal conical-connection implants.

scholarly journals Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 10715
Author(s):  
Odontuya Dorj ◽  
Hsi-Kuei Lin ◽  
Eisner Salamanca ◽  
Yu-Hwa Pan ◽  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of opposite tooth conditions on change in marginal bone level (MBL) around submerged dental implants. Materials and methods: The study included healthy patients with one or two implants. Structures opposite implants were either natural teeth (NT) or fixed restorations (FRs). MBLs were measured on digital periapical radiographs at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. Results: Sixty implants were inserted by the 3-year follow-up. Mean MBLs for NT were 0.21 ± 0.33 mm before prosthetic loading and 0.30 ± 0.41 mm 3 years later (p = 0.001). Mean MBLs with FRs were 0.36 ± 0.45 mm before loading and 0.53 ± 0.50 mm 3 years later (p < 0.001). Changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1- and 3-year follow-ups were statistically significant (p < 0.01) for implants opposite NT. However, changes in mean MBL from the 6-month follow-up to the 1-year (p = 0.161) and 3-year follow-ups (p = 1.000) were not significant for implants opposite FRs. Between baseline and the 3-year follow-up, MBL change was relatively small and did not differ regarding NT and FRs. Conclusion: Bone loss was greater if submerged dental implants were opposed by FRs. MBLs around submerged implants continued to change after 3 years if NT opposed implants.

scholarly journals The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Nasreen Hamudi ◽  
Eitan Barnea ◽  
Evgeny Weinberg ◽  
Amir Laviv ◽  
Eitan Mijiritsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Mucosal Barrier ◽  
Control Group ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The One

Objectives: Repeated abutment disconnection/reconnection may compromise the mucosal barrier and result in crestal bone level changes. The clinical significance of this phenomenon is not yet clear, as most studies on this topic are short-term. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of abutment disconnections and reconnections on peri-implant marginal bone loss over a medium-term follow-up period. Material and methods: Twenty-one patients (6 men and 15 women) with a mean age 66.23 ± 9.35 year at the time of implant placement were included. All patients who received two adjacent nonsubmerged implants were randomly assigned into one of the two groups: definitive multiunit abutments (DEFs) connected to the implant that were not removed (test group) or healing abutments (HEAs) placed at surgery, which were disconnected and reconnected 3–5 times during the prosthetic phase (control group). Peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL) were measured through periapical X-rays images acquired immediately after the surgery (baseline), at 4–7 months immediately after prosthetic delivery, and at 1-year and 3-year follow-up visits. Results: No implant was lost or presented bone loss of more than 1.9 mm during the 3-year follow-up; thus, the survival and success rate was 100%. Peri-implant mucositis was noticed in 38.1% DEFs and 41.9% of HEAs at the 3-year follow-up assessment. At the end of 3 years, the MBL was −0.35 ± 0.69 mm for participants in the DEFs group and −0.57 ± 0.80 mm for the HEAs group, with significant statistical difference between groups. Conclusions: Immediate connection of the multiunit abutments reduced bone loss in comparison with 3–5 disconnections noted in the healing abutments 3 years after prosthetic delivery. However, the difference between the groups was minimal; thus, the clinical relevance of those results is doubtful.

scholarly journals A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Immediate Loading and Delayed Loading of Single-Tooth Implants: 5-Year Results

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1077
Author(s):  
Björn Gjelvold ◽  
Jenö Kisch ◽  
Bruno R. Chrcanovic
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Maxillary Tooth ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Implant Crown ◽  
Treatment Procedures

The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study was to compare the clinical treatment outcome for single dental implants submitted to either immediate loading (IL) or delayed loading (DL) after 5 years of follow-up. Fifty patients with a missing maxillary tooth (15–25) were randomly allocated to either the IL or DL. The treatment procedures included implant installation in healed sites, temporary screw-retained crown and replacement with a permanent single implant crown. The two groups were evaluated with regard to implant survival, marginal bone level, papillae index, pink and white esthetic score (PES, WES). At the 5-year follow-up the implant survival rate was 100% and 95.8% for IL and DL, respectively. Implant success rate was 91.7% and 83.3% for IL and DL, respectively. The mean ± SD marginal bone loss for IL and DL was −0.50 ± 0.73 mm and −0.54 ± 0.65 mm, respectively. (p = 0.782). Statistically significant less marginal bone loss was found non-smokers (p = 0.021). No statistically significant differences were found for IL and DL concerning papillae index PES and WES after 5 years. This study suggests that implant-supported single crowns in the maxillary aesthetic zone can present similar results with respect to either IL or DL after 5 years.

scholarly journals Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (18) ◽  
pp. 6920
Author(s):  
Saverio Cosola ◽  
Simone Marconcini ◽  
Michela Boccuzzi ◽  
Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris ◽  
Ugo Covani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
English Articles

Background: to assess the radiological marginal bone loss between bone-level or tissue-level dental implants through a systematic review of literature until September 2019. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and other database were searched by two independent authors including only English articles. Results: The search provided 1028 records and, after removing the duplicates through titles and abstracts screening, 45 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. For qualitative analysis 20 articles were included, 17 articles of them for quantitative analysis counting a total of 1161 patients (mean age 54.4 years) and 2933 implants, 1427 inserted at Tissue-level (TL) and 1506 inserted at Bone-level (BL). The survival rate and the success rate were more than 90%, except for 2 studies with a success rate of 88% and 86.2%. No studies reported any differences between groups in term of success and survival rates. Three studies showed that BL-implants had statistically less marginal bone loss (p < 0.05). Only one study reported statistically less marginal bone loss in TL-implants (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In the most part of the studies, differences between implant types in marginal bone loss were not statistically significant after a variable period of follow-up ranged between 1 and 5 years.

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants and the Specific Characteristics of Implant-Prosthetic Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-100
Author(s):  
Piotr Szpak ◽  
Jolanta Szymanska
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Compact Bone ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Important Indicator ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract The marginal bone loss around dental implants is an important indicator that helps to evaluate the course and the final outcome of implant-prosthetic treatment. It is, therefore, important to understand the factors that may affect this. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the specific characteristics of implant-prosthetic treatment on the marginal bone loss around implants. The study included 28 patients, aged 37-66 years, treated with dental implants. Every patient received at least one of the two types of implants: with Morse taper connection and with internal hexagonal connection. The average marginal bone loss around the implants was evaluated on the basis of the panoramic radiographs. The maximum follow-up period after implantation was 46 months. The peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated taking into consideration the implant localisation, the procedure of sinus lift with bone augmentation, implant type, implant diameter, vertical implant position relative to the compact bone level and the type of prosthetic restoration, the time between implantation and loading with prosthetic restoration, as well as the time between loading and the measurement of marginal bone loss. The correlation between bone loss and the selected characteristics of the treatment was assessed using generalised estimating equations (GEE). An objective analysis was enabled via the applied research model: evaluation of an impact of the specific implant-prosthetic treatment characteristics on peri-implant marginal bone loss in patients treated with implants with different implant-abutment interface systems. The results of the study showed that peri-implant marginal bone loss increased significantly with implant localisation in canine sites (compared to the localization in premolar sites), as well as with prosthetic restorations in the form of dentures (compared to bridges), and decreased when implants were placed below the compact bone level (compared to those placed at the bone level). At the same time, marginal bone loss was not significantly related to implant diameter or to the sinus lift procedure. The results obtained seem extremely useful in everyday clinical practice

Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting Fixed Restorations

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 549-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emre Mumcu ◽  
Hakan Bilhan ◽  
Ali Cekici
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Size ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Implant Length

A key criterion of success following dental implants is the marginal bone level. Long-term clinical and radiographic evaluation is necessary to test the results of in vitro studies investigating how cantilevering of restorations or implant size affect bone level changes around implants. There is no consensus on the effect of several variables such as age, gender, implant size, and cantilever prostheses on marginal bone levels around fixed dentures supported by dental implants. Patients who received cemented, fixed restorations supported by implants and who were examined in routine recall sessions 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after loading were included in the study group. Comparative bone level measurements were obtained from images of radiographs at ×20 magnification using the CorelDraw 11.0 software program. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and 1-way analysis of variance. In the 36-month observation period, there were no incidences of implant failure, excessive bone loss around implants, or peri-implant inflammation. One hundred twenty-six implants in 36 patients were evaluated, and the effect of several factors on marginal bone loss (MBL) during the 36 months after loading was analyzed statistically. There was no significant relationship between MBL and implant length or diameter, whereas age, gender, and cantilevers affected bone loss rates. MBL was elevated in older and female patients as well as in patients who received cantilevers. In cases of limiting anatomic conditions, short and/or narrow implants should be preferred over cantilever extensions.

scholarly journals Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single- Tooth Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine N Berberi ◽  
Ziad N Noujeim ◽  
Wasfi H Kanj ◽  
Rita J Mearawi ◽  
Ziad A Salameh
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Single Tooth ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level

ABSTRACT Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate marginal bone level around single-tooth implants placed in anterior maxilla and immediately restored. Materials and Methods Twenty implants were placed in 20 patients (8 men and 12 women) that were selected for this study. Following atraumatic non-surgical extraction of tooth, all patients immediately received implants and the definitive prefabricated abutment was placed. Implant position was transferred to the scanning unit of the CAD/CAM system using prefabricated surgical guide. Temporary crowns were immediately fabricated and cemented. Eight weeks later final crowns were luted. Outcome assessment as implant survival and level of marginal bone radiographic evaluations were performed at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period after loading. Results All implants placed osseointegrated successfully after 3 years of functional loading. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.16 mm (SD, 0.167 mm), 0.275 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) and 0.265 mm (SD, 0.171 mm) at 8 weeks, 1 and 3 years time period respectively. Four out of the 20 implants showed no bone loss. Conclusion Immediate loading technique using the final abutment directly eliminated the need for a second stage surgery and prevented interruption of soft and hard tissue at implant neck, which resulted in better soft tissue response and reduced marginal bone loss. Clinical significance Immediately loaded implants, in fresh extraction sockets by insertion of a provisional restoration on the titanium abutment without any later manipulation, helped to protect the initially forming blood clot and presented a template for soft tissue contouring that resulted in significant reduction of marginal bone resorption and maintenance of soft tissue architecture. How to cite this article Berberi AN, Noujeim ZN, Kanj WH, Mearawi RJ, Salameh ZA. Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single-Tooth Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(2): 202-208.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Peri-Implant Bone Level around Platform-Switched Dental Implants: A Retrospective 3-Year Radiographic Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 2570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Hwa Pan ◽  
His Kuei Lin ◽  
Jerry C-Y Lin ◽  
Yung-Szu Hsu ◽  
Yi-Fan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Radiographic Study ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Long Term Stability ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Observation Period

Objective: To describe remodeling of the mesial and distal marginal bone level around platform-switched (PS) and platform-matched (PM) dental implants that were sandblasted with large grit and etched with acid over a three-year period. Materials and Methods: Digital periapical radiographs were obtained at the following time-points: during Stage I of the surgical placement of dental implants, before loading, immediately after loading (baseline), and one, three, six, 12, and 36 months after loading for measuring the horizontal and vertical marginal bone levels. Results: Sixty implants were successfully osseointegrated during the overall observation period. Vertical marginal bone levels for the PS and PM dental implants were 0.78 ± 0.77 and 0.98 ± 0.81 mm, respectively, whereas the horizontal marginal bone levels for the PS and PM implants were 0.84 ± 0.45 and 0.98 ± 0.68 mm, respectively. During the time leading up to the procedure until 36 months after the procedure, the average vertical marginal bone level resulted in less bone loss for the PS and PM groups—0.96 ± 1.28 and 0.30 ± 1.15 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean levels of the horizontal marginal bone also showed increases of 0.48 ± 1.01 mm in the PS and 0.37 ± 0.77 mm in the PM groups from the time before loading until 36 months after the procedure. However, these increases were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: PS dental implants appeared to be more effective than PM implants for minimizing the mean marginal vertical and horizontal marginal bone loss during the three-year period. Regardless of which abutment connection was used, the dental implant in the present retrospective investigation exhibited minimal marginal bone remodeling, thus indicating long-term stability.

scholarly journals One-Piece Implants with Smooth Concave Neck to Enhance Soft Tissue Development and Preserve Marginal Bone Levels: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 6-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Axiotis ◽  
Paolo Nuzzolo ◽  
Carlo Barausse ◽  
Roberta Gasparro ◽  
Paolo Bucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Patient Level ◽  
Implant Abutment ◽  
Mucosal Layer ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
Marginal Bone Level ◽  
Over Time

Novel one-piece implants with concave smooth neck have been introduced to promote the formation of a thick mucosal layer and preserve marginal bone. A retrospective study on 70 patients with 1- to 6-year follow-up was carried out. Cumulative survival rates were assessed. Variations of marginal bone level were measured on periapical radiographs as distance of the implant-abutment junction from the bone crest. Influence of different variables on treatment outcome was evaluated. Cumulative success rate after 6 years was 99.4 % at implant level and 98.6 % at patient level. Marginal bone level changed in a significant way over time. After 4 months, an increase of radiographic bone level of 0.173 ± 1.088 mm at implant level and 0.18 ± 1.019 mm at patient level was recorded. Mean marginal bone loss after 5 years was 0.573 ± 0.966 mm at implant level and 0.783 ± 1.213 mm at patient level. Age, sex, smoking habits, implant sites, implant lengths and diameters, prosthetic retentions, and timing of loading did not influence marginal bone remodeling in a statistically significant way. At 4-year follow-up partial restorations lost a mean of 0.96 mm of more marginal bone compared with single restorations. This difference was statistically significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document