scholarly journals Avoidable Blood Loss in Critical Care and Patient Blood Management: Scoping Review of Diagnostic Blood Loss

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 320
Author(s):  
Philipp Helmer ◽  
Sebastian Hottenrott ◽  
Andreas Steinisch ◽  
Daniel Röder ◽  
Jörg Schubert ◽  
...  

Background: Anemia remains one of the most common comorbidities in intensive care patients worldwide. The cause of anemia is often multifactorial and triggered by underlying disease, comorbidities, and iatrogenic factors, such as diagnostic phlebotomies. As anemia is associated with a worse outcome, especially in intensive care patients, unnecessary iatrogenic blood loss must be avoided. Therefore, this scoping review addresses the amount of blood loss during routine phlebotomies in adult (>17 years) intensive care patients and whether there are factors that need to be improved in terms of patient blood management (PBM). Methods: A systematic search of the Medline Database via PubMed was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The reported daily blood volume for diagnostics and other relevant information from eligible studies were charted. Results: A total of 2167 studies were identified in our search, of which 38 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 interventional studies and 29 observational studies). The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (37%) and Canada (13%). An increasing interest to reduce iatrogenic blood loss has been observed since 2015. Phlebotomized blood volume per patient per day was up to 377 mL. All interventional trials showed that the use of pediatric-sized blood collection tubes can significantly reduce the daily amount of blood drawn. Conclusion: Iatrogenic blood loss for diagnostic purposes contributes significantly to the development and exacerbation of hospital-acquired anemia. Therefore, a comprehensive PBM in intensive care is urgently needed to reduce avoidable blood loss, including blood-sparing techniques, regular advanced training, and small-volume blood collection tubes.

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotta Hof ◽  
Suma Choorapoikayil ◽  
Patrick Meybohm ◽  
Kai Zacharowski

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Hofmann ◽  
Donat R. Spahn ◽  
Anke-Peggy Holtorf

Abstract Background: Patient Blood Management (PBM) is an evidence-based approach in surgery and emergency care which aims to minimize the risk for blood loss and the need for blood replacement for each patient through a coordinated multidisciplinary care process before, during, and after surgery. In combination with blood loss, anemia is the main driver for transfusion and an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes including morbidity and mortality. Hence, identifying and correcting anemia as well as minimizing blood loss are important pillars of PBM. Evidence demonstrates that PBM significantly improves outcomes and safety while reducing cost by macroeconomic magnitudes. Despite its huge potential to improve healthcare systems, PBM is not yet adopted broadly. The aim of this study is to analyze the collective experiences of a diverse group of PBM implementors across countries reflecting different healthcare contexts and to use these experiences to develop a guidance for initiating and orchestrating PBM implementation for stakeholders from diverse professional backgrounds.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 1-4 PBM implementors from 12 countries in Asia, Latin America, Australia, Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Responses reflecting the drivers, barriers, measures, and stakeholders regarding the implementation of PBM were summarized per country, and key observations extracted. By clustering the levels of intervention for PBM implementation, a PBM implementation framework was created and populated.Results: A set of PBM implementation measures were extracted from the interviews with the implementors. Most of these measures relate to one of six levels of implementation including government, healthcare providers, funding, research, training/education, and patients/public. Essential cross-level measures are multi-stakeholder communication and collaboration.Conclusion: This implementation framework helps to decompose the complexity of PBM implementation into concrete measures on each implementation level. It provides guidance for diverse stakeholders to independently initiate and develop strategies to make PBM a national standard of care, thus closing current practice gaps and matching this unmet public health need.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2630-2639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas von Ahsen ◽  
Christian Müller ◽  
Stefan Serke ◽  
Ulrich Frei ◽  
Kai-Uwe Eckardt

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4250
Author(s):  
Christian Hoenemann ◽  
Norbert Ostendorf ◽  
Alexander Zarbock ◽  
Dietrich Doll ◽  
Olaf Hagemann ◽  
...  

Anemia, iron deficiency and other hematinic deficiencies are a major cause of perioperative transfusion needs and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Anemia can be caused either by decreased production of hemoglobin or red blood cells or by increased consumption and blood loss. Decreased production can involve anything from erythropoietin or vitamin B12 insufficiency to absolute or functional lack of iron. Thus, to achieve the goal of patient blood management, anemia must be addressed by addressing its causes. The traditional parameters to diagnose anemia, despite offering elaborate options, are not ideally suited to giving a simple overview of the causes of anemia, e.g., iron status for erythropoiesis, especially during the acute phase of inflammation, acute blood loss or iron deficiency. Reticulocyte hemoglobin can thus help to uncover the cause of the anemia and to identify the main factors inhibiting erythropoiesis. Regardless of the cause of anemia, reticulocyte hemoglobin can also quickly track the success of therapy and, together with the regular full blood count it is measured alongside, help in clearing the patient for surgery.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4385-4385
Author(s):  
Gemma Louise Crighton ◽  
Philip A Thompson ◽  
Mary Gaskell ◽  
Marija Borosak ◽  
Anne C Dykes ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4385 The multiply alloimmunized patient poses a difficult predicament for clinicians, the hospital blood bank and duty hematologist. Whilst parallels may be drawn between patient blood management strategies used in the setting of blood refusal, others are unique to alloimmunization. There is limited literature guiding the management of the multiply alloimmunized patient requiring transfusion. We describe a 54-year-old lady who presented with symptomatic anaemia due to a delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction from an unidentifiable antibody. She had been transfused 2 units of red cells 13 days earlier in the setting of gastrointestinal bleeding. At this time she was found to have an anti- Fya antibody and was transfused with Rh matched, K negative, Fy(a-) and indirect anti-globulin test (IAT) cross-match compatible red cells. Her history included previous transfusions in the setting of bleeding, but no pregnancies. On admission hemoglobin (Hb) was 69 g/L [115 – 165], reticulocyte count 237× 109/L [20 – 100], bilirubin 33 μmol/L [<20] and haptoglobin <0.1 g/L [0.3 – 2.0]. Her blood film showed moderate polychromasia and nucleated red cells. A direct antiglobulin test was weakly positive (3/12) for IgG and C3d. Antibody investigations revealed a weakly positive auto-control and a new unidentifiable antibody. Subsequent testing identified 2 heterozygous mutations in exon 13 of the Lutheran gene: 1742A>T, encoding Gln581Leu and a silent 1671C>T, not affecting Ser557. These mutations are 2 out of the 3 mutations describing the LU- 13 genotype1. Our patient lacks the third mutation 1340C>T previously described. The patient's Hb dropped to 42 g/L and her treatment included bed-rest, intravenous iron, intramuscular vitamin B12, oral folate and erythropoietin. Whilst she had no active gastrointestinal bleeding she was given pantoprazole infusions and had a capsule endoscopy. She had a history of menorrhagia so was started on norethisterone and tranexamic acid to suppress menstrual loss. No first degree relatives were available for directed donation. She was transfused with 1 unit of IAT cross match compatible red cells together with 100mg prednisolone orally daily and 1g/kg intravenous immunoglobulin in an attempt to suppress immune haemolysis. She tolerated the transfusion well; however there was no increment in her Hb. Avoidance of unnecessary blood testing and pediatric collection tubes were used to reduce phlebotomy related loss. Over the next 10 days her Hb incremented without further transfusion to 78 g/L and had normalized by 4 weeks. Due to the need for future gastrointestinal surgery, on recovery of her Hb she had 5 autologous units of blood collected and frozen. Patient blood management strategies in the patient where the risk of potentially significant haemolytic reactions to transfusion is high must focus on minimizing blood loss, maximizing tissue oxygenation, promoting erythropoiesis and reducing metabolic needs. Approaches to lessen blood loss include early radiologic or surgical intervention to stop active bleeding, cessation or reversal of anticoagulants or aspirin and avoidance of medications or supplements associated with increased bleeding risk. Reducing phlebotomy-based blood loss includes minimizing the number of blood tests, using pediatric collection tubes and point of care devices. In our patient we investigated for ongoing bleeding sources, utilised proton pump inhibitors and used hormonal control for cessation of menstruation. Erythropoiesis was stimulated by the delivery of iron, folate, vitamin B12 and erythropoietin. Early investigation for associated coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia and early treatment with vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate ensures that red cell volume is optimised. In a patient with multiple alloantibodies, the hospital blood bank should screen their inventory of donated red cells and consult with local and regional blood authorities. The blood typing of family members may allow for identification of potential donors. In the acute setting with an unstable haemorrhaging patient, the decision to transfuse the least incompatible blood may need to be considered. Long-term management plans may include autologous unit collection and identification of alloantibodies at a molecular level. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aryeh Shander ◽  
Mazyar Javidroozi ◽  
Gregg Lobel

Transfusion ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 2173-2183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbee Whitaker ◽  
Srijana Rajbhandary ◽  
Steven Kleinman ◽  
Andrea Harris ◽  
Naynesh Kamani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document